Board of Education’s Office of Integration and Human Relations

Human relations was the term used to describe a desired state of harmony between different ethnic groups in America during the heyday of the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s.  It was in use in 1968, when I was twelve and my father was forty-four, when he was working at the New York City Board of Education’s Human Relations Unit.  Human relations and intergroup relations meant black students would be allowed to go to the same schools as white students, and that all reasonable steps would be taken to ensure that ancient and present anger and grudges did not interfere in the relations between these young humans or with their education.  The animating idea was that all children have potential and that it is a crime to waste that human potential.

Not to be an asshole about it, but the landmark 1954 Supreme Court decision that had finally done away with the hateful “separate but equal” doctrine in public education was already older than I was in 1968.  The Court had called for desegregation of public schools “with all deliberate speed” and, like many things the law solemnly proclaims, it amounted to a kind of mockery.  

The weasel words “with all deliberate speed”, well-meant, no doubt, but… as they say, you cannot legislate morality, and if local whites sincerely hated local blacks it would do more harm than good, perhaps, to send in troops with bayonets and defend the little Negroes from the wrath of the children of their fellow poor people who hated them.   How, in fact, could we police every playground, bathroom, elementary school cafeteria, even if we wanted to?    

A better approach, it seemed at the time, was to create groups to study the problem, issue reports, and form Human Relations programs.   New York City had a program, so did several other large cities including Los Angeles and St. Louis.   My father joined the Human Relations Unit as an experienced high school teacher with a proven talent for interacting with students, as he had for years as faculty liaison of the G.O. at Martin Van Buren High School.  The G.O. (“general organization”) was the student organization at Van Buren and my father was its faculty adviser.  He worked closely with student leaders, at least one of whom, Mike Levine, by name, called him at home regularly during dinner hours.  

Thinking about this now, my father’s move to the Board of Ed headquarters on Livingston Street in Brooklyn from the nearby high school in Queens, was his chance to make a difference in something he believed in.   He received the same teacher’s pay and benefits and commuted two or three times the distance to and from work every day, but was finally able to use his talents to do more than inspire the occasional high school social studies student.   He was returning to the front lines of tikkun olam, repairing the world, doing God’s work, fulfilling his potential to help bend the arc of history toward justice and fairness.

They did some good work in the world in those years.  Angry Italian kids, their high school turf forcibly invaded by unwanted Negro kids and Puerto Ricans, on top of the insult of the dark brown kids, literally rioted.   Cops were called to the school, the place was put on lockdown.  My father, his black hair spilling over his collar in the back, his thick sideburns showing a certain counter-cultural panache, strode into the school with a young, blonde WASP on one side, an Italian guy on the other side, a black man, a hispanic woman.  Into the vestibule of the Brooklyn shit-hole they went, getting dirty looks from the kids as they entered.

“Dass some shit,” one of the passersby would hear the black haired Jewish intellectual type say, and the tiny door would begin to come open.  

“You are free to express yourself freely here,” the big Jew would tell them.  “I’m not squeamish about language, but I am about dishonesty — I have no use for a fucking liar.  Use the words you need to express yourself, but please, out of respect for the rest of us, don’t try to feed us any bullshit, all right?  Our bullshit detectors all work very well. We have a problem at your school that can be fixed, mostly by learning that we have a lot more in common than we are led to think we do.  We are all going to fix a bunch of the problem together this weekend.  It’s going to be fine, but first we have to talk.”  

And they would talk, in sensitivity training sessions, in role playing sessions.  

“You want to know why the word ‘nigger’ is offensive, motherfucker?” the black kid would say to the leader of the Italian kids.  And my father and his trainers knew to hang back at that moment, I suspect.  This is a great moment between the leaders of the two gangs.  My father would make a note in his head, and at the proper time he’d begin.

“‘Motherfucker’ is one of the most fascinating and powerful words in our language.  Tony, you said it’s a fighting word, the last, irresistible, provocation before fists fly, which it certainly is.  Lamar gave us two or three other meanings for ‘motherfucker’.  The word is like holding lightning in your hand, if you think about it,” and they would talk about who the real motherfuckers were, and who just thought they was real motherfuckers, and soon every motherfucker in the room would be nodding their heads, some of them laughing.

 “Do you make the feeling behind a word more or less powerful when you forbid its use?”  I could hear my father asking.  “Lamar, would you prefer Tony call you a nigger or an ‘n-word’?  Any preference at all between those two?”

“Fuck no,” says Lamar, “let the nigger call me what he wants, but let him say it with love.”  And Tony bursts out laughing, he never realized what a funny motherfucker Lamar was.  The two had been implacable enemies, the most charismatic of their respective warring tribes, and now they were each seeing the other as a highly intelligent, witty young individual.  Like the Jew said, they actually did find out they had more in common than they thought.

“You know, as far as my people were concerned, and I mean the White Anglo Saxon Protestants who actually run this country,” said the blond folk singer, “Italians were niggers too.  I mean, no offense, Tony, but Italians were one tiny step above niggers, in the same category as garlic-eating Jews like Irv over here.   American history has not been pretty, in fact, in many ways it’s been very, very ugly, but going forward the future belongs to us.”

As they broke for lunch students who had never talked to each other began to chat.  The food was way better than school food, the setting, in a country campus somewhere, was a bit magical for these city kids, made them feel special.  Breaking bread, talking frankly, having adults who were not trying to micromanage and control everything, who let them talk the way they talked… these things were all good.  Friendships emerged.  The fighting at their school would stop.  For a year or two.  The friends would graduate and their little brothers and sisters would start attacking each other.

“Well, you’ve captured some of this, Elie, but you know who you really need to speak to if you want a primary source, don’t you?  You have to find and contact my man Phil Trombino.  Phil was there, he’d be sitting next to Tony as Evelyn was telling him Italians were actually niggers.  Tony would look at Phil and Phil would raise his eyebrows and nod.  ‘Ain’t dat some shit?’ Phil’s familiar expression would tell the Italian kid.  The Unit really was a great idea, until Nixon and that ventriloquist’s dummy Reagan and all the rest of them repackaged the narrative and made guys like us the problem, and, if you think about it, when have we not been the real problem?  Nixon had plenty of guys like us on his enemies list, the paranoid, drunken fuck.  Call Trombino, Elie, seriously.  This is a story that should be told, and who better to tell it than you?”

FDR’s Four Freedoms and Irv’s eternal horror

I can picture my teen-aged father, on January 6, 1941, huddled around someone’s radio, probably his uncle Aren’s (I assume my father’s family was too poor to own an expensive piece of furniture like a radio) listening to Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s State of the Union speech.   Radio broadcasts were new at the time, it undoubtedly still seemed like magic to hear a president’s voice, broadcast live over radio waves, somehow entering a receiver built into a large fancy box and emerging, alive, from a speaker, to be heard in its every nuance in millions of American living rooms, over speakers in the streets.  

I can imagine my young father drinking in the part of the speech about the four essential human freedoms that American democracy, indeed common decency, was built upon.   Irv would have been a senior in Peekskill High School, going on seventeen, and the president’s words about Freedom from Want would have stirred his impoverished young heart.  

“Well, you have to understand, here was a patrician, literally to the manor born, who fought against the inborn corruption of his own class to actively expand the unheard of concept of common decency for the masses, he was actually creating America’s social safety net during the New Deal,” said the skeleton. “I was aware, even then, that most of FDR’s speech was a politician’s rhetoric to help bring the skeptical nation to an acceptance of the need to fight fascism, to join the side of the European democracies against militant, hell-bent totalitarian regimes.”  

“Still, the reason FDR was so loved by so many was because he was willing to incur the hatred of those who regarded him as a class traitor.  He told them, the same merciless fucks whose adult children and grandchildren are robustly yet casually screwing us all today, he said it with that great smile of his, ‘I welcome their hatred!’*  I remember that ecstatic moment from a newsreel I saw when I was about twelve, and the crowd at that rally went absolutely wild, as many of us in that theater yelled when we saw him say it on the flickering movie screen.”

“He challenged basic assumptions held by the rich.   Why is private college still and forever the exclusive right of the children of the well-to-do?   Because we can price the children of the riff-raff out and keep it pure, pass on our ivy garlanded love of higher learning, and higher earning, to our own DNA.  It’s always been us against them, since earliest homo sapiens war parties, but FDR articulated something more.  That’s why he was elected four times, he was fighting for the basic freedoms of the common man.” 

Today one has to go to google to find out exactly what these then famous Four Freedoms even were.  Sure enough, there they are, immortalized in the famous Norman Rockwell paintings, those strikingly realistic evocations of a mythical American life.  The famous one where the fat, perfectly browned turkey is being served at a big table, with the beautifully rendered greedy faces of the children at the end, one smiling lustily almost directly at the viewer, is his depiction of Freedom from Want.  One picture = a thousand words.

rockwell_freedom_from_want

“Yeah, FDR told us that the right not to go to bed hungry, in a world of abundance and super-wealth, was a basic human freedom.  Of course, any self-respecting billionaire will tell you exactly where to fuck yourself on that proposition.  Go down FDR’s list of the old enemies of peace, the first paragraph of your footnote below*,” said the skeleton. “It is now, what, eighty years later, and… hah! what do you know?!!  Same Dick Cheney types treating the government as their own piggy bank, the forces of selfishness and lust for power fucking away with insatiable, mechanized erections.  Ruthless, inhuman forces still in control of our great democracy, you say?  I don’t mean to single out Mr. Cheney, you understand, just because he’s such an unrepentantly evil motherfucker, and not even a born member of that social class FDR betrayed, still, you take my point.”

Preaching to the choir, dad.  I couldn’t have put it any better myself, self-evident as that is to say, of course.  The reality of this impossibly slippery slope of self-serving privilege and the constant rewriting of history to suit their purposes is no doubt part of what finally broke you.  

“Play the game the right way, take advantage of every bit of luck you get handed, work hard, work harder than everybody else, work as many jobs as you need to work, struggle, fight hard against ignorance and hatred, try to be a decent person and… oh, fuck, I was putting myself under so much pressure to live the American Dream that I fucked up both of my highly intelligent kids, oh, shit, and now, here comes Dick Cheney, oh, God, no…  look at that famous self-satisfied smirk…”

“And they’re not enforcing the Voting Rights Act anymore in the former Confederacy since we’re now so clearly post-racial and the f-ing ‘n-word’ is no longer tolerated, except in private among whites and among the n-words themselves, of course, and we don’t need to regulate Wall Street speculators any more, the Free Market will insure fairness, you dig, and there’s nothing wrong with a little pre-emptive ten year war on some anonymous brown bastards who hate our freedom, even with no actual causus belli, think of all the jobs we create in the lucrative war industries, and it’s so judgmental to call us ‘war profiteers’, you fucking glib, hateful class warriors, and oh, blah blah blah…  You want Hope and Change?  Vote for the charismatic black guy who will break your heart in more ways than you ever dreamed possible.  Yes, in the end, the seeming futility of it all broke me in half like a fucking dried out stick.”

 

 

*  “We had to struggle with the old enemies of peace—business and financial monopoly, speculation, reckless banking, class antagonism, sectionalism, war profiteering.

They had begun to consider the Government of the United States as a mere appendage to their own affairs.  And we know now that government by organized money is just as dangerous as government by organized mob.

Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today.  They are unanimous in their hate for me—and I welcome their hatred.

I should like to have it said of my first Administration that in it the forces of selfishness and of lust for power met their match.  I should like to have it said, (crowd cheers begin to drown him out) wait a minute, I should like to have it said of my second Administration that in it these forces met their master.”

Reading these lines is nothing next to listening to his powerful delivery of them, hear the actual 1936 speech here.

America’s Exceptional Exceptionalism

Other countries, other cultures, other People, may consider themselves ‘exceptional’.  This may be true —  to them — but American Exceptionalism is exceptionally exceptional, more exceptional than any other exceptionalism, as I’m sure you’ll all agree.  As I shall endeavor to demonstrate again here.

I don’t say this only to be arch– or only to avoid doing things I must do today while I tap blindly at these keys.  Those motives cannot be denied, I add in the spirit of complete transparency of the kind President Obama so forcefully advocated as a candidate.  If you don’t feel like reading my bullshit but still want a good reason to be pissed off, just click this link.

Consider this: America has been exceptionally successful selling the ideas of freedom, justice and the American way.  Selling is the American genius.  This is beyond dispute.  Nobody does it, or did it, better.  

I don’t say this only out of bitterness at not being a sales genius myself, though admittedly that’s part of it.  America has packaged and ingeniously sold any number of wonderful and terrible things.  We are the undisputed genius of that ever-growing field which now encompasses advertising, public relations, spin-doctoring, marketing, branding, market research, demographic targeting, political persuasion, fundraising, data collection for targeted marketing, political advertising to influence the outcome of democratic processes, etc.

I think everyone can agree this amazing industry, employing many millions and influencing every American deeply (not to mention billions of others worldwide) is kind of exceptional.  To have the genius and ability to sell millions of rocks as pets?  Exceptional!  To be able to expertly package and market candidates for political office, and launch devilishly targeted attack ads to torpedo enemy candidates? Truly exceptional!  No shit, really, and no wonder these experts are paid enormous sums of money for the invaluable services they provide.  

Of course, it’s mostly the bitterness speaking. And glibness, which, though I sometimes flash, I know is also a vice.  So let me stop flapping me gums and post the link to the latest illustration of American Exceptionalism that has come across my desk.  

Apparently, to avoid another threatened government shut-down by those elected government officials who are hell-bent on proving that government is the enemy, certain compromises were made here in the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave.

Sekhnet warned me to take my blood pressure meds before reading this short article on five of the most infuriating political compromises that prostitutes, pimps and panderers struck recently in our name and in the name of preserving and funding our great democracy.  I made it to the end of number two, before going into the small room to do the same myself.  As I went I chanted “USA! USA! USA!”  If you’re feeling strong today, click here.

And God bless our exceptional United States of America.

 

 

Fun in the Sun

I had something closer to my heart to write just now, but decided to write something closer to my inflamed baboon’s asshole instead:

Dear NY State of Health:

 I had a message on the website congratulating me when I logged in recently. The green notice told me that there was nothing more I needed to do to keep my health insurance as it is for 2016. I then checked my Inbox for the message received on 12/20/25 and read that my subsidy was being removed. I called to straighten things out and two or three days later got an electronic disenrollment notice.

A confusing ninety minutes on the phone with NYS of Health on 12/22 resulted in erroneous information being inputted on my application on my behalf. The website crashed mid-conversation, which made things more difficult still.   During the first call Marlon told me he would list my income for 2016 as zero, since my income for the last three months had been quite low. I described to him why it would be inaccurate to list my 2016 income as zero and then the call was abruptly cut off.

When I called back I learned, from the next person I spoke to, Izahn, that Marlon had filed my application listing my income as “zero”.   I was unable to see my own application on-line because of the trouble with the website. Izahn assured me that he’d fixed Marlon’s mistake, submitted a new application for me and apologized for the website being down so I couldn’t see the application he’d filled out for my continued health insurance.   He advised me to send the most recent tax returns. They are enclosed.

I had two emails on Christmas Day, the first referred me to a notice that turned out to be the disenrollment notice at the bottom of this letter.     Marlon’s “zero” apparently triggered the other notice I was emailed on Christmas Day, informing me that the income information on the 12/23 application did not match income obtained from State and Federal sources.

 I’d like to maintain my insurance coverage. Your assistance is greatly appreciated,

 “Your assistance is greatly appreciated,”

He added ironically, disgustedly, clenching his face into a fist with which to smash the reader of his words to a powerless minimum wage bureaucrat working for the health insurance industry, under the guise of a program to help New Yorkers afford overpriced health insurance.

LOG INTO THE NY STATE OF HEALTH WEBSITE TO SEE IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR HEALTH COVERAGE

Two Christmas Day emails from the tireless Obamacare spambots after months without a peep from my ruthless benefactors.

Happy Christmas, sucker, (click the link to see, inter alia, the letter informing you that your health care insurance has been canceled, effective immediately, for unspecified reasons.) 

On the website, the message is a bit cheerier:

Congratulations

The email arrives, arrives again, reminding you there is a message in your INBOX.  It could be anything, it arrives on Christmas Day, should be some good news.

 

LOGIN to Obama's asshole

Have a nice day.  You have ten days to produce all required (if any) documentation at our Albany offices before this decision becomes final and binding.

Obamacare website

 

Excellent short piece on one of three discreet mentions of the peculiar institution in the Constitution

Not being at home, where I have a short paper I once wrote about the three slimy and well-camouflaged Constitutional foundations for American slavery, the “Peculiar Institution”, I hit the internets to find the three discreet, coded, legally binding devil-in-the fucking-detail phrases. 

I found this one first, the timeless reference to “the Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit”; lucked on to this excellent one page discussion of the slave trade clause, well worth a read:

http://abolition.nypl.org/essays/us_constitution/3/

Glad to see there are some excellent teaching materials on-line.  My niece teaches American History in High School and I’m glad to see high quality discussions like these are easily accessible, with teaching notes.  Here’s another excellent short discussion (citing all three clauses) of one of the three legal foundations for the Peculiar Institution (I’ll leave the fucking 3/5 compromise — which apportioned representatives to Congress based on total population, including 3/5 of each slave, slaves comprising 40% of the population in the South — out of this post):

Fugitive Slave Clause — Article IV, Section 2, Clause 3
Essay by Matthew Spalding (pp. 275–276)
A model of circumlocution, the Fugitive Slave Clause comes the closest of the so called Slave Clauses (Article I, Section 2, Clause 3; Article I, Section 9, Clause 1; and Article V) to recognizing slavery as a protected institution. The Fugitive Slave Clause was one of the most controversial clauses in the Constitution because it provided that escaped slaves would be returned to those who claimed ownership. 
 
The Framers carefully drafted the clause to ensure that the Constitution did not give moral sanction to slavery. The final revision emphasized that slaves were held according to the laws of individual states and that slavery was not based on natural or common law. The language also implies that a slave owner’s property did not extend to federal territories if Congress chose to prohibit slavery there. Indeed, according to the legal requirements of the clause, an escaped slave was no longer a slave upon entering a state that did not recognize slavery under its law.
Unlike other clauses in Article IV, which vest power either in Congress directly or in the United States, this clause is written in the passive voice…

Click to access lesson-19.pdf

Matthew Spalding, author of the above, does an excellent job breaking down this “carefully drafted” clause, showing in very few words the complexities of political compromise I generally leave out of my morally indignant posts.  I frequently take a less nuanced route:

A “model of circumlocution”, “written in the passive voice”– this is how the fucking devil speaks and writes.  Just goes to show, once again, if showing again were needed (not to say it’s not): one needn’t be Hitler’s legal counsel to do excellent work, as a result of which, many millions are humiliated, maimed and killed.

467

 

 

150 years since slavery was abolished

Slavery, at one time enshrined, in coded language, in our Constitution, was abolished by the 13th Amendment, apparently passed 150 years ago today.  The justice and mercy of Law, what can one say?   I am about to go on a bike ride before tackling other things, but thought I’d tackle this old chestnut briefly first.

l always love the racist complaint that when it comes to slavery American Blacks should “just get over it”.  It was 150 years ago! they will heatedly remind you today.  A brief survey of those 150 years may be in order.  American states seceded from the Union, took up arms to defend their rights, including the Constitutional right to hold humans as property, to do with such property as they saw fit.  Although today most people consider slavery inexcusably evil, it was Constitutionally protected, more vigorously protected than many rights enjoyed by American citizens.

Treatment of American citizens was, and remains, largely a States Rights matter.  Advocates of States Rights seem brazen about the fact that the states most loudly demanding their rights are the same ones who took up arms against the government they felt, with mixed justice, was interfering with their Constitutional rights.  Demanding unthinkable things like the end of our genteel way of life, sir!  Damn you, sir, I say, damn you!

After a monstrously bloody war slavery was abolished by a Constitutional Amendment, the thirteenth.  The defeated rebel states had to endorse this amendment or forfeit the right to Federal funds to rebuild their war torn infrastructure (most of the fighting was in the Confederacy).  “Reconstruction” was a short-lived project, it lasted about as long as Prohibition and, though it began with great promise, did about the same amount of lasting good before it was abandoned.  When federal troops were removed from the South, and the Supreme Court severely limited the scope of the other Amendments designed to insure rights to the freed slaves, it was time for States Rights again.

We had states ruled in many cases by outfits like the Ku Klux Klan.  Can’t be sheriff, son, nor mayor, nor governor, neither, unless you move up in the Klan.  Black Codes in these states made it a crime for a black man to be unemployed and walking the streets without a certain amount of money in his pocket  Wealthy white men with fields to plow could bail out imprisoned Negroes and have them work to pay off their bail money.  The repayment was structured to last a lifetime.  The arrangement lasted less than a century, but surely seemed longer to those freed slaves who, on paper, had the same rights as anyone else.

A war was waged steadily throughout the 1930s, 40s, 50s and 60s and the Civil Rights legislation of the 1960s finally restored much of the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments, passed a century earlier.  Then it was only a matter of 50 years or so after that until the question of widespread poverty among the descendants of American slaves, and hopelessness, violence, racial profiling, killing by police and so forth would be back in the news.  

Malcolm X questioned why such barbarous conditions were considered a matter of Civil Rights when, more properly, they should be regarded as violations of Human Rights.  Let the U.N. decide whether America is still denying basic Human Rights to millions of its citizens, he demanded.   The ballot or the bullet, you know.  They chose, as they so often do, the bullet.  February 21, 1965.  Another big anniversary, less than a year ago, sir.

 

NY Times on Federal Judge Jay Bybee

Not that I am a huge fan of the Grey Skank, but I did have to applaud this editorial bit on the Torture Memos and their author, life-tenured Judge Jay Bybee (the article I read it in, linked below, is also worth a read):

Their language is the precise bureaucratese favored by dungeon masters throughout history. They detail how to fashion a collar for slamming a prisoner against a wall, exactly how many days he can be kept without sleep (11), and what, specifically, he should be told before being locked in a box with an insect — all to stop just short of having a jury decide that these acts violate the laws against torture and abusive treatment of prisoners.

In one of the more nauseating passages, Jay Bybee, then an assistant attorney general and now a federal judge, wrote admiringly about a contraption for waterboarding that would lurch a prisoner upright if he stopped breathing while water was poured over his face. He praised the Central Intelligence Agency for having doctors ready to perform an emergency tracheotomy if necessary.

These memos are not an honest attempt to set the legal limits on interrogations, which was the authors’ statutory obligation. They were written to provide legal immunity for acts that are clearly illegal, immoral and a violation of this country’s most basic values.

source

Collateral Damage, yawn

This will no doubt seem a peevish time, an ill-timed time, to bring this up, days after the hideous terrorist carnage in Paris, and Beirut.  There is never a good time to bring things like this up.  Why is it that I cannot help but bring things like this up?  It’s just a government policy, after all, mostly secret, designed to kill those who hate us, why the necessity to fuss over it like a bone caught crosswise in the craw?

When someone who is objectively evil, driven to do evil things, like Dick Cheney, or his bully lawyer David Addington, or generously rewarded torture justifiers tenured law professor John Yoo and Federal Judge Jay Bybee, authors of the secret Torture Memos; when someone sees the world in simplistic terms and is seemingly gullible, like George W. Bush, well– it is understandable that to them a bit of “enhanced interrogation” or “collateral damage” would mean little in the general scheme of things.

Who but a pussy, after all, would worry about the rights of people who are quite likely guilty of the most unthinkable crimes?   Or even if not guilty, nothing like a little brutality and a decade or so of detention to weed out the true haters from the ugly fuckers who just look like true haters.

In the case of evil people, or true believers, insisting that their actions are decent and morally justified, all you can really do is clench your jaw, in all but the rarest case you can’t stop them.

But what is one to do when the person ordering daily murders by remote control, from a kill list, and referring to murdered children as “collateral damage” is an excellent salesman who has made of himself the most likable product, an articulate and winning expression of our highest democratic ideals?    The quick-witted, cool exemplar of human decency?

This is, of course, a purely rhetorical question.   Candidates lie.  Presidents spin, conceal their worst acts.  Some give stirring speeches about government transparency that make lovers of participatory democracy tingle and then have a worse record on state secrecy and the concealment of government crimes than Mr. Cheney.   If Israel is condemned for “extra-judicial” killing of its enemies, so be it.  If it then becomes our national policy, secret kill lists, body counts, any dead, dismembered male over 18 presumed to be the enemy, who the hell are you to get all self-righteous about it?  

An excellent question, sir.  You are nobody to get all fucking self-righteous about it.   Better a thousand innocents die over there than one of us be murdered by them over here.  End of story.  

Any other questions, jerk-off?

 

 

 

 

 

Why My Mother Loved Jon Stewart, but Hated Stephen Colbert (Draft 1)

It’s easy to understand why my mother loved Jon Stewart, what Jewish mother could not love him?   My mother was a secular Jew from the Bronx, raised to believe in equality, human rights and social justice.   I recall her telling me when I was young that she didn’t think much of Howard Fast as a writer, but that the idealistic man who’d been blacklisted as a suspected Communist had his heart in the right place.  As an old woman she was discouraged by the many signs that our country did not always have its heart in the right place.  She would clench her teeth every time President Bush came on TV.  

“How an obvious imbecile like that got to be president… every time I see him it makes me sick.”  

She regarded him as the worst American president, definitely the worst of her lifetime.  One of the last things she said to me on her deathbed at the hospice, and she said it urgently:  “please promise me Sarah Palin will never be president of the United States!”  

I promised her, thinking to myself “certainly not in your lifetime, mom.”  

She watched Jon Stewart every night.  Whenever I was in Florida with her she’d call me in to watch when his show was about to start.  She found him adorable, as, of course, he is.  He made her laugh, with his trenchant insights, facial expressions and overall comic brilliance.  He, almost alone among the media in the years of her widowhood, gave her hope that not everyone in the world was insane.  She was doubly delighted when Bill Moyers interviewed Jon Stewart and the discussion quickly became an intelligent hour long mutual admiration society between two of her favorite media personalities.  

As much as she loved Jon Stewart, she had an almost visceral dislike of his gifted protege Stephen Colbert.  As soon as Stewart’s show ended, even before Colbert’s American eagle swept beak and talons first toward the camera, she had the remote in hand and was looking for something else to watch.  I never understood this.  She couldn’t explain it, she just couldn’t stand him.  

“You realize that the overbearing right wing blowhard persona is parody, he’s playing a character.  He’s hilarious, mom.”  

She shook her head.   “I know.  I don’t know what it is, I can’t watch him.  I know it’s a parody, I just can’t stand him.”

So it wasn’t that she was like President Bush’s team who’d hired Colbert to do the Correspondents’ Club dinner, most likely in the mistaken belief that he was a fellow traveler, a very funny, popular comedian who happened to be patriotic and believe in the unquestionable greatness of America, right or wrong.  In 2006 nobody in the media was saying too much out loud about Bush and Cheney’s muscular excesses.  It was as if they were all afraid of being shot in the face with a blunderbuss full of birdshot or something.

I showed my mother the video of Colbert fearlessly skewering the president at the Correspondents’ Club.  I recall at the time feeling great admiration for him, he was about the first person to publicly suggest the Emperor and those around him were naked.   He showed impressive sang froid by doing it, literally, in the president’s face.  My mother admitted it was a great routine.  He began:

Mark Smith, ladies and gentlemen of the press corps, Madame First Lady, Mr. President, my name is Stephen Colbert and tonight it’s my privilege to celebrate this president. We’re not so different, he and I. We get it. We’re not brainiacs on the nerd patrol. We’re not members of the factinista. We go straight from the gut, right sir? That’s where the truth lies, right down here in the gut. Do you know you have more nerve endings in your gut than you have in your head? You can look it up. I know some of you are going to say “I did look it up, and that’s not true.” That’s ’cause you looked it up in a book.

Next time, look it up in your gut. I did. My gut tells me that’s how our nervous system works. Every night on my show, the Colbert Report, I speak straight from the gut, OK? I give people the truth, unfiltered by rational argument.  (the rest is here)

Bush is still smiling gamely at this point, but his smile becomes more and more brittle until it falls off his face after a few moments.  Good sport and nice guy that I’ve often heard George W. Bush is, his politics aside, I’m pretty sure he shook Colbert’s hand at the end, told him he’d done a heck of a job.   But he clearly understood in pretty short order that he was being roasted by a merciless chef with a bullet-proof persona.  You can see that watching his reactions on the video.  My mother loved it.

I tried to get her to watch Colbert’s show a few times, but she never lasted through the opening, switching to an in progress re-run of NCIS, CSI or other murder mystery as I left, befuddled.   She loved murder mysteries, particularly NCIS.  Murder mysteries were increasingly all she read as she got older.  No less a mystery than any of these was her intense dislike of the brilliant Mr. Colbert.

One night I was going through a box of black and white family photographs.  I found a photo that made me feel like a great detective from one of her mysteries.   It was a shot of my uncle, my father’s younger brother, as a young man, dressed in a well-fitting suit.  It could have been a photograph of Stephen Colbert, in character as the rooster-like right-wing talk show host.   My mother strongly disliked my uncle.  She found him narcissistic, tyrannical, unreasonable, demanding and petty.   In  a word, Colbert’s character on the show.   She once desperately offered me a huge monetary bribe to spend a week in Florida when my uncle and aunt planned to visit her, after my father died.  She kept upping the dollar amount as I hesitated.

“Please,” she begged over the phone, “you can’t leave me alone with them!  For a week!  A week, Elie!  There will be bloodshed.”  

I rushed into her room with the photograph of my uncle.

“Is this why you hate Colbert?” I asked, handing her the photo.  

“Oh, my God,” she said, staring at the picture, “oh, my God!”  And then she began to laugh.  Another mystery satisfyingly solved.

 

Draft two is here, complete with a couple of moronic editorial improvements.