Category Archives: Law and Justice
Sheldon Whitehouse on the greatest Supreme Court that dark money can buy
Ever hear of the Major Questions Doctrine, the Independent State Legislature Doctrine, the Non-delegation Doctrine, the This Came Straight out of Charles Koch’s Costive Colon Doctrine? Here is Senator Sheldon Whitehouse with another excellent installment of his series The Scheme. I wish millions of people could take in these lectures and learn what we are actually up against, it is a fucking monster.
If you have trouble playing the video (as one viewer reported), here’s the link:
Too good to delete

Hawley haulin’ ass
The whole thing is wonderful, the reaction shot is priceless.
Trump’s Homeland Security Inspector General Joseph Cuffari, on the job
my man was already under investigation
Fri February 11, 2022

Joseph Cuffari speaks to the Senate Homeland Security Committee during his nomination hearing to be Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security on March 5, 2019.
Washington (CNN)The Department of Homeland Security Inspector General is being investigated as part of a newly revealed probe looking into allegations of retaliation, according to documents shared with CNN.
Inspector General Joseph Cuffari, who is responsible for oversight of DHS, is under scrutiny by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, a federal government umbrella group tasked with fielding allegations made against an inspector general. The probe stems from accusations of retaliation related to the the authorization of an independent report by law firm WilmerHale that was concluded in late 2020 following complaints of unprofessional behavior by several top Homeland Security officials. . .
Cuffari, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, had a tumultuous start at DHS, and has been occasionally accused of looking the other way for political reasons regarding actions that involved the former administration, which he vehemently disputes.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/11/politics/dhs-inspector-general-investigated-watchdog-group/index.html

Chronic leadership problems have plagued oversight of DHS inspector general’s office, GAO finds
If the crime don’t get you, the cover up will
Watchdog Informs Secret Service of Criminal Inquiry Into Missing (Secret Service) Texts, reads the NY Times headline. The story begins:
WASHINGTON — The inspector general for the Department of Homeland Security directed the Secret Service to halt its internal search for purged texts sent by agents around the time of Jan. 6 so that it does not “interfere with an ongoing criminal investigation,” according to a letter reviewed by The New York Times.
“To ensure the integrity of our investigation, the U.S.S.S. must not engage in any further investigative activities regarding the collection and preservation of the evidence referenced above,” the Homeland Security Department’s deputy inspector general, Gladys Ayala, wrote to James M. Murray, the director of the Secret Service. “This includes immediately refraining from interviewing potential witnesses, collecting devices or taking any other action that would interfere with an ongoing criminal investigation.”
The Times article makes only the obliquest reference to the Trump appointed DHS Inspector General’s months’ long cover up of the Secret Service’s destruction of evidence, a particularly egregious bit of law-skirting by a federal law enforcement agency bound by law to preserve all records for the federal archives. The popular right-wing British tabloid The Daily Mail had as its sub-headline:
Sources who worked under Trump-appointed Inspector General Joseph Cuffari claim watchdog didn’t report February findings to Congress about the purge.
(the article includes, and emphasizes this damning detail).
Meanwhile, a Washington Post report on Tuesday reveals that the DHS watchdog agency did not alert Congress in February when it learned about the Secret Service purge that deleted nearly all text messages from around January 6, 2021.
Two whistleblowers within the DHS Inspector General’s office told the Post about the previously unreported months-long delay in the watchdog office flagging the erased Secret Service cellphone messages to Congress.
The Grey Lady reported it more succinctly, with characteristic anodyne understatement.
The inspector general, Joseph V. Cuffari, who has for months conducted a review of the Secret Service’s actions on Jan. 6, first raised the issue of the missing texts last week with the House select committee investigating the attack on the Capitol.
All the news that’s fit to print, I guess (and don’t bother clicking that link, not very enlightening.) The quick Times reference leaves open the suggestion that Mr. Cuffari himself may have only recently discovered the mass deletion of possibly incriminating evidence from Mr Trump’s Secret Service detail, most of whom recently hired private counsel to represent them, now that Trump’s personally loyal bodyguards who innocently permanently deleted their texts from the day before and during the riot are all targets in a criminal probe.
The uniform, reflexive pattern of every single one of Trump’s associates, lackeys and appointees invariably breaking laws, bending rules, burying evidence, abusing descretion, obstructing investigations, delaying required procedures (recall that fucking Bill Barr buried the credible, urgent whistleblower complaint and transcript of Trump’s perfect phone call with Zelensky for a long time after he was legally required to take action on the referral), using government appointments for financial (Jared and Ivanka) or political gain (fucking Wilbur Ross and his maddening bullshit with the Census[1]), dismissing inspectors general, bringing frivolous lawsuits and appeals to dominate the news, harass enemies and run out the clock on accoutability, with quid pro quo pardons, if all else fails. The uniform corruptness of how these motherfuckers operate makes it infuriating that the paper of record remains so opaquely fucking dainty in reporting the facts.
Just sayin’…
[1]
Almost exactly a year ago the DOJ declined to prosecute Wilbur Ross despite a watchdog finding that he made misrepresentations to Congress about adding census citizenship questions. His real purpose in adding that question, of course, which they fought all the way up to the Supreme Court, naturally, was to intimidate minorities from answering the census to reapportion money and political representation (House seats) away from minorities and integrated urban areas and toward white, rural, faithful Republican voting areas. As you do, when you have discretion to abuse and you work for an autocrat.


Inadequate answer
With the revelation that the Secret Service (literally the [US]SS, damn), destroyed all evidence of real-time communications on January 5th and 6th, presumably out of loyalty to their former leader, since they were his praetorian guard and had taken a personal oath of loyalty to him, as in the old days of the Führer oath, my mind goes back to another famous, little remarked on bit of obstruction of justice by our greatest criminal president,
If you want to set the date for when the Department of Justice left an unaccountable criminal president in office because of an OLC memo, look no further than Trump’s final interrogatory answer to Mueller’s last written question. The questions were put to Trump in writing after a long negotiation because Trump’s lawyers understood his inability to tell the truth, even under oath, would inevitably land him in the famous “perjury trap”. The question is long and convoluted and Trump, who has a famously short attention span, had his lawyers provide what Mueller tactfully, and ridiculously, called an “inadequate response.”
Mueller’s question is insanely long and convoluted, but also greatly detailed. Good luck getting through it, I suggest a quick skim noting the names of an infamous cast of characters, and then a moment to review the full depth of Mr Trump’s inadequate response. If you want the date that democracy probably died, just look up when this inadequate answer, that was never answered more adequately, was made.
SPECIAL COUNSEL’S OFFICE:
b. Following the Obama Administration’s imposition of sanctions on Russia in December 2016 (“Russia sanctions”), did you discuss with Lieutenant General (LTG) Michael Flynn, K.T. McFarland, Steve Bannon, Reince Priebus, Jared Kushner, Erik Prince, or anyone else associated with the transition what should be communicated to the Russian government regarding the sanctions? If yes, describe who you spoke with about this issue, when, and the substance of the discussion(s).
c. On December 29 and December 31, 2016, LTG Flynn had conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak about the Russia sanctions and Russia’s response to the Russia sanctions.
i. Did you direct or suggest that LTG Flynn have discussions with anyone from the Russian government about the Russia sanctions?
ii. Were you told in advance of LTG Flynn’s December 29, 2016 conversation that he was going to be speaking with Ambassador Kislyak? If yes, describe who told you this information, when, and what you were told. If no, when and from whom did you learn of LTG Flynn’s December 29, 2016 conversation with Ambassador Kislyak?
iii. When did you learn of LTG Flynn and Ambassador Kislyak’s call on December 31, 2016? Who told you and what were you told?
iv. When did you learn that sanctions were discussed in the December 29 and December 31, 2016 calls between LTG Flynn and Ambassador Kislyak? Who told you and what were you told?
d. At any time between December 31, 2016, and January 20, 2017, did anyone tell you or suggest to you that Russia’s decision not to impose reciprocal sanctions was attributable in any way to LTG Flynn’s communications with Ambassador Kislyak? If yes, identify who provided you with this information, when, and the substance of what you were told.
e. On January 12, 2017, the Washington Post published a column that stated that LTG Flynn phoned Ambassador Kislyak several times on December 29, 2016. After learning of the column, did you direct or suggest to anyone that LTG Flynn should deny that he discussed sanctions with Ambassador Kislyak? If yes, who did you make this suggestion or direction to, when, what did you say, and why did you take this step?
i. After learning of the column, did you have any conversations with LTG Flynn about his conversations with Ambassador Kislyak in December 2016? If yes, describe when those discussions occurred and the content of the discussions.
f. Were you told about a meeting between Jared Kushner and Sergei Gorkov that took place in December 2016?
i. If yes, describe who you spoke with, when, the substance of the discussion(s), and what you understood was the purpose of the meeting.
g. Were you told about a meeting or meetings between Erik Prince and Kirill Dmitriev or any other representative from the Russian government that took place in January 2017?
i. If yes, describe who you spoke with, when, the substance of the discussion(s), and what you understood was the purpose of the meeting(s).
h. Prior to January 20, 2017, did you talk to Steve Bannon, Jared Kushner, or any other individual associated with the transition regarding establishing an unofficial line of communication with Russia? If yes, describe who you spoke with, when, the substance of the discussion(s), and what you understood was the purpose of such an unofficial line of communication.
TRUMP:
(No answer provided.)
Arizona Secretary of State candidate, former Marine, explains the Second Amendment
This is an exemplary four minute class on the Second Amendment by Adrian Fontes, a former Marine sharpshooter instructor running for Secretary of state in Arizona. It is the most intelligent discussion of the Second Amendment, and the right’s gun fetish, that I’ve ever heard. If I lived in Arizona I would definitely vote for this guy, based solely on this analysis and his style of coveying complex things in an easily understandable way. We need many more Democrats as articulate and direct as Adrian Fontes.
Good points from Robert Reich

Sure we can, even if our conservative party has gone full fascist. We just need about 54-55 non-Republican Senators not on the fossil fuel payroll.
Also, British conservatives got rid of their lying chatlatan leader, even after he survived a vote of no confidence, something that apparently can’t happen here. American Exceptionalism, yo. USA! USA!!!
Oh, yeah, also this:

Good, sorely needed questions for the GOP
How to prevent Republicans from worming out of questions about Trump
Jennifer Rubin lists some of the many follow-up questions that the US corporate media is too spineless to ask of Republicans who avoid taking a stance on whether they support Trump in 2024 by daintily dancing around their brand new set of core beliefs: the election was stolen, Trump was robbed, Trump is cool, we’re all cool.
Here are a few follow-up questions that must be asked, by every Democrat and, crucially, by well-paid corporate shills/journalists with only a hint of a commercially sponsored spine:
You didn’t answer the question. Is Trump disqualified in your judgment?
Have you read about or watched the Jan. 6 committee’s hearings?
Why can’t you render a judgment?
How can voters trust you to defend democracy if you cannot rule out supporting the instigator of a coup attempt?
Is seeking to procure fake electors acceptable?
Should pressuring the Justice Department to “just say” the election was fraudulent despite any evidence of fraud be permissible?
If Arizona’s state legislature had submitted alternative, phony electors contradicting Arizona voters’ choice, what would you have done?
Is it acceptable to urge an armed mob to march to the Capitol to stop the count of electoral votes?
What about inciting a mob against the vice president at the Capitol? Is that acceptable?
https://wapo.st/3IOMHgO
Read the whole op-ed, she makes some excellent points that, if not heeded by the corporate media, will likely result in the triumph of triumphalist American fascism, brought to you by the same media who brought us viable, normalized presidential candidate, an embarrassment transactionally tolerated by Charles Koch and his ilk, Donald fucking Trump, the most virulent symptom yet of the worst of us taking absolute power.