Who knew? President HUMBLE

Not one to brag about himself, fair enough, but how is it possible that this is the first time we’ve ever heard this fantastic news about a fabulous result of the president’s unwavering commitment to protecting us all?  This is from yesterday’s shameful attack by the Democrats.

President Donald Trump: “People are pouring into our country, including terrorists. We have terrorists. We caught 10 terrorists over the last very short period of time. Ten!”

Don’t hide your light under a bushel, sir!

The SAD part is that none of the treasonous, millionaire late night “comedians” are even making fun of him for this one.   No credit whatsoever for an incredible job.  An incredible job.  Incredible, you know, like unbelievable.   Can you believe how unbelievable this is?

Individual 1 and friends

If you are Individual 1 (and, in fairness to his anonymity in the DOJ filings, we know only that he is an American president who came into office at the end of 2016) you’ve lived a life in which you were always number one, and never accountable for any reason.   As an eight year-old you were already, personally, a millionaire with all the rights and privileges appurtenant thereto.  You never had to meet or interact with poor kids, working class Greeks, Jews, Chinese, Negroes, Hispanics (these used to be called, back in the ignorant days, “scum”, Greeks, Kikes, Chinks, Niggers— er, sorry, I mean n-words… N-words, sorry, SORRY, God help me, Spics).  You never developed the antibodies to deal with the many diseases purportedly carried by these types, never learned to play with people who were not born-rich like you, never learned to judge anything on any basis but how much money was in it for you personally.

As an adult you might have had the most successful casino in a casino town.   To give your first wife something to do, to keep her busy while you screwed a bimbo who would eventually become, for a short time, your second wife, you might have built a second casino in the same town for her to personally manage.  Wife one would manage your second casino well and it too would become a gold mine.  And then, because there had never been any consequences for any of your previous errors ($400 million from dad and a team of good bankruptcy lawyers will go a long way to covering one’s ass), and because your ambition knows no reasonable bounds, you will borrow close to a billion to build the mother of all casinos, in the same casino town.  That giant casino (the worlds’ largest), will quickly put all three out of business (not to mention the many local businesses your bankrupt casinos will stiff and put out of business).   Big deal, really, nothing to see here.  Truly, do you all really get it?  NOTHING TO SEE HERE!

So while I do, in a twisted way, feel a tiny bit bad for this guy, as the walls close in, you know, with this “perjury trap” for Individual 1 (a trap that can only work, by the way, if you lie under oath, or can’t help lying because, really, seriously, what fucking difference has it ever made?) there is really a kind of poetic justice side to it.   It’s wise not to put too much faith our justice system, a system built by the super-rich to serve themselves first, food from a different, more discerning kitchen than the rest of us eat from, or in the punishment of the most destructively evil among us, but I can’t help seeing just a little beauty in the recent implication of Individual 1 in the felonies of two close associates who have, under oath, dragged poor Individual 1 into their felony messes.    

Individual 1 may tweet that there is No Smocking Gun, no Smocking Gun, but, of course, he has always used twitter (assuming this Individual 1 is the same guy I’m thinking of) as an engine to blow smoke up everybody’s ass. 

And now, a few words from the sworn testimony of the guy who was Individual 1’s first choice for his second Supreme Court nomination, a supremely unqualified man (based on his own tantrums, partisan rage and unabashed weaselishness during his confirmation hearings) I will identify, in the interest of fairness and full transparency,  only as Individual 2.   At the bottom there is a line I muse about now whenever I consider how a man can behave despicably toward women.

It is literally inconceivable that anyone but Individual 1 would thrust Individual 2 to sit, by the barest of partisan majorities, among the final arbiters of what is lawful and what is not lawful in a nation he claims to love:

20181211_171547.jpg 

POTUS nails the Libtards, in the face, thrice!

Trump had an Oval Office press photo op with Democratic Leaders Nancy Pelosi (House) and Chuck Schumer (Senate) on Tuesday.   You can see the whole video of their filmed meeting here, though it’s really not necessary to see it in any detail.   I can tell you that after watching it, during his statement and while muscularly refuting everything that Pelosi and Schumer had to say, POTUS repeatedly nails the Democrats.   (Trevor Noah’s merciless take, which seems to deny this obvious fact, is here)

POTUS starts off talking about the bipartisan criminal justice reform bill and the aid to farmers bill both about to become new laws.   This announcement is the reason for this press photo op and Pelosi and Schumer surely smile and nod (they are off camera by now, we are close on POTUS, who is speaking)  about the two bipartisan soon-to-be laws they had come to the Oval Office to announce.  

Then POTUS begins talking about the importance of building the remaining sections of the wall which has been very, very successful, in fact, 92% to 96%  successful in the areas where it has been built, he confirms through notes he picks up from the nearby table and reads, in keeping illegals, including terrorists, out of the country.   To understand how effective a complete wall is one only has to look at Israel, he adds, which is 99.9% successful keeping terrorists who want to kill them out of the country, because of their wall.

He tells the Democrats that they’d better be ready to do what needs to be done and sign the proposed law funding the rest of the wall because otherwise there could be a government shut down.   Then he asks Nancy Pelosi to speak.  

Pelosi says that she would like to see the proposed law first in the House, so they can work out a draft and vote on passing it on to the Senate.  The House, she points out, is where bills are introduced, and where they are worked on before being sent to the Senate for the vote on whether they will become laws.   The president’s party, she reminds him, controls the White House and the Senate, (as well, obviously, as the House where Pelosi is currently Minority Leader), which she continues to insist is the only place where any compromise on funding the wall can possibly be worked out.

Trump tells her there is no point going through the House since there’s no way he’s getting the needed sixty votes in the Senate [1].   That’s why he’s going directly to the Senate, bypassing the House and threatening to shut down the government if the Senate doesn’t vote to appropriate the requested funds for the wall.   Pelosi says she’s not at the photo op to publicly argue policy in front of the press, that negotiations are supposed to be done in Congress.  Trump tells her that he could easily get the votes in the House, easily, in moments, but that it’s pointless because the Senate wouldn’t pass the bill anyway, because of the partisanship of the Democrats.  That’s why he’s not going to the House, he tells her again.

Pelosi simply doesn’t seem to get it.  She keeps saying that bills are always introduced in the House, because of something she calls Article One.  The House, she says is where details are thrashed out and the improved draft, if approved in the House, is sent to the Senate.   Trump says he could easily get a bill passed in the House, but that it’s pointless, because he’s going to automatically lose in the Senate, so he’s skipping that step.   Pelosi keeps insisting that this is exactly what he should do, especially if he is so confident of getting the votes, send the bill to the House.   He tells her again that he could easily pass this bill to fund the wall in the House, but that he’s bypassing the House because the Senate is too rigid to get ten votes from the Democrats.   She gets nasty and tells him that he wouldn’t get the votes in the House.   He tells her again that she’s wrong and calls on Schumer. 

Schumer says the most important thing, during these negotiations, is to keep the federal government open for business, to avoid a shut down.   Trump tells him there is nothing more important than border security and Schumer agrees, but is coy about any Democrats voting for POTUS’s proposal about building the wall (which, it turns out, is a measly five billion dollars).   Schumer then gratuitously quotes a recent article from the lying Washington Post awarding the president multiple “Pinocchios” for his untrue remarks about this proposal, about how much of the wall has actually been built so far and how effective it has actually been in increasing security.

Trump cuts him off to announce that his border wall has resulted in ten terrorists already being caught trying to sneak in to murder us.  Ten TERRORISTS.  Arrested. Recently. Because of the wall.  In your face, Chuck Chuck Bo Buck!

Schumer was clearly not ready for this one, and comes back again lamely with the importance of avoiding a government shut down.

The president then reminds Schumer and the rest of us of the how badly things went the last time the Democrats shut down the government.   My memory, I confess, was a bit hazy on that one, so I scurried to Wikipedia and read all about it.  Fucking lying commie bastards!    

Pelosi then tries to bring up the Constitution, Article One, the Legislative Branch and good faith negotiations.   POTUS tells her we can have good faith if the Democrats don’t force a government shut down, which he promises not to blame them for, by the way.  He thanks everybody.  Then the fucking press starts butting in, and I lost interest there [2].  Then I couldn’t resist hearing the rest and the video was almost over anyway.   POTUS then says “border security” many times in a few sentences, and stresses that the wall is necessary for border security.  It’s a national emergency, he stresses, and we have to have border security and a wall.  He says again “border security”.   

Schumer made another remark about the importance of not shutting down the government over the issue of funding the wall.   The president then buried the Democrats as Vice President Pence continued to sit stock still next to the president, saying nothing, betraying nothing.  

“You know what I’ll say?   Yes, if we don’t get what we want, one way or the other, whether it’s through you, through a military, through anything you want to call, I will shut down the government, absolutely, and I am proud, and I’ll tell you what, I am proud to shut down the government for border security, Chuck, because the people of this country don’t want criminals, and people that have lots of problems, and drugs pouring into our country.”  

Schumer mutters something about how bad it would be to shut down the government and then, after the president again thanks everybody, a pushy journalist shouts out a question about the looming chief of staff vacancy.

POTUS, extremely cool, says there are a whole bunch of excellent candidates who want the job and there’s no rush, no rush to choose among them, they have an excellent chief of staff there now and there will be an announcement soon, maybe in a week or two, maybe even sooner, about the excellent replacement.  

All I can say is USA!   USA!!!   And, God bless these United Shayyyshhh.

 

[1] And it takes only a one vote majority to put someone on the nation’s highest court for life?   Something is a little bit wrong there, no?

[2]  Lawrence O’Donnell, liberal talking head for liberal MSNBC, for example, said of this meeting that Pelosi and Trump should have stressed there was no reason for the Senate to vote on funding the wall that Trump had promised repeatedly would be paid for by Mexico.  The gloating O’Donnell even said they should have put that in writing, before the press conference, along with their strong desire to avoid any disruption in payments for government programs that a shut-down could cause, to HUMILIATE the president.   “The most painful thing that Donald Trump could possibly have heard in that room today is ‘Mexico will pay for the wall.’  The chant that he led, and lived by on the campaign trail, would have been the most painful thing that the Democrats could have said to the president today but they don’t know yet how to fight Trump… with Trump’s own words.”   Talk about bastards…

Khashoggi’s last moments

The news finally comes out, more than two months after his murder, that Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi was murdered in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul on October 2, 2018 in a particularly gruesome manner.   A transcript of the tape the Turks have of his killing has been made public.   Before his screaming starts, the last words Khashoggi says, as he is being choked to death, are “I can’t breathe, I can’t breathe.”  

This is now reported in the American media, although our intelligence services already knew this.   Gina Haspel, CIA director, had heard this in the recording many weeks ago when she flew to Turkey to investigate.  There is no hint of surprise, urgency or panic in the manner of the team who kill and dismember the journalist with a bone saw.   They are simply carrying out their boss’s wishes, doing a job for their future king, the reformer.

All of Trump’s lapdogs went before the cameras of the Lying Media and denied there was clear and irrefutable evidence that the hit team’s boss, Mohammed Bin Salman, ordered the murder and dismemberment of his American resident critic, in spite of what might have been said on the tape none of them listened to.   “No smoking gun,” one after another claimed.  

These morally challenged sycophants always insist that if there is no absolute hard 100% proof — like a video tape, or an audio tape, or many eye witnesses hooked up to polygraph machines in different rooms, all telling the identical story — that the presumption of innocence must apply to any criminal, or simple scumbag,  they do business with.  

Scratch audiotape from that list, would you?   No proof that it was Khashoggi himself whimpering “I can’t breathe, I can’t breathe.”   No “smoking gun”, because they didn’t use a gun, they simply choked him to death and cut his body into many pieces for disposal, to conceal the crime, assuming there actually is a crime when the future king orders something in a monarchy.  Plus, the Saudis deny there was ever a phone call confirming the kill, even though the killers talk about callimg the boss.   No 100% proof.  See!  Presumption of Innocence, you merciless fucks.

I wonder if there would be any of this media coverage, so long after the murder, if the killers had merely slipped a needle into Khashoggi’s leg with a paralytic agent as soon as he walked into the consulate.   They could have then said, on the secret recording (or one they made themselves)  “Mr. Khashoggi, are you all right?”   It would probably have been the way to go, in hindsight (not that there’s any real problem with this either, as it turns out).    If they’d been more discreet, instead of having to dismember him, possibly while he was still alive and screaming, they could have induced a heart attack with another needle between the toes and announced the sad news that the fucker had died of a heart attack while freaking out because he is an insane, paranoid supporter of terrorism who hates his country. 

The important thing, from Trump’s point of view is that Mohammed Bin Salman maintained his deniability.  The “smoking gun” that is lacking is irrefutable proof that the boss of the hit team, several of who were part of his personal security team, if I recall correctly, orderd the hit.  According to Trump’s assessment really anyone could have ordered the premeditated murder in the Saudi consulate, why assume it was the Crown Prince who had been directly criticized by the murdered journalist?

But like Trump also said, badly conceived, badly executed.  A public relations shit storm for the young, impetuous billionaire Crown Prince.   As POTUS also pointed out, as long as the Saudis are paying hundreds of billions for American weapons (the best weapons, the best weapons) to slaughter civilians in the poorest country in the Middle East, there is nothing to see here.   What is the life of one nasty critic next to 500,000,000 American jobs making bombs for freedom?  Making America great again, yo.

The problem with an anodyne explantion

The good thing about an anodyne explanation is that it does not stir conflict.   Anodyne explanations are calculated not to ruffle feathers, not to feed into controversy, not to piss anyone off.    

The bad thing about an anodyne explanation is that it must leave out certain things in order to remain inoffensive.   An anodyne explanation can never encompass the difficult parts of the truth about any problem that is vexing and hard to solve.   An anodyne explanation explains away deadly complications in the most inoffensive way.   Those deadly complications, as we know, persist, no matter how gently anodyne the explaining away is.  If these deadly complications don’t affect you directly, an anodyne explanation is fine.  If you are hurt by those complications, the anodyne rap will not leave your feelings as unruffled.

Anodyne:  we are family, family loves each other, you must forgive, we love you, you mustn’t be angry or renounce us, no matter what you think or feel.

Left out:  much violence takes place in families, the intimacy of families leads to as much anger and antipathy as love, we have a choice to forgive or not, based on all of the circumstances, including the sincerity of the apology, love is a beautiful thing, but it is one of several emotions at play here, perhaps I must renounce you, to save myself.  Can you think of one family without factions and outcasts?  I can name several in the closest circle of your loving family, now that I mention it.

Anodyne:  our democracy is a meritocracy that recognizes the inviolable truth that all men (and women) are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain unalienable human rights including the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.   We have a level playing field in our democracy because our commitment to equality of opportunity and freedom of expression for all are our highest values.   Every vote matters and every vote will be counted as we choose the very best candidates to represent us and rule according to our democratic wishes.

Less anodyne: Let us put aside the hundreds of slaves owned by the visionary men who signed on to those words, open any newspaper to the crime section, pull up the news on your phone, visit any penitentiary, look around.   Our meritocracy does indeed grant equality and freedom of expression, but not always in a fair manner, not always having anything to do with merit.  As far as freedom of speech, piles of secret money talk louder than any single individual in our nation and this unlimited “dark money” plays a bigger role in electoral outcomes than even the most inspiring candidate who does not have a sufficiently huge advertising budget.  Plus, don’t get me started about the voting laws, once the Supreme Court decided recently that racism is dead in the USA, with the Birther President’s undeniably mulatto predecessor and all, and therefore, fair is fair, let the states of the former Confederacy decide who can vote in state and federal elections.

Anodyne:  there is great equality and liberty and social mobility in our country, any child can grow up to be president, or become as rich and successful as he or she wants, provided she works really hard.

Less anodyne:   Every American kid loves to hear that, but the reality is, of course, a tad more complicated.    If you’re born poor, and have a stroke of good luck, you may have one chance to work your way out of poverty– and don’t screw it up because you will have the one shot and that’s it, loser.   If you are born wealthy you will not require luck to have as many chances as you need to succeed.   The small network of your fellow rich will do their best to ensure that you do not fail in the end.    You will be given everything you need to succeed, over and over.  You can mismanage and bankrupt countless businesses, take imbecilic business risks (and fail), embroil yourself in a dozen scandals, fuck up in every possible way, and your social network of fellow extremely wealthy people will find a way for you to succeed, if you are determined enough to keep at it, even if it takes fifty years or more.  

(Thank you Chris Hedges [1] for this insight about endless chances for the children of the rich to make good, and virtually none for the children of the poor, it is self-evident once you put it that way).

Anodyne: George H. W. Bush, Bush 41, was our last true gentleman president, civil, kind, decent, human.

Less anodyne:  George H. W. Bush was a child of privilege, son of wealthy senator Prescott Bush who invested in lucrative heavy industries that Hitler made sure were booming (in the rearmament and lead up to war) and kept those booming stocks, apparently, even after the U.S. entered the war against Hitler.   Patrician Prescott’s connections kept him out of trouble.   H.W. was not decent or kind to AIDS sufferers, who hate him to this day (though he was arguably civil) for his inaction in the early years of the deadly crisis. He told homosexuals that AIDS was a disease of their lifestyle choice and that they should stop being irrational and just stop the behavior (anal sex) and they wouldn’t get AIDS.   His armies slaughtered countless people in several bloody wars, including one in Panama, apparently launched to cover up some drug business between himself, when he was head of the CIA, and Manuel Noriega, who had been involved in the cocaine trade that financed many CIA ops.   He arguably obstructed justice by refusing to testify during the Iran-Contra scandal hearings and later, as president, pardoning everyone involved who had been indicted or convicted of anything,  bringing inquiry into the scandal to a clean and permanent end.  I remember him as a complete dick, a perfect clueless patrician twat, though he did sign the ADA, Americans with Disabilities Act, and was not as in-your-face psychopathic as this stinking pile of born privileged schitt we have in the Oval Office today,   Then again, nobody in public life has ever come close to stinking up the public sphere as much as this stubborn schitt stain currently soiling the office chairs in the White House.

For a definitive, completely un-anodyne discussion of George H.W. Bush’s legacy, check out Jeremy Scahill’s video tribute to the war criminal.

I note here that Jeremy, in the interest of time, does not even mention one of the cannonized Bush’s most horrific legacies, the crippling sanctions on once prosperous Iraq (which, even under a dictator, had free health care for its citizens) that killed uncounted persons over many years.  

Anodyne:  in the land of the free and the home of the brave the only people who claim there is a class war are the malcontents who don’t understand the real nature of our liberty loving society.   Most Americans recognize the beautiful and unparalleled opportunity and equality here, outside of Marxist-type agitators. 

Less:  (the above was not really anodyne, since it was opinionated in a way not designed to sidestep controversy, but onward)   In America there is actually less social mobility than in most other wealthy, developed countries.   The class you are born into is, in most cases, the class you will be in when you die (earlier for the poor, of course, but you get what you pay for here), though people do still escape from poverty or the working class and attain high profile positions that seem to argue that anyone, with enough hard work, can become Michael Jordan, LeBron, Jay-Z.

So, as we can easily see, an anodyne explanation is good for avoiding a fight, agreeing to disagree in an amiable way, simplifying, over-simplifying, walking on the sunny side, staying out of really aggravating terrain.  The New York Times is a long-time master of this anodyne, status quo supportive approach, in many cases.  

We can always set up a grotesque false equivalency to add punch to the anodyne position.  Is the Free Market better than a slave economy where employers are bound by no rules of any kind and are free to kill workers outright at any time?  Of course.   Is the Free Market we have in America, one that grants legal monopolies to certain corporations and huge taxpayer-funded subsidies to preserve already vast profits, truly a free market?   You fucking tell me, buddy.

Freedom is on the march, bitches, that’s all you need to know.  Have a very anodyne day!

 

[1]  Journalist Chris Hedges was a scholarship kid in an elite academy for the children of the extremely rich.  Most of his fellow students were the product of generations of inherited wealth, and were born into an honest sense of superiority.   Hedges was struck by how unaccountable these rich boys were, how stage managed everything was in their lives to make them feel successful and untouchable.   He refers to their isolated, protected sense of entitlement and freedom from the consequences of most of their actions on everybody else, not unfairly, as the pathology of the rich.  

An odd society of married men (final)

For years four married men, and I include myself, as I am as married as anyone (Sekhnet and I have been together twenty years now) would take a ferry ride to an island once a year and spend the day on the beach.   It was an annual tradition that ensured we all got to spend some quality time with a friend who was living abroad and came to the US every summer for a harried, duty-packed visit.   We’d have lunch in a small restaurant there and compare notes on what had happened from the previous year before heading to the beach.   The boat ride there and back, across the sparkling water, was always a highlight of the day.

A few years ago I had a final falling out with a longtime friend named Andy, one of the four, and it became awkward after that to convene the annual meeting.   It would have forced the two men into the conflict, made them choose between me and Andy, something they could not do.   The day was celebrated the last couple of years as a two-some, the two old friends hopping the ferry, eating lunch at the restaurant, spending the day at the beach, catching up.

It must have been one of the last times the four of us were there that the subject of Andy’s wife, Hitler, came up.   I immediately barked out my extreme distaste for her, protested that I was trying to eat and that this harshly opinionated angry little Russian Jew was not a fit subject for mealtime. Andy and I had an understanding that his noisome wife would not be discussed between us.  We’d patched up a friendship Hitler had sundered a few years earlier and not discussing his wife was a condition of our reconciliation. I found it impossible to talk about her without disputing her proclaimed right to express the full measure of her ready rage whenever she wanted to.

But during the polite lunch discussion, Rob, the peacemaker, chided me for my vehemence, for the shorthand “Hitler” (which I stand behind, incidentally) and began defending this woman, Hitler.   “If you really listen to her, and talk to her, she’s really, really smart and she makes a lot of sense”, Rob said.  He noted that she has a great sense of humor.  He said he actually has learned to appreciate her and he gets along great with her now, that he has actually come to like her and feel like she likes him too.   Andy began to laugh an unpleasant, mirthless laugh.

“She fucking hates you, Rob!” Andy said with exaggerated disgust.  He went on to flesh out that hatred a bit.   He did this with a big, humorless smile on his face.  A year or two later Andy’s sickening marriage to Hitler was heading toward a long-overdue divorce.   Andy left her during the separation, moved out of the marital domicile and into a spacious wooden garden apartment that looked like the Zen dojo he’d begun hanging out in with the little sect he’d joined.

Andy, a very bright man who’d scored a perfect hole-in-one on his SATs back in high school, would be quick to point out that a “dojo” is a place where martial artists train and he’d tell me the right word for a place where Zen meditation is done.    In response I’d point out that every place Andy practices anything is a forum for martial arts (and that the only difference between the words “martial” and “marital” is the placement of the I, how’s that for a koan?).

I recall these lunches in particular as a place where unhappily married men complained about and defended their bad marriages.  Since I am not actually married, am not legally contracted to Sekhnet, I was somewhat exempt from this part of the conversation, though, obviously, not really. Everybody has some kind of issue, conflict or problem with virtually everybody else, it’s just one of the features of being human.  

Life partnerships are certainly not exempt from this general rule, in fact, they are often more subject to conflict than less intimate relationships.   The better friendships are the ones where affection causes us to give generous allowances for the foibles of the other, and the proverbial benefit of the doubt.   We’re lucky, in this life, if we find a couple of people we can count on to truly have our best interests at heart and not fight with us too much, it seems, especially during these combative days as we wait for our home, the increasingly besieged earth, to become uninhabitable.

It struck me as a bit ironic that Rob the peacemaker, who defended Andy’s wife, Hitler, against my unfair, if not inaccurate, portrayal, probably also supported him 100% in his decision to divorce her.   It would have been hard not to be supportive of the move.  I am quite sure the divorce did not fix Andy’s somewhat broken life, but it was certainly a step in the right direction.   Rob has been at war with his own wife since shortly after they married, many years ago.  It is one of the most explosive and angry minefields of a marriage I know.   There are periods of uneasy peace surrounded by devastation that has done damage to everybody in its orbit.   I am a casualty, finally, of that toxic relationship.

There is a picture of Andy and me, dressed in misshapen suits, ties inexpertly knotted at our throats, standing on the front stoop of my parents’ house in Queens. Each of us has a bad haircut we probably hacked out ourselves.   The snapshot was taken right before we headed to Rob’s wedding.   I wonder where that photo is.

There were signs at Rob’s wedding, now that I think back, of the disaster that was about to unfold.   A sense of uneasiness and mutual desperation hung over it all, though perhaps my memories are also colored by what has come to pass in the decades since.

                                                                                 ii

To explain why Rob’s marriage was probably doomed to be a war from the start it is necessary to describe my old friend a little.  Rob is also the most important character in this little story as he was my connection to the other married men in the odd society of married men who spent a day at the beach every year.  I’d met Andy through Rob (they’d been at an Ivy League college together) and later I met the émigré, the man for whose company we’d meet at the ferry terminal every summer.   Keep that thought in mind, Rob as the nexus, and the oldest friend of each of us, since it may explain some things later.

Rob has always been a nervous person. He was a nervous boy when I met him in fourth grade when we became best friends, after he had skipped into my grade. The nervous boy grew into a nervous teenager and later a nervous man.   A very smart kid and an intelligent, thoughtful man, I have rarely known him not to be nervous about something.

He comes by it honestly, I would say.  Rob was raised by somewhat nervous parents, two people I knew quite well for decades.  After Rob and I became friends our parents became close friends too.   The families spent many holidays together.    In some families (like Rob’s, actually) I would have called his parents Aunt and Uncle.   The families were very close and I was familiar with Rob’s domineering maternal grandmother as well.    Rob and I went in different directions in High School and fell out of touch for a number of years.

At one point Rob’s mother, Caroline, came across an envelope of James Bond trading cards Rob and I had pasted on to pages and written humorous captions for, many years earlier (Sean Connery was Bond on those cards).  I’d found them in a closet and sent the collection to Rob, whom I hadn’t seen for a few years.   On top of the pile I’d scrawled a note to the effect that “someday we’ll play guitars”.   As I recall, Caroline framed that note, after weeping joyfully to my mother over the life-affirming optimism of an old friend reaching out that way to a friend he’d grown apart from.

We did play guitar a few years later, in San Francisco, where Rob was living at the time.  The cover story for his sojourn in SF, as I recall, was that he was becoming a California resident to get in-state tuition for medical school.  He was actually playing in a rock band, trying to be as close to a full-time musician as he could be.   He had already abandoned the idea of medical school and was probably working on how to best break the news of his career change to his folks.

I plugged a guitar into a large amp in the concrete warehouse room where his band practiced.  It was just Rob and me in the reverb-rich room.  I loved the sound, played some bluesy line, sustaining a note against the wonderful acoustics of that big empty room and Rob’s jaw dropped as he told me how much I sounded like Clapton [1].   This may seem a silly image to include here, but it will be useful to recall later on.

Sometime later, back in New York, we had a remarkable jam session in the basement office of a pediatrician named Dr. Geller (who turned out to have been Sekhnet’s pediatrician, she recalled his enormous hands).   Geller owned the house Rob’s parents rented, the home where Rob and his older sister were raised. I’d had many a holiday meal in that house, in the company of our two families. I’d spent massive amounts of time in that house over the years, but had never been down to Geller’s office before that night.  It was a remarkable session, with Andy on synthesizer keyboard.   It was the first time I’d played with Andy and there was a certain magic to the musical connection that first time.

But none of this explains why Rob was doomed to a combative marriage, so onward. He’d had a series of fairly longterm girlfriends over the years, but as far as I knew, for many years, none of them were Jewish.   In his mind he could only marry a Jewish woman, so this easy out kept his sexual relationships limited in a certain crucial way.   A way that eventually caused great pain, and sometimes anger, in his longterm partners.  A psychiatrist finally pointed this pattern out to Rob, when he was in his early thirties.  I remember Rob telling me about this breakthrough session when he realized, with the shrink’s help, that it was essential for him to date a Jewish girl and get married as soon as possible.   He proceeded to do exactly that.

I liked the woman, though she seemed volatile.   Her older brother (a guy Rob and I both knew in passing at Hebrew School), we soon learned, had opted out of the family, not contacting any of them for years.   This happens in families, I figured, who knows what the whole story is?   The haste with which they got engaged and married may not have been to my taste (I’m still not officially married, nor is Sekhnet planning to marry me) but it wasn’t my business, really.   Yet there was still something a little unsettling about the lead up to the wedding and the wedding itself.  An ominous foreshadowing, if you will.

There was a dinner party before the wedding, at a Mexican restaurant, maybe it was their engagement party.   Hitler, Andy’s wife,  insulted Rob’s oversensitive sister in a curt, particularly brutal manner.   I remember feeling a tension at that dinner that I can only say felt tense.

The bachelor party for Rob was also memorable for something being off about it, even for a bachelor party.   The main thing I recall is that the party was commandeered by the loud, overbearing, drunken asshole brother-in law of the bride, a boisterous clown named Eddie.   My main memory is of Eddie loudly critiquing the body of a stripper in a bar he’d dragged us to.   Perhaps her breasts or buttocks were not up to his exacting standards, although it could have been literally anything, or nothing, at that point.  He was shit-faced and somehow in charge.

Eddie would not be Rob’s brother-in-law that much longer, he and Rob’s wife’s sister divorced not long after that idiotic display of alpha-maleness.   I don’t disparage anyone for getting divorced from someone who mistreats them.  I have been divorced myself several times over the years, even if not from a marriage.   When all you are getting from a relationship is grief, harshness, abuse — time to hop on the bus, Gus.  In fact, for that reason, a terrible relationship, Rob’s wife wrote off her younger sister a few years later.  The sister, although seemingly pleasant enough, is apparently an unredeemable complete fucking bitch.

Rob and his wife finally reached the conclusion that they were better off apart.  They could not find a way out of their eternal war.   A year or two ago they sat their two sons down and informed them of their plan to split up, to divorce. Then, miraculously, they unaccountably reconciled when their younger son moved across the country for college.  It was like a rebirth for their relationship, a beautiful new springtime, though it was not very long before catastrophic sky-blackening storms swept back in.

Now this here, what I am doing now, this is what I always do.   I write about things that are nobody’s business, betray people left and right, simply for the sake of an “interesting” story, even if I don’t use their full names, or any names.  They know it’s them I’m writing about, and that’s the unspeakable thing, that I am publicly probing into things they don’t want probed into, particularly, and most unforgivably, in the public space of the internet.  I eventually write about ticklish, chafing details that make people who used to be my friends angry, defensive, sometimes vindictive.   My beloved Sekhnet, on reading part one of this piece, had a related reaction and a one word review: “flush!”

In other words, down the drain with this whole nasty subject, done with the eternal bad feelings it engenders, these sad and distasteful details of disappointing, doomed disputes with desperate people.  “Flush!” she said again when I began trying to explain why these lived materials from my life are so useful to me.

She listened as I went on about the personal experiences and lessons of one’s life being the most important things to ponder and learn from, the richest things to write clearly about, the best tools for attaining insights and for personal growth.   Plus, I pointed out, there is a great punchline to this particular story, if I can manage to tell it correctly, more than one punchline, actually.   She eventually agreed not to say “flush!” again, for this particular tale, at least.

So onward, but not today, my allotted writing time is at an end.  Part three will put the final pieces in place and hopefully provide a satisfying, if mildly merciless, punchline.

                                                                      iii

In the end, the real trouble between men is not a wife like Hitler who forbids her husband to have someone as a friend.  It is the individual who must act with integrity, or not.  Looking around it doesn’t take long to see that integrity is in short supply in our relentlessly competitive world.  It is not our fault, strictly speaking, as violence is often the rule — faced with superior force we are often stopped in our tracks. Maybe homo sapiens are doomed to eternal compromise with the killers who are always among us and some of that compromise is soul-crushing.

I do the only thing I can imagine doing from one day to the next, try to make sense of seemingly incoherent things.  I know it makes me appear to be a smugly superior asshole to some people, but it’s the best way I’ve found to deal with things that perplex me.

Much of the conflict in the world is the result of incoherent narratives, things we believe based purely on feelings. Armies march for reasons that make absolutely no sense, though a rousing excuse is always given for the slaughter, no matter how otherwise empty and incoherent the war slogans might be. The twitching man with the loaded gun does not need a rational explanation when he tells you to lie on the fucking floor so he can blow your head off.  How the west was won, how slavery was maintained for centuries, how great tracts of land have always changed hands, how fortunes have always been made. Thus it has always been among we who are made of flesh.

At the table on that holiday island we always spoke of long-time intractable problems that sometimes were better and sometimes were worse. There was rarely a perceptible change from year to year in the larger picture of this circle of problematically married men.  This is the lot of virtually everyone, this ebbing and flowing of good and bad fortune and the moods that accompany these changes. I try not to be judgmental, though I do not always succeed in this.

I got a text from Rob that he needed to see me immediately. I called and got a text not to use the phone, just to text him a time and place to meet. I asked what it was about, but he couldn’t say anything but that it was urgent that we talk face to face.

When he showed up in his car he was extremely nervous, even for him. I probed, after a session of small-talk, and learned why his eyelid was twitching. He was there to confront me, to accuse me of deliberately, or thoughtlessly, trying to destroy his marriage. I was probably out of their lives, he said, with no way to redeem myself, because what I’d done was so destructive and unforgivable. But he was going to give me a chance to save our friendship by talking my way out of my death sentence.

What had I done that marked me this way?  Made a remark to his wife, in passing, that she, weeks later, weaponized and used to whip him bloody in front of their marriage counselor. The therapist agreed that I was a malicious force in their marriage who needed to be dealt with immediately.

I walked Rob and myself through everything I could remember about the remark, which was essentially that the wife’s ten minute story about an embittering encounter between the wife and Andy made a lot more sense than Rob’s harried one minute version of the same story about a month earlier. Rob’s story made little sense, but as I have no use for Andy, except perhaps to throw him on the ground and kick him, I didn’t probe for details and we went on to other subjects. Rob immediately expressed regret for telling me anything about his wife’s run-in with Andy. The wife’s story was much more detailed and I understood things I had not when I first heard a rushed, regretted version from Rob that I asked not a single clarifying question about.

The wife seized on my “oh, that makes much more sense than the story Rob told me,” as proof that Rob’s oldest friend also says you’re a fucking liar, Rob, a fucking liar! The therapist was hard-pressed to disagree. You need to confront this person, she’d told him. His wife told them he was afraid of me. He rushed to confront me.

Another man might have reacted to the accusation differently than I did, maybe just punched him in the face, like in a western, just to make it stop.  I wasn’t raised that way, so I went through everything I could remember, a process I repeat whenever I sit down to write. I suppose it’s part of my nature to muse over puzzles, and this was one of the more piquant puzzles that my nose has ever been shoved into. Rob seemed satisfied by the end that I had not intended his marriage fatal harm, intentionally or unconsciously.  Still, he raised other issues with me, had other suspicions and accusations. He seemed intent on keeping me on the defensive.  I have to say, I hate that kind of shit.

Here I will give you a little additional information about the odd society of married men who used to assemble around a table once a year at that restaurant on Fire Island. Rob is Jewish, as am I, so his particular psychological type is familiar to me. Having grown up in the same cultural milieu I get the whole set-up, learned the same formulation of moral values that are supposed to be taken seriously and all the rest. Culturally, the other two problematically married men were always a bit more mysterious to me in some ways.

Andy is a peculiarly Anglo-Saxon version of the classic jovial passive-aggressive, from stock that one writer (Dennis Potter) referred to as “a pinched and whining breed.” Andy’s personal mix is finished with a cringing grandiosity tinged with self-hatred.  If you don’t actually hate yourself, at least a little, you will never understand it. I confess, I truly don’t understand the sick fuck. As for the émigré, you’d have to ask him yourself, he is no longer talking to me, for reasons he need not specify.

I could not simply flush this whole matter of the death of my oldest friendship, as Sekhnet urged me to do. Andy proved himself exceedingly flushable in the end, my life enriched by his subtraction from it, as Rob also turned out to be, in the end, but the part about the émigré continued to bug me.   I knew why I couldn’t be friends with Rob, it was his constant provocation and his infernal, convoluted denials about it.   What was his gripe against me, exactly?

I reached out to Rob, assuming that he’d cried piteously to his old friend about my heartlessness and that had affected his friend to cut ties with me.  It took weeks after my phone calls, and the formulation of precise questions which I emailed to him at his texted request, and a good deal of diligence and forbearance on my part, but eventually Rob gave me the three unforgivable things I had done to him. He told me he had not talked to the émigré about our falling out, in any detail, at least until I’d asked about it in one of the three emailed questions.

His wife told him I’d worn a fucking wire on him the last time we spoke, on what he admitted had been “a bad day.”  Wore a fucking wire like a fucking fuck. An unforgivable betrayal, under any circumstances.

His wife told him I’d said I’d been mad enough at him, at one point in our maddening chat, to want to punch him, throw him on the ground and kick him to make him shut the fuck up.  Unforgivable, no matter what the provocation supposedly was, no matter if I’d acted on it or not.

His wife told him I’d called him a pussy. Unforgivable!

This last bit was a slight distortion of what I’d said.  I had a revelation while she and I were speaking (she’d called to offer the choice of unconditional acceptance of a blanket apology for whatever I thought Rob might have done to me, or fucking myself– something I already periodically do). I realized toward the end of the conversation why Rob was always so competitive with me.  It was only tangentially related to that Clapton sound I could get on a guitar.

The real conflict, it came to me in a flash, was that Rob’s father had never stood up to his wife, and that Rob felt that he was unable to stand up to his wife, or to anybody, really, but that he feels I somehow hold my own in these situations, always seem able to take care of myself, somehow.

So Rob feels, on some level, like he’s a pussy, I told her, and he feels, for whatever reason, that I am not a pussy, and it makes him angry and so he provokes me and he can’t help himself or stop doing it.

“You are definitely not a pussy,” she said.  (The jury is still out on this, I think it’s safe to say).

Then she told her husband that anybody who could be friends with somebody who thinks he’s a pussy is a fucking pussy, end of story.  That’s all she wrote.

 

 

[1]  I don’t want to get bogged down in this Clapton business right now.  I love his tone, Eric’s vibrato is up there in a class almost by itself, the touch and the microtones are beautiful and subtle, etc. but he is an extremely limited guitarist. Great singer, excellent musician, can do that one thing beautifully on guitar, plus the nice acoustic blues picking, but truly, I don’t get why he is not a better and more versatile guitarist by now.  It’s like a failure of imagination, a dull incuriousness, an insane commitment to “brand,” or just an indication of a kind of rigidity, or something.   His autobiography reveals him as something of a shallow jackass, maybe that explains it.  Anyway, Clapton’s vibrato is beautiful, I’ve always loved it and I did indeed strive to master it, to the extent I ever did.

The importance of editing

I have an old friend who doesn’t understand why ham-fisted or dick-fingered editing is so maddening to a writer.  We who choose our words with care always chafe when someone swaps out our precise formulations and inserts cliches.    My friend doesn’t understand this, because, if they are paying you, don’t they have a right to decide what they like about your writing or not?   I wrote this for her.

I want to show my friend something about writing, and a little bit about my notion of honor and trust.

“Would you have any objection to me recording this conversation?”

“Yes, I would. Why would you want to record me?” she will ask.

“I want a personal record of this conversation we’re about to have,” I’ll say.

“You want to wear a fucking wire on me, you fucking fuck?”

“Not a wire,” I’ll say, “ a personal record of our talk, for only our use, yours and mine. I’ll make you a copy and you can listen to it if you like. I’m planning to listen to it, if this talk turns out to be at all interesting, which I’m pretty sure it will. I won’t play it for anyone else.”

“Call it what you want, making a ‘personal record’ is wearing a fucking wire, you fucking fuck,” she’ll say.

“I promise that only you and I will ever hear it,” I’ll say.

“You’ll write about it,” she’ll say.

“If I do, I’ll give you whatever I write, for your approval, before anybody else sees it,” I’ll say.

“I preemptively revoke my approval,” she’ll say “what is the use of this recording? It could only come back to haunt me, in some hideously distorted form. Or am I supposed to learn something from hearing my own words, is that your idiot plan, teacher man?”

“Not directly, but maybe so. If our words find their way onto a printed page you will find out a lot about the process of writing and editing. A simple transcript of the talk may not be satisfying to either of us. That’s where some tightening up, some editing comes in, and you will have final editorial say.

“Anything you object to, we will simply edit out of the conversation. Anything that would make anybody feel bad, anything that doesn’t feel 100% kosher, anything that would embarrass anyone. We simply edit it out. We may have to change a few words at the end of what the person before said, for the natural flow of the conversation to make sense, but we will only change words we both agree on and only add things that make what we’re saying more clear than when we originally said it, with the facial expressions, body language and so on that won’t be conveyed in the mere words.”

“I’m not going to sit at a computer and rewrite anything,” she’ll say.

“I’ll do all that. I’ll give you a printed copy, cross out whatever you want and I’ll read you all the changes and edits for your final approval. Plus, I won’t try to sell or post it unless I have your permission. I’m not in any way doing this to make you look bad. I think we’re going to have an interesting conversation and I’d like to have an accurate personal record of it, as a keepsake and a tool.

“Those kind of verbatim notes are invaluable if you are writing, the actual words the people spoke, not a recreation or imagining of what they said, how they spoke. Plus, like I said, you will understand the difference between good editing and shit editing by the time we are done making our talk read as smoothly as possible.”

“What topic do you have in mind?” she’ll say.

“I have in mind only where our conversation takes us,” I’ll say.

“Bullshit,” she’ll say “how many hidden agendas did you sneak in here today?”

“Only one or two, I promise you,” I’ll say.

“I don’t want you to record me,” she’ll say.

“I’ll only record myself, then, if that’s okay,” I’ll say.

“That’s even worse,” she’ll say, “you performing for the open mic.”

“At least if it’s both of us, you will get to understand, without a doubt, how good editing is a very wonderful thing and how bad editing bites and sucks with many rows of razor sharp teeth, like a shark.” I’ll say.

“I don’t really care if you record me,” she’ll say, “I was just busting your balls because you always tell me I’m paranoid. I’m not worried because, if it came down to it, I could kick your fucking ass, as you well know. Hit ‘record’ and let’s dance, Bozo.”

An odd society of married men (part 2)

To explain why Rob’s marriage was probably doomed to be a war from the start it is necessary to describe my old friend a little.  Rob is also the most important character in this story as he was my connection to the other married men in the odd society of married men who spent a day at the beach every year.  I’d met Andy through Rob (they’d been at an Ivy League college together) and later I met the émigré, the man for whose company we’d meet at the ferry terminal every summer.   Keep that thought in mind, Rob as the nexus, since it will explain some things later.

Rob has always been a nervous person. He was a nervous boy when I met him in fourth grade when we became best friends, after he had skipped into my grade.  He grew into a nervous man.   A very smart kid and an intelligent, thoughtful man, I have rarely known him not to be nervous about something.   

He comes by it honestly, I would say.  Rob was raised by somewhat nervous parents, two people I knew quite well for decades.  After Rob and I became friends our parents became close friends too.   The families spent many holidays together.    In some families (like Rob’s, actually) I would have called his parents Aunt and Uncle.   The families were very close and I was familiar with Rob’s domineering maternal grandmother as well.    Rob and I went in different directions in High School and fell out of touch for a number of years.

At one point Rob’s mother, Caroline, came across an envelope of James Bond trading cards Rob and I had pasted on to pages and written humorous captions for, many years earlier (Sean Connery was Bond on the cards).  I’d found them in a closet and sent the collection to Rob, whom I hadn’t seen for a few years.   On top of the pile I’d scrawled a note to the effect that “someday we’ll play guitars”.   As I recall, Caroline framed that note, after weeping joyfully to my mother over the life-affirming optimism of an old friend reaching out that way to a friend he’d grown apart from.

We did play guitar a few years later, in San Francisco, where Rob was living at the time.  The cover story for his sojourn in SF, as I recall, was that he was becoming a California resident to get in-state tuition for medical school.  He was actually playing in a rock band, trying to be as close to a full-time musician as he could be.   He had already abandoned the idea of medical school and was probably working on how to best break the news of his career change to his folks.

I plugged a guitar into a large amp in the concrete warehouse room where his band practiced.  It was just Rob and me in the reverb-rich room.  I loved the sound, played some bluesy line, sustaining a note against the wonderful acoustics of that big empty room and Rob’s jaw dropped as he told me how much I sounded like Clapton [1].   This may seem a silly image to include here, but it will be useful to recall later on.   

Sometime later, back in New York, we had a remarkable jam session in the basement office of a pediatrician named Dr. Geller (who turned out to have been Sekhnet’s pediatrician, she recalled his enormous hands).   Geller owned the house Rob’s parents rented, the home where Rob and his older sister were raised.   I’d had many a holiday meal in that house, in the company of our two families.  I’d spent massive amounts of time in that house over the years, but had never been down to Geller’s office before that night.  It was a remarkable session, with Andy on synthesizer keyboard.   It was the first time I’d played with Andy and there was a certain magic to the musical connection that first time.

But none of this explains why Rob was doomed to a combative marriage, so onward.  He’d had a series of fairly longterm girlfriends over the years, but as far as I knew, for many years, none of them were Jewish.   In his mind he could only marry a Jewish woman, so this easy out kept his sexual relationships limited in a certain way.   A way that eventually caused great pain, and sometimes anger, in his longterm partners.  A psychiatrist finally pointed this pattern out to Rob, when he was about thirty.  I remember Rob telling me about this breakthrough session when he realized, with the shrink’s help, that it was essential for him to date a Jewish girl and get married as soon as possible.   He proceeded to do exactly that.

I liked the woman, though she seemed volatile.   Her older brother (a guy Rob and I both knew in passing at Hebrew School), we soon learned, had opted out of the family, not contacting any of them for years.   This happens in families, I figured, who knows what the whole story is?   The haste with which they got engaged and married may not have been to my taste (I’m still not officially married) but it wasn’t my business, really.   Yet there was still something a little unsettling about the lead up to the wedding and the wedding itself.  A foreshadowing, if you will.

There was a dinner party before the wedding, at a restaurant, maybe it was their engagement party.   Hitler, Andy’s wife,  insulted Rob’s oversensitive sister in a curt, particularly brutal manner.   I remember feeling a tension at that dinner that I can only say felt tense.   The bachelor party for Rob, a few months later, was also memorable for something being off about it, even for a bachelor party.   The main thing I recall is that the party was commandeered by the loud, overbearing, drunken asshole brother-in law of the bride, Eddie.   My main memory is of Eddie loudly critiquing the body of a stripper in a bar he’d dragged us to, calling her a dog of some kind.   Perhaps her breasts were not up to his exacting standards, although it could have been literally anything, or nothing, at that point.  He was shit-faced and somehow in charge.

Eddie would not be Rob’s brother-in-law that much longer, he and Rob’s wife’s sister divorced not long after that idiotic display of alpha-maleness.   I don’t disparage anyone for getting divorced from someone who mistreats them.  I have been divorced myself several times over the years, even if not from a marriage.   When all you are getting from a relationship is grief, harshness, abuse — time to get on the bus, Gus.  In fact, for that reason, a terrible relationship, Rob’s wife wrote off her younger sister a few years later.  The sister, apparently, is an unredeemable complete fucking bitch.

Rob and his wife finally reached the conclusion that they were better off apart.  They could not find a way out of their own eternal war.   A year or two ago they sat their two sons down and informed them of their plan to split up, to divorce. Then, miraculously, they unaccountably reconciled when their younger son moved across the country for college.  It was like a rebirth for their relationship, a beautiful new springtime, though it was not very long before catastrophic storms swept back in.

Now this here, what I am doing now, this is what I always do.   I write about things that are nobody’s business, betray people left and right, even if I don’t use their full names, or any names.  They know it’s them I’m writing about, and that’s the unspeakable thing, that I am publicly probing into things they don’t wanted probed into, particularly, and most unforgivably, in the public space of the internet.  I eventually write about ticklish details that make people who used to be my friends angry, defensive, sometimes vindictive.   My beloved Sekhnet, on reading the previous post, had a related reaction and a one word review: “flush!”  

In other words, down the drain with this whole nasty subject, done with the eternal bad feelings it engenders, these sad and distasteful details of disappointing, doomed disputes with miserable people.  “Flush!” she said again when I began trying to explain why these materials are so useful to me.  

She listened as I went on about the personal experiences and lessons of one’s life being the most important things to ponder and learn from, the richest things to write clearly about, the best tools for attaining insights and for personal growth.   Plus, I pointed out, there is a great punchline to this particular story, if I can manage to tell it correctly, more than one punchline, actually.   She eventually agreed not to say “flush” again, for this particular tale, at least.

So onward, but not today, my allotted writing time is at an end.  Part three will put the final pieces in place and hopefully provide a satisfying, if mildly merciless, punchline.

(to be continued)

 

 

[1]  I don’t want to get bogged down in this Clapton business right now.  I love his tone, Eric’s vibrato is up there in a class almost by itself, the touch and the microtones are beautiful and subtle, etc. but he is an extremely limited guitarist. Great singer, excellent musician, can do that one thing beautifully on guitar, plus the nice acoustic blues picking, but truly, I don’t get why he is not a better and more versatile guitarist by now.  It’s like a failure of imagination, a dull incuriousness,  or an insane commitment to “brand,” or just an indication of a kind of rigidity, or something.   His autobiography reveals him as something of a shallow jackass, maybe that explains it.  Anyway, Clapton’s vibrato is beautiful, I’ve always loved it and I did indeed strive to master it, to the extent I ever did.

An odd society of married men

For years four married men, and I include myself, as I am as married as anyone (Sekhnet and I have been together twenty years now) would take a ferry ride to an island once a year and spend the day on the beach.   It was an annual tradition that ensured we all got to spend some quality time with a friend who was living abroad and came to the US every summer for a harried, duty-packed visit.   We’d have lunch in a small restaurant there and compare notes on what had happened from the previous year before heading to the beach.   The boat ride there and back, across the sparkling water, was always a highlight of the day.

A few years ago I had a final falling out with a longtime friend named Andy, one of the four, and it became awkward after that to convene the annual meeting.   It would have forced the two untainted men to choose between me and Andy, something they could not do.   It was celebrated the last couple of years as a two-some, the two old friends hopping the ferry, eating lunch at the restaurant, spending the day at the beach, catching up.

It must have been one of the last times the four of us were there that the subject of Andy’s wife, Hitler, came up.   I barked out my extreme distaste for her, protested that I was trying to eat and that this harshly opinionated angry little Russian Jew was not a fit subject for mealtime.   Andy and I had an understanding that his noisome wife would not be discussed between us.   I found it impossible to talk about her without disputing her proclaimed right to express the full measure of her ready rage whenever she wanted to.    

But during the polite lunch discussion, Rob, the peacemaker, chided me for the shorthand “Hitler” (which I stand behind, incidentally) and began defending this woman, Hitler.   “If you really listen to her, and talk to her, she’s really, really smart and she makes a lot of sense”, Rob said.  He noted that she has a great sense of humor.  He said he actually has learned to appreciate her and he gets along great with her now, that he has actually come to like her and feel like she likes him too.   Andy began to laugh an unpleasant, mirthless laugh.

“She fucking hates you, Rob!” Andy said with exaggerated disgust.  He went on to flesh out that hatred a bit.   He did this with a big, humorless smile on his face.  A year or two later Andy’s sickening marriage to Hitler was heading toward a long-overdue divorce.   Andy left her during the separation, moved out of the marital domicile and into a spacious wooden garden apartment that looked like the Zen dojo he’d begun hanging out in with the little sect he’d joined.   

Andy, a very bright man who’d scored a perfect hole in one on his SATs back in high school, would be quick to point out that a “dojo” is a place where martial artists train and he’d tell me the right word for a place where Zen meditation is done.    In response I’d point out that every place Andy practices anything is a forum for martial arts (and that the only difference between the words “marital” and “martial” is the placement of the I).  

I recall these lunches in particular as a place where unhappily married men complained about and defended their bad marriages.  Since I am not actually married, am not legally contracted to Sekhnet, I was somewhat exempt from this part of the conversation, though, obviously, not really.   Everybody has some kind of issue, conflict or problem with virtually everybody else, it’s just one of the features of being human.   Life partnerships are certainly not exempt from this general rule, in fact, they are more subject to it than less intimate relationships.   The better friendships are the ones where generous allowances for the foibles of the other are routinely made.   We’re lucky, in this life, if we find a couple of people we can count on to truly have our best interests at heart and not fight with us too much, it seems, especially during these combative days as we wait for our home, the increasingly besieged earth, to become uninhabitable.    

It struck me as a bit ironic that Rob the peacemaker, who defended Andy’s wife, Hitler, against my unfair, if not inaccurate, portrayal, probably also supported him 100% in his decision to divorce her.   It would have been hard not to be supportive about the move.  I am quite sure the divorce did not fix Andy’s somewhat broken life, but it was certainly a step in the right direction.   Rob has been at war with his own wife since shortly after they married, many years ago.  It is one of the most explosive and angry minefields of a marriage I know.   There are periods of uneasy peace surrounded by devastation that has done damage to everybody in its orbit.   I am a casualty, finally, of that toxic relationship.

There is a picture of Andy and me, dressed in misshapen suits, ties inexpertly knotted at our throats, standing on the front stoop of my parents’ house in Queens. Each of us has a bad haircut we probably cut ourselves.   The snapshot was taken right before we headed to Rob’s wedding.   I wonder where that photo is.  

There were signs at Rob’s wedding, now that I think back, of the disaster that was about to unfold.   A sense of uneasiness and mutual desperation, though perhaps my memories are also colored by what has come to pass in the decades since.

(to be continued)

 

President man, supports his friends

The president defends the murderous crown prince of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed bin Salman (“MBS”), saying, essentially, that MBS lied very strongly, very strongly, when he denied direct involvement in the organized murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, a Saudi citizen, US resident and strong critic of MBS.  Khashoggi was murdered in the Saudi consulate.  

After denying that Khashoggi had been killed at all, in the days after MBS’s brother himself directed the journalist Khasshoggi to the consulate where the murder was promptly carried out, MBS changed the story:  it was Saudi rogues who had illegally entered the Saudi consulate, fifteen of them including an autopsy expert with a bone saw, and accidentally killed and dismembered MBS’s critic in the course of a fist fight ill-advisedly started by the hotheaded, terrorism-linked, middle-aged journalist.    

“He was very strong in his denials, very very strong, like Kavanaugh, ” our clueless, careless president said of his born-wealthy, supremely entitled Saudi counterpart, a soon to be future king and close friend of the president’s billionaire son-in-law, son of a convicted felon billionaire who lost his law license after hiring a prostitute and rigging a motel room with video equipment to blackmail his brother-in-law who was about to testify against him in a federal case.  [1]   

Here is what American intelligence agencies and members of the president’s own party are now saying about the crown prick’s involvement in the murder of a journalist/critic, according to the lying Public Broadcasting Station, PBS ——> clickez ici, mes enfants.

Freedom is on the march.

 

[1]  Jared Kushner’s aunt really didn’t like that videotape of her husband with the hooker.