L’espirit d’escalier

A saleswoman, just now, making small talk as she showed us samples before working up the estimate of a price, asked me what I did before I retired.  I told her I was a lawyer, and that I hated it.   Her daughter is a litigator, she said brightly, works for Aiken Gump [1], presumably litigating on behalf of corporate clients.  I smiled, sort of.  A moment later, l’espirit d’escalier [2] caught me and I had to shrug, with almost Gallic resignation, thinking of my missed much better answer to “what did you do before you retired?”– about my law career, my teaching career, about my life in general:

I conspicuously lacked the serenity to accept the things I could not change.

 

1] oy, my achin’ gump, as Sekhnet and I reflexively say whenever we hear the name of that law firm

{2]  L’esprit de l’escalier or l’esprit d’escalier is a French term used in English for the predicament of thinking of the perfect reply too late.

George Conway and Preet discuss Trump’s unfitness for office

I would recommend this conversation for anyone who may still be on the fence about whether Mr. Trump is fit for office.   The recent long, detailed  George Conway article takes a good bit of reading to get through.  The recent affable conversation between Preet Bharara, former United States Attorney for the Southern District  of New York, and corporate lawyer George Conway is snappy.   Check it out here.   The transcript of their conversation, thankfully, is here.

A few nice moments from that transcript (I was ready to transcribe this myself):

Calling it what it actually is:

George Conway:           In fact, one of the descriptive terms in the psychological literature for narcissistic sociopaths such as Trump, narcissistic sociopaths who have elements of paranoia and sadism, there’s a term called malignant narcissism, and that was a term coined by a psychoanalyst named Erich Fromm, who was a Holocaust survivor. And he spent a lot of time writing and thinking and writing about what explains these tyrants like Hitler. What is it about their personality traits that is common?

George Conway:           The point is that, if there was a psychological designation for evil, it would be malignant narcissism. It coincides with moral failings. So there’s nothing, in any of these psychological terms, even if you had a full-out actual diagnosis of the parallels, what I wrote in the article, that would not excuse his moral failings. Not at all. Not for a moment.

Part of The Case for Impeachment:

George Conway:   You don’t want to impeach somebody for one isolated incident that wasn’t so bad. I think particularly when you’ve got an election coming up, and there’s a bit of judgment involved in weighing the seriousness of what I call a breach of fiduciary duty that amounts to a high crime and misdemeanor. Part of that is looking to patterns of behavior. And in the case of Trump, there is a pattern of behavior. He does tend to use his office for personal gain in many respects.

George Conway:           I mean, you can point to his threats to Amazon and you can point to his apparent determination to have the next G7 summit at Trump Doral. I mean there are so many different things, I list many of them in the article, his vendettas against ambassadors and allies and so on. I mean, you can point to so many things, areas and ways in which he puts himself before the country. Not all of those things individually would amount to an impeachable offense, but they do fit a pattern. The reason why they fit a pattern is because that’s who he is, and the reason why that’s who he is is because of these personality disorders.

On Trump/White House Counsel’s double down obstruction letter to Congress about the” illegitimate, unconstitutional impeachment inquiry”:   

Preet Bharara:   I don’t understand this on a strategic level, forget about moral and character-

George Conway:   Because Trump’s, his theory is never to give ground on anything and he never shows remorse for anything.

Preet Bharara:    Is that part of his personality disorder or is that just, he’s a tactical genius?

George Conway:   It’s part of his personality disorder, and it relates to both his narcissism and his sociopathy. As a narcissist, he completely lacks empathy. He can’t see the world the way other people see it. It’s not just, “I feel your pain,” kind of empathy, but it’s also he can’t put himself in the position of how other people see him or see the world. Then there’s the complete lack of remorse. He’s not capable of remorse in any way. You don’t see him apologize or feel guilty about anything. The only time you ever saw him apologize was for the Billy Bush tape.

Preet Bharara:       The Access Hollywood, right.

George Conway:     Right. And that was within weeks, he was telling people, according to Maggie Haberman of the New York Times, he was telling people that the thing was doctored. Which is completely-

Preet Bharara:      After he had admitted it was [inaudible 00:40:07]. (him talking)

George Conway:   After he admitted it was [inaudible 00:40:08] (him talking) and there was no evidence of doctoring and he was telling the United States senators that the thing was doctored, which is just completely insane.

Preet Bharara:    So the polls have been shifting a little bit.

George Conway:  Right. A lot, actually.

Preet Bharara:    What is the significance and what weight should be put on public sentiment in connection with impeachment?

George Conway:     Well, I think it’s … it is very significant and I think a bunch of different things are going on here. One is obviously there’s movement because I think some people are following Nancy Pelosi’s lead, but I also think people are influenced by the brazenness of the conduct that they see, that he engaged in with respect to Zelensky. I also think the bizarreness and the extremeness of his response has triggered a reaction, particularly with those press conferences, with the Finnish prime minister or president or whatever.

Preet Bharara:    I always feel bad for those guys.

George Conway:     It’s just incredible. I mean, I guess … I hope they get a warning before they go in there. And then finally I think, and I don’t think … I think you can’t underestimate this, there’s an exhaustion factor that’s starting to set in among the marginal Trump supporters, I think. That like, “When is this going to end? What is it with this guy? He continually does this. It’s just, I can’t take it anymore. It’s like the volume’s up at 11 all the time.” He keeps digging himself in… It’s not the fake news. He did this to himself. He does it to himself. He’s his own worst enemy.

Preet Bharara:      It’s even worse because you’re like, “Oh God, I just want some light entertainment. Maybe I can watch Dancing with the Stars. Oh my God, there’s Sean Spicer.”

George Conway:   And I think that the other thing to understand about it, too is, I mean, first of all, you have the independent voters, some of whom I think are probably former Republicans, he needed in 2016, remember, he … I mean, the two most important numbers in American politics today are 20, which is the number of Republican senators it would take to remove him from office, and the other number is 77,744, which is the aggregate number of votes by which he won Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin.

A few things POTUS denies today

The Trump administration has faced widespread criticism from both Republican and Democratic lawmakers for abandoning the stateless Kurds who had helped the U.S. fight ISIS.

source

Trump: fake news, false, a complete and total lie, they love me, my people, plus the Kurds didn’t help us at Normandy during World War Two

Both Republicans and Democrats affirm that Russia, not Ukraine, was responsible for tampering with the U.S. election.

source

Trump: complete partisan shit job from Shifty Shitt and the “squad”, a total lie by very corrupt and treasonous traitors who are going to lose some primaries, I can tell you for sure

One from the give me a fucking break department:

Screen Shot 2019-10-10 at 6.29.05 PM.png

This totally, totally fake “bipartisan” “Senate Report” confirming “Mueller” “finding” of “sweeping and systematic” Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election below [1]:

85 fake pages worth

Trump: they make this crap up because they can’t touch me — and they’re jealous, and corrupt kangaroos, sick and dangerous “people”.  Article Two, nobody talks about it, Article Two, look it up, bitches.

 

[1]  From (U)REPORT OF THE REPORT 116-XX S ELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE UNITED STATES SENATE ON RUSSIAN ACTIVE MEASURE;S CAMPAIGNS AND INTERFERENCE IN THE 2016 U.S. ELECTION ‘ VOLUME 2: RUSSIA’S USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA WITH ADDITIONAL VIEWS

I. (U) INTRODUCTION In 2016, Russian operatives associated with the St. Petersburg-based Internet Research Agency (IRA) used social media to conduct an information warfare campaign designed to spread disinformation and societal division in the United States. •••••••REDACTED  ••••••• Masquerading as Americans, these operatives used targeted advertisements, intentionally falsified news articles, self-generated content, and social media platform tools to interact with and attempt to deceive tens of millions of social media users in the United States. This campaign sought to polarize Americans on the basis of societal, ideological, and racial differences, provoked real world events, and was part of a foreign government’s covert support of Russia’s favored candidate in the U.S. presidential election .•••••••••••

The Refusal to Yield

Humans are fallible creatures, we make mistakes from time to time, even the smartest of us.   Often our mistakes are purely emotional ones, if we’d thought more carefully at the time we wouldn’t have done what we’ve come to regret (or, just as commonly, cover up).  We know we were wrong, thinking back on it honestly, but at the time we couldn’t help doing it — we felt it was the right thing to do.  The moral question is what do you do when you realize you were wrong (assuming you are capable of such self-assessment).

There is a common type, particularly in a competitive, litigious society like ours, who will never admit wrongdoing of any kind.  Corporations are one example, never, ever admit wrongdoing without a viable lawsuit brought against you, and then, settle with no admission of wrongdoing.  We all know this type.  Their defenses are familiar.    If, once, in a rage, I threatened to kill you, your parents and your children, in a very specific, detailed way, IT WAS ONLY ONCE, YOU MERCILESS FUCK!   If an investigation found insufficient evidence of my crimes, because I was largely successful in covering them up– THEN FUCKING SHUT UP ABOUT WHAT YOU COULDN’T ACTUALLY PROVE I DID, LOSER!

The categorical refusal to yield is a terrible thing to be up against.  There is no possibility of resolving anything, except by accepting an unacceptable version of events.   When we are wronged we’d like the other person to at least acknowledge “my bad.”  That simple acknowledgement goes a long way, can stand in for an apology, in a pinch.   I realize this is a regular theme of mine, the difficulty of reconciliation, and a perhaps it’s a bit of a tired theme, but Yom Kippur and current events both remind me of it.

I think of recently dead Mark, whose ashes his brother and I scattered in his favorite lake last week.   I don’t want to think further about his exasperating and tragic life, but there are apparently emotional loose ends I still need to tie up.   His chief characteristic was a refusal to yield.  That, above all else about him, marked him for a life for constant conflict, rage and eventual betrayal and/or repudiation by virtually everyone.  There was no compromise in him.   Here is a snapshot of his life, the album cover photo for the LP of a life of great expectations and even greater disappointments:

 

20191010_043548 (1).jpg

When Dubya Bush and Cheney were president, their steadfast refusal to ever take responsibility for their own fuck-ups always reminded me of this guy.   It was categorical.  Nothing bad was ever their fault, and if they were ever called on anything they insisted on setting the rules for being interviewed:  they’d take no oath to be truthful, no recording or note taking allowed, absolute blanket secrecy about anything they said.

When Trump was elected by the Electoral College in that massive 78,000 vote nationwide landslide, he was Mark even more to a T.   He has the body posture down perfectly — the arms crossed across his chest, the surly expression on his face.   The picture of childish churlishness.

Here’s a bit of how the thinking by this type goes.    If you have a small business, and your most loyal, long-serving employees work for low wages, and often work many hours of overtime without extra pay, and you hit it big with a startup and suddenly have millions of dollars … what does one thing have to do with another?   It’s true, during the years when you were eking out a living from your business, rolling nickels and dimes and taking them to the bank, every dollar you didn’t pay your workers went into your pocket.   Then your pockets were overflowing.  SO?   I repeat:  WHAT DOES ONE THING HAVE TO DO WITH ANOTHER?

You avoid any kind of moral consideration of your behavior by reframing the accusation so that there is no reason to yield.   And you can make a good argument.   Business is one thing, personal wealth is another, clearly.  In business every dollar of profit you make first goes to ensure the health of the business, something your workers have no worry about.  Personal wealth is another thing entirely, particularly if that wealth is not derived from your business.   The exploited workers were free to quit any time they liked, nobody literally held a gun to their head.   A wise $30,000 investment in a start-up that blew up a hundredfold has nothing to do with that other thing, nothing whatsoever.

I’m not going to bother bringing our Mark doppelganger president into this, the examples are too plentiful and too well known to bother recounting here.   If you have time, as I do, I highly recommend a podcast called The Report [1],  a thorough run through of the dramatic story told in Mueller’s dense, long report, with readings of pertinent parts and illustrative sound bytes from people involved in the campaign’s collusion with Russia (collusion, yes, chargeable criminal conspiracy — insufficient evidence)  and obstruction of Mueller’s investigation.    Listening to the details, particularly in light of recent headlines, you will have repeated “aha!” moments and come to understand the full perfidy of Bagpiper Bill Barr, another grim example of the utter refusal to yield, ever, on anything. 

The refusal to yield, no matter how strong the moral or legal case against you, is the mark of mobsters, sociopaths, tyrants and fanatics.   We can understand it comes from insecurity, weakness, terror — but still.   Let’s call it what it is: fucked up.

 

 

[1] as the creators of the podcast wrote on July 19, 2019:

For the past several weeks, a group of us has been working on a project to tell the story of the Mueller Report in an accessible form. The Mueller Report tells a heck of a story, a bunch of incredible stories, actually. But it does so in a form that’s hard for a lot of people to take in. It’s very long. It’s legally dense in spots. It’s marred with redactions. It’s also, shall we say, not optimized for your reading pleasure.

Various folks have made efforts to make the document easier to consume: the report is now an audiobook; it’s been staged as a play; there have been live readings. We took a different approach: a serialized narrative podcast.

  

 

Nothing to Hide

Today is Yom Kippur, the day in Jewish tradition when our deeds of the past year are weighed, our apologies, attempts at reconciliation, the repayment of our debts are considered, and we are judged and marked down in an ineffably gigantic book for a year of health and peace or one of trouble.   When the day of fasting ends, the book is sealed.

I feel virtuous today because I made one stinking sincere apology the other day.   Sekhnet and I, and most Jews we know, are fasting today.   Don’t ask me why, I suppose it’s for the discipline.   One year in high school I fasted every Friday for a while, back when I weighed 137 pounds.  I do it once a year now, on Yom Kippur.  It’s the least I can do, so I do it.

The pious fasting of a horde of bad-breathed Jews who paid top dollar to pray all day at Hillcrest Jewish Center and, after a final blast of the ram’s horn signaled the Book of Life was sealed, race home to eat, always left me cold.  It still does.  On the other hand, I like the idea that we should seek forgiveness from those we’ve hurt.   The world would be a much better place if making amends was widely practiced.

Alas, it’s not.  We are, for the most part, unrepentant because we’re justified.  We are geniuses at justifying why we don’t owe some thin-skinned asshole who claims we hurt them jack shit.  Easier to write the person off, fuck ’em, you know what I’m sayin’?

This year I’m thinking I’d almost rather be in synagogue than listening to the talking heads I’m compulsively listening to.   On this holiest day of my people’s year I find myself in my regular chair, laptop on, watching the hideous shenanigans of a deranged man who was never the sharpest knife in the drawer (and his failure to master basic spelling is not the only tip off) and who is now the sharpest and deadliest pair of scissors this country has ever drunkenly raced around holding.  

His dead-enders in Congress, driven by blind ambition, supported by dark money, rush in a gaggle to explain why what he did — seeking dirt on a political rival from the new Ukrainian president (a Jewish comedian with a law degree, don’t you know?) in exchange for releasing defensive weapons Ukraine needs to protect itself from Putin–  if he even did what he admitted he did (and he’s known to joke, josh, provoke, tweak, trigger, sometimes lie, so who knows why he actually said that he did it?) is not nearly as bad as the desperate and despicable unconstitutional acts of the partisan lynch mob determined to bring him down.  

The angry Democrats have convened a kangaroo court.  That’s it!  There’s our talking point!  This constitutional provision about impeachment is allowing the crazed, jealous, loser Democrats to hold a kangaroo court.   The president is the best, the jealous assholes who are determined to impeach him, those disgusting defecators, have convened a kangaroo court!   Here’s Trump tweeting the phrase, echoing it into microphones under the blades of his helicopter, now another loyalist says it, now another and another.  You see, it is a good defense, the “court” is a kangaroo court, not a real court, it’s an illegitimate, traitorous fake court, run by a “malicious Captain Kangaroo”. [1]  

The president has nothing to hide.  That’s why he’s not allowing any testimony to be given or any documents to be produced.  Nothing to hide!  Kangaroo court!   Obstruct this, libs!   Illegitimate, illegal!   Smelly!   Cooties-infested!   BULLSHIT!   Treasonous traitors!   Enemies of the People!   It’s nobody’s business how badly I did on the SATs (my scores were perfect, by the way), what my grades were at Wharton (5.0 all the way), who I got money from as reported on my taxes (totally legal — and which you losers will never, NEVER see) what incriminating texts my people sent each other.   Article Two, you traitors, I can do whatever I want!  Read the constitution, I hear it’s something.   And, by the way, fuck you and the stinking kangaroo you rode into your kangaroo court on, Captain.  You’re deranged, not me.  LOL!

 

[1]  37 year-old Florida congressman Matt Gaetz made this impassioned charge to a gaggle of reporters: 

“We would sure like to see the Volker testimony released before we continue the depositions and transcribed interviews. And what we see in this impeachment is a kangaroo court, and Chairman Schiff is acting like a malicious Captain Kangaroo,” Gaetz told reporters Tuesday morning after the State Department blocked scheduled testimony from U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland, a key figure in the Ukraine controversy.

Apparently this maligning of Captain Kangaroo (innocent of all charges, he never, even once, presided over a ‘kangaroo court’) triggered such a viral response on Merriam-Webster’s site that they felt obliged to step in and straighten this shit out.  Here’s the rest of the story.

The First Draft of History

We currently have a president, in his great and unmatched wisdom (if he does say so himself), who is as prudent as a petulant two year-old who feels he’s being unfairly singled out for punishment when all he did was take a tiny dump in the punchbowl.   He was obviously joking when he pulled his diaper down to let one fly! No sense of humor, his aghast parents.   The other day the artist of the deal made a deal to allow the Turkish autocrat to wipe out our allies in the war against ISIS, the Kurds in northern Syria, the army who did the actual fighting against the ISIS “Caliphate”.  If Trump wasn’t an EXTREMELY stable genius, we might have reason for concern that his seeming unilateral impulsivity is hurting our international reputation beyond repair.

I’ve been thinking lately about the age of the child in each of us, when certain reflexes get frozen into our adult personalities.    In my father’s case, as he was dying, he told me his life was basically over by the time he was two years old.  He lived almost eighty more years, his life basically already over.  He had good reason to feel that way, but still.  Then I think about the lessons he taught me, directly, and also by his tragic example, about history.   Whenever you can, he told me, find primary sources– and always put the date on anything you clip from the newspaper, it will come in handy years from the date you first read it.

Journalism, which is what many of these pieces I’ve been writing lately amount to, is correctly said to be the first draft of history.   For proof, look no further than this dusty magazine cover from April 15, tax day, 1974.   The cover article is a nice secondary source for digging into the story of the unraveling of Nixon’s presidency.  

20191008_123533.jpg

I’d forgotten all about this story, probably because I never saw it in the first place.  I was picking peaches on a kibbutz in Israel when the news broke here in the USA. Gone for a year, I missed the entire drama of the downfall of Tricky Dick Nixon.  He had a tax scandal?   Flipping to the article I see he underpaid his taxes by a gigantic sum of 1971 dollars, had apparently been doing so the previous few years too.

Jesus, I thought, looking at the pie charts of what Nixon paid and what he should have paid, plus penalties, this is why our current president, a man of great and unmatched wisdom, is so keen to have his lawyers use any means necessary to block disclosure of his tax records.  Of course!   No way to make someone look bad as quickly and dirtily as showing he’s a tax cheat.

In Nixon’s case, his resignation came after a long, determined fight against a mounting army of determined enemies, some from his own party, brandishing “smoking gun” evidence of his wrongdoing.   He had tried to cover up his involvement in the break-in to the office of his political enemy (a guy he handily defeated in a landslide, so the break-in had been totally unnecessary) a criminal act he probably gave the green light to, and arranged payments to silence the burglars he had hired to break into the Democratic headquarters at the Watergate complex. He’d gone on television to assure America that this investigation into him was a witch hunt (though he didn’t use that word, as far as I recall).  He explained to America that he was honest, not a crook, and that everything he did was on the up and up.   America eventually came to understand he’d been lying, was not honest, was a crook, that everything with Nixon was not on the up and up.

Jane Mayer reminds us that one of the diehards in the Nixon administration was a young man named Roger Ailes [1], Nixon’s media consultant who dolled the candidate up for TV and made him more telegenic and ‘likable’.  Ailes later was the driving force (before he resigned in disgrace, outed as a sexual predator) behind the mass media antidote to “fake news” — FOX news, fair and balanced.   In the event of a future Watergate scandal against a right wing president, this influential network stands ready to rumble, to set people straight in a way that was impossible when trusted Communists like Walter Cronkite, Huntley and Brinkley and their ilk dominated the network airwaves and manipulated public opinion against great Americans like Richard Milhous Nixon.

And so we have the FOX attack machine, running full time attacks (as well as the numerous paid ads the re-elect Trump people are running) against any critics of the president, claiming that the claims against this president of great and unmatched wisdom are being unfairly, even illegally, prosecuted by a bunch of sore loser Commie extremists who lost the 2016 election fair and square, by more than 78,000 votes in every key district needed for Trump’s historic Electoral College mandate.  

I think again of the great advice about fair judging that Justice Boof Kavanaugh [2]  got from his mother:  ‘Use your common sense. What rings true? What rings false?’

 

[1] Wikipedia on Ailes:

His pioneering work in framing national campaign issues, capitalizing on the race-based Southern Strategy and making the stiff Nixon more likable and accessible to voters was later chronicled in The Selling of the President 1968 by Joe McGinniss.[8]

[2] Wikipedia:

Eighty-three ethics complaints were brought against Kavanaugh in regard to his conduct during his U.S. Supreme Court confirmation hearings. Chief Justice John Roberts appointed a special federal panel of judges to investigate the complaints. In December 2018, the judicial panel dismissed all 83 ethics complaints, concluding

that while the complaints “are serious,” there is no existing authority that allows lower court judges to investigate or discipline Supreme Court justices.[188]

 

George Conway makes a strong case for the president’s unfitness for office

What I’ve read about him makes me no fan of George Conway or his worldview.   He’s a corporate lawyer, for starters, an expert in “corporate ethics” — whatever that might be.   Conway is an enthusiastic participant in Federalist Society galas who celebrated the appointment of the unimpeachable Boof Kavanaugh.  He’s a partisan right wing Free Market conservative.   That he is the husband of shameless alternative-fact spouter Kellyanne Conway, one of Trump’s most ardent loyalists, is not a fact (alternative or otherwise) in his favor, from my point of view.  

Yet George Conway has long been publicly critical of the reality TV president’s regular excesses.   I suspect a lot of Conway’s opposition has to do with the damage the volatile, conspiracy mongering Trump is doing to the right-wing brand.   Hard to defend liberty from government tyranny when the front man for your cause is acting like an unhinged government tyrant.

Recently Conway wrote a long article for The Atlantic entitled “Unfit for Office” with the subtitle: Donald Trump’s narcissism makes it impossible for him to carry out the duties of the presidency in the way the Constitution requires.   You can read it here.

I have to give it to the man, it is a very well-written, thorough and compelling case that states the obvious in painstaking detail, with hundreds of illustrations.   As he points out at the start: you don’t need to be an orthopedist to know that when a man’s foot is violently twisted at a hideous angle to his body, a loud snap is heard and the afflicted man is writhing in agony, unable to sit up, his leg broken in a grotesquely unnatural position, that the guy has a serious medical problem.   Same with the president’s clear pattern of lying, attacking, bragging, blaming, erratically changing course, compulsively doubling down.    

Malignant Narcissist?   Who knows.   Trump is clearly unfit to be a corporate CEO, (this person is a fiduciary in Conway’s world), or even the manager of a Burger King, let alone the president of the United States.  That much is pretty clear to the 60% of American voters who have never supported him.

Conway didn’t mention the murder and dismemberment of American resident journalist Jamal Khashoggi, the grisly hit ordered by Jared Kushner’s good buddy Mohammed bin Salman, or Trump’s nuanced embrace of the ever changing lies the Saudis kept spinning when the shocking story was front page news for a couple of weeks.   If Trump had his way, the man who wrote these traitorous, treasonous, fake words would meet a similar fate, no question about it:

(4) Requires excessive admiration? Last Thanksgiving, Trump was asked what he was most thankful for. His answer: himself, of course. A number of years ago, he made a video for Forbes in which he interviewed two of his children. The interview topic: how great they thought Donald Trump was. When his own father died, in 1999, Trump gave one of the eulogies. As Alan Marcus, a former Trump adviser, recounted the story to Timothy O’Brien, he began “more or less like this: ‘I was in my Trump Tower apartment reading about how I was having the greatest year in my career in The New York Times when the security desk called to say my brother Robert was coming upstairs’”—an introductory line that provoked “‘an audible gasp’ from mourners stunned by Trump’s self-regard.” According to a Rolling Stone article, other eulogists spoke about the deceased, but Trump “used the time to talk about his own accomplishments and to make it clear that, in his mind, his father’s best achievement was producing him, Donald.” The author of a book about the Trump family described the funeral as one that “wasn’t about Fred Trump,” but rather “was an opportunity to do some brand burnishing by Donald, for Donald. Throughout his remarks, the first-person singular pronouns—I and me and mine—far outnumbered he and his. Even at his own father’s funeral, Donald Trump couldn’t cede the limelight.”

The (4) Conway refers to here is one of the nine diagnostic criteria for the most extreme form of narcissism.  They are listed in the DSM (the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), the authoritative text that psychiatrists, psychologists and insurance companies use to determine who is clinically nuts and what exact shade of pathological nuttiness they suffer from.  

I adopt this cute form because the DSM is far from a definitive masterwork of the healing arts, particularly in the tricky, mysterious, value-laden, fluid field of mental health disorders.   In the first edition of the DSM (they are up to version 5 or 6) homosexuality, for example, was considered a mental disorder.  It was listed in the DSM as a “sociopathic personality disturbance” for more than twenty years.    Still, Trump’s nine for nine on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual’s list for Malignant Narcissism is impressive.   A clinician only needs five of the nine to make the case, write the code, prescribe the pharmaceutical, have the insurance company cut a check.  

Conway makes the point that we don’t need a clinical diagnosis to see the problem with having somebody like this as the most powerful person in the country.   Every day there are numerous examples of his unfitness for office.   I guess, given the circumstances, Conway would prefer the more dignified Mike Pence as president. Pence may be a pious, rigid yet supremely ambitious conservative fanatic (with enormous talents as an ass-licking sycophant) placed in public position by the cynical Koch machine, (like Mike Pompeo and Mick Mulvaney), but at least he’s not an embarrassingly loud-mouthed imbecile who threatens to destroy the carefully cultivated, expensively promoted right wing brand.  Conway:

The diagnostic criteria offer a useful framework for understanding the most remarkable features of Donald Trump’s personality, and of his presidency. (1) Exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements? (2) Preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance(3) Believes that he or she is “special” and unique and should only associate with other special or high-status people?  That’s Trump, to a T.  As Trump himself might put it, he exaggerates accomplishments better than anyone. In July, he described himself in a tweet as “so great looking and smart, a true Stable Genius!” (Exclamation point his, of course.) That “stable genius” self-description is one that Trump has repeated over and over again—even though he has trouble  with spellingdoesn’t know the difference between a hyphen and an apostrophe, doesn’t appear to understand fractions, needs basic geography lessonsspeaks at the level of a fourth grader, and engages in “serial misuse of public language” and “cannot write sentences,” and even though members of his own administration  have variously considered him to be a “moron,” an “idiot,” a “dope,” “dumb as shit,” and a person with the intelligence of a “kindergartener” or a “fifth or sixth grader” or an “11-year-old child.

If that’s not high treason, yo, what the fuck is?  It’s fucking BullSHIT!   SAD!!!   Good thing Mr. Trump has Mr, Giuliani and Mr. Barr on speed dial for exactly this kind of traitorous treachery.  USA!   USA!!!    

Read the article and tell me George Conway is wrong about Trump’s unfitness for the office he holds in his short-fingered, vulgar hands.

Our lives, after death

Yesterday I guided a dead former friend’s older brother to the favorite lake of the departed, a lake he’d swim in for literally hours at a time, a place I’d hiked to many times over the years.   Sunny and cool, it was a perfect day to carry Mark’s ashes up the small mountain and scatter them in a beautiful lake.   

The trek also gave us six hours to talk, and remember, and flesh out more details of a convoluted, vexing, largely miserable life.  Made me think about what’s left of each of us after we die — the impact we had on the people closest to us.    You can see the last of Mark’s mortal remains in the grey splotches at the edge of the lake at the bottom of this photo:

20191004_150114.jpg

Mark had many good people in his life at various times, though virtually nobody by the end.   His brother was one such person, but they had a falling out three years earlier, hadn’t spoken since.   His other brother never broke things off with him, but was quite dismissive.    His ex, who he rejected after she was insufficiently moved when his 98 year-old mother died suddenly, is a good and generous woman who hosted Mark’s brothers for two weeks as they tried to put the dead man’s affairs in order.   His favorite cousin, a beautiful spirit twenty years younger than him, a kindred soul he loved and wrote long. soul-baring letters to (until the family intervened to let the adult know they thought his flourishing quasi-romantic correspondence with a teenager was inappropriate) — they’d finally had a fatal falling out too.   Me and him?  At one time best friends, but for years estranged, finally virtual enemies.  I literally cannot imagine what the guy’s laugh sounded like, I hadn’t heard it in that many years.  All I can recall of him now is his churlish glare.   Nice legacy.

I’ve discussed him with several people who knew him pretty well.   We are hard pressed to recall any  unreservedly fun times with him (though our Corsican friend — among the first to repudiate him after three brutal strikes — shared some fond memories).   What we all recall is the familiar three act play he was compelled to act out over and over.  Act one: new person or thing — amazing, the best, the ultimate! Act two: warning signs of imperfection, Act three: traumatic, unendurable betrayal.

Mark was demanding, famously so, of all of us and of himself as well.   He was a perfectionist continually disappointed to be living in a world of fallible hacks where perfection is almost never seen.   He always sought the highest expression of perfection and was continually disgusted to find only the sorry human equivalent — flawed people, disappointing, aging, doomed to wither and die.   Old age depressed him terribly, though he was completely crushed when his mother died before she was even a hundred.

I learned two truly terrible things yesterday, one on the ride up, the other almost at the end of our hours together.  Each with a horrific image to go with it. 

Mark had a business, selling food made in a dirty commercial kitchen his friend the inspector gave him a pass on.  The new inspector was less inclined to overlook the black mold, the filthy deep fryers, the unwashed ventilation hoods, the old worn counters the pad thai and breakfast burritos were made on.  Mark’s workers were badly underpaid, all of them, and when they worked overtime they were never paid extra, as the law requires.  He was able to get away with making them work 12 and 15 hours days (when necessary) because the workers were for the most part undocumented or otherwise vulnerable to coercion.

His two longest tenured employees, a Salvadoran couple who had worked for him since 2002, made a claim, shortly after he died, for unpaid overtime since 2002.   He had sponsored them for green cards and so they owed him, but now they were demanding their due.   As part of a settlement, Mark’s brothers paid them severance of about a year’s wages and let them take what they liked from the kitchen and from Mark’s house.  They pulled up in a pickup truck and filled it at least twice.   They cashed the checks the brothers wrote for them after they signed the release, then started a lawsuit  for the back wages since 2002.

Horrible image number one, right out of Ebenezer Scrooge’s Christmas eve nightmare conducted by the silent, terrifying ghost of Christmas future.  After Mark died, people he’d openly exploited for years, people who justifiably hated him, gleefully rummaging through his possessions looking for things of value.   All of the things he collected, cherished and loved, fingered and pocketed by people intent on recouping something from a man who had taken ruthless advantage of them.   I can imagine faces beaming maliciously as one of the defrauded holds up some cherished object that could be sold for $300.   $300 they’d been cheated out of by nickels and dimes over countless long days in a filthy job.

The final horrible image was of his last moments on this earth.  I learned of this toward the end of our trip yesterday and it is maybe the worst of all. 

Mark lived with an apparently lovely young woman, a Muslim from Morocco, a religious woman.   They’d been together for four years, since he’d hired her, and it was unclear what the nature of their relationship was.  She did not consent to be photographed, she was very religious.   She wanted to marry Mark, but only if he converted to Islam.   Mark was never going to convert to anything.  And so they lived together in Mark’s cluttered house, though one can only imagine the details of their arrangement.  Shades of the Salvadoran couple in that she had no legal status in the U.S. and she lived under Mark’s protection, to a large extent.

His housemate had called at 5:30 to tell Mark she was on her way home.  He said he’d see her soon.   At 6:00 she arrived to discover his naked, dead body.  

The moment of his death.    Naked in his computer chair he was following his new practice for achieving perfect clarity.   The theory has been popularized by “Ice Shaman” Wim Hof, teaching practitioners to push past boundaries to a fuller existence.   Part of it, apparently, requires teaching the body to go without oxygen for longer and longer periods.  After a round of deep breathing, you hold your breath for as long as you can then rush into an ice cold shower (or plunge into an ice bath) where you breathe for your life and emerge feeling energized, with no further need for caffeine.  Mark, over the course of several months of diligent practice, was apparently up to four minutes without oxygen in his quest for perfect clarity.  This theory was exactly the kind of dramatic shortcut to enlightenment that greatly appealed to Mark.

Try holding your breath for as long as it takes to read this next paragraph (I’ve already had two or three lovely, life sustaining breaths myself) and see if you can follow the logic of striving for perfection this way.   After a short interval without oxygen you feel a desperation to  breathe (you’re at about ten seconds now).   You must resist this desperate feeling as the mortal weakness it is (I made it this far holding my breath, but hold on to the end, you can do it!) — put all thoughts of an oxygen deprived brain out of mind.   After a time your lungs feel like they might burst, but pay no attention to that, the theory demands you exceed what you falsely believe to be your limits.  Your heart may begin screaming, twisting in your chest, no worries.  Nothing to fear but fear itself, and the rewards are fantastic.   (30 seconds, come on, come on, you can do it…)  Two minutes and twenty seconds, let’s go for two and a half.  Now we’re up to four.

In fairness to Wim Hof, and the many who swear by his techniques, Mark’s death probably had much more to do with Mark’s rejection of science and doctors than it did to the health enhancement techniques Hof advocates.  Mark apparently hadn’t been to a doctor in years.   He was overweight, aggravated, fighting with everybody.   His arteries may have been only a hairsbreadth wide when he began this demanding regime of holding the breath and plunging into ice water.

Picture the unimaginable horror of the devout, modest Muslim woman, finding her beloved housemate naked in death.   The medical examiner noted that the discoloration on the skin over the naked cadaver’s heart was a clear indication of death by heart failure.  There were other signs as well.  The heart apparently gave out.  It was not a stroke, the signs would have been different, reflecting some terrible agony at the end.  

In the end this man who stubbornly refused to believe, in spite of a lifetime of evidence, that the world was a viciously unfair place, where the ecstasy of perfection was at best fleeting, where betrayal by anyone you love was inevitable, where all flesh withered and people aged and became grotesque, might well have held his breath until he died.