Partisan, zealot, citizen

Many of us, living in these highly polarized, partisan times, have taken to calling everything partisan lately.  We are increasingly told that our perceptions of reality itself are entirely dependent on which tribe we belong to, this is the new mantra which equates truth with partisanship.  There are partisans, zealots and the rest of us, ordinary citizens, living our ordinary lives, hoping for the best.

What is a partisan?  [1]   Republicans marching in lock step to support a nominee for the Supreme Court even if an artificially rushed, heavily redacted sham hearing and reluctant, extremely limited last minute FBI probe (the report of which is being provided to Senate Judiciary Committee members on a top secret basis) are required to cover up the many unseemly things about the nominee, many things that many Republicans no doubt, on a personal level, find as repugnant as the majority of regular American citizens do.   Partisans are loyal, and when they vote, they vote in a block.

Republican partisans march in pretty strict lockstep, taking orders and talking points from leaders, talking points they will not deviate from.   Democrats unify to oppose the Republican march, although rarely with the same unanimity of voice that characterizes the highly disciplined Republicans.   When Republicans are in power nowadays they revile the out-voted Democrats as ‘obstructionist’ losers.    

Of course, it is the other way around when the Democratic party is in power, when Republicans shut down the government (extremist Newt Gingrich was the first to do this, to try to hamstring Clinton, more recently it was the Tea Party fighting Obama) and vow to defeat every idea of the sitting, illegitimate Democratic president.   When Democrats proposed policy, like a conservative health care plan, Republicans united in opposition at every step,  trying to repeal it dozens of times once it was law.  There is no question of the two parties working together to fix the many things in Obamacare that need to be fixed.   There is little question of all (or even any of) six female Republican senators voting against Kavanaugh after the credible testimony that he attempted rape back in high school while stumbling drunk.  They will quickly lose their jobs if they vote against their party’s pick, at least the four who represent states of solidly Republican old Dixie.

Partisans are closed minded, see only  black or white, two sides, right or wrong, good or bad, fair or unfair, just or unjust.  Partisans don’t see nuance, can’t hear arguments that are inconvenient, can’t smell the mess they make.  Partisans will not discuss the many things that need to be fixed, they won’t compromise to address even the most pressing problems, they stick to their guns, their talking points, no matter what.   As long as they win, they’re good.  Winning/not losing is the only thing that drives a partisan.  Discussing an issue based on facts, and policies or candidates based on the actual merits?  So twentieth century, man!

A partisan is a fighter willing to go to extremes to advance his zero sum cause.   In the current American government, many partisans also fight to keep from being killed by their own more powerful partisans for the crime of insufficient partisanship.   Partisans are often willing to do things that violate norms, rules, laws, as long as their risk advances their cause.   A true partisan will never compromise.   We have many of these motherfuckers in government today, most of them on the right, sad to say.   They have been training them for decades, with glittering rewards for loyalty.   A supremely loyal partisan is poised to be confirmed for a seat on the Supreme Court by other partisans, on a straight 51-49 vote.

Zealots [2] are uber-partisans willing to die (at least metaphorically)  before they will surrender.  They will do whatever it takes, no matter the cost.  They will strive to win no matter how undignified, how ugly the battle might make them look.   “Extremism in the defense of freedom is no vice” is an expression of zealotry that cost Barry Goldwater a lot of votes in 1964.  It made him sound like an extremist.  The trick for zealots is, no matter how extreme your beliefs might be, to never, ever appear extreme.  The Kochtopus has learned this over the years, present your ideas in an attractive way, even if it means lying about your actual ideas.   Always appear reasonable and do not publicly reveal details of your plans that will make people angry.   Call your favorite far-right think thanks things like “The Institute for Humane Studies” (Charles Koch reportedly loved this particular institute).  Couch everything in terms of unrestricted liberty, even, and especially, when proposing a form of serfdom for 90% of citizens.

Everybody else in a nation where partisans fight for control of the government is a citizen, or an immigrant.    Citizens are concerned with their neighborhood, with public services, with the habitability of the world around them.   As a general rule, citizens want fairness and decent treatment.   You would think senators and representatives, the president, the Cabinet, the justices of the Supreme Court, are also citizens, they must be, under the law.  In a narrow sense they are citizens.   In a larger sense, they are an elite that is not accountable to the needs and desires of the less powerful citizens.    

Democracy, which is supposed to be an expression of the will of its citizens, majority rule that respects and protects minority views, becomes a casualty of unprincipled partisanship.   Particularly when unlimited money to support extreme partisan politicians is thrown on to one side of the scale to decide elections, manipulate citizens.   For the first time in American history, we see beautifully produced ads extolling a Supreme Court nominee, to counter the stink of his sworn testimony, the credible charges against him.  

Of course, limiting the numbers of citizens opposed to your party who can vote is also very important — disenfranchisement of the poor has been on the upswing in recent elections.  Voter suppression has been an important goal of the Kochtopus.  A small turn out favors the right wing status quo.  Any kind of change takes millions and millions of votes to initiate.

Brett Kavanaugh is a partisan, even a zealot, who will do whatever is necessary, including appearing to be a smug, entitled jerk and publicly crying in frustration, to advance his party’s beliefs.   He started his political life, after being a law school (and lifetime) member of the ultra-conservative Federalist Society, as a Republican operative, pressing for an aggressive investigation of Bill Clinton’s sex life to find grounds to impeach him, rushing with other young Republican lawyers to stop the recount in Florida, providing legal advice on judicial appointments, torture and other classified matters to Bush and Cheney.  

He railed, immediately after he was nominated for the top court,  against a left wing claim that Bush staffed his White House with former Kenneth Starr assistants, noting that he was the only one.  Let’s take him at his word.   For our present purposes we need only look at him and the current FBI director, Christopher Wray, a partisan presidential loyalist who was also an assistant of Kenneth Starr during the long, ranging investigation of Bill Clinton that led to his impeachment for perjury about oral sex.   The FBI director had the last word, along with his boss, the president who appointed him, on the scope of the belated, rushed probe into fellow partisan Kavanaugh.   Therefore neither Kavanaugh nor his accuser Blasey Ford were contacted for follow up interviews.  Fair is fair.

Those who had any doubt that Kavanaugh is a partisan, should no longer have any after the speech he gave defending his ruined good name.  In that speech, which he pointed out he wrote himself, he ranted intemperately about a vast Left Wing Conspiracy, motivated in part by revenge for Hillary Clinton’s loss, that had spent untold millions to produce fake charges against him, at the eleventh hour of an urgently rushed confirmation process, for purely political reasons.  

Nobody who is not a partisan would have made that speech, those over the top assertions of persecution by political enemies.   It would never have occurred to most nominees to claim that the person complaining credibly against him was strictly a political plant, part of a “calculated political hit”.  He called desperate Democratic opposition to his immediate confirmation a “circus” and a “disgrace”.  Clarence Thomas used identical words as support for him plummeted from 90 votes to 52 in the days after Anita Hill’s handlers orchestrated his ‘high tech lynching for an uppity black’.    Sadly for Kavanaugh, he couldn’t use that last bit of wonderfully moving innocent victim rhetoric.

Confronted with Blasey Ford’s strong testimony, another nominee might have withdrawn their name, as Reagan-appointee Douglas Ginsberg did when confronted with proof that he smoked marijuana on occasion.  He might have tried to address the woman’s credible allegations against him, though that would have been fairly hard to do, given the apparent sincerity of the witness and her damningly credible allegations.   He might have called for a full FBI investigation, having nothing whatsoever to hide, to clear his good name.  Seems the best move for an innocent man, let them interview everyone who was supposedly there, including himself and his accuser, confirm his innocence once and for all time.  Instead he screeched like a wounded animal about a despicable partisan lynch mob coming to get him for no reason except ugly political calculation and he fought, smug-faced, against any additional delay for an investigation of any of the new charges against him.   It pleases and energizes Trump’s base to hear someone screaming indignantly, angrily blaming and vilifying others, as long as he’s a powerful white man from their tribe.

Republicans were soiling themselves over Kavanaugh’s chances for confirmation when they saw how compelling Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony was.   Unlike most liars, she did not claim to know anything she didn’t remember clearly.   She was meek, and clearly frightened of the spotlight.  Her account was credible, quite specific in what she was able to recall.  She was believable and made a very sympathetic witness.   Importantly, she had nothing to gain by subjecting herself and her family to the angry reaction they faced, except that it was important to bring these ugly facts to light, for everyone’s sake.  Even the Fox news partisans were saying as much by the time she was finished testifying.   The president reportedly complained that nobody had warned him what a good witness she was.

Kavanaugh’s nomination— and this is a judge who has written that he doesn’t like the Special Counsel Statute (the one that authorizes the Mueller probe), that a president, on his own, should be able to declare laws unconstitutional, and that a sitting president should not be the subject of a criminal or civil  investigation– was in real trouble when Blasey Ford was done testifying.   She may not have given enough concrete detail to support a criminal indictment of Kavanaugh, as Rachel Mitchell concluded in her report to the Judiciary Committee Republicans she acted as mouthpiece for,  but Christine Blasey Ford gave more than enough specific detail, under oath,  to trigger a full FBI investigation.

After a long lunch break, (Grassley had called for a half hour break, which I thought at the time niggardly, they were out three times as long) Kavanaugh would have his turn to tell the truth.   Kavanaugh apparently spent the break steeling himself, and putting the finishing flourishes on the passionate, angry opening statement he wrote himself, as he stated.   At one point during the hearing, Rachel Mitchell, the female prosecutor brought on by the 11 man Republican majority on the Judiciary Committee to avoid the optics of the Anita Hill hearing, closed in on a date on Kavanaugh’s calendar, July 1, 1982, an entry with the names of others Blasey Ford had named as being present in the house, and began asking about it.   Kavanaugh seemed to begin coming unhinged as he carefully answered questions about his former drinking buddies, named in the box for that day.   When Senator Amy Klobuchar next asked him about his drinking, he became testy, surly, and finally outright rude.  He lost control of himself when he defiantly asked her if she was a black out drunk.  He then called for, and was given, a five minute break, to compose himself.

After crying it out and pulling himself together, Kavanaugh apologized to Ms. Klobuchar for his outburst and the hearing proceeded.  The outraged men of the Judiciary Committee left their mouthpiece,  Rachel Mitchell, sitting silently at her tiny desk as they hurled invective at the unprincipled partisans on the Democratic side, the ones who were making the hearings into a circus, a forum for disgraceful political grandstanding, seizing a chance to crucify a good, super-qualified, impartial judicial nominee.  The Jesuits and the nonpartisan American Bar Association would soon weigh in on the side of not confirming Kavanaugh, but that’s neither here nor there.  They have no power to do anything, so who cares?

That five minute break, and a quick on-the-fly change in Republican tactics, saved that unethical partisan motherfucker’s lifetime dream from going down in flames. His nomination, burnt toast as he called for the time out, was golden again once he came back and the other partisan bullies stuck up for him, privileged white men angrily, indignantly attacking, like the partisan hacks they are.   There is only one thing for partisans, winning.

Which is why, when he was a young, extremely conservative political operative, working for Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr, Kavanaugh strongly advised that under no circumstances should President Bill Clinton be permitted to take a break when they were grilling him under oath.   He knew that a guilty man will crack, no matter how smart a lawyer he is, if the pressure is not relieved.  Smart guy, Brett Kavanaugh, even if hypocritical, unethical, and fit only for partisan purposes.

David Brooks, moderate Republican smart guy, cannot admit that Kavanaugh behaved atrociously at the hearing because… partisans don’t admit shit.  It all depends, you dig, on what tribe you’re in.  Truth is tribal now.  My tribe is winning, suck it.

And God bless these United Shayyyssssh.

 

 

[1]   par·ti·san (n):  1.  a strong supporter of a party, cause, or person.                      synonyms:  supporter, follower, adherent, devotee, champion                                        2.   a member of an armed group formed to fight secretly against an occupying force, in particular one operating in enemy-occupied Yugoslavia, Italy, and parts of eastern Europe in World War II.         synonyms: guerrilla, freedom fighter” underground fighter, irregular (soldier)

partisan (adj):  prejudiced in favor of a particular cause
synonyms;  biased, prejudiced, one-sided, discriminatory, colored. partial, interested, sectarian, factional

[2]    zealot (n):  a person who is fanatical and uncompromising in pursuit of their religious, political, or other ideals.     synonyms: fanatic, enthusiast, extremist, radical, young Turk, diehard, true believer, activist, militant.

 

Paid for by…

These wild baboons are playing by reality TV rules.   Alpha males RULE!Screen shot 2018-10-03 at 11.13.01 PM.png

The survey’s not the point, it’s the message that this guy is tough.  The base loves every reminder they can get of how fucking tough their guy is.   Look at him.  Inspires confidence, that confident pose.   Stay on message, the media is lying, so is the evidence of your own eyes and ears watching the battling testimony.   A woman who appears sincere is no more believable than a man your party supports raging in indignant innocence.

The problem is not a cover-up and a mad rush to confirm a candidate of demonstrated bad character, and possibly worse.  The problem is tribalism, the other tribe is insane!

The real problem is the fake news, that liberal conspiracy to undermine the Leader and thwart his will. Like this fake news from the fake New York Failing Fake Times:

As the 1980s ended, Donald Trump’s big bets began to go bust. Trump Shuttle was failing to make loan payments within 15 months. The Plaza, drowning in debt, was bankrupt in four years. His Atlantic City casinos, also drowning in debt, tumbled one by one into bankruptcy.

What didn’t fail was the Trump safety net. Just as Donald Trump’s finances were crumbling, family partnerships and companies dramatically increased distributions to him and his siblings. Between 1989 and 1992, tax records show, four entities created by Fred Trump to support his children paid Donald Trump today’s equivalent of $8.3 million.

source

You decide– are you a real man (that includes you too, ladies) or are you a pencil necked freedom-hating wimp who reads old fashioned newspapers and thinks it’s real news? Take the survey!

 

Kavanaugh’s Candor Under Oath

formerly FN [1]

Kavanaugh has been evasive, belligerent and defiant under questioning during the confirmation process.   It also strongly appears he’s been untruthful under oath, deliberately misleading, or both.  His repeated assertions about drinking only beer, beer and nothing but beer included a frank, but tacit admission that he had been drinking beer illegally before he was allowed to do so legally, during his senior year of high school, when he was eighteen.   The use of the word “beer” dozens of times suggests, at least to this beer drinker, an effort to deny drinking anything stronger than beer, just beer and nothing but beer.  The beer drinker doth say “beer” too much, methinks.  Also, it turns out, the legal drinking age in Maryland, in 1983, when Kavanaugh was an 18 year old beer drinker, was actually 21.

Then there is reframing and refuting a question not asked, a classic lawyerly dodge, as when he claims he never blacked out from beer, which he said was the accusation here, but only fell asleep from it.   There was no accusation that Kavanaugh was a black out drunk, only that he had been stumblingly drunk when he and his equally drunk buddy pushed a fifteen year-old girl into an upstairs bedroom, across from the bathroom, and locked the door. 

An example of a more direct Kavanaugh untruth is his stating, emphatically, and more than once, that witnesses had refuted Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony about his attempted rape of her.  He repeated the word “refuted”, with great emphasis, to hammer home his point that only the alleged victim seems to recall that long ago day when he held her down, his friend turned up the music, he covered her mouth when she tried to call for help, etc.   The other four or five people in the house… well, they say it never happened, according to Kavanaugh.  Not only don’t they recall that particular unremarkable early evening — every witness, according to Kavanaugh, REFUTED the vengeful, well-financed partisan lie against him.  

What the witnesses said was that they have no recollection of an ordinary long ago summer late afternoon or evening gathering of six teenagers that was of no significance to anyone but the fifteen year-old who was traumatized that day.  There is a slight difference between “refute” and “don’t recall”, as even a neophyte judge should be able to easily judge.   Repeated assertions of “refute” in place of  “don’t recall” might well be grounds for a perjury charge, particularly if, as here, the repetition is integral to one’s defense.   The only thing not in dispute is that the misleading statement, whether deliberate or in the heat of the moment under great emotional stress, was made under oath.  

When Brett Kavanuagh was vetting material for the Bush/Cheney White House for hearings about judicial appointees, (prior to his own appointment to the federal bench, obviously) he disclosed the contents of hacked (illegally obtained) emails with classified background memos prepared by Democratic members of the Judiciary Committee.   He denied this charge, denies ever seeing the hacked emails, let alone unethically forwarding them to parties who should not have seen them, but the author of some of the memos improperly obtained and passed on to the nominees (think debate questions obtained before the debate), former Judiciary Committee staffer Lisa Graves,  saw whole paragraphs of her 4,000 word report cut and pasted into emails that Kavanaugh sent and received.   This could easily be resolved by a subpoena for the emails, although the emails Lisa Graves cites are already part of the small percentage of Kavanaugh-related documents the Senate Judiciary Committees has allowed to become part of the record.

There is another answer by Kavanaugh that could be proved or disproved as perjury by a subpoena for related emails.   The truth or falsity of the statement is a question of fact that could easily be determined by seeing some of the disputed emails.   Kavanaugh denied knowledge of the conduct and sexually off-color email listserve of his disgraced friend and former mentor, Alex Kozinsky, the federal judge who resigned recently amid multiple allegations of sexual harassment over a span of many years.  This denial appears to have been another lie, told to keep the shine on his choir boy image.  It’s hard to believe this longtime confidant of Judge Kozinsky’s could be unaware of the well-known reputation of his disgraced friend, a reputation for doing things every one of Kozinsky’s former clerks who has spoken on the issue has confirmed he did.

There is also evidence that team Kavanaugh contacted Yale classmates as soon as he heard that Debbie Ramirez’s claim that he’d drunkenly exposed himself to her when they were freshmen at Yale were going to be published in the New Yorker.  Potential witnesses were contacted by team Kavanaugh before the New Yorker article that broke the story was published.  At the hearing last Thursday Kavanaugh swore to Orin Hatch that the first he learned of the allegations from the New Yorker article, though there is an argument about whether this meant the publication date or when he got advance knowledge that Debbie Rodriguez’s charges were about to be published.  

If this were a criminal trial, these attempts to get witnesses to line up behind him and say things on his behalf so that he could be confirmed to a high appointment would be seen as a clear case of witness tampering.   Since it is not a criminal trial, nothing to see here, yo, except a naughty bit of standard corrupt practice that any powerful person routinely engages in.  The appearance of impropriety is only that, an appearance.  The answer to that is 51-49, suck it.

 

The president is fine

For purposes of the longtime right wing agenda– no taxes, no regulations (except against pregnant women and maybe pot smokers), a powerful military, a government that does not coerce anybody to do anything, making any false claims necessary to hide secret plans that disadvantage the vast majority of Americans – this president we have here is fine, better than fine.   He also, conveniently, undermines people’s faith in democracy, even common decency, with his shameless lying and his willingness to attack others and promote even the most indefensible policies.

The current president is the personification of government incompetence, corruption and overreach. A living argument for why you cannot trust your government.  Sure, it’s easy to criticize a man who hasn’t filled a record number of important government jobs in the first 20 months of his administration (like in the agency that oversees our stockpile of nukes), but on the other hand, he’s filled the federal bench with a record number of lifetime federal judges, vetted by the top conservative think tanks for their fealty to a core set of beliefs, he’s slashed taxes dramatically for America’s wealthiest and our corporations, he’s on the inhumane side of every humanitarian situation.   He has thousands of ‘migrant kids’ being moved to open air desert prison camps like the ones Joe Arpaio used to run.  He has expressed concern, in the wake of Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony, that many completely innocent men are being victimized and publicly destroyed by this #metoo movement.

He’s a divider, not a uniter, he honestly doesn’t understand democracy, the idea of it, he loves autocrats wherever he encounters them.  He is, his vulgarity aside, exactly what the Koch brothers and the rest of the best people, the best people, want.  That he knows very little about how our democracy actually works appears to be a plus for the smirking rich winners who are currently riding his donkey ass to their dreamed of land of unlimited liberty free from government tyranny.

He can be excused for insisting, as he did the other day, that the Senate majority, that inviolable 51-49 mandate they have in the Senate, is in charge of what the FBI investigates and what they don’t investigate about a Supreme Court nominee who could be, among other things, colorably charged with perjury [1].  It would probably be a first, a sitting Supreme Court justice hauled into a House investigation for perjury.  There is also the nominee’s reported belligerent drunkeness, strongly hinted at by his belligerent ‘rebuttal’ of Blasey Ford’s allegations, and more than one woman alleging sexual assault by the nominee.  There is, perhaps most importantly for purposes of a Supreme Court justice, the over the top partisan rage he displayed during his testimony to counter Blasey Ford’s detailed story of a stumbling drunk, privileged seventeen year-old trying to rape a fifteen year-old at a gathering of six high school kids when there were no adults in the house.   He appears, based on his childish temper tantrum before the Judiciary Committee, to have a supremely unjudicial temperament.  

I have been before many judges, only an insignificant fraction of whom appeared to lack the ability to rule fairly on what was in front of them.  An even tinier fraction appeared to be bellicose jerks venting about their personal problems, or acting based on anger at their imagined persecutors, in their courtrooms.  There is a Judicial Code of Conduct (naturally not enforceable against the Supreme Court justices) that requires a judge to act in a way that inspires confidence in the integrity of the courts.  So much for that, Brett.   Trump’s tribe might get excited by the belligerent defiance, but it’s not judicial temperament any more than the thin-skinned reflexively attacking Trump is an example of presidential temperament.

The president, with his limited understanding of anything but “winning” and “losing”, grasps only this– we’re winning 51-49.  If this was a game, and it is, we win.   The obstructionist Democrats are losers, everybody not included in that robust 51-49 mandate for whatever he wants, or has been convinced, to do — losers!    

Into the mix drops the lying New York Times recent piece about the source of Trump’s self-made fortune.  Donald was paid the equivalent of $200,000 current dollars a year starting when he was three years old. Nice work if you can get it!  He was a millionaire by age eight.   An inspiring American diaper to riches story! After dad’s first choice, Fred Jr., turned out to be unsuited to take over his father’s empire, Fred Christ Trump began grooming his second choice, Donald, in earnest.    The details of daddy Trump’s manipulative generosity are sickening, but unsurprising.   We know the president is a lying self-promoter, even his base acknowledges this– they just don’t care.   Still, some of the details of things he lied about, his entire self-made billionaire origin story, are truly sickening.   The luxurious first class safety net provided by his father explains the reckless fearlessness with which Donald has always conducted his many failed businesses and vanity projects.  It emerges that the president’s brother Robert is cut from the same cloth as Donald.    His defensive statement about having the decency to leave their dead, sainted parents to rest in peace, leaves a bit of a stench.   Of course, as David Brooks points out, the tendency to perceive that stench/breath of fresh air is purely tribal.  The president is loved by his tribe, and that is his only concern, to remain beloved of almost 40% of the angriest people in America.

But that New York Times hatchet job is just another distraction.   As far as getting Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court, all Trump needs to do is run out the clock to have the game end 51-49.  He’s set an artificial, arbitrary deadline of one week for the FBI to fully investigate multiple allegations against his nominee.   To stack the deck just a bit more toward his beleaguered, unfairly crucified nominee, he ran three days off the clock by saying publicly that the FBI would have “free rein”, while imposing severe restrictions on the definition of free rein.   Then he said that Mitch McConnell must decide the scope of the investigation, then apparently learning that the president alone dictates the scope of any FBI probe he orders, blandly opined that the FBI should talk to anyone they can find, including Kavanaugh.  As long as it’s all done before my inviolable Friday deadline when everybody votes 51-49 and we have this great man, with his spotless record, to rule on all the most important matters of constitutional law.   Because the constitution, you understand, is an inviolable and indisputable blueprint for our highest aspirations as a free democracy and it must be interpreted faithfully by the best people, the very best people.  Especially those who kiss my ass the most passionately, if you know what I’m saying.

 

 

[1]  Kavanaugh has been evasive, belligerent and defiant under questioning during the confirmation process.   It also strongly appears he’s been untruthful under oath, deliberately misleading, or both.  His repeated assertions about drinking only beer, beer and nothing but beer included a frank, but tacit admission that he had been drinking beer illegally before he was allowed to do so legally, during his senior year of high school, when he was eighteen.   The use of the word “beer” dozens of times suggests, at least to this beer drinker, an effort to deny drinking anything stronger than beer, just beer and nothing but beer.  The beer drinker doth say “beer” too much, methinks.   Also, it turns out, the legal drinking age in Maryland, in 1983, when Kavanaugh was an 18 year old beer drinker, was actually 21.

Then there is reframing and refuting a question not asked, a classic lawyerly dodge, as when he claims he never blacked out from beer, which he said was the accusation here, but only fell asleep from it.   There was no accusation that Kavanaugh was a black out drunk, only that he had been stumblingly drunk when he and his equally drunk buddy pushed a fifteen year-old girl into an upstairs bedroom, across from the bathroom, and locked the door. 

An example of a more direct Kavanaugh untruth is his stating, emphatically, and more than once, that witnesses had refuted Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony about his attempted rape of her.  He repeated the word “refuted”, with great emphasis, to hammer home his point that only the alleged victim seems to recall that long ago day when he held her down, his friend turned up the music, he covered her mouth when she tried to call for help, etc.   The other four or five people in the house… well, they say it never happened, according to Kavanaugh.  Not only don’t they recall that particular unremarkable early evening — every witness, according to Kavanaugh, REFUTED the vengeful, well-financed partisan lie against him.  

What the witnesses said was that they have no recollection of an ordinary long ago summer late afternoon or evening gathering of six teenagers that was of no significance to anyone but the fifteen year-old who was traumatized that day.  There is a slight difference between “refute” and “don’t recall”, as even a neophyte judge should be able to easily judge.   Repeated assertions of “refute” in place of  “don’t recall” might well be grounds for a perjury charge, particularly if, as here, the repetition is integral to one’s defense.   The only thing not in dispute is that the misleading statement, whether deliberate or in the heat of the moment under great emotional stress, was made under oath.    

When Brett Kavanuagh was vetting material for the Bush/Cheney White House for hearings about judicial appointees, (prior to his own appointment to the federal bench, obviously) he disclosed the contents of hacked, (illegally obtained) emails with classified background memos prepared by Democratic members of the Judiciary Committee.   He denied this charge, denies ever seeing the hacked emails, let alone unethically forwarding them to parties who should not have seen them, but the author of some of the memos improperly obtained and passed on to the nominees (think debate questions obtained before the debate), former Judiciary Committee staffer Lisa Graves,  saw whole paragraphs of her 4,000 word report cut and pasted into emails that Kavanaugh sent and received.   This could easily be resolved by a subpoena for the emails, although the emails Lisa Graves cites are already part of the small percentage of Kavanaugh-related documents the Senate Judiciary Committees has allowed to become part of the record.

There is another answer by Kavanaugh that could be proved or disproved as perjury by a subpoena for related emails.   The truth or falsity of the statement is a question of fact that could easily be determined by seeing some of the disputed emails.   Kavanaugh denied knowledge of the conduct and sexually off-color email listserve of his disgraced friend and former mentor, Alex Kozinsky, the federal judge who resigned recently amid multiple allegations of sexual harassment over a span of many years.  This denial appears to have been another lie, told to keep the shine on his choir boy image.    It’s hard to believe this longtime confidant of Judge Kozinsky’s could be unaware of the well-known reputation of his disgraced friend, a reputation for doing things every one of Kozinsky’s former clerks who has spoken on the issue has confirmed he did.  Common knowledge that Kavanaugh insisted he knew nothing about.  Why open that door, you know?

There is also evidence that team Kavanaugh contacted Yale classmates as soon as he heard that Debbie Ramirez’s claim that he’d drunkenly exposed himself to her when they were freshmen at Yale were going to be published in the New Yorker.  Potential witnesses were contacted by team Kavanaugh before the New Yorker article that broke the story was published.  At the hearing last Thursday Kavanaugh swore to Orin Hatch that the first he learned of the allegations from the New Yorker article, though there is an argument about whether this meant the publication date or when he got advance knowledge that Debbie Rodriguez’s charges were about to be published.  

If this were a criminal trial, these attempts to get witnesses to line up behind him and say things on his behalf so that he could be confirmed to a high appointment would be seen as a clear case of witness tampering.   Since it is not a criminal trial, nothing to see here, yo, except a naughty bit of standard corrupt practice that any powerful person routinely engages in.  The appearance of impropriety is only that, an appearance.  The answer to that is 51-49, suck it.

 

 

An unrestricted, quick search for the truth about the accusations against Kavanaugh

We can, of course, count on the character and integrity of President Trump in this and congratulate him for the “free rein” he’s generously given to the FBI to investigate multiple allegations against Brett Kavanaugh.   Our peerless leader has demonstrated these qualities endlessly, as that Great Wall of China on our southern border, the only thing that will save America, is being speedily built and paid for by Mexican rapists.   Faith in the president’s strong sense of justice is what caused Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley to bang the gavel as soon as they had the party line 11-10 vote for Kavanaugh in his committee.  “Two hour rule,” he said as he gaveled the session closed, using a never used antique procedural rule to cut off discussion of the “limited scope” of the “maximum one week FBI investigation” that Jeff Flake, weakly but with principle, had insisted on as the condition of his vote.

As it turned out, partisan Democrats and people of the left had nothing to worry about.   The president assured everybody by tweet that he’d instructed the FBI to do a full and unrestricted investigation.   He placed only a few minimal conditions:  nobody can talk to Kavanaugh, he did very well at the hearing, beautifully, really, and no reason to follow up on anything, very unfair and upsetting to put him through anything more; nobody can talk to Blasey Ford, she said everything she has to say and it was very damaging, she really said more than enough; no interview with Julie Swetnick, she’s clearly a bitter gang rape survivor trying to take it out on Kavanaugh who she has no idea if he was in the train or not because she was passed out while being gang-raped, allegedly, allegedly=-and you know how women love to play the victim card about “rape’, so, no, not her.   Just a few other minor guidelines:

 

Screen shot 2018-10-01 at 4.48.19 AM.png

 

Each of these minor conditions makes perfect sense, in Trumpworld.   Whether or not Kavanaugh was a mean drunk in high school is irrelevant, it has nothing to do with the accusation that he tried to rape her while drunk.    So, no, the FBI can’t ask any of his former classmates about how he behaved when he had had too many beers– and let us say once more for the record, he never drank anything stronger than beer.  The FBI, in conducting any investigation that is not a total witch hunt, must investigate only exactly what the White House decides is relevant.   After all, who better to decide how to investigate something fairly than the president who has been trying to just get this fine man’s confirmation done?    The FBI does not assess credibility, and if it does, it has no right to judge a man as wonderful and well-qualified as federal judge for life Brett Kavanaugh.   The White House is the only power impartial enough to make a fair assessment of what, if anything the FBI finds.   Don’t forget, the FBI and CIA behave like Nazis and are not very loyal to the president.

Six female Republican senators will vote yes or no to confirm Brett Kavanaugh based on the most heavily redacted record of any candidate for the Supreme Court.   The votes of four of those women are never mentioned, as though, because they come from Republican strongholds in the former Confederacy, they would NEVER vote against the party.   If they voted against the party line they’d be primaried out of office quicker than you could say “Jackie Roosevelt Robinson”, yes suh.   Such is the bawdy house of current American democracy.  The two female senators from states that do not always vote straight Republican are supposed to be the votes in play.   We don’t hear much from them yet, they’re probably waiting for the results of the White House’s scrupulously fair limited FBI investigation.

Reagan’s nominee Douglas Ginsberg smoked marijuana (Ronnie was bitterly surprised to learn this) and withdrew his name when it came out, rather than lie about it, pout, fight, hiss, bluster, threaten, make sarcastic remarks, yell, glare, conjure vast conspiracies against him and curse the millions spent to make him look like he smoked pot which he never DID, NEVER– YOU SMOKED POT!

Brett Kavanaugh, accused of something much less serious, of course, than smoking a joint, is made of sterner stuff.  He’s like Trump.   He’s a fighter who lashes out when cornered.  In fact, he’ll scratch your fucking eyes out before he’ll even think about backing down, he has amply demonstrated his fighting judicial spirit to the pussies who tried to make him look bad at the eleventh hour, after he already did OK enough that he would actually get confirmed.   That fighting spirit makes him, according to Trump, the ideal impartial-imsmartial deciding vote on the Supreme Court for, insha’Allah, many years to come.

 

                   Screen shot 2018-10-01 at 3.41.04 PM.png

 

Why do I bother listening to David Brooks?

Speaking of rigid, studiously reasonable sounding political hacks, Brooks, predictably, viewed the testimony of Christine Blasey Ford and the fierce rebuttal by Brett Kavanaugh as basically a wash, one’s opinion of who was the victim breaking down 100% along tribal lines.  

Along tribal lines, of course.  Nothing to see here, boys and girls.   Alan Dershowitz had the same observation, as did so many others in their tribe. There is no such thing as truth to a tribe who believes that outraged impudence is a wholly appropriate substitute for candidly answering questions at a hearing.  Good people on many sides, on many sides, no doubt, no doubt.  

The angry man is an outraged victim of a vast conspiracy, the woman, although credible and reasonable and refusing to speculate about things beyond the details of the traumatic experience she was relating — well, your opinion of who was more credible and who testified more compellingly will break down along tribal lines.

“Truth before justice” is David Brooks’ motto [1] — and there is truth on both sides, there appears to be, according to David Brooks.  None of us can know who is more truthful, and therefore who we believe must break down along tribal lines.  If you supported Clinton, you hate Kavanaugh.  If you hated Clinton, you love Kavanaugh.  There is no way, at present, that any of us can know which of the two was actually more truthful, or even who demonstrated better character.  Thus Spake David Brooks. 

Unless of course, you impartially apply Judge Martha Kavanaugh’s famous test:    ‘Use your common sense. What rings true? What rings false?’

If you apply this test, Brooks, and compare the ring of Blasey Ford’s meek but firm description of events and the ring of Kavanaugh’s raging contempt for the very accusation and still conclude it all depends on your tribal allegiance, I must conclude that your tribe, the assholes, is finally beyond redemption.  But, of course, that only confirms my membership in the enemy tribe, proving your point.  Don’t give me that smug smile, Brooks, go wash your ass instead, eh?

I would be fascinated to hear Judge Martha Kavanaugh’s unguarded opinion on the application of her now famous test to the testimony of her son and his accuser.

 

[1]  Though to understand exactly what that dramatic-sounding credo actually means you’d need a mind as deep as David Brooks’ finely tuned, elegant thinking machine.   

 

The Plan to Seize Total Political Control in America’s Third Century

 

While angry partisan hack Brett Kavanaugh snarls about the vast, vindictive, well-funded Left Wing conspiracy conducted on behalf of the Clintons, the people whose plan to put a permanent corporatist majority on the Supreme Court is likely about to come true are laughing into their cocktails.   They’re not laughing at Kavanaugh’s childish performance, that truly doesn’t matter.   They’re laughing in the giddy realization that their sixty year long game is finally bearing such wonderful fruits.  With the beautifully orchestrated 80,000 vote Electoral College victory of a supremely malleable vain, wealthy imbecile and the appointment of their picks for the federal courts that decide what’s constitutional and what’s not, these freedom loving old fucks can finally die in peace, leaving vast, untaxed fortunes to their liberty loving offspring.

 The Left Wing Conspiracy Kavanaugh fulminated against the other day during his tearful denials of sexual abuse alleged against him brought us exactly one president: Bill Clinton.   Clinton moved his Democratic party quite a bit to the right in order to win approval and a second term.   “Our first black president” is as often called the “greatest Republican president of the 20th Century”, and there is a strong argument to be made for that second proposition.   He signed an anti-crime bill that wildly accelerated America’s mass incarceration crisis (for the poor, the wealthy are doing well with privatized prison stock, thank you). He signed off on the repeal of Glass-Steagall, a law put into effect during the Depression to prevent the next massive, speculation-fueled economic disaster, a law that had worked well for 66 years. Within eight years of its repeal, the dismantling of the wall between risky financial investment and government insured consumer banking brought about a vast, predictable economic catastrophe (again, for the middle class and poor– for the already rich, it turned out to be a boon, go figure!). Clinton “reformed” welfare.   He told homosexuals that as long as they keep their mouths shut, they could stay in the military.  His health care plan died on the drawing board.   A real liberal firebrand, Mr. Clinton.  In addition, recall the army of vitriolic enemies who emerged to make names for themselves fighting Clinton’s tyranny and immorality– Rush Limbaugh, Newt Gingrich and a young Brett Kavanaugh among them.

On the far right, the once lunatic fringe has conducted a brilliant long game, learning from their mistakes, perfecting the uses of a public influence machine with many moving parts to normalize their extreme and unpopular views, eventually capturing the Republican party.   By lunatic fringe I mean the founders of the radical right John Birch Society.  Not surprisingly, the fire under these very rich boys was set by the 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown v. Bd. of Education, ruling that the former Confederacy’s “separate but equal” racial segregation of schools (it’s done nationwide, didn’t mean to malign the now solidly Republican southland) was in fact an unconstitutional denial of equal rights and equal protection under the law. The history of “massive resistance” to this belated attempt to enforce the constitutional amendments made to extend equal protection to former slaves and their descendants is a long and ugly one, and ongoing.

In 1958 this small group of very wealthy men, including Robert Welch, maker of Sugar Babies, and Fred Koch, father of the infamous Koch Brothers, organized as the Birchers, sought to fight back against what they felt was federal government overreach.   Their political descendants would make a move toward mainstream respectability by morphing into the Libertarian party, a group that embraces American liberty and opposes all “government coercion”.   The government, they argue, may not coerce integration, segregation or anything else.  The government is, and must always be, merely a guarantor of personal liberty, the only truly precious human value: the right to choose.    

The comical aspect of this assertion was lost on these serious, angry white men, threatened at the very core of their autonomy.  There was nothing funny about what was at stake.  A rich man’s right to choose what to do with his own goddamned money is the only value government should protect.   The rest of you motherfuckers are free to make any choices you like about your own money, and we will defend your right to do that, just don’t ask the government to do anything else for you fucking parasites.

Among these rich guys were some brilliant men, including autocratic Charles Koch, an engineer who used his skill, and some of the reported three hundred million inherited from his father, to vastly increase the profitability of his many family businesses, and his political influence.  They understood they were playing a long game, had to build a lot of infrastructure, institutions that could bring about the endgame they were seeking: permanent freedom, for everyone, from all government interference. It was, as they understood it, tyranny for the government to penalize the wealthy for the benefit of the poor and the useless.  Why should rich people be forced to pay for something they got no benefit from?   It was economically illogical, morally wrong.

The closest to the mainstream these forces ever came, until recent years, was Republican presidential candidate Barry Goldwater.   He espoused many of their core beliefs.  He lost badly in 1964, to a liberal who would betray the powerful men of the South by passing laws to protect the rights of blacks and poor whites, including the goddamned Voting Rights Act– a deadly threat to those wealthy men who had always ruled the South–  give low cost government-subsidized health care to old people, use the federal government’s newly expanded powers to wage a senseless and futile war on poverty.  

These rich Libertarians soldiered on.  In the mid-1970s they founded their first “think tank”, the Cato Institute.  Funded by Charles Koch, we can probably date their movement’s present day power to this move as much as to any other single choice made in the long course of their ascendance.  Koch realized they must create institutions that could train and graduate a cadre of dependable warriors, men who would not waver, who could forcibly argue their case and withstand the public tyranny of popular democracy.    He learned this lesson from the strategy of Vladimir Lenin, ironically enough. Lenin succeeded in toppling the Czar by creating a well-organized leadership cadre and having a small army of dedicated, loyal believers in place to seize power all over Russia.

The Libertarians ran David Koch as their vice presidential candidate in 1980.    They employed a loophole in the then campaign finance laws — no limit on what a vice presidential candidate could spend of his own money– allowing the Koch network to basically fund the campaign themselves.    Koch and his running mate garnered a mere 1% in the national election.   An accurate reflection of the percentage of Americans who would actually benefit from their program.

Realizing the massive unpopularity of their views, they began relying as much on extra-electoral power as on influencing democratic elections. The real power in America, they realized, is the Supreme Court, final, unappealable arbiters of the law.  The best way to change the hearts and minds of Americans is by taking over every state government in the country.   The state houses, they understood, were the minor leagues for national politicians.   It behooved them to cultivate a constantly replenishing network of up and coming true believers.   For years they focused their electoral strategies on the state level, where there were also, conveniently, far fewer restrictions on how much they could spend to influence these races.

The rest of their story has become more well-known and open in recent years, their confidence about taking their bows publicly has come with their great successes.    They created, among an army of influential organizations, a corporate-legislative partnership called ALEC, active in most states. ALEC provides legislators with model laws they can sponsor, written by legal academics at conservative Think Tanks.   “Stand Your Ground”, the state law that allows someone with a reasonable fear to shoot to kill anywhere he is with his gun, is an ALEC law.  So are laws placing restrictions on voters likely to oppose their carefully vetted candidates.  Many states have voter restriction laws that have been rendered constitutionally inoffensive by a recent Supreme Court decision declaring the racism that formerly motivated such restrictions definitively dead in the US, as shown by the election of a popular black president.  The Court ruled that there is no longer a need for the federal government to restrict or even scrutinize state laws that tend to disenfranchise particular kinds of voters.

When Barack Obama became America’s second black president, the Koch network immediately organized and funded the spontaneous outpouring of popular rage against him, the “grassroots” Tea Party.   In the midterms they spent a fortune primarying moderate Republicans out of office in Congressional elections.   The new, radical Tea Party Congress was tireless in its obstruction of anything Obama proposed, even going so far as shutting down the government during a showdown with the president.   After Citizens United, their corporate avatars were legally allowed to spend as much money as they wanted to get their candidates elected, this unlimited spending was deemed a corporate “person’s” “free speech”.   Finally, a Supreme Court that would advance the rights of the persecuted “persons” who’d been the real victims all along, the eternal, legally-created vampires known as corporations.

These extreme and unpopular right wing views have now influenced several generations of academics, lawyers, and politicians, as well as an industry of self-proclaimed pundits.   Their views have been tirelessly promoted and are now embraced by about a third of average Americans, who tend to vote in a block for politicians who spout these populist sounding principles.   These extremely wealthy men and their corporations are closer than ever before to actually achieving their dream of permanently ending all “government coercion”.  

Who is the government, and who are the goddamned scientists of the world, to say that lucrative corporations are destroying the earth, regulate their profits in the name of trying to slow catastrophic climate change?   A well-funded, cleverly run decades-long campaign has transformed a good proportion of Americans, values voters, into sophisticated “climate skeptics” who doubt the veracity of the world’s scientists and the cynical politicians who cite them, men and women who don’t really care about the earth but want to kill jobs and punish the job creators.  Parasites.  Fucking parasites, all of you.

Welcome to the Supreme Court, Brett, and never be ashamed to embrace the radical values that will protect liberty, free Americans from the tyranny of government coercion and make America great again.

Suggested readings:

Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right, by Jane Mayer

Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right’s Stealth Plan for America by Nancy MacLean 

 

Study their mothers to get to the roots of their misogyny

Men who are violent toward women, even those who simply hold them down while trying to have a few sexual thrills, even if they indignantly claim to be feminists while defending themselves against actual women with credible complaints against them, behave this way for a reason.   They felt traumatized, or abandoned, at some point in their early lives, by a woman who had power over them.  I would think that in most cases this woman was the boy’s mother.  This is not to blame the mother for raising a misogynist.   Sometimes the most harmful things a mother did were also very subtle, even done with love. Sometimes nothing the mother did or failed to do could have changed the outcome for the angry son.

My father’s mother, for example, whipped him in the face from the time he could stand.   This had an effect on my father’s personality — he tended to be dismissive of women most of the time.  He married a woman who pretty much worshipped him, his great intellect, his moral stance, his unshakably secure ego.   That last bit struck my sister and me as particularly hilarious, nobody was more shaken by a particular kind of challenge than our father.   Anyway, a guy who’d been whipped in the face by mom grew up to marry a very bright woman who believed the sun shone out of his ass.

Brett Kavanaugh, only child, often claims that his mother was his inspiration.  I believe him.  She was an ambitious woman who went to law school as the mother of a ten year-old, became a lawyer, a prosecutor, a judge.  Before that she taught in predominantly black public high schools and taught her son that racism was bad.   Pretty impressive.   All she expected from Brett (or perhaps only he expected it from himself) was the same kind of diligence and ambition, all the way to the Supreme Court.   

Kavanaugh claims to have been number one in his class at elite Georgetown Prep (number one?  smells more like number two to me…).    This claim is possible, I suppose, at least as plausible as his claim that he got so shit-faced he didn’t know what teams were playing at games he was at, so drunk he didn’t black out, just fell asleep, by drinking good old American beer. 

In senior year, he points out, when he was eighteen, it was legal in his state to drink beer.   He did it legally, after a few years of doing it illegally.  Beer.   He stated many times that he drinks beer, only beer.  Beer.  Who hasn’t been so drunk on beer they fell into a deep sleep after raving drunkenly, with no memory of any of it afterwards?  Beer is really pretty harmless, as everyone who has ever drank a couple of six-packs on a hot summer day knows, worst that will happen— you fall asleep.  That’s the only reason they don’t sell beer in stadiums after the fifth inning, they don’t want the fans falling asleep.  Now turn your head and let me piss in your other ear.

It is clear that Kavanaugh has a lot to hide.  He is hiding his extreme right wing views, his long pedigree as a strict partisan, hiding his right wing zealot resume, the thousands of questionable memos he wrote for Bush and Cheney before they rewarded him with a lifetime federal judgeship. 

It could not be more clear how much he has to hide after his defensive, tearful temper tantrum the other day during which he whined that he had to wait weeks, WEEKS, to find out if— yo, I have to quote this amazing talking turd in his own words, they are curiously vulnerable, childish words:

“When I at least did OK enough at the hearings that it looked like I might actually get confirmed, a new tactic was needed.”   (and the passive voice used)

What a fucking worm, what a victim.   Yes, at least OK enough that you deserve your lifetime appointment, no questions asked, no witnesses called.   The woman who remembers clearly that it was you testified credibly and convincingly.   It was clearly wrenchingly difficult for her to step forward.  You did nothing but double down on your denial, ratchet it up to 100% to match her 100% certainty that it was you.  Then, like the simple-minded partisan hack you are, you stood to deliver your indignant defense about the Clintons having it in for you.

The Supreme Court was my mommy’s one and only dream for her number one son!   How dare they?!!   

Indeed.

How dare this woman, Christine Blasey Ford step forward to accuse somebody of your sterling reputation, your impeccable credentials?  She may have had hard years learning to deal with the traumatic memory of the mocking laughter of you and your asshole friend Mark Judge after the two of you, allegedly, allegedly,  locked her in a room, turned up the music and had some fun she wasn’t on board with, but does that give her the right to step forward at the eleventh hour?   This seemed to be his point, that there was barely time to get fucking Mark Judge into hiding.  The fucking Clintons, the ruthless Democrats who call ME evil!!!  They did the same thing with Anita Hill, boom, sneak attack two days before the vote to confirm Clarence Thomas. 

They always do this shit, it’s what they do, keep in mind all the people the Clintons  murdered, starting with Vince Foster, and GOT AWAY WITH – THEY GOT AWAY WITH MURDER!    It’s why they must be permanently crushed, no matter what ethical shortcuts must be taken (and the passive voice used, to avoid, you dig, saying out loud that we are the ones taking ethical shortcuts).   This hearing has nothing to do with what I did or did not do one early evening when I was stinking drunk on beer, only beer, America’s favorite beverage.  This is about anger at our wonderful president and revenge by losers, fucking vicious losers.

I have to think the reason Kavanaugh was a black out drunk in high school, and a mean and aggressive one (the tendency shown even while sober, angrily defending his ruined ‘good name’ and raging against the machinations of his enemies, a cabal of well-funded, unprincipled weasels conspiring against his good name, ruining his life, traumatizing his family), while studying hard to be the number one student at Georgetown Prep, and going to church, and being of service to everyone, and having many close female friends, just friends he had beers with, and following in the good Christian footsteps of Ignatius of Loyola  (the Jesuits have since abandoned him, up there on his cross)– well, I have to think that Brett’s mom had something to do with it.  Quite possibly through no fault of her own, sometimes kids are just irrationally needy creatures that nobody could love enough.

Perhaps she was as demanding of Brett as she was of herself.   She expected even more of her only child than what she herself had achieved, which was considerable.   Imagine growing up in this household, with the pressure to do even better than your accomplished mom.   So, it stands to reason you need to blow off some steam from time to time, get shit-faced, hammered, so drunk you are visibly staggering.  A cute, younger girl comes in, goes upstairs to use the bathroom.  The parents aren’t home.  You and your drunk friend Mark, just as a goof, go upstairs push her into a bedroom across from the bathroom and lock the door. 

Nothing, so far, that any two drunken male high school assholes wouldn’t do.  The rest, the things that would sear themselves into the hippocampus of the young woman, traumatize her for decades to come, are things that only misogynistic drunken high school assholes do.  Throw yourself on top of her, grab her, rub against her.  Suddenly she starts to cry for help.  Fuck that, a meaty hand over her mouth will put an end to that!  The girl’s bathing suit, under her clothes, is what saved her from worse, Brett was too drunk to forcibly remove the bathing suit, keeping his other hand over her mouth as she struggled.   Oh, well!   Have a good laugh, go outside and ralph on the lawn.  Have you boofed yet?

It seems to me that in the cases of most rapey assholes, the uncontrollable misogyny at the root of that power-crazed behavior often comes from mom.   Not to say that all boys raised by difficult mothers grow up to hate women, but some do.   The extreme right wing partisan zealot Neil Gorsuch (Georgetown Prep, ’85), Trump’s first Supreme Court pick,  had a mother so powerful Ronald Reagan appointed her to head the Environmental Protection Agency, to make things a little more comfortable for his super-wealthy job creator friends who were being badly hurt by the hysteria over potential catastrophic climate change. 

Gorsuch’s mother was a powerful conservative ideologue with a mission.  You can only imagine the humane values young Neil imbibed with his mother’s powerful milk.   The results can be seen in his fair-minded, even-handed application of the laws, his unflinching instinct to protect the rights of those eternal “persons” who have been so unfairly oppressed in this great, deluded nation liberalism has brought to the edge of godlessness.

Perhaps the most obvious case is the misogyny of Donald J. Trump.   He rarely makes a peep about his sainted mother, in contrast to the many things he’s said about his father over the years.  Everyone knows his father was an overbearing, ruthless, larger than life asshole who reluctantly groomed his younger son for the job he’d hoped his oldest, Fred Jr., would take.   Fred Jr. was too nice a person, too decent a guy, by all accounts, and so Fred Christ Trump groomed the younger Donald, who had always exhibited the required meanness of spirit, to be his successor, inheritor of the great Trump Empire.  The wife and mother was at home, she had everybody’s backs.

Trump, in addition to his many fine attributes, his finest attributes, is clearly a cruel man.   He takes pleasure in humiliating others.   You want to know the roots of his cruelty toward women, which is as famous and often displayed as his cruelty toward blacks, Mexicans, the children of illegal immigrants and asylum seeks, Muslims and other rapist-types, look at his mother.

Fred Christ Trump’s father, the president’s grandfather, an immigrant from Germany, was a self-made wealthy man.   Fred Christ Trump took a small fortune and made it a much bigger fortune in the decades after his father died.  At some point he was looking for a wife.   A poor immigrant woman fresh off the boat from Scotland somehow caught his eye.   He married her.   She was a rich man’s wife, now rich herself.   She would put on a mink coat, have her driver take her in the limo to one of the Queens laundromats they owned.   She would collect the bags of quarters in that outfit.  Take them home and count them. 

Not much more is known about Trump’s mother, except for her proud professions that she always knew little Donald would grow up to be a great and important man, but I can only imagine he never received her love in the quantity needed.   His rigidity speaks to that, his insistence that he has never, ever, been wrong about anything, even his multiple bankruptcies were all the right moves, made after winning bigly.  

He makes a canned remark about his mother any time he is asked about her.  Identical words each time.  A great woman, a great, great woman.   Very smart woman, very smart.

Unsaid, of course, but hinted at like the artist of innuendo he is:  if any of my wives had been half as great as her, I wouldn’t have cheated on them, wouldn’t have divorced them after publicly humiliating them.  My mother was a saint.   My bad luck to marry a series of whores.  I can’t tell you how much money I’ve had to pay to these fucking bitches over the years, you wouldn’t believe it.

Trump’s misogyny is beyond dispute.  He treats men badly too, but he feels a special urgency to belittle women.   If you are reading this, Mr. President, I don’t blame you, not entirely.   You apparently had a pretty bad  mother, even though she arranged photo ops for you with a series of pretty models every weekend when she and dad visited you at the military academy they sent you to because they worried about your uncontrollable bullying.  That was the beginning of your Ladies’ Man brand, those photo ops with pretty girls hired to make you not look like the cringing bully douche-bag you’ve always been.   You were voted Ladies Man of your school by your all male classmates at the Maladjusted Sons of Wealthy Assholes Academy.

It is no mystery why Trump supports Kavanaugh.   Kavanaugh has changed his opinion on the accountability of a sitting president for ordinary civil and criminal prosecution.  As a zealous young Republican operative he believed with all his heart that a Democratic president who lies under oath about a blow job must be aggressively investigated, impeached, thrown out of office for the felony of perjury and then prosecuted for it and imprisoned, if possible.   A president like Trump?   He has such a hard job, the hardest job, the hardest job, a job that he can’t do well while burdened with civil and criminal investigations into his alleged conduct while he is the sitting president.   Kavanaugh writes in that tell-tale 2009 law review article that his views have changed a little, or evolved.  Wait,  I thought you twats don’t believe in evolution.   I’d say Kavanaugh’s views changed by Intelligent Design.

The larger reason that Trump is insisting on Kavanaugh as the only Supreme Court justice he wants, of course, is that Trump sees himself in the unfairly maligned Kavanaugh.  It’s always about The Donald, after all. Many people sincerely hate Trump, many women accuse him of things they can never prove 100%.   Women are always trying to attack Trump, according to him, because they are jealous, or simply liars, now there are three women falsely accusing Kavanaugh of the same kind of utter crap, this bitchy “she said, I said” slander.  All lies!  Thank God for the law in this great nation that says they have to prove it 100%!   100% you fucks!

Trump apparently told Kavanaugh to show some balls at the hearing, come out swinging, attacking, they can’t prove shit, they’re liars, a well-funded attack network of lying liberals propped up by a couple of freedom hating class traitor billionaires — blast ’em, Brett, with both goddamned barrels.   He defended the impeccable moral credentials of his nominee at a rare presidential press conference the night before the Blasey Ford testimony.   An object lesson in being a brazen alpha male.

Now, after Kavanaugh’s alpha bitch performance defending his “good name”,  he and Trump are definitely BFFs, two victimized wealthy white men, being unfairly held to the same standard as powerless Puerto Ricans, Mexicans, Blacks, poor whites who do– allegedly!– the same things to women that they’re accused of.   Those types go to prison behind the same charges we have to face down, Brett.  See, it pays to be a rich white guy with mad connections to powerful people, LOL!  Am I right, Brett?  Am I right?

Kavanaugh’s victims, ALLEGED victims, well, he’s very sorry that they had some kind of traumatic experience they mistakenly recall he was involved in, things he has 100% no recollection of, but that he is, at the same time, 100% sure never happened, not him.  100% positive.   The gold standard of irrefutable rebuttal, 100% certainty, just like Christine Blasey Ford.  These women may believe they are being truthful, but they are the tools of liars.

It is because I have always been an unwavering far-right partisan that these false allegations have been orchestrated by a powerful group of well-organized, well-funded rabidly liberal enemies.  By bitches.  I treat ALL women with dignity and respect, even these lying ones intent on destroying my reputation as a pious and humble church-going Christian on the cusp of fulfilling a lifelong dream, my mother’s and mine.   SO UNFUCKING FAIR!!!   Arrrgggghhhhh!!!!!

Kavanaugh’s mother and father sat in the small audience in the Senate hearing room during his passionate, petulant rebuttal.  I wonder if Judge Martha Kavanaugh was as proud of her boy as Trump’s mother always publicly pretended to be of her troubled son Donald. 

Those Who Always Get A Pass in Life

There are people, born into the right families, who will always, always get a pass for fuck ups.  Fair is fair, you dig, if you are among the best of the best, that’s what privilege is all about.  

Brett Kavanaugh, with his $40,000 a year prep school and Ivy League education, is one of these, the best of the best.  They call it the Boy’s Club, the people you meet at the finest schools become important connections who will introduce you, hire you, promote you, protect you when you fuck up.   You can be a liar, it’s not a vice if you lie for a really principled reason, if you are privileged and have other privileged people to vouch for you.   Who among us is perfect, after all?  

Kavanaugh told Fox the other night that he was a virgin throughout high school and therefore, somehow, it followed he could not have committed the sexual assault he is accused of.   He had previously bragged to his high school classmates, other wealthy boys, on his year book page, that he was a “Renate Alumnius” (sic), a boys will be boys reference to having had sex with one of the girls who’d grow up to sign a letter defending his character. [1]    Reminds me of that old Andrew Dice Clay throwaway:  Mother Goose?  I fucked her.  Like many contradictory claims liars make they can’t both be true.   Either you fucked Mother Goose or you were a virgin.

We don’t know whether Christine Blasey Ford, no matter how credibly and sympathetically she testified, was correct in identifying Kavanaugh as her attacker.   It seems very likely, otherwise why would she have faced the nightmare she did to bring the accusation to the public?   On the other hand, we know that Kavanaugh did not do what an innocent man with nothing to hide would have done, asked for a full investigation to clear his good name.   He was evasive, he was angry, he was belligerent and entitled.

As his mother, Judge Martha Kavanaugh always told him, according to Brett: “Her trademark line was: ‘Use your common sense. What rings true? What rings false?'”

If we use our common sense, and weigh what rings true and what rings false, if we compare their demeanors and their candor/lack of candor, put the two versions side by side, Blasey Ford’s very detailed and precise, Kavanaugh’s merely an angry categorical denial of something he said never happened, blaming the Clintons for this vengeful ordeal he was being put through, it would seem Judge Kavanaugh is, sadly for him, kind of fucked.  

Fortunately for him, perhaps, none of that should matter, since he, like the man who nominated him, has never been held responsible for anything in his life, has a glib, angry answer, or a sullen evasion, for all of it.  And his team holds a 51-49 majority and unlimited money to deploy against disloyal Senators when they face re-election.    If it was put to a public vote he’d probably get around the same 30 something percent that supports the leader of his party, a similarly unfairly besieged, privileged victim.   Lucky for Brett Kavanaugh, such things are kept out of the hands of the rabble, left in the hands of his powerful peers.    

By the way, this Guardian editorial made some excellent points.   Worth a look just to see the collage of Kavanaugh facial expressions as he tried to defend his ruined name during the rebuttal phase of the trial of Christine Blasey Ford.

 

Screen shot 2018-09-30 at 1.43.37 PM.png

AP/Getty images

[1]   Renate herself, now an adult and mother, was outraged, horrified to learn that those prep school boys bragged about having sex with her (Kavanaugh explained the reference was about dancing– Dance YOU, you transparently lying asshole), almost said she regretted signing the letter with 64 other wealthy women from Montgomery County.   But  I’ll say this for them, they stick do together, usually.   Here’s a bit about the adult Renate’s reaction to the yearbook page.  

And to underscore that the above is not from some Clinton-Soros-Oprah fake news liberal hatchet job publication, here’s the pop-up ad that popped up when I tried to read the article linked above.   You might not want to miss this summit!

Screen shot 2018-09-30 at 5.18.13 AM.png