
Author Archives: oinsketta
Enough, Elie
“You know, if you read those last few posts of yours, you appear to be a man obsessed. Jesus, Elie, some fuck doesn’t send you back a comment on your manuscript, I mean, boo fucking hoo, welcome to the monkey house,” said the skeleton with a yawn, or pantomiming a scream.
I’m aware of that, dad. It’s not that the fuck didn’t send me back a comment. It’s that he then did what you always did, what that insane former judge once did when he unleashed a torrent of rage on me when he suddenly felt vulnerable.
“Uh oh,” said the skeleton, with mock terror.
I’ve got to keep this brief, at the risk of nauseating my two or three loyal readers. The fuck didn’t send back a comment. It kind of made sense. He’s a distracted guy who cranks out short 1,000 word pieces for $250 a shot, keeps ’em light. He’s a craftsman, an excellent writer, a great raconteur and, also, a long-time professional writer.
I was hoping for his feedback, he’s a very smart guy and he expressed what seemed like genuine fascination with the Book of Irv project, but when I didn’t get any feedback, after a few tries, I moved along with the writing, as you know. There was no point to keep asking him for something he clearly wasn’t ready, or willing, to give. I kept writing.
“Nursing a grudge,” said the skeleton.
Sure, if you like. I suppose I concluded he wasn’t that much of a friend after the third time I asked for his notes and heard nothing back from him.
“Not an unreasonable conjecture,” said the skeleton.
When I got an email from him recently asking if I was pissed at him for some reason because I’d ignored an email he sent, one it turned out I never got because he’d accidentally sent it to a phantom mailbox, and, although he never followed up when he didn’t hear back (as he’d chided me for not doing), he felt a little hurt, the irony of it was too beautiful to ignore. The irony was fucking gorgeous, dad.
My appreciation of that irony, which I did my best to capture in 1,000 words, was apparently forwarded to him by his ex, mortally offended on his behalf and feeling betrayed that I had, apparently, been vicious by referring to the fact that he didn’t need the $250, although I expected, if he’d been honest, he’d concede he’d have been annoyed to have it plucked from his hand by his editor friend, as the fellow had done to me, accepting a piece and later rejecting it.
“I’ll pretend I followed all that. This guy’s ex-wife was offended on her former husband’s behalf and sent him the piece that also offended, nay, infuriated him?” said the skeleton.
Bingo. I suppose my callous observation that he doesn’t need the $250 was my treacherous betrayal. I was supposed by this snide crack, I surmise, to have brutally laid bare what must never be spoken of. It would be obvious to even a casual reader what “doesn’t need the $250” really means, and it certainly wasn’t just merely to illustrate his lack of empathy toward a friend who’d gotten slightly screwed. Nobody, apparently, is supposed to know the shameful secret that this guy is sitting on a shitload of cash, stocks, bonds, etc. I guess, somewhere in the twenty, thirty million dollar range as of twenty years ago.
You know, he’s a salt of the earth working man, who has always worked hard for a living, sometimes in low-paid jobs to make ends meet, this fortune he long ago inherited is a closely held, and apparently humiliating, secret that has nothing to do with anything and it’s certainly not his long-time good friends’ fucking business nor his ex-wife’s business to run her fucking mouth about, whatever the original context may have been for her disclosure.
“Uh, OK,” said the skeleton, understandably beginning to lose interest in the whole thing.
I kept writing about the details of the situation the last few days, after furious, terse emails from both of them decrying my vicious, unprovoked hatchet job. It was my only way to process it. Writing allowed the cortisol and adrenaline coursing through my system to dissipate. I had to dissect exactly what the flood of fight or flight chemicals was caused by, and sorting my thoughts and editing them was the only way I could do that. As I got a better understanding of the reason I felt as hurt as I did, the situation began to make more sense. I was finally able to calm down and come to a reasonable resolution of the whole thing.
“And the flood of stress hormones was caused by me?” said the skeleton.
No, dad, you’re cool now. It was caused by the guy’s immediate and enraged reaction when I finally asked him why he’d never commented on the pages I sent him. He aggressively blamed me for being hurt without cause, told me anybody but an asshole would have just followed up again, and was enraged that I had been so unkind to him. His tart email ended: That being said, i think you’ll agree that you and I are done here. Then his ex jumped in, too incensed to use her words, and started clawing at my eyes.
“Sounds fair enough,” said the skeleton of my father, “they sound completely nuts. Fuck ’em.”
Not with your dick, dad.
Anger and “The Insula”
Last word.
I will keep this simple. I’ve heard (granted from a historian Bill Moyers interviewed) that there’s a specific part of the human brain, located in the primitive, survival-oriented region that’s sometimes referred to as the lizard or reptile brain, where anger is experienced. Let’s call it the insula (or insular cortex), and assume, for our purposes here, that feeling anger is one of its primary functions.
When the insula is engaged for anger, all bodily engines are mobilized for fight or flight. Cortisol and adrenaline, already coursing through the system, are ready to be released in a flood, as soon as the insula gives the command. The ability to see nuance and make distinctions disappears, along with the ability to compromise. All the person with the glowing insula can see is rage and the enemy in the upcoming battle. There is a clear evolutionary survival advantage to this hyper-focus.
It explains why it seems impossible for an angry person to acknowledge certain things that may seem easily seen. An angry person, told that his ignoring three requests for a comment was hurtful, cannot process that information. You would think anybody who had been ignored several consecutive times would feel hurt, at least slighted. You’d think it would be an easy matter to put yourself in the other person’s place and feel and express regret for not doing the decent, human thing for a friend. If your insula is glowing, and you never learned how to calm it, it is actually biologically impossible to do any of those things.
First of all, you will say, I don’t remember ever having ignored you, so I couldn’t have done it on purpose and you’re the aggressor for blaming me. Second, you say I ignored you but it’s quite possible I responded to you, I think I did, and you just, for whatever reason, maybe to feel justified in your irrational rage, blocked it out. Third, I don’t even remember if I even read the thing you asked me to comment on, it made no lasting impression in any case, so what’s the fuss about? Fourth, you’re a fucking hypocrite, I sent you something you never responded to, even though I realize now I must have somehow sent it to an address where it never reached you. Fifth, I will need your unconditional surrender before any peace negotiations can begin. Blah blah blah.
The effective thing to say, if you meant to have a sincere and lasting peace, and friendship, with the other, would be more like:
Of course I’d be hurt if you did that to me, anyone would. A friend should not have to beg another friend for feedback on a project they had a long, animated conversation about. This is especially true between two writers who have discussed one of their projects. Three separate requests should have been enough. It’s not necessary to send me the email string to prove I never uttered a peep in response. It was wrong of me to question your veracity on that, I was angry and feeling desperate. I was an asshole not to get back to you, a jerk to insist you should have contacted me for feedback a fourth time, and a fifth if necessary, and I apologize. It’s not as though I’m working two full-time jobs and am overwhelmed by work, I’m semi-retired. I understand it was hurtful, I didn’t mean to do it and I hope you will forgive me. Would it help if I read it now and gave you some notes you might be able to work with?
The insula, glowing, knows only how to continue the do-or-die fight for survival. God bless the reptile brain, when fight is needed. Hard to be friends with an angry reptile, though. I speak from long experience.
NOTE:
The frontal insula is where people sense love and hate, gratitude and resentment, self-confidence and embarrassment, trust and distrust, empathy and contempt, approval and disdain, pride and humiliation, truthfulness and deception, atonement and guilt.
The NY Times printed this, on June 2, 2007. (source)
The D.U. and Rosh Hashana
The D.U. was the Dreaded Unit, my father, who died in April of 2005. Rosh Hashana is the Jewish New Year, it means literally “head of the year”. This year is 5777 on the Jewish calendar. There are still a few literal-minded, God-fearing Jews who believe that it was 5777 years since God created the heavens and the earth in six days, resting on the seventh, but I can’t imagine there are very many of them.
For all I know Chava, my father’s mother, believed that. Belief, of course, is a funny thing, not really amenable to debate or logic. The things we live by are like that, they can only be changed by an experience that makes a deep enough impression. Belief is like anger, I suppose, or love — it resides in a deep place in the brain, in the soul.
If you love someone, it’s not the end of the world if they say something you might find offensive coming from somebody else. You understand completely where they’re coming from. If you are disposed to become enraged, you will see provocations everywhere, no matter how imperceptible these might be to others.
I suppose it’s the same with God. My friend’s parents spent the years 1939-45 as teenagers and young adults in Poland at the mercy of the Nazis. The Nazis, I hardly need to say, were not known for mercy, which they despised as a race-weakening Jewish vice. My friend’s mother had been pushed out the back door with her much younger brother by her parents and told to run as the Nazis burst in the front door. They survived in hiding, and living by their wits and their luck, for the entire war. His father wound up in a concentration camp and was eventually promoted to the Major League team at Auschwitz. The mother came out of the war an atheist, quite reasonably believing there could be no God after what she’d experienced. The father came out of Auschwitz deeply religious, eternally grateful to God for the miracle of saving his life, another reasonable conclusion.
It’s hard to know what my father’s view of God was. I know Chava was very religious and he was raised in a strict, joyless, loveless home where every commandment of God was taken very seriously. Every one but the crucial unwritten ones about loving each other, being kind, forgiving those who seek your forgiveness.
Because he was raised as an orthodox Jew, my father continued to go to High Holiday services every year until the end of his life. He would fast and pray in a synagogue all day on Yom Kippur. At the end of his life he waved feebly and shook his head when I asked if he wanted me to say kaddish for him after he died.
Kaddish is a prayer of thanks to God, uttered in Aramaic, a language only a few scholars can understand today. Traditionally the male child says kaddish for a dead parent every morning, not long after sunrise, for a year, in the company of at least nine other Jewish men who will also chant the haunting prayer with the mourner.
My father waved his hand weakly and said it made no difference to him, he really didn’t care. Sekhnet and I said kaddish together every day for thirty days after he died anyway. In the event, I guess, that if his soul was hovering nearby, he’d be touched and feel loved.
I feel like my father instilled in my sister and me what I consider the most important teachings of our religion, though he didn’t try to impose anything regarding the rituals. When we tasted bacon at a diner, and loved it, he didn’t object when my mother began frying bacon in the kitchen at home, as his mother, Chava, rotated angrily in her grave. He didn’t eat it, but he didn’t raise any objection. He was, we all were, primarily secular Jews, Jewish humanists.
We celebrated Rosh Hashana with a big meal, our small family gathered around. Sam and Yetta, my mother’s parents were there, Eli and his wife Helen, and my uncle Paul and aunt Barbara, my cousins Jon and Ann. We did the same at Passover. During these annual meals he instilled in my sister and me the moral essence of the occasion.
Passover was about identifying strongly with the oppressed and fighting oppression, for we were once slaves to Pharaoh in Egypt. Rosh Hashana was about a new start, getting all of our ethical affairs in order, making sure God knew we would try to do better in the coming year by making amends, apologizing to those we’d hurt and granting forgiveness to those who sought it from us.
Which, actually, you know, is fucking hilarious.
It is way easier to rise and please be seated, and rise, and turn to page 79 for the long standing silent prayer, and be seated, and please rise, and shiver with awe as the holy ark is opened, and bow your head in unison with the congregation when the appropriate words are chanted, rip your sleeve to show your penance, and sing in a chorus of praise to God, than it is to go up to someone you’ve been mean to and humbly apologize. I don’t believe I ever saw my father do that, nor, in my experience did he ever forgive, himself or anybody else.
I think of that today because good people, hurt, routinely act viciously. They cling righteously to their angry justifications for why the hurtful event was not their fault, why you were the actual cruel perpetrator of anger and hurt, not them. They will mutter a half apology while blaming you for being hurt and not unconditionally accepting what they consider a completely sincere semi-apology. They utter what Harry Shearer styles an if-pology,
“If you feel I did something bad to you, and I’m sure you feel I did because of what a relentless prick you’re being to me now, then, truly, I am deeply, deeply sorry.”
You can take an apology like that, swallow it with a little sacramental wine, and blow it out your ass like the fart it was to begin with.
“Couldn’t have said it better myself,” said the skeleton of my father, not without a slight blush of pride on a very chilly Rosh Hashana night on his lonely hill in the boneyard.
Knots
When I was a sprout, in the late sixties or early seventies, a brief period of creativity when there seemed to be wonderful possibilities for the human and natural world, there was a book called Knots. It was written by a Scottish psychiatrist named R. D. Laing, about whom Wikipedia offers this great line: Many former colleagues regarded him as a brilliant mind gone wrong but there were some who thought Laing was somewhat psychotic.
As I recall the short book was a series of poetic vignettes about things like Complementary Schismogenesis (“creating of division”), somewhat gnarly psychological concepts involved in relationships, laid out, with some wit, in simple, down to earth scenarios, or dialogues. As I dimly remember the book, they were more elegant versions of things like:
Guy is very sensitive to being ignored, interprets silence as anger. He writes a play about the pain of being ignored, asks his friend the playwright if he’ll have a look. Playwright cheerfully agrees, takes the manuscript and never writes back about Guy’s play. Guy asks the playwright three times for his feedback. Each time he gets a short, witty reply unrelated to his play.
Months pass. Guy gets another unrelated note from the playwright, complaining that Guy is now ignoring him. Guy writes an arguably nasty poem about the playwright, or at least one the playwright might find insulting. Playwright’s attention is called to the poem, which is tacked to a small door around the back, by a troll. The poem infuriates him, he seethes about the unprovoked attack, attacks Guy as an oversensitive jerk for not simply asking a fourth time when he didn’t hear back the first three times.
“Plus,” says the playwright, “I said I’d look at his fucking play, I didn’t promise I’d say anything about it, Jesus.”
Complimentary Schismogenesis, I am told, is when two opposites are locked in some kind of conflict, neither getting what they need out of the arrangement, the attempts of each to resolve it, coming from opposite orientations, only make the problem more intractable, tighten the knot. The schism continues to deepen as the two struggle cluelessly in opposite directions to heal the underlying fissure.
If we assume everyone is somewhat fucked up, damaged by life, laboring under certain sometimes vexing disabilities, friends are those whose asshole side we are able to overlook. The friend has other lovable qualities we value that counterbalance the bad tendencies we all have. We extend the benefit of the doubt to friends, a benefit we do not readily confer on random people we encounter.
I told a friend recently that whatever other problems we may have had with each other over the years, we both are confident that neither of us would, seeing the other strapped in the electric chair, throw the switch before insisting that every single witness had a chance to speak. He agreed.
I got a short, infuriated email today, keeping it simple, telling me I must agree that I’m dead to the writer of the email. I read it to an old friend who immediately suggested I call the guy and see if I could placate him. I told him I’ve already written back, trying to be gentle, comparing the guy’s hasty, angry email to an arrow let fly in a spasm of anger, an arrow that can’t be called back. I told him I’d replied as mildly as I could and wasn’t sure there was anything to be achieved by calling this angry fellow who had already done the prosecutor, witness, judge and jury bit in very short order.
During the call to my friend I had an email back from the infuriated man. I was reluctant to read it so soon after his “you’re dead to me” note. Curiosity finally got the best of me. He placed conditions on our possibly remaining friends, reminding me again that, in his opinion, I had attacked him viciously. As for what I claimed he had done, he certainly hadn’t meant to do it, if he even did do it, which he was not prepared to admit. Plus, if I was hurt by his behavior, it was my own fault for not telling him he was being an insensitive jerk since obviously he hadn’t been aware of it.
It got me thinking about the nature of friendship, whether friends ever get the right to have a temper tantrum, ignore your needs and rant angrily at you until they are satisfied. I suppose there are certain friends who have earned the right to do that one time, maybe twice, for good cause, and get a pass. Then, since they are good friends, they calm down and apologize for their outpouring of anger, and are able to see the situation from your point of view and promise to try to do better in the future.
I have to think about this proposed detente more, since my general policy is once somebody shows me raw rage, that savage inability to empathize that is characteristic of righteous fury, there is really no coming back from that.
Or, rather, without an honest and mutually vulnerable exchange, there is only the possibility of returning to a false and fragile peace, ready to be set ablaze the next time a spark comes near the short, highly flammable fuse. Another chance to prove to yourself, and intimates, that you have mastered the urge to strike back in kind, a fairly paltry reward for a very strenuous bit of forbearance.
Dueling Douche Bags in the New Jersey Night
Friedman and I once went to hit golfballs at a NJ driving range on a Saturday night some time in the 1980s. Neither of us had ever done it and we both sucked badly at it. Standing side by side we snorted and giggled as we hit dribblers and sideways three hoppers. Almost assuredly we were also somewhat intoxicated as we tried to drive golfballs for the first time.
Making the obvious assumption of the homophobic day (and fair enough, given the optics), two self-respecting macho Jerseyites walking to their cars behind us loudly exchanged a sneering comment about the two girlish fags taking their homo hacks. Nowadays that witless comment seems hideous but quaint, but at the time, the words made my ears burn.
My next swing was like Mantle driving a golf ball, I hit it flush and sent a long drive to the back of the lot there (my only decent shot of the night).
I could swear I heard the two homos behind me clam up simultaneously. Very satisfied, I felt, as I hit the next sixty sissified dribblers, although Friedman and I, more self-conscious now, tried a bit harder to suppress our giggles.
On Being Direct
Getting to the Heart of Things
We live in a largely superficial society, sadly enough. Authentic emotion is often suppressed in favor of putting on the smiling face of the winner. The only emotions everyone in America is free to express are happiness and rage, which is a fucking shame. We are warned not to advertise that you feel sad, unless the provocation is extreme and obvious. In the case of a death, or mass murder, nobody could blame you for feeling sadness. In fact, you’d be a monster not to be sad in the aftermath of a tragedy.
But sadness for no real cause? They have medications for that. Only a loser is sad for no reason. That all this is clearly bullshit designed to foster the inauthentic, unexaminable life of the acquisitive consumer has nothing to do with it. Drive a winner car and you’ll feel better about yourself. Pretending you’re not a loser is half the battle, the constant commercial assures us.
I have a friend who’s an excellent writer. He was a professional writer for many years, a deep thinker and a man of deep feelings. It seems to be part of his professional credo that the deepest feelings do not belong in writing one does for pay. He advised me to keep it light when I was sending things to his friend, the gatekeeper for an online publisher, for $250 a pop. He writes a 1,000 word anecdote in an hour, eats lunch, gives the piece a final polish and by dinnertime he gets the thumbs up and a check for $250. Of the fifty or so he’s sent in, only one has ever been rejected and none has ever needed to be revised in any way.
I scored on the first two I sent in, and it was great, even if my pieces were a bit darker than most of the others posted on the on-line magazine. Even as a few of my thoughts were muddled by a clumsy editor trying to earn his keep. Then the hoop I had to jump through for my $250 was made smaller and smaller.
The third piece I sent was accepted for publication, and I smiled as I tallied another $250 score in my notebook. Weeks went by and I didn’t see it on-line, nor was there any check. I inquired. “Oh, I could have sworn I emailed you that I reconsidered, we’re not using it. Beautifully written and powerful, but, oddly, too personal for a personal anecdote.”
My writer friend told me over dinner to shrug it off, keep ’em light. He keeps ’em light, but I wonder how easily he’d shrug off having the $250 snatched back after the piece was accepted. He doesn’t need the money, so there’s that, but, still, it didn’t sit right with me that he’d feel nothing about having $250 plucked out of his pocket.
Later the two of us had dinner and I described the Book of Irv to him. He’d had family traumas aplenty, but his father was apparently a good and gentle soul who always treated him well. He told me it was a fascinating project, trying to conjure the complicated wonderful, monstrous Dreaded Unit father I had described to him over the years.
As we said goodbye he told me he was looking forward to reading some of the manuscript. I told him I’d send him the link to several selections, which I did when I got home. I sent the earliest incarnation of the Book of Irv site (link) and told him how much I looked forward to his take on it. I thought this piece (link) in particular, about my father asking me hopelessly for Detroit Tiger scores all through my childhood, would resonate with him. He is a huge sports fan, currently writing a book on college basketball.
The next email I had from him read:
from the late, great New Yorker cartoonist William Hamilton, speaking of his novels and screenplays:”Although I have not exactly been published or produced, I have had some things professionally typed.”
Outside of that zen koan, I never heard a word back about the pages I’d sent him.
In fairness to him, he is famous for being an affable space cadet. Once, in a restaurant, his wife’s chair fell backwards, she almost fell with it, and he didn’t seem to notice, absorbed as he was finishing his anecdote. Good natured obliviousness is one of his known characteristics. I figured he was just being himself and I later sent him a few other Irv pieces, asking what he thought. I never heard a peep.
Our email conversation petered out after he wrote, of my comparing my frustration trying to get a reply from a promising business contact who was not responding to root canal:
“Have to disagree — based on 30 yrs of extreme periodontistry, molars and their double roots are worse.”
We’d had a good laugh over dinner last April recalling Mel Brooks’ genius definition of tragedy and comedy. “Tragedy is when I break my fingernail, comedy is when you fall down a manhole and die.”
I was truly at a loss to account for his silence about my work. Since we rarely talk more than once or twice a year, I put it out of my head and kept writing.
Yesterday I wrote a piece about sports and sent it to him, hoping the note found him well and telling him the piece made me think of him, a one time competitive tennis player and a seasoned teller of tales I have always enjoyed swapping yarns with.
To my surprise, he wrote back instantly, telling me he assumed I was angry with him since I’d never written back to his several emails. I checked and the last emails I had from him were things he forwarded, months ago. I wrote telling him this and he replied that he must have sent the personal emails I’d ignored to the wrong address.
I don’t often write poems, but sometimes they seem the most direct way to process and express a specific thing. On the subway an hour later I found myself writing:
My Proudest Sports Moment
Sports is a metaphor for a lot of things, many of them fairly mundane if not moronic. But one very beautiful and meaningful thing is sportsmanship. Playing fair, and cleanly, and being a good teammate, is no small metaphor for how a person should always try to live, even as it is largely a neglected art on the professional level where trash talk and loudly stinking millionaire egotism has become the norm in our sickened unto the death society.
Top personal contender for my proudest sports moment was a long, grueling contest I had on a paddle ball court in Queens with an Israeli who kept assuring his friend, waiting to play the winner on the only court available, that he’d beaten me many times, that I was shit, that he’d kick my ass easily, that I was lucky as a bitch every time I made a good shot. In his defense, he said all this in Hebrew and had no idea I understood everything he was saying.
He soon had me down 9-2 in a 15 point game, then 12-3. Then I just got sick of hearing his bullshit and wound up beating him in triple or quadruple overtime. You have to win by two when the game is tied at 14, 15, 16, etc. and in the end I did. He was like a wet, wrung-out rag as his friend started on to the court to play me.
I graciously gave them the court, but not before turning to my opponent, putting a hand on his shoulder, and telling him in flowing colloquial Hebrew “this happened to you, sweetheart, because it wasn’t enough for you to play the game and win– you wanted to annihilate me….”. The look on his face was indescribable and his friend had a very hard time not pissing himself as he fell over in hysterics. I waved goodbye and walked off, feeling like a true champion. I remember feeling like Bruce Lee.
But that was an ego-gratifying event in a sport I had decent skill in. The true number one moment in my life playing sports was this one, years later, with much less personal glory in it for me, but much more illustrative of the way I have always tried to live.
I taught a semester of French (a language I mangle badly) at the Frederick Douglass Academy, a public middle school in East Harlem, directly across the East River from Yankee Stadium. I was hired because the dynamic principal, Lorraine Monroe, hated her French teacher and wanted to get rid of him. I’d been working in every kind of weather (there were many blizzards that winter) as a sub at the attached elementary school, been screwed by the moron principal of the other place, who reneged on her offer of a full time job, and I went to the other side of the building to say goodbye to Ms. Monroe.
“Widaen, do you speak French by any chance?” she asked me. I told her I was taking a French translation test at CCNY in a few weeks to complete my Masters requirements. That was good enough for her.
I rehearsed the line I delivered with a Gallic shrug when the French department chair asked me how my French was. “Le Francais n’est pas exactement mon metier, you know,” here I gave the nonchalant little shrug and added what I didn’t know how to say in French “but I can get by”. He nodded, good enough for him. I was hired for an extended joke term as French teacher for several classes of 8th and 9th graders.
At the school there were several Teach for America teachers, America’s brightest and most idealistic young graduates, who taught for a year or two in inner city schools before going on to their graduate studies and lucrative and fabulous medical, legal, financial careers.
Toward the end of the year there was a school sports day and Lorraine Monroe walked her entire school and staff a couple of miles across Harlem to the State Park built on top of the sewage treatment plant on the Hudson River in West Harlem. The Park was impressive, a giant running track, many basketball courts, both indoor and outdoor, a weight room, tennis courts, an indoor pool. This particular day the air flow was moving the right way and it did not smell like the million tons of human waste being processed directly under us. In fairness to the many Harlemites who had protested its construction, on many days the whole neighborhood now does smell like shit.
When we got to the track, one of the young Teach for America guys, a tennis pro, I’d heard, challenged me to a foot race. He was ten years younger than me, and wiry, but the kids seemed to want to see the race, so I said ‘sure’. I was amazed by the number of kids who were noisily rooting for me as we ran. He claimed he won, but if he did, it was by less than a step. A surprisingly slow motherfucker for a young tennis pro, I remember thinking. I probably said as much to him at the time.
But that was not the great sports moment. It came an hour or two later, when I walked into a gym where a full court basketball game was going on. For some reason the tennis pro and an even more athletic Teach for America guy were on one team, the other team was all kids. The team with the two adults was beating them something like 45-6 when I stepped on to the court for the side that was having its ass kicked.
I don’t recall taking a single shot, or pulling down a single board, and I never was a very good basketball player. I just fell into the point guard role. I kept calmly talking sense, distributing the ball, pointing out a guy who wasn’t covered, getting everyone back on defense.
In a very short time the game was tied. I remember the way my teammates changed their demeanor, from whipped dogs to the clearly better team. I remember the shock on the two young superstar teacher’s faces as the seesaw pivoted, the cautious way they started to play, the shots they were suddenly bricking.
I don’t remember the final outcome. I think I probably left before the end of the game, rotated back out and left the gym, never found out who won or lost, I truly didn’t give a shit.
It remains my proudest sports moment.
The Tipsy Anti-Semite
Camp Tel Yehuda, the national camp for Young Judaea, the Zionist youth group my father had long worked for as his second job, was located by the Delaware River in Barryville, New York. Who Barry was nobody knew, or even where exactly the town of Barryville was in the late 1960s and early 70s.
There was a German restaurant called Reber’s, a mile of two from the camp, in what we thought of as downtown Barryville, if there had been anything else downtown with it. Across a little metal bridge from Reber’s was Shohola, Pennsylvania. Shohola had a little general store and possibly also a post office. There was probably also a post office in Barryville, beyond Reber’s, and maybe even a store of some kind. But if you needed some little item from a store, you went to Reber’s, hung a left and clanked over the Delaware to Pennsylvania.
We were told that Barryville had once been an epicenter for the German-American Bund. The Bund was an organization for Americans of German ancestry, a group that comprised more than a quarter of the white American population during World War Two. The Bund made its voice heard in large public demonstrations when people, particularly Jews, began defaming Time Magazine’s Man of The Year for 1938. By 1938 Mr. Hitler was very controversial, and taking a lot of shit for things he was doing to make Germany great again. Hitler, for his part, originally had expected that America, with its large, proud Aryan population, and its many Anglo-Saxons, who were almost Aryans, would join Germany in helping end the menace of world Jewry.
Some of the locals who worked at Camp Tel Yehuda displayed an attitude that seemed a bit more what you’d expect in Mississippi than a few hours from Jew York City. While I never directly saw anti-Semitism from any of them, one or two skated close to the line as they did their jobs in the Jewish camp. Stories were told in camp of the local Klan types who drove the dark roads in the heavily wooded area, hunting deer, drinking, hating Jews. Thankfully, I never had any encounters with these types.
My parents spent quite a few summers at the camp, my father as the director, my mother as the registrar. I attended a few sessions there as a camper, made a few lifelong friends, learned rudimentary Hebrew and eventually, since many of my good friends were going and I had little interest in college at the time, flew off for a year in Israel after High School. At the very least, I figured, I’d come home bilingual.
When I returned from the year in Israel, speaking Hebrew to a lying, criminal Israeli cabbie named Sarfati who drove me back from JFK, it was summer and my parents were up at camp. I got a chance to betray and enrage them almost as soon as I touched down, but that is a story for another time. I went up to Barryville not long after I got back and my parents and aunt and uncle took me out to a restaurant several miles from Barryville where this memorable vignette unfolded.
The little town may have been Pond Eddy, I don’t recall, I’m too lazy to look at a map, and what difference does it make anyway? It was a restaurant with a salad bar. We sat at the table, my parents and I, along with my aunt and uncle. My sister may have been there or she may have been a camper at T.Y. that session. I don’t recall any other customers eating there while we had an early dinner. It was full daylight outside, I remember that.
I was at that time skinny as a Whippet. I was a skinny teenager, but also, had just completed a month-long intensive course of dysentery during the end of my time in Israel. It was hubris that brought about my weeks unable to keep any food in my body. I had eaten all the things we were warned not to eat, the fly speckled shish kebab in the Old City, fresh berries that flies also loved, other delicious but allegedly dangerous foods. By the late spring, after several others had been afflicted with stomach troubles, I foolishly thought myself immune. Turned out I was not. This became clear when I woke suddenly in the middle of the night, stomach full of daggers, running down the hall, hunched over, barely making it.
I’d been better for a few weeks by the time I got back and my appetite was in full effect. I finished my salad and went up to the salad bar to get some more salad. The short, stout maitre de smiled at me. She was nursing a drink and she may even have winked at me. Then my mother got up to get some more salad. My mother was quite heavy at the time, as she had been for most of my childhood. She could have by then been considered obese, I suppose. It was not until after her beloved husband died, and what she called The Widow’s Diet, that she lost the weight she’d been unable to for many decades.
When my mother reached the salad bar the maitre de turned mean. “Haven’t you had enough?” she snapped, as my mother was about to put some pickled beets on her plate. My mother recoiled as if she’d been slapped and she fought to hold back tears. Suddenly all this Nazi stuff I’d heard about the area was palpable. I remember thinking “what the fuck?” and having no doubt this snippy maitre de was an anti-Semite. I looked at my father across the table from me, his lips were pressed together and he sat perfectly still.
My uncle jumped up at once, like an angry rooster, and went straight over to the maitre de. “That was a very disrespectful thing to do! You owe my sister-in-law an apology. If you weren’t a woman … I’d take you outside and teach you how to treat your customers!” he snarled, not sparing a bit of sprayed saliva. The maitre de stood her ground, smug, clearly not cowed by this empty threat from a slight, middle-aged Jew.
There was eventually a muttered, almost convincing apology to my mother from the maitre de, but the meal was pretty well ruined. We stayed, and ate there, I’m not sure why, thinking back on it. I remember clearly my father’s silence, and it bothered me that it took my uncle to stand up and take my mother’s part. My father later explained that the bitchy maitre de had been drunk, if not also a little crazy, and, yes, probably an anti-Semite.
The only other thing I recall is the tipsy maitre de, in an attempt to, as my grandmother Yetta would have phrased it, “make nice”, coming up behind me and putting her hand on my shoulder. She asked me sweetly if I was enjoying my food. I answered by roughly shrugging her hand off my shoulder. She took the hint and backed discreetly away, the ice cubes in her glass gently clinking as she went.