Timeline of Events Seen from the Future

Looking back after a dramatic change, assuming all records of events have not been destroyed or concealed and the available historical record wiped clean, as when a new regime in ancient Egypt would scrape the faces off tomb walls and erase from history and the afterlife the prior regime that also claimed to have been chosen by the gods, it becomes much easier to see cause and effect.  Looking at a timeline, the connection between seemingly disparate events emerges.  The events can be seen, after the fact, as steps in a clear pattern that led, seemingly in a straight line, from one thing to another. 

Experiments in democracy are not immediately cancelled when an autocratic party takes control.   There are leaders of the opposition to be silenced, beaten up, discredited, removed from public view.   There is the shaping of public opinion, which must be done strongly and systematically.   There is the criminalizing of dissent, which becomes treason, a terrible crime justly punishable by severe penalties including death.   After enough struggle, with violent safeguards against rebellion firmly in place, a new society can be born, a culture based on values inculcated through years of hard work by the new leaders, their ideologues and financial backers, and the party faithful.   

One template for looking at how this change comes about is the transition from democracy to totalitarianism in Germany last century.   It was the farthest thing from a historical certainty, though the stars were lined up perfectly for it and it seems inevitable today.    A hundred years ago the forces of the extreme right in Germany were starting to brawl with crowds of armed leftists in the streets in a nation on the verge of revolution.  The liberal Weimar Republic, which at the time had the world’s most enlightened democratic constitution, was ill-equipped to enforce its laws and new democratic values in the face of mounting despair after a humiliating military defeat, increasing financial desperation and political violence and propaganda.   The stage was set for a decade or more of pitched battles at political rallies before the fateful late 1932 election when the Nazi party won its largest share of the votes ever in an open election, 37%.   After March 1933 the Nazi vote total was a constant 100%, once it became the only party in Germany.

The history of the end of German democracy in 1933 is well-known to anyone who has read any of the numerous books on the subject, or seen a history of World War II documentary.   Let’s take a quick look at few selected moments from  the timeline, for a sense of how long it takes — how many years it takes, even in the perfect petri dish for the change that was Germany in the 1920s, the early 30s — before the proposed solutions of cynical autocrats become irrevocable and final solutions.

The German military refused to take part in the surrender of November 1918 and its leaders afterwards helped perpetuate the myth that an undefeated German army had been stabbed in the back by the “November criminals”, the treasonous liberal members of the new Weimar democracy who signed the punitive peace treaty that led in a straight line to World War II.   General Kurt von Schleicher was a top military leader in World War I who, after refusing to participate in the humiliating surrender, pushed this narrative and sought political power in the turbulent years leading up to the Nazi takeover.   He was regarded by many patriotic right wing Germans as a national hero.

Fast forward to January 1933 and the calculations of the German right wing, including Schleicher, that 84 year-old general Paul von Hindenburg was a strong enough president, with robust powers to appoint or dismiss the chancellor under the law at that time, to control the uneducated, emotional leader of the Nazi party.  Hitler became Chancellor, appointed by President Hindenburg, serving at his pleasure, as they say.   History shows unambiguously that the idea that Hitler could be tamed by his social superiors and restrained by others on the right was wildly wrong.

In February 1933 the German parliament building, the Reichstag, was set on fire.   That night, in a coordinated nationwide sweep, the police, on orders of Herman Göring (who was busily putting together the Gestapo) arrested hundreds of people whose names had been on Nazi  enemies lists for a while.   The following day, in an emergency session of the Reichstag, the constitutional provision for political emergencies was invoked and an Enabling Act was passed with bipartisan support, giving the Chancellor vast emergency powers he never relinquished.   There were several major parties, all of the right and center, and center-left parties voted with the Nazis.  Think of the rush of support from across the American political spectrum for the massive, “patriotic” Patriot Act hastily passed by our Congress after the al Que’da attacks of 9/11/01.  In the name of fighting “terror” terrifying compromises can be made by otherwise decent and well-meaning politicians.

After the Reichstag fire, and with the invocation of emergency powers and passage of the Enabling Act that made it all legal, Hitler was the all-powerful unitary executive in Germany.  His word, and increasingly his whim, was effectively constitutional law for the next twelve years, under the enhanced emergency powers he invoked after his party set fire to the Reichstag.  He exercised those powers wantonly, sometimes insanely, until that fateful day in the bunker under Berlin when his enemies were closing in from all sides and he declared Germany too weak not to deserve its total destruction.  And then blew the top of his head off with a pistol in his mouth after killing his new wife and faithful dog.

Here’s the thing that caught my eye, the passage of time before the Nazis took the next violent, decisive step, even after they had what we now see as unchallengeable power.  In some cases, like the eventual program to physically exterminate the Jews, this took five to seven years.  Public sentiment has to be carefully and systematically cultivated before previously shocking proposals can be seen as “normal”.  Think of the frogs in the pot of slowly heated water, realizing too late that they are becoming frog soup and there’s nothing they can do about it.

After Hitler became the undisputed leader of Germany it was more than a year before the chilling “Night of the Long Knives” on June 30, 1934.  On that night, in coordinated nationwide raids, the leaders of the brawling SA, the three million man army of violent Nazi brownshirts (including a contingent of  working class socialists) that had been crucial to the rise of National Socialist Hitler, were killed.   The newly formed SS would be the strong right arm of Hitler going forward, its members bound to Hitler by an oath of unquestioning personal loyalty to their Fuhrer.

Here’s the thing that jumped out at me about the gradual escalation of autocratic violence, listening to the audiobook of Benjamin Carter Hett’s well-done The Death of Democracy

On that fateful night of orchestrated murder in June 1934, two armed men showed up at General Kurt von Schleicher’s house.   He was a well-known national public figure, of the stature of a General Patreus, or Colin Powell, or some of the generals who once sat as members of Trump’s cabinet, to some Germans almost like Quaseem Soliemani in Iran.   He was regarded by many on the German right as a national hero.  The Nazis who went to his house found him in his office, shot him dead at his desk and also killed his wife, who was also in the office when they found Schleicher.

The story in the Nazi-controlled press was that Schleicher had died in a gunfight with police, resisting arrest (it went without saying that he was a dangerous criminal who needed to be taken into custody to face justice).  The Nazis had fired on him in self-defense, returning fire, the stories said, and his wife had been killed in the crossfire, what we now blandly call “collateral damage”.   That was the story trumpeted on German mass media right after the killing.   Within a few weeks Hitler could nonchalantly tell German crowds at rallies “I had Schleicher shot.”   The clear message being: what the fuck are you going to do about it, or Nazi lies about it, traitor?

The Nazis are famous for their wholesale, industrialized slaughter of Jews and other enemies.   We have all the factual details about the sometimes disputed “Final Solution”, the evolving improvised mass murder program that ended in very efficient death camps, gigantic mass killing facilities.   In hindsight we think: Nazis seize power, start World War II, perpetrate Holocaust.   Each of these things was many years in the works.  Each proceeded by many small steps, over time.  Over years.

Some will remember Kristalnacht, “The Night of the Broken Glass”, the nationwide Nazi-sponsored orgy of violence against Jews across the country.   That was in November 1938 (probably organized around the 20th anniversary of the famous Jewish orchestrated “stab in the back” by the “November Criminals”) more than five years, almost six, after Hitler’s seizure of dictatorial power under a legal provision of the Weimar Constitution.   

It would be several more years until the actual mass killing of Jews would begin in the territories conquered by the German army.   Ditches and machine guns, trucks with exhaust pipes directed inside to kill undesirables with carbon monoxide, these crude methods were not up to the daunting task of killing millions.  The kind of plan the Nazis eventually devised and put into operation does not happen overnight, or in a year, or even in five years.  It takes time.  People have to accept every step leading up to it.  First you euthanize the mentally ill, see how that goes.   You stop the euthanasia program due to public outcry and there is more work to do to convince everyone of the necessity for ridding the earth of dangerous human parasites eternally intent on raping German women and poisoning the gene pool.  The public eventually falls into line, but it can take years sometimes.

Then, suddenly, one day, you have Adolf Hitler, full-blown, the way history remembers one of its most successful and prolific liars and mass murderers.  

Advice for Screwed NYS health care consumers

There is a new consumer complaint process for victims of unappealable health insurance company “mistakes” in NYS that is easy, fast and efficient.  It can reverse unappealable termination of your health insurance within two business days.   Here is a link to that on-line complaint form that virtually nobody in New York State knows about:  CONSUMER COMPLAINT.

The only readily available help for someone in NYS who buys insurance under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act  (which can only be purchased at the ineptly run New York State of Health Marketplace) and looks on-line for help is the NYS Attorney General’s Consumer Health Bureau.   I reached out to them when I had my health insurance abruptly terminated without notice last week.  The woman I spoke to was very kind.   She sadly got back to me to a couple of days later to tell me that the company that had screwed me had responded to their query and had not changed its mind.

New York State’s Commissioner of Insurance position was abolished in 2011 along with the Department of Insurance.   The regulation of insurance companies in New York State was assumed by the newly reorganized Department of Financial Services which also oversees banking, finance and commerce.  Makes sense, no?  As of a few years ago this agency had no ability to help consumer victims of insurance company fraud or abuse.  It only took complaints against consumers who the insurance companies accused of fraud.  Makes sense.

When the Attorney General’s consumer health bureau gave me the sad news that there was nothing further I could do to get my insurance for 2020 back, until March 1, at the earliest, if I acted quickly, I continued my online research and round of phone calls.  I eventually found a new online consumer complaint form at the NYSDFS website.   That form is here:  https://www.dfs.ny.gov/complaint.

Within two business days I had a call from the insurance company, Healthfirst, informing me that my insurance was in full force and effect.  They apologized for their “mistake” and acknowledged that the DFS complaint had caused them to “escalate” the appeal process they’d previously told me didn’t exist.  Cool, now I can reschedule the appointment for ongoing treatments with the cardiologist that I had to cancel for today.

I emailed to let the kind woman at the AG’s office know that, after only a week of indescribable stress and aggravation, my complaint had been quickly resolved by the DFS complaint process.   She wrote back to tell me she was happy for me and asked if I wouldn’t mind helping a consumer who’d been screwed as I had been, could she give the distraught woman my email address?  I opted to write to the screwed citizen instead.   Here is what I advised her (and anyone else in NYS sodomized by an unaccountable, constantly feeding artificial “person” of eternal life):

Kimberly:
 
I was given your email address by the overwhelmed woman at the AG’s help desk, who asked if I’d be willing to help you.   I am a private citizen who was recently screwed by my health insurance company.   Not sure why the woman at the AG’s help desk couldn’t help you, and I’ll be writing to the assistant AG in charge of the sympathetic but unhelpful help desk (will not mention any names, the woman I spoke to was perfectly nice and really tried to help), but here is my advice.
 
I can’t go into the details of how you were screwed, believe me I know how many ways the virtually unregulated private insurance companies — and the accursed NY State of Health “Marketplace” — have to screw us.    I’m sure thousands are similarly abused.   Here are my recommendations:
 
1) contact the NYS Department of Financial Services today.  They are the agency that oversees health insurance in NY State.   Their NYC phone number is 212-331-6266 * (I don’t know what county you live in).  They are open til 8 pm today.   Wherever you live:  Go to their website https://www.dfs.ny.gov/complaint and submit your complaint today.  You can do it on-line.  
 
If your complaint is complicated, write it out before you work on the on-line form, since you have only 30 minutes to complete the complaint once you start.  Cut and paste the complaint you’ve already written, if you think it will take a long time to put your concerns in order.
 
Keep it brief and to the point.  I was cut off health insurance for 2020 without notice when I called to pay my premium last week.  The AG’s Health Bureau Help Desk called Healthfirst and was told my termination was done properly and in compliance with the “guidelines” and that nothing more could be done.   Within 2 business days of filing my complaint at NYSDFS I had my insurance restored, Healthfirst told me it had been a “mistake” and they were sorry.   I’m sure they were very sorry… corporations always say they are, when they are caught and there is no consequence to them for apologizing.
 
2) If the NYSOH Marketplace screwed you (as they have screwed me twice in the last few years) file a formal appeal over the phone (this cumbersome process will take about 3-4 months for a determination that will likely be in your favor).  I’d recommend also writing directly to the unaccountable political appointee who runs it.  Include a copy of your NYSDFS complaint.    Here is her contact information (as best I can determine it, she keeps a very low profile):
 
Donna Frescatore
Executive Director, New York State of Health Marketplace
New York State Department of Health
Coming Tower
Empire State Plaza
Albany NY 12237
I subsequently learned that Ms. Frescatore, the incompetent political appointee who ran NYSOH so badly for years has since been promoted to a grander title and office, as of January 2019.  I’m told by people at the AG’s office that she is also still Executive Director of the NYSOH, a highly secretive post.  Here is her new title and address:  
 
Donna Frescatore 
Deputy Commissioner and Medicaid Director 
New York State Department of Health 
One Commerce Plaza 
Albany, NY 12110
 
and this (though you’ll likely find it completely useless)  https://www.health.ny.gov/contact/doh800.htm
We are victimized in a state with virtually no protections for health care “consumers” who are screwed.  Log on to the NYSDFS website and file an on-line complaint, that’s your best first stop, and hopefully your last.  
 
Best of luck to you, be direct, give ’em hell, and don’t take this abuse lying down!  Many of us are similarly screwed, take courage from the new help now available at the Department of Financial Services.
* This is actually the telephone number for the New York City Human Resources Administration, Public Engagement Unit.   I’m told the NYSDFS 800 number is as useless as it was the last time I entered their administrative cul du sac several years ago.

Hmmmm…

I just watched President Trump’s lawyer, Jay Sekulow, repeatedly quote from an impartial, unimpeachable constitutional expert who says this impeachment is illegal– his co-counsel Alan Dershowitz.  Yesterday, Kenneth Starr, architect of the Clinton impeachment, argued about the danger of partisan impeachments like the one against Trump, and the dodgy, unconstitutional standard of Abuse of Power, although it was at the center of the impeachment he engineered in 1998. [1]  

Now, apparently, Senate Republicans working closely with Trump’s defense team, are worried about the increased possibility of an actual partial impeachment trial– rather than opening and closing arguments, a session of questions from Senators and a quick vote to acquit the eternally victimized innocent president before the State of the Union next week.

Only in America, folks.

 

[1] These two lawyers, Dershowitz and Starr, by the way, were the top-shelf attorneys who got that excellent deal for Jeffery Epstein a decade ago, a slap on the wrist for employing under-age “prostitutes” (he gave them money).

Trump Ephemera

In our current age of in-your-pocket/in-your-face instant, disposable communication, traditional written documents are relied on less and less in daily life.   If you want to test how little a written page is regarded by most people today, try writing a letter to somebody.   Put it in an envelope, mail it.   In my recent experience, it is rare to ever hear more than a peep about it, if that.

It’s a shame that quickly thumbed, highly opinionated, disposable smartphone ephemera has largely replaced good writing in public discourse.   The famously short American consumer attention span is shorter than ever before, and growing shorter all the time.    The published statements of public figures like Churchill, Gandhi, FDR, Nixon, Goebbels live on.   They are printed on paper for the ages, available to scholars, historians and everybody else.   Not so with a text, email or tweet, which serves its immediate purpose and is quickly forgotten, lost in a massive haystack of such disposable communications.  

Check out the Hitlerian overtones of this one, part of a long tweet stream by the president of the United States, from last April, less than a year ago.  The echoes should be noted, and they deserve to be remembered.   Shot off right after AG Barr exonerated Trump of all wrong-doing in connection with accepting sweeping and systematic Russian help to win in 2016, with making sure insufficient evidence of “collusion” reached the Special Counsel and for his numerous attempts to thwart the investigation itself.   Trump tweeted “complete and total exoneration!” denounced the “big fat waste” of time and millions of dollars and ended on this ominous note:

20200127_182122.jpg

A favorite trope of Mr. Hitler and his followers was turning the tables on the “November Criminals” the sick and traitorous Jews and socialists who were forced to sign the humiliating and punitive German surrender on behalf of the military in November 1918.   The generals would not be tarred with that defeat, it was, the right wing story went, the goddamned sick and dangerous Jews and socialists who “stabbed undefeated Germany in the back.”  The popular justice often proposed for these treacherous traitors, shouted often in enthusiastic rallies of humiliated, angry Germans, was to “hang them from lamp posts.”  

Nothing to worry about here, of course, in our great democracy, with its exquisite system of checks and balances, ensuring that a tyrant will never be able to seize power here.

Here are a couple of the president’s many tweets, at random, from today, which should be reassuring:

 

Screen Shot 2020-01-28 at 1.10.34 PM.png

Screen shot 2020-01-27 at 1.24.41 PM.png

Screen shot 2020-01-27 at 1.26.23 PM.png

Screen shot 2020-01-27 at 1.26.41 PM.png

… America, America, God shed His grace on thee…

… and shit…

As the President’s Defense Begins

The president’s defense is that even if he did exactly what has been shown over the course of several days of opening arguments by his hated enemies, supported by the cherry-picked sworn testimony of anti-Trump members of the Deep State– traitorous career “diplomats” and their ilk– and so-called “corroborating” video clips of the president and his most powerful advisors — it does not amount to a crime, nor, by definition, anything serious enough to merit any kind of detailed fact-finding trial in the Senate.   The President’s position is that even if his irrationally enraged enemies in Congress manage to “prove” their case, which they can’t because they are all traitors and liars and don’t follow the law so their arguments are all false and invalid — it is not a case that merits impeachment, let alone removal from office.

Every American accused of a crime (or a high crime and misdemeanor) is entitled to a vigorous defense at trial.   Defense lawyers must cast reasonable doubt on the facts in evidence and the testimony of the witnesses to get acquittal for their client.  The appearance of a fair process is crucial to integrity of our legal system.  

If a judge has some connection to the case that gives any appearance that she might take one side or another, she must recuse herself, even if the suspicious looking connection is innocent.   The standard for recusal is an “appearance of impropriety”.   The same is true for the jurors, anyone with an interest in convicting or acquitting the accused, or an expressed prejudice, may not sit in judgment on the case.   That’s why the Senators who are acting as jurors in the impeachment had to take an oath to be impartial and uphold the constitution.

The accused never has any say about (let alone control of) the conduct of the legal proceedings.  The unalterable procedures that ensure due process for all accused citizens are part of our law.   In certain cases (as in overtly racist trials down south back in the day– and in some places to this day) the outcome is a certainty before the first bit of evidence is presented during the trial, but American law strives to avoid this kind of openly unfair trial today.   If active prejudice is involved in a conviction, and can be shown on appeal, it is grounds for overturning the verdict.   There is no such appeal in an impeachment trial, making it even more important that all relevant evidence and witness testimony is presented and carefully examined by the jury at the trial.

In the present impeachment trial of Donald J. Trump, the head juror and trier of fact has announced, ahead of the trial, that he will work in close coordination [1] with the defendant’s defense team for a speedy acquittal, since once again, treason is afoot and the extremist opposition party, motivated by unreasoning hatred of an innocent man, is a lynch mob that must be stopped.  

The position of the president’s party toward impeachment is identical to their unified stand after the Special Counsel’s investigation of Russian influence on Trump’s behalf in the 2016 campaign (“sweeping and systematic” and ongoing) and the detailed description of Presidential Obstruction of Justice.  Their narrative is that the traitorous Mueller team was so twisted by their hatred of one innocent man that they contorted themselves to find no grounds to exonerate him for obstruction of justice!  Other members of the impeachment jury have also publicly committed to a speedy acquittal for the persecuted president.  No need for witnesses the defendant has been blocking from testifying, no need for any further evidence from anyone.  If it’s Shifty Adam Schitt, you must acquit!

OK, fine, everybody knows the deal.   The accused, the most powerful man in the world, has tremendous power over these elected officials of the Senate majority party who are now sitting in judgment at his impeachment trial.  He is the leader of their party.  He can destroy disloyal, “impartial” jurors’ chances for reelection by denying them campaign funds from the RNC, if he were that kind of vengeful person.   He can publicly mock them, instantly expose them to ridicule — a dangerous thing for any politician– if he were that kind of mean guy.  He can publicly and privately bully them, if he was inclined to bully people.  He could even invite reprisals against disloyal members of his party, if he was that kind of angry person.

Thankfully, the president is a very stable genius, an extremely stable genius.   Nothing to worry about here in the land of the free and the home of the brave.

A complete, very, very short summary of Mr. Trump’s legal defense in the impeachment trial is here.

 

 

[1]  This pre-coordination neatly fits the definition of criminal conspiracy, not to mention violation of a sworn vow (perjury) to act as impartial jurors, Mitch.

Moscow Mitch’s Secret Trial

I’ve been refraining from directly writing about politics lately.   It is sickening to watch the zero-sum fascistic blood sport it has become.   The arguments are beginning in the Senate today about whether opening arguments must be conducted until after midnight on back to back days and whether any evidence at all will be allowed at the trial.   I start wondering, again, what country I am living in.   Koch country, I suppose, this is the autocracy these born-wealthy, earth-destroying autocrats have long dreamed of and worked hard for.

I heard a sound bite from the fair and impartial head of the 51-49 Suck It Senate, Mitch McConnell, who is busy coordinating with the defendant and his lawyers, organizing a show trial designed to quickly acquit America’s Greatest Fraudster. The McConnell quote was him telling supporters about the greatest moment of his political life. Mitch’s proud evocation of his greatest dramatic moment of extra-constitutional triumph got to me.

The peak experience, McConnell said, was when he looked President Obama in the face, during an exchange about the president’s duty to appoint a replacement for a Supreme Court justice who died during the president’s tenure, and without using the n-word or anything in any way impolite, said (I’m paraphrasing) “fuck you, nigger.”  No nomination, no hearing, no nothing, fuck you, I wish you were never born in Kenya, you Muslim bastard.

I’m not saying Mitch is a racist, or a “Birther”.  I have no idea.  Would he have said the same to Bill Clinton?  Probably (that libertine draft-dodging fucker got BLOWJOBS!), though the time would not have been right yet for such a brazen and extra-legal power play — it took 8 years of Cheney, and then 8 of Obama, before angry partisan division would get that openly ripe.  So ripe that a trial without witnesses and evidence, conducted partly late at night on consecutive days so it can be wrapped up as quickly as possible, sounds reasonable to about 40% of our countrymen.

Mitch’s behavior is just the traditional southern way, I suppose, the smug superiority of wealthy white people (traditionally men) long used to having their way.   Powerful white men presided over quick trials whose fore-ordained outcomes were always black and white, men who identified with these all-powerful men sat on the juries, beholden to their bosses.   Black defendant alleged to have attacked a white?   Guilty.   White defendant being harassed and dragged into court on flimsy evidence for supposedly just basically touching a Negro?   Come on, boys, there’s no need for witnesses or supposed evidence here, nor any jury deliberations neither.  Let’s get this done toot sweet and go have lunch, what you boys say?

So it is with the impeachment trial.  The president did exactly what he is accused of — mounted an organized campaign to pressure the new president of an ally dependent on American aid during an ongoing war, to make the Ukrainian president announce that Trump’s possible opponent in the next presidential election was the subject of a Ukrainian corruption probe.   The perfect phone call to the Ukrainian president on July 25 was merely one chapter in this long and ongoing campaign that involved several of the president’s closest circle and went on for at least three months, until the confirmed report of the Whistleblower complaint became public.   The record of the July 25 call was immediately locked in a secret server by alarmed aides and attorneys, because that’s what democratic governments always do with perfect calls.  

Trump abused his power for personal gain and obstructed the investigation by Congress, as he had successfully obstructed the Mueller investigation.  Mueller’s investigation led to a few perjury convictions for close associates of Trump and a conclusion of no triable criminal conspiracy, because Mueller found “insufficient evidence” to show every element of such a conspiracy.   He also wrote a second volume detailing the president’s successful obstruction and explicitly did not exonerate him of the serious crime of obstruction of justice, a pattern of corrupt behavior intended to conceal guilt and destroy evidence of the underlying criminal enterprise.

Enter Trump’s new attorney general, conservative extremist Bill Barr, longtime defender of the president’s absolute authority (almost Pope-like in his infallibility, according to the Bagpiper) who gave him the legal means to delay testimony and documents in any investigation from ever being allowed until, at minimum, a year or so from now when the courts would ultimately rule on the unprecedented (and ridiculous) claim of absolute immunity under the most audaciously dodgy, extreme version of Executive Privilege.  A claim Barr explicitly, publicly and notoriously urged Trump to make in his letter of May, 8, 2019.

Now, one of the president’s lawyers, Patrick Philbin, is using the phrase “ram this through” over and over to characterize the Democratic request for a vote on an amendment to McConnell’s special impeachment rules to allow for the introduction of documentary evidence and witnesses.   Any lawyer asking for this on the first day of a trial, Philbin insists, would have his case thrown out of court and probably be sanctioned by the judge.  Imagine asking for evidence at a trial?!!   What kind of pettifogging scumbag would ask a judge for that?   To allow this kind of partisan bullshit to suddenly change the rules of trials would forever destroy the integrity of our democratic system.

Yes, indeed.  If the president had something to hide WOULDN’T HE BE HIDING IT?  

The People rest.