These billionaires may not like him personally, but kissing up to the vain, shameless autocrat has been fantastic for their bottom line, which is the only thing that truly concerns the hoarders of thousands of millions of dollars. I don’t know that every billionaire is genetically a psychopath [1], but the percentage is surely way above the psychopath’s 2% prevalence in the the general population. The billionaires most devoted to becoming trillionaires, and then quadrillionaires (a million million), are surely psychopaths. Trump is very handy for these best of the best and their desire to have, and to control, everything, which is the same driving impulse that animates Dozy Don’s every waking moment.
I stumbled on this description of the tech billionaire personality/philosophy listening to an interview The Nerd Reich author Gil Duran conducted with author Paulina Borsook. Her book, Cyberselfish: A Critical Romp Through the Terribly Libertarian Culture of High Tech [2], described exactly what we are up against today with the Silicon Valley elites that are forcing AI down everybody’s throat. Borsook’s book focuses on the unique personality type, and antihuman politics, of the fascistic billionaire tech bros. This description is from her 2000 book:
It bespeaks a lack of human connection and discomfort with a core of what many of us consider it means to be human. It’s an inability to reconcile the demands of being an individual with the demands of participating in society. Which coincides beautifully with a preference for — and glorification of — being the solo commander of one’s computer — in lieu of any economically viable behavior. Computers are so much more rule-based, controllable, fixable and comprehensible than any human will ever be. As many political schools of thought do, these techno-libertarians make a philosophy out of a personality defect.
Almost nobody likes these motherfuckers.
In a new CNBC/Generation Labs survey that polled 1,088 Americans between the ages of 18 and 34, about 45% said AI would have a negative impact on their careers, compared to 10% that said it would help them.
A majority of respondents said they distrusted the leaders of major companies investing in AI—81% said they distrusted Palantir CEO Alex Karp, 79% distrusted Palantir chairman Peter Thiel, 76% distrusted Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, 74% distrusted Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai, while around 70% said they distrusted Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk.
All you need to do is picture the smug faces of Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Jeff Bezos, Alex Karp, the stilted way they speak, how they carry themselves, their self-proclaimed priorities and idiosyncratic dreams for the future. Clearly they consider themselves the most important people in the world, by a million miles. Why should they not also control it?
Donald Trump is a crude and brutal means to a crude and brutal end, a few obscenely wealthy people having control over everyone else on earth. Trump’s first order of business, after his miraculous capture of all seven swing states by virtually identical margins, was to appoint his largest donor, technological wizard and chainsaw wielding racist Elon Musk, aided by a handful of twenty year-old hackers, to a fake commission to cut government fraud, waste and abuse. Musk gleefully wielded that chainsaw to do untold damage here in the US while condemning millions in poor countries to death from preventable causes when he destroyed USAID. He denies this vehemently, as those who can never be wrong always do. He’s right, after all, he was briefly the world’s first trillionaire!
Keep in mind, this dynamic is nothing new. The only difference now is they have technology to enforce everything they want to do.
Here is Gil Duran’s full interview with Paulina Borsook:
[1]
Here are three videos with James Fallon, the mild-mannered, affable neuroscientist who discovered he was a “prosocial” psychopath at 60, and realized he didn’t care when it was confirmed, proving he was a psychopath. If you’re pressed for time, the TED talk is the most condensed of the three. All three are fascinating and cover slightly different aspects. The Moth story is a relaxed and charming telling of his personal story, the second is the same length but much more detailed, and also excellent — it includes his recent humane accommodations to his condition and a surprising moral realization.
Moth https://youtu.be/fzqn6Z_Iss0?si=2aby-jSOm5YbQmQU
This 7 minute TED talk, with the most science, and the direct connection of the “warrior gene” to violence, was done either before he saw the PET scan of his own brain or before was willing to talk about it:
In the TED talk he explains the biology, genetics, epigenetics and brain changes of psychopathy (a condition not listed in DSM-5, oddly enough). The PET scans of the brains of psychopaths are always similar, a unique and recognizable configuration. The recessive gene for psychopathy, MAOA, is on the X chromosome (making psychopathy much more prevalent in males, with only one X) and that in addition to passing on the gene, the mother produces an extreme volume of serotonin while the fetus is in the womb. This overexposure renders the newborn immune to serotonin’s effects and so unable to really bond, feel empathy or have the capacity for regret (bonus: no hesitation or anxiety).
This constellation of traits that some are born with explains things I am otherwise at a loss to grasp about our human world.
[2] from the Yale Journal of Law and Technology:
Abstract: Paulina Borsook, high-tech cultural commentator and author of Cyberselfish: A Critical Romp Through the Terribly Libertarian Culture of High Tech, discusses Silicon Valley’s paradoxical “technolibertarian” attitude
towards the government and the Big Capital Establishment who made the meteoric rise of the technology industry possible. Borsook, in deconstructing the myth of the freewheeling Silicon Valley technogogue, exposes the fragile
connections between the Randian pretensions of today’s near-religiousegotism and the genuinely libertarian fringe from the salad days of the Internet.














