Note about Irv’s Holocaust Denial

Here are the words of the man with the check book, about the piece that follows.  He’d emailed earlier in the day soliciting stories about family secrets.  Take his comments with a grain of salt, you might find the piece strangely moving, even if the keeper of the online Reader’s Digest-type site deemed it ‘strangely unmoving’. And, of course, he’s right, the details in those two short paragraphs about the actual slaughter do read like they’re from an encyclopedia.  And it would, of course, be peevish of me to point that out to the man who pays good money for things he likes.

“Again, nicely done, but I found this one strangely unmoving. I think the problem (at least for me) is that, since your grandparents never tell their individual stories, you had to rely on online research to find out what happened in August 1943 in this town in Ukraine. The details are horrific, but they’re the kind of thing you find in an encyclopedia. I wish you had some small, personal details of your grandparents’ experience, but I guess the story is that they never told you their story.”

Good guess, brah.

An Unbearable Family Secret
(Hitler who?)
 

“I’m worried about your grandmother, she’s drinking too much,” my grandfather told me one day, toward the end of their lives.  “I bought a new bottle of vodka Monday and now, on Wednesday, it’s almost gone.”   I knew my grandmother was a big drinker, apparently the colon cancer she was dying of had done nothing to reduce her thirst for relief.

I was sitting on the terrace later that day, screened from my grandfather’s view.  He walked into the living room, bent to open the cabinet below the lamp and took out the vodka bottle.  He regarded it for a moment, unscrewed the top and took a long, thirsty drink.  He downed it like water.  When he was done he calmly wiped his lips and put the bottle away.

“Holy shit,” I recall thinking.  I had no idea my grandfather was a drinker.  Then again, why wouldn’t he be?   He was a Russian Jew who shared an unbearable secret that would never be whispered.

My mother’s parents were Jews from Vishnivetz, a small, six hundred year old town in the Ukraine. They had emigrated to the United States when Warren G. Harding was president.  Each had been one of seven children.   My grandparents were the only members of their famil​ies to l​ea​ve Vishnivetz, the only two still alive after a brutal night in August of 1943.  

I was a boy of about eight when I first learned about the Nazi atrocities, the millions killed.  I vividly recall my shock when I first saw the film clips from the death camps.  

After watching a guy in a cap wheel a huge wheelbarrow full of jiggling skeletons and dump them down a chute, I’d seen enough.  I ran to puke my guts out.   My mother cried and tried to console me, but the truth was the truth.  Over the years I would read many books on Hitler’s rise to power, the Nazi state and the Final Solution, but as a boy it was just a nightmare that was not to be shared.

Sitting around the dinner table, smiling at my sister and me, were the only two survivors, one from each large family, of a recent episode of mass murder.  It was never, ever spoken of.

Vishnivetz still exists, though I doubt there are any Jews there today.  I learned the exact fate of my grandparents’ extended family and the rest of the Jews of Vishnivetz only recently, after finding an online source of witness accounts.  

The Germans occupied the area in 1942 and forced the Jews of Vishenvetz to construct a ghetto within a very short time frame.  I was chilled to read the name of a member of my grandmother’s family, held hostage by the Nazis to force the Jews to keep to the deadline.  One boundary of the ghetto, I read with hairs rising on my spine, was the home my grandfather had grown up in.

In August of 1943 the Jews who’d survived more than a year of disease and starvation in the ghetto were marched to a ravine just north of town where each got a bullet in the back of the head.  This was after centuries of periodic small scale massacres in Vishnivetz.  

On my father’s side, the muddy little hamlet outside of Pinsk where his mother’s family comes from has been erased from the map.  No trace of it can be found in English or, as a Polish speaking researcher friend confirmed, in Polish.  Everybody there, and the little town itself, disappeared into Mr. Hitler’s famous Night and Fog.

When I asked about these things my father quickly dismissed my concerns.  “You act like these things happened to you personally, they didn’t.  Those people were mere abstractions, we never knew any of them,” he told me impatiently.  “The letters from Europe just stopped coming one day,” he said.   My mother was tearful, but said nothing.

Each of the “mere abstractions”, of course, had a name, and a personality, favorite things and things they couldn’t stand.  Each was known intimately by my grandparents.  Some were funny and generous, others were schmucks, each had certain endearing and maddening qualities.  The thing they had in common was the bad luck to remain in those accursed little towns when the Nazis came through the area.

​​Many years later, not long before she died, my mother told me of her correspondence with her grandfather in Vishnivetz.  She used to write to him in Yiddish, which she studied in school.  Her grandfather would send her letters and Russian coins.  When she was about 14 years old the letters, indeed, stopped coming.

My grandparents are now all long gone, and my parents have followed.  It may have been a healthier thing to have discussed these horrors when they were all alive, instead of making the subject off limits, but we cannot remake the past.   My childhood took place in a different time, before the importance of grieving was widely understood.

I find myself haunted by this terrible family secret from time to time, and sometimes, when I am feeling very low, I find myself standing by that ravine outside of Vishnivetz, with the other ‘mere abstractions’, waiting for the invitation to kneel for my bullet to the back of the head.

High Threshold of Pain, Low Threshold of Frustration

My father liked to mention his high threshold for physical pain. He took great, manly pride in his above-average ability to withstand pain.   I don’t know whether he had a high threshold for pain or not.  I imagine that he might have learned to keep an impassive face when, as a young child, his mother whipped him furiously across the face with the heavy, chafing cord of her steam iron.

When he was on his death bed I asked him if he was in pain.  “Only psychic pain,” he said.  

It’s possible that the kind of death he was dying, which I witnessed the very end of, was not physically painful.  Liver cancer eventually shuts down the kidneys and when the kidneys shut down you have increasing fatigue and finally one last breath and you’re done.  A mercifully painless way to go, still, I have no idea what other pain he was in, though psychic pain is often quite enough, thank you.

“I want to talk to you, later.  I’m still putting my thoughts together,” he told me from his deathbed the afternoon I arrived.  

By the time I sat with him the last night of his life he had put together his thoughts in that impressive way he had.  He spoke like he was dictating a final draft of a book to an amanuensis.  The verbatim transcript of the recorded parts of that last conversation reads as though edited by a skilled wordsmith.  I know about his psychic pain in great detail, and will go into it at length later on.  

But while his threshold for pain may have been high, his tolerance for frustration was very, very low.  As self-possessed as he usually was in any public setting, in private he was prone to being overcome with frustration and bursting into a tantrum.  I can think of a hundred examples, but maybe the most poignant was his reaction to the random theft of a long letter he wrote me, a review of my master’s thesis Me Ne Frego [1].

He had worked for the Board of Education for many years, retiring with a pension, and knew what a maddeningly Kafkaesque outfit it was.  Meritocracy had little to do with the hierarchy there, and he had swallowed gallons of bile in his dealings over the years with imbecile supervisors and idiots promoted to positions of power based purely on the dexterity and shamelessness of their ass-licking. 

He watched my struggles when I worked for a series of these highly qualified supervisors, as I was fired from one school and moved from that sizzling frying pan to the next.  I did this for about five years, the average attrition time of a new teacher, and finally wound up in the perfect storm of a nightmare class set against an incompetent and destructive new principal.   Unqualified to be the principal of a Harlem elementary school is about the nicest way to put it.  The woman was a living nightmare.  Here’s a quick snapshot, since I am talking about her:

Minnie Frego was an insecure, crazy woman desperate to be loved. I hated her and didn’t have the compassion not to, nor the sense or skill to hide it from her even a little bit, even as I smiled, pretended to like her and we danced our clumsy, for me deadly, dance.

“We’re not here to date each other and fall in love,” Ms. Frego said from the stage of the auditorium.  She was addressing all of her teachers, assembled by her for another required emergency after-school meeting.

“She’s looking right at you, Widaen,” Violet said out of the corner of her mouth.

“Shut up,” I said.  Minnie was looking at me, a little jealous of the friendship I had with a female colleague.

“Is what I’m saying funny, Mr. Widaen?” asked Minnie from the stage.

“Not at all,” I said, and there was a twitter of laughter from my colleagues who knew me as an ironic man.

I wrote the manuscript, a novel length description of my long nightmare at the Board of Ed, in fulfillment of the Master’s Degree Requirement for elementary school teachers.  Ironic, I know, but Creative Writing was deemed functionally related to my duties as a “Common Branches” teacher and so I happily took the writing degree instead of one in Phonics or Advanced Departmental Analingus.

(I know, I know…)

Another irony is that I was, while taking graduate courses and working on the manuscript, exhausting my legal remedies against Minnie Frego’s arbitrary and capricious firing.  After arbitration that decision rested on air and should have been overturned after an Article 78 proceeding that would have allowed me to resume my teaching career with back pay for the lost time.  Instead, since nobody told me about the 90 day statute of limitations for an Article 78, my slam dunk appeal was time barred and I wound up blacklisted. 

When I completed the manuscript I sent my father the heavy tome in the mail.  He read it and called to tell me he liked it very much.  The comment I recall is “it was remarkably devoid of self-pity.”  This was salient because the narrator realizes he’d brought on his troubles by his own inability to simply keep his mouth shut and smile.  My father told me he was working on a longer reaction to the book and would send it to me.

“Did you get my letter?” he asked me a week or so later.  It was rare to get any letter from him, rarer still to have a long review of what is, to date, my greatest sustained literary work.  I’d been greatly looking forward to his comments.  I told him I hadn’t received it.

“I sent it a week ago,” he said, “it was seven or eight pages long.  It’s odd you haven’t gotten it yet.”   I agreed it was odd, went down to check my mail and — nada.   A little research revealed that, for the only time in the 40 years I’ve lived here, some junkies, delinquents or criminals had broken into the mail distribution box on the corner and all that day’s mail had been lost.  I had to request a couple of duplicate bills I hadn’t received.  I called my father back to tell him this.

I can still hear his howl of pain.  He cursed and yelled for a while, a mortally wounded lion slain by an army of hamsters.  I never got a word in the mail about Me Ne Frego, nor another comment about the manuscript he’d admired.  It was all just too fucking frustrating for the poor guy.

 

[1] fuck, talk about frustrating, here’s the intro to “Minnie Frego” I was just able to open on my computador  (keep scrolling, actual footnote at the end of these glyphs):

ò òINTRODUCTIONó ó:€<font€color=€”red”>ÔÿÔò ò€Me€Ne€Fregoó óÔÿJÔ€


<font€size=5>€ñBñÔ#†¼þt¼XX5B¡#ÔñBñÐ d ´ ÐÌÔ‡îz`î¼¼þtÔñDñà àñDñAlthough€opinion€is€divided€on€the€marketing€wisdom€of€doing€so,€IÐ d ´ Ðcontinue€toÔ#†¼þt¼îîz`%#Ô€Ô‡îz`î¼¼þtÔcall€this€book€ñ;ñò òñ;ñMe€Ne€Fregoñ;ñó óñ;ññ<ñ.ñ<ññ=ñ.ñ=ñ€€For€non-Italian€speakers€and€thoseÐ ˆ Ø Ðreaders€whose€knowledge€of€€the€history€of€fascism€may€be€spotty–€”me€neÏfrego,”€a€salty€expression€of€non-concern,€was€a€rallying€cry€of€the€ItalianÏfascists€during€the€years€leading€up€to€the€Second€World€War.ñ>ñ€ñ>ññ?ñÌÌà àñ?ññ>ñ

ñ>ñ€It€was€a€verbal€sneer€of€bravado,€famously€spoken€by€€Il€Duce€himselfÏafter€his€armies€invaded€Ethiopa€in€1936,€using€planes,€bombs,€machine€guns,Ïand€other€state€of€the€art€weapons€to€slaughter€an€army€mounted€on€horsesÏand€camels€and€armed€with€primitive€rifles€and€swords.€€When€newsÏcorrespondents€asked€him€if€he€wasn’t€worried€that€invading€an€AfricanÏcountry€might€cause€an€international€incident€Mussolini€grabbed€his€crotchÏand€in€an€operatic€gesture€of€disdain€barked€:€”Eh!€Me€ne€frego!”€€(“it€meansÏas€much€to€me€as€rubbing€dead€skin€off€my€ass”).€€The€New€York€TimesÏtranslated€Mr.€Mussolini’s€slogan€as€”I€don’t€give€a€damn”€which€does€conveyÏthe€sense€of€it,€though€without€the€piquance.€Wounded€fascists€would€scrawlÏ’me€ne€frego’€on€their€bandages€with€their€blood,€mutter€it€with€a€smirk€as€aÏleg€was€amputated.€

€€Ìñ@ñÌñ@ñà àThe€phrase€retains€currency€in€modern€Italian,€macho€men€and€womenÏare€referred€to€as€€me€ne€freghistas’€and€the€quality€of€being€a€tough€son€orÏdaughter€of€a€bitch€is€called€€me€ne€freghissimo’.€€€In€my€experience,€it€is€aÏpose€usually€struck€in€situations€where€one€has€the€least€power€over€theÏprevailing€stink.€€Sometimes€the€smirk€and€the€sneer€of€me€ne€fregissimo€areÏthe€only€defenses€circumstances€allow.€€€

ÌÌMinnie€Frego€is€also,€by€pure€coincidence,€€the€name€of€the€last€principalÏI€worked€for,€as€a€full-time€regular€teacher,€at€the€New€York€City€Board€ofÏEducation.Ô#†¼þt¼îîz`à#ÔÐ X,¨’$ ÐñCñÔ‡X5BX¼¼þtÔñCññEñà àà ` àà ¸ àà àà h àà À àñEñ

Irv would have been howling in despair and anger at this point.  I was able to pull this up, by taking a few deep breaths and coming up with a workaround:

“Me ne frego”
-Benito Mussolini
INTRODUCTION
I call this book Me Ne Frego. I have to explain the title to readers who aren’t fluent in the history of fascism. “Me ne frego” was a rallying cry of the Italian fascists during the years leading up to the Second World War. It was a verbal sneer of bravado, originally spoken by Il Duce himself after his armies invaded Abyssinia. When news correspondents asked him if he wasn’t worried that invading an African country, sending bombers against men with rifles on horseback, might cause an international incident Mussolini grabbed his crotch and in an operatic gesture of disdain barked : “Eh! Me ne frego!” (“it means as much to me as rubbing dead skin off my ass”).

The New York Times translated Mr. Mussolini’s slogan as “I don’t give a damn” which does convey the sense of it, though without the flavor. Wounded fascists would scrawl ‘me ne frego’ on their bandages in blood, say it smirking as a leg was amputated.

Minnie Frego is also, by pure coincidence, the name of the last principal I worked for at the Board of Education.

 

Notes for Book of Irv

Emotional roller coaster, emotional trampoline, edge of that fucking ravine in Vishnevitz August 1943– call the motherfucker what you will, my knuckles are fairly white these days.  A few notes, then, for future posts on the Book of Irv that came to me while walking today, to be amplified one at a time in the near future.

1) High Threshold of Pain, Low Threshold of Frustration

My father liked to mention his high threshold for physical pain. When he was on his death bed I asked him if he was in pain.  “Only psychic pain,” he said.   While his threshold for pain may have been high, his tolerance for frustration was very, very low.

2) Great Candor and Honesty, Great Denial

My father loved Lenny Bruce.  He loved Malcolm X and Richard Pryor.  He loved them for their brilliance and originality and, just as much, for their unflinching honesty.  He hated hypocrisy and valued true honesty above most things, and he instilled those values in me and in my sister.  At the same time, there were things he defended tirelessly but was completely blind about.   He had regrets about this capacity for denial, the ultimate untruthfulness, as he was dying.

This capacity for denial extended, amazingly, to a kind of Holocaust denial [insert Sam and Yetta piece here– ed]

3)  Soul Music

I mentioned that my father bought every Sam Cooke album as soon as it came out.  The thing about Cooke that thrilled my father was the same thing in Bill Kenney that thrilled Sam Cooke.  It was soulfulness.   Cooke would take a beautiful melody and make it more beautiful with his small, perfect improvisations on it.  He was famous for  singing with melisma, a graceful, bluesy sliding between notes on a single syllable, using his voice like a great horn player uses his horn.   Even as a boy, I always loved Sam Cooke’s singing above all other singers.

My father also greatly loved cantorial music, also sung with great soulful longing.  I did not love cantorial music.

How Much Can We Change?

I had an ongoing debate with my father about how much people can really change our fundamental natures.  It was one of several ongoing debates we had over the years.  Since his death I’ve come to see his position more clearly and understand the reasons for it better than I ever could while we were arguing about it.  Nuance was missing from our debate, and empathy.  I can see and feel the nuance of his argument now where I couldn’t before.

The matter of contention was how profoundly one can change.  I took the position that great personal changes are possible, if enough effort is expended.   His position was that by the time we are two we are pretty well set in our behaviors and can only change superficial aspects of how we react to the world.  

That this contradicted his insistence that childhood must be left behind when we grow up and take responsibility as adults was not lost on me.  None of us are models of consistency, and if we look for logic in human affairs we will often come up empty.  If I had seen that he was talking about his own life, frozen in the emotional reality of being an abused two year-0ld, I might have understood it differently.  If I’d learned earlier of the unthinkable abuse he was subjected to as a young child I’d have had much more empathy for him all along.  We might have actually been able to help each other.

They have recently identified a genetic predisposition for happiness, after having long known of the genetic link to depression and other emotional maladies.  Surely there are genes that make one more or less predisposed to every emotion.  Nature versus nurture, again.  

The baby born with a sunny disposition, the easy baby, will have an easier time of it, being easier to deal with.  The snarling prick baby will be treated accordingly, and so we have the intricate dance of nature and nurture.

A child raised in an angry home will become much more sensitive to the tones of voice preceding an outburst.  They have brain scans of children who experienced childhood trauma showing changes in the brain itself.  It is a long and fascinating subject and my time and focus are waning at the moment.

I am making notes here for a book about my father.  This is an online first draft I plan to work over, pound into a book.  This debate over how much and how profoundly one can change is central to the book, to grappling with my father’s life, to appreciating his early optimism about change for the better and his increasing pessimism about anything good coming of anything.

My sister asked her brilliant ten year-old son, shortly after our father’s quick death from undiagnosed liver cancer, if he’d noticed grandpa seeming particularly unhappy lately.  “How would I know?” said the boy, and my sister nodded at how profound the young poet-to-be was.  Irv was not a happy camper in those golden years.  How could he have been?

It gratified me greatly when, once during this ongoing argument, my mother chimed in that she had seen great changes in me.  She had seen me increasingly master my temper over the years.  I’ve made difficult, conscious strides in becoming a milder person.

And yet, my father’s position has a lot of truth to it too.  Things that would not get a rise out of most people make my blood instantly boil.  How do I know they don’t make other people’s blood boil?  I don’t.  I just know they seem like small things, things that should not produce such anger, but they can set me off instantly.  I react better than I did, most of the time, but am still subject to these lightning strikes of temper.  I wax Tourretic when the computer has a little fun with me, for example.  Not everybody has this reaction to a device being a little playful, or corporate voice menus that insist they are serving you better than a human could, or obtuse low-level bureaucrats saying “I know you are, sir, but what am I?”.

“I rest my case,” says the grinning skeleton of my father from his underground bed not far from the haunted little town where he was traumatized as a boy.

It is not so simple, dad.   Few things are.  We will get back to this.  The Book of Irv will not inevitably wind up on the pile of promising ideas I’ve started to work on and later abandoned.  Unless, of course, it will.

The humiliation of being on Relief

Irv was five years old when the stock market crashed in the fall of 1929.  His family had no stock, but, being already poor, they too lost everything.   Their difficult life suddenly got even harder.  

When my father started school at the beginning of the Great Depression he was the biggest kid in kindergarten.  His only trouble was that he didn’t know any English, having heard only Yiddish spoken in the home.  

The school called his mother in to find out why a boy born in New York City did not speak English.  Chava, his mother, summoned her best English and said to the principal in her heavily accented English:  He’ll learn.   This was rendered “heel loyn” in the comical version of the story I heard from my father’s first cousin Eli, who probably provided her with the rejoinder.

His mother was right, though, he picked up English quickly.  In a short time he was well-spoken in English, but the early going must have been exceedingly tough.

The mockery of the other five year olds before he could speak made a deep impression on young Irv.  He went to his death believing he’d been the dumbest Jewish kid in Peekskill.  The statement shocked me; nobody who’d conversed with my well-spoken father could picture him as dumb.  I asked how he could say he’d been the dumbest Jewish kid in Peekskill.  His answer was emphatic: “by far!”.

He invariably described his early life as one of “grinding poverty”. His family’s extreme poverty was confirmed by others in the family.   It was a terrible, gnawing poverty, as most poverty is, and worse than most of the poor neighbors’ poverty, since his mother apparently insisted on giving much of what little they had to the synagogue as charity.

When I was a teenager I got my first pair of eye glasses.  I chose frames something like John Lennon’s, thinking the wire frames looked cool.  When I put them on my father smiled a sad smile.  

“Man, those were the glasses they gave you when you were on Relief,” my father said.  “They were a badge of humiliation, those wire frames.  If you wore those glasses everybody knew how poor you were, that your father couldn’t make a living, that you were on Relief.  I wore those for years, and it was humiliating to me.  Now they’re cool.  How times change, eh?” 

Relief was the forerunner of Welfare, FDR’s innovation to provide a livelihood for people who had no work during the Great Depression.  My father started life identifying with those who had nothing.  He had little choice, growing up in very dire circumstances.  

Working two jobs most of his life was his solution, he worked night and day.  Our mother worked too, once we were old enough to fend for ourselves after school.  He gave his children the decent start in life he’d never had.  The thanks he got was having to deal with two ungrateful middle class pricks at steak dinners he paid for every night.

There is much more to the story than that, of course, but I am laying out the bones here, just the bones of the story at the moment. 

 

Seenas Cheenam

“Seenas Cheenam!”, (Yiddish for senseless hatred) is the only phrase of my grandmother’s I ever heard quoted enough to remember.  Irv’s mother uttered this, in exasperation, to her sons, as the prelude to a display of rage.  She said it whenever her sons fought or quarreled.

“This is not what you should be writing today,” says the skeleton of my father, emphatically.  Today, on his hill in Cortlandt, NY, his grave is covered with two feet of snow.  He’s right, I need to get back out there and continue my digging, see if I can tunnel a path out to the feral kittens and give them a feed.  They are hunkered down somewhere under all this snow.

But I did want to make a note of this key phrase that explains so much about the living contradiction that was my father.  The once-living contradiction, I suppose, if you want to be technical.  Contradictions endure, I’ve noticed, especially in the case of a parent.   A parent is also a riddle.  Take my father’s mother Chava, for example.  

Chava’s younger son, my Uncle Paul, was a small man and by all accounts a sickly child, much doted on.   Chava’s first child, a daughter, died, either still-born or shortly after birth.  Her next child was a gigantic baby she named Israel Irving, after a terrible struggle birthing him with her tiny body.  She always called him Sonny.  Talk about seenas cheenam, I dug up some insight into that double edged, twice-cooked phrase.

I never met my grandmother Chava, she died shortly after my parents’ wedding.  There is a black and white photo of her at the wedding, old at sixty-two, wearing sun glasses to cover the eye that had been removed not long before.   My mother met her a few times during the courtship and had only a small handful of stories about her.  

The first time my father took her up to Peekskill to meet his mother my mother made the mistake of wearing red shoes.   My father’s mother took Sonny aside and told him sternly that red shoes are for shiksas (non-Jewish women).  She apparently had the same opinion about brown shoes– no Jew should wear anything but a black shoe, according to her strict view of matters.  I learned this unusual fact the first time I bought a pair of brown wingtips.

“She was a great cook,” my mother told us at dinner one night, “and I’d ask her for recipes.  She’d show me how to cook something, ‘you throw in a little handful of this, and a handful of this…’ but she had these tiny hands.  The recipes never worked for me.”  My mother held up her good sized hands.

I’ve been told Chava was barely five feet tall, red-haired, beautiful, religious and with a bad temper.  As invisible as my father’s father was to me, his mother I could easily picture, though I heard as little about her as I did about him.  What I heard made a huge impression on me, she loomed scarily in my imagination.  The most important thing I learned about her I got from my father’s first cousin, Eli, who was her beloved nephew.  I was close to forty when Eli revealed this to me.

There are a lot of details to be filled in between that last sentence and this one, but I have to get out there and try to dig my way to those freezing kittens.  They will be wanting a feed today, of all days, to help them stay warm.  

Toward the end of his life Eli gave me this gift insight, after describing his great love for Tante Chava, and how they fell in love at first sight when his father and he picked her up at the ship that brought her from what is now an undesignated spot on the outskirts of Pinsk in present-day Belarus.  The American-born Eli was a handsome boy and he described his aunt as a goregeous red-headed girl, bursting with health and joy as she came toward them.

It was Eli, perhaps a decade later, who came down to the Lower East Side in his father’s truck to transport the unfortunate little family up to Peekskill where his father could watch out for his little sister and her luckless little brood.   He told the story to me out of love, it was story he was not happy to tell, but he knew it would explain things that were otherwise incomprehensible.

“Your grandmother had a bad temper.  She had a Glieberman temper,” he paused to let me recall the many shows of red-faced rage I had seen from him and others on his side of the family over the years, “so you know what I’m talking about.  A real temper.  She used to sit at the head of the table in the kitchen and there was a drawer next to her.  She kept the cord to her steam iron in that drawer.  You remember those old, heavy cloth wrapped electrical cords?”  

I did, from when I was a boy.  They were covered with frayed burlap, a rough, sturdy cloth covering from the days before plastic was supple and insulating enough to be used for this purpose.

He then described to me how she would fly into a rage, reach into the drawer, pull out the heavy cord and whip my young father across the face with it.  

“How old was he?” I asked.  

“From the time he could stand, he was maybe a year old,” he said, with infinite sorrow and tenderness.

 

 

 

For the Love of Animals

Although Irv ate steak almost every night for dinner he was a lifelong lover and defender of animals of all kinds.  We always had a dog in the house, and he taught my sister and me one of the most merciful provisions of Jewish law:  always feed the animals before you yourself eat.  He, above any of the rest of us, took care of the dogs, walking them, feeding them, giving the most pitiful of them daily injections of insulin for her diabetes in the last years of her life.  There is a great photo of him lying on his back on the sofa, exhausted after work, his glasses on top of his head, with Winnie, the Westie, on his torso, cradled in one of his sleeping arms.

He could not encounter a small dog any place we visited without picking it up, under the armpits, and giving it a few gentle swings. The little dog’s front paws would always be held stiffly in front, an incomprehensible expression on the dog’s face.   No dog ever nipped or protested this treatment, his good will evidently came through to them.  He used this same technique on selected young children, sometimes with more mixed results.  

Although he long professed a disdain for cats, and let us stipulate here that they are largely stand-offish creatures, he recognized my cat, Oinsketta, as an individual and grudgingly came to regard cats as OK.  Oinsketta, for the record, was one of the most dog-like cats I’ve ever known.   A great individual.

Human love of sympathetic animals, the first was the dog, goes back 14,000 years, we learn (cats only 12,000 years).  The first domesticated dogs and humans made a mutually beneficial pact back in very primitive times.  That bond has never been broken.  My sister and I get this love of dogs directly from our father.  And from our mother, who also had a great love for dogs, for most animals, even if my father was the main caregiver.

Although he ate steak almost every night during his working life, a sign of affluence that meant a lot to him in those days before the harmfulness of eating a lot of red meat was known, he cut way back later.  He also joined PETA.   This tenderness toward animals will assume a more poignant tone as you get to know Irv better.

 

 

Black History Month

For a good part of my childhood, before society thought to set aside the shortest month of the year as Black History Month, every month in our home was Black History Month.   Our father was what wittier racists might have referred to as a Race Man [1].  He loved soul music, Sam Cooke in particular.   He bought every one of Mr. Soul’s records at Sam Goody’s in downtown Brooklyn as soon as it came out.  He’d listened to and loved Bill Kenney, Sam’s idol, when Sam and he were boys.  

He actively worked for the cause of integration.  He had several black friends who came by the house from time to time.  This was unheard of in the 1960s, even in New York City.  His friend Olvin, a jovial man who looked like a black Hoss Cartright on Bonzana, stepping out of the house and seeing the strained expression on the neighbors’s face, extended his hand to my father and said “it’s a beautiful house, Mr. W., and my family will love it.  I’ll take it.”

“The color drained out of Sonny’s face, I thought he was going to keel over.  You should have seen it,” my father reported with delight.

It was a rare thing in those days for a white family to spend the day in nearby St. Albans, at the home of a black family, as we did one Sunday afternoon in the early spring, the year “Cloud Nine” came out.  I remember Donald, Rani’s little brother, and I kept spinning that 45 over and over, and how the girls danced.   The Eversleys lived in a fine, upper middle class home, a mansion really, but nonetheless.   It no doubt raised a few eyebrows when we integrated Pastrami King with the Burnetts after graduation from sixth grade.

I learned in pretty good detail the bones of the struggle for Civil Rights well before I was ten.  I knew about slavery, about de jure and de facto segregation, about lynching and the freedom rides.   I know this because when I heard the news of the murder of Malcolm X on the radio I knew immediately what a tragic catastrophe it was.  

I was alone in my parents’ room when I heard the news of the killing.  I recall how hard it hit me.  My father had obviously made me appreciate Malcolm and what he stood for prior to February 21, 1965.

The identification with the oppressed was always very strong in the house.   It’s clear to me now this was partly a psychic accommodation to having the roots of our family tree plucked out of the earth, the histories of our forebears extirpated, disappeared.  

Tonight on the radio I heard the descendant of slaves describe the pain of being unable to trace her family back before slavery.  I truly heard it.  I imagine my father did too, whether he could acknowledge it or not.  

 

1:   My mother had chafed at being referred to, with less wit, as a “Nigger Lover” when she supported integration of the elementary school my sister and I attended.

The Human Relations Unit

In the newly formed Human Relations Unit, Office of Intergroup Relations, as Coordinator of Student Programs, Irv met with the brightest, most troubled kids in the city.  In those days gangs of Italians and Blacks would square off in the newly integrated cafeterias of the high schools.   Puerto Rican gangs would fight for their piece of turf.  My father would go to the schools, find the leaders, and take them on weekend retreats for sensitivity training.

He related easily to these kids born into dead-end situations, fighting for self-respect.  I suspect the kids related to him, his identification with them was genuine and most kids react well to this.   He wasn’t there to bust them or make them fall in line.  His mission was to get them to talk to each other, become friends.  They did talk, role play, work as teams, imitate each other, laugh together, eat together.  Many, indeed, became friends when they got to know each other.  The most charismatic kids in the high school would make peace, so would everyone else. It was exhilarating work for a short time.

There are more stories about this Mod Squad my father headed for a couple of years, but the short version was reported by my exhausted father a few years later.  

“The program worked great with the kids we reached, the ones we worked with.  They actually got along after those weekends we ran.  The problem was when they graduated and their little brothers and sisters began killing each other.”  


I remember visiting him in the hospital around that time, but that is another story for another day.

 

Irv checks in on Martin Luther King Day

I am touched that you’re earnestly digging into the truths of my life, the mysteries I didn’t begin to untangle until Death was already sitting on my chest those last days.  I really am.  You seem to be proceeding without rancor, which is the most touching part of this whole exercise.  I deserve a little rancor, more than a little, to be honest, that much is beyond dispute.  I’m grateful for the dispassion, is all I’m saying.  

Of course, I have a few questions on this day set aside for platitudes about the great progress in Civil Rights, and, even though I am an eternally grinning skeleton with no further stake in the world of the living and nothing but time on my hands now, I need to ask them.  

Do you really suppose writing these things is the best use of your time?  I ask this because you are going to be a senior citizen soon and time does not go on forever.   Do you really imagine anyone gives a rat’s cuisse about the abandoned dreams of a dead guy from a mostly murdered family?  

Is there some redeeming message here for the reader in this Book of Irv or is this just more attempted self-therapy for you?  To put it more bluntly, is there a compelling reason you’re working for free on yet another project you seem to believe in?  

I don’t ask this just to be arch, it’s a serious question.  You’re a talented and sensitive person, you’ve always been that way.  But you’ve lived in the world long enough to realize that nobody but your grandmother, your proud parents and one or two friends really give a shit about that.  You’re a good listener sometimes, that’s wonderful, I applaud you for it. But, really,  beyond making the person you’re listening to feel listened to, what is the point?

Since we’re celebrating the life of the slain Civil Rights leader today, let’s take a quick look at the world before and after.  A very quick look, and then you’d better get back to trying to make order of this chaos in here, a much better use of your time at the moment than channeling even my profound musings.

For whatever reason, I didn’t find time or need to mention to you and your sister that, in addition to my work at the Human Relations Unit at the Board of Ed, which you know all about, I was a speaker on behalf of school integration after Brown v. Board of Education.  

You know all about that case, decided two years before you were born, old man, and how it supposedly struck down the pernicious fiction of “separate but equal” in education.  You taught in some of those Harlem shit holes almost fifty years after the Supreme Court ruled that schools must be desegragated with “all deliberate speed.”   Remember that one white kid who was there for a couple of weeks in 1991?  How Miss June said “look, Whitey, we integrated now!”?  

Anyway, I was part of a speakers’ board who was sent to speak to parents and teachers about school integration.   This was in New York City, in the late nineteen fifties.  The first time I spoke the audience received me like I was a Jew preaching Communism and miscegenation in Alabama.   They assaulted me verbally and started to charge the stage, they were already throwing shit at me. On my way out the back I took a rancid tuna fish sandwich to the face.  I had to throw away that tie and sports jacket.   We barely got out of there in one piece.  Your mother could not stop crying for days afterwards.  

After that they sent two cops with me, they stood on either side of the little podium where I told these frightened racists that we were entering a new era of social justice.   You were a baby at the time.  It’s one of the things I’m sorry we never got to talk about.  I know your sister was surprised when you mentioned it to her the other day.  I may be dead, but I still hear things.

Anyway, fast forward almost sixty years and we have Bernie Sanders about to speak at a rally someplace, Chicago maybe.  He’s disrupted by two earnest but very shrill idiots.  They burst on to the stage demanding the right to be heard so they can preach to the converted.  “Black lives matter!”, they begin to scream.  They are hysterical about it.  And they are right to be hysterical.  

Almost fifty years after the immortal Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr. is slaughtered, the same people who are denying that enormous changes in earth’s climate are taking place are snarling that blacks should shut up about being killed by police in disproportionate numbers.   What about all the blacks killed by blacks, they ask.   That’s their answer.  How can you complain about cops shooting blacks when blacks shoot blacks?  This is the level of discourse in our great democracy.  

You studied law, you know more about the devilishness of the details than most people.  You can set it out plainly, I’m sure.  But I ask you again: what is the fucking point?  Malcolm X was right when he told Alex Haley about progress in race relations.  You remember the image: pulling a deep thrust knife an inch out of somebody’s back and calling it progress is far from actually removing the knife and operating to repair the wound.  

God knows I don’t mean to stomp on the burst balloons of your idealism, far from it.  The world needs people of faith, belief, a strong vision of justice, of healing the world.  I don’t blame you and your sister for taking that lesson from what I taught you.  It was the best of what I taught you, the seek justice for the powerless part.  I wouldn’t wish it on you, though.  

Anyway, you have to get back to your cleaning and I’m just about out of strength at the moment.  Talking from beyond the grave is not as easy as you may think.  Speak while you can, that’s my advice.  And thanks for thinking of me.