It’s like this insane idiot is playing on a loop

2019 tweets after “Russiagate”, fresh as if he just truthed ‘em yesterday

Speaking of spying or treason, under the Espionage Act, which Trump has been indicted for violating, all the government has to prove is that the defendant had classified documents he was not allowed to have, that he handled them carelessly. In the ex- president, future dictator on day one’s case, while also in a position to give or sell them to the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, Jared’s buddy, or perhaps a fine fellow like Vlad Putin, or Xi, or Orban. 

Add in his recently released filmed obstruction of justice, evidence in the case against him, surveillance video showing his hapless  workers moving boxes, at his direction,  into new hiding places to avoid being seen by the FBI and his lawyers who could then swear that they had never seen the documents he had them falsely declare had all been returned.  He was also trying to make sure the dozens of proofs of his crime were not seized and used as evidence against him.

The only thing he has going for him in that case is the female Alfred E. Neuman who is presiding over US v Trump, after the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals forced her to dismiss Trump v US for lack of jurisdiction and abuse of discretion.

Both cases, the illegal one preemptively brought by Trump to block the government’s case against him, involve the identical fact pattern. She is one dedicated Colombian/American woman, Judge Cannon (shout out to her colleague and countryman Juan Merchan) working her ass off for the man who appointed her.   It appears she’s hoping he’ll reward her doglike loyalty with a Supreme Court seat.  She couldn’t be a more obedient lapdog to reactionary oligarchs religious and racial extremism, than Alito or Thomas. She would be at home on the John Roberts supreme Court.

She’s presiding over the stolen documents trial, for the moment, anyway, but, though she has the most brilliant legal minds at the Federalist Society and Heritage Foundation advising her how not to overstep the bounds of her discretion every step of the way, she doesn’t seem to be that much sharper than her severely limited benefactor, the guilty acting criminal defendant who would be dictator, though only on day one.

We’ll see how much stronger her impulse control remains as she continues wildly lashing out at the Department of Justice on the defendant’s behalf.

Part of being a good Nazi is showing your willingness to show you have the stomach to do whatever needs to be done, and the unflagging stamina to do it by any means necessary.

Nazis demand mockery

As to why this brazen, hopped up, truth-challenged, wife blaming fascist has visible synovitis in his prosthetic left knee, this painful and intractable disease is the least I would wish on this particular powerful spineless reactionary partisan.

Excellent discussion of this lying, corrupt, compromised, misogynist fuck’s behavior, by Ari Melber.

Jamie Raskin makes irrefutable argument on required recusal of Thomas and Alito from MAGA cases

There is no hole in Raskin’s legal reasoning, as he presented it in today’s New York Times. The law is very clear, whatever a whining Alito might have to say about his wife’s indomitable flag flying habits and his own complete and obvious objectivity. We can only hope the remainder of the MAGA caucus on our highest court heed binding federal law, the Constitution, and their own precedent and force their two openly pro-insurrection colleagues to obey the law and take themselves off of pending cases that will decide the fate of insurrectionists, and quite possibly our Republic.

The only weakness in Raskin’s impeccable, beautifully written argument is that the action irrefutably required by the Constitution, explicit federal statute and Supreme Court precedent, depends on the transactional ethics of “justices” from an extremist judicial fraternity actually following the law to enforce required ethics. Several of them (Kavanaugh, Roberts — rewarded by Dubya Bush for his excellent work on the case that made him president — and Coney Barrett) were partisan actors, sent to Florida in the days leading up to Bush v. Gore, a highly dubious legal ruling decided by at least two judges (The Black Klansman being one of them) who had an ethical obligation to recuse themselves from that nakedly partisan case. The Federalist Six are lifetime political appointees who have many times over revealed their lack of integrity and their fraternity’s united contempt for precedent, norms and the rule of law.

Here’s a taste of Jamie Raskin’s op ed in today’s NY Times:

In one key 5-to-3 Supreme Court case from 2016, Williams v. Pennsylvania, Justice Anthony Kennedy explained why judicial bias is a defect of constitutional magnitude and offered specific objective standards for identifying it. Significantly, Justices Alito and Thomas dissented from the majority’s ruling.

The case concerned the bias of the chief justice of Pennsylvania, who had been involved as a prosecutor on the state’s side in an appellate death penalty case that was before him. Justice Kennedy found that the judge’s refusal to recuse himself when asked to do so violated due process. Justice Kennedy’s authoritative opinion on recusal illuminates three critical aspects of the current controversy.

First, Justice Kennedy found that the standard for recusal must be objective because it is impossible to rely on the affected judge’s introspection and subjective interpretations. The court’s objective standard requires recusal when the likelihood of bias on the part of the judge “is too high to be constitutionally tolerable,” citing an earlier case. “This objective risk of bias,” according to Justice Kennedy, “is reflected in the due process maxim that ‘no man can be a judge in his own case.’” A judge or justice can be convinced of his or her own impartiality but also completely missing what other people are seeing.

Second, the Williams majority endorsed the American Bar Association’s Model Code of Judicial Conduct as an appropriate articulation of the Madisonian standard that “no man can be a judge in his own cause.” Model Code Rule 2.11 on judicial disqualification says that a judge “shall disqualify himself or herself in any proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” This includes, illustratively, cases in which the judge “has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party,” a married judge knows that “the judge’s spouse” is “a person who has more than a de minimis interest that could be substantially affected by the proceeding” or the judge “has made a public statement, other than in a court proceeding, judicial decision or opinion, that commits or appears to commit the judge to reach a particular result.” These model code illustrations ring a lot of bells at this moment.

Third and most important, Justice Kennedy found for the court that the failure of an objectively biased judge to recuse him- or herself is not “harmless error” just because the biased judge’s vote is not apparently determinative in the vote of a panel of judges. A biased judge contaminates the proceeding not just by the casting and tabulation of his or her own vote but by participating in the body’s collective deliberations and affecting, even subtly, other judges’ perceptions of the case.

read the rest here

Whiny little Nazi responds to Senate Judiciary Committee’s strongly worded letter about recusal from MAGA-related cases

The Nazi sophist replied by letter to Senator Durbin’s spineless attempt to get him to do the right thing. He cited the below as proof that he has no legal obligation to recuse himself from a case he flew flags in support of one of the parties in, and that party’s right to use violence and trickery to overthrow an election he felt he deserved to win. His answer, really, was 6-3 suck it, cuck!

He then claimed it was all his wife’s doing, saying, sub silento, that his wife, who loves to fly flags and frequently refuses to take them down when he asks, has the right to fly a Confederate flag with a swastika on it if she wants, since they jointly own both homes and he doesn’t have anything to do with her Christ-given First Amendment freedom of expression. Men, of course, Alito piously suggests, have no right to use any kind of moral suasion on women, under any circumstances (unless they are raped, in which case, God wants that left up to the gerrymandered Republican legislatures of Alabama and the rest of the God-fearing states).

Speaking of the First Amendment, fuck that fucking puto.

Whiny little Nazi

On the day when we remember our valiant dead, killed in wars, it is worth recalling what the now old men (my father, drafted when he turned 18, would be 100 next week) who fought and died in great numbers to defeat Nazism died for.   The freedom to have a voice in government, no matter how small, and to sometimes see justice done in a democracy, rather than the terrifying absence of all fairness in a totalitarian state ruled by obedience to the will of one enraged psychopath bent on revenge.

Below is a clip of Sam Alito, one of our nine unappealable lifetime rulers on what is lawful in the US, whining about a made up theoretical scenario in which a president, after committing crimes while in office, will be compelled, after losing a “close and hotly contested” election, (say by a razor thin 7,000,000 vote margin as the ex-president now making the immunity claim did) to pardon himself, or foment violence to stay in office, if absolute lifetime presidential immunity for criminality while in office is not preemptively granted.  You know, since history shows that every president before Trump was immediately indicted for crimes, by his political enemies, after leaving office… while somehow all forgetting to invoke their absolute constitutional right not to be indicted.

This kind of floridly assholic line of reasoning/questioning can only be posed by a judicial genius who is also a fucking Nazi.

And when I say Nazi, recall that this was a party of ambitious power-hungry climbers willing to do anything to advance the Nazi cause.  They were not all-in on mass murder, until it was required of them by their unquestioning obedience to the will of their Führer, which was their only principle, outside of seeking their own power.  The 2020 GOP platform had one plank, whatever the Big Guy wants, we support it.  Remember also, it took the Nazis several years in power, after years of violence, rhetorical and physical, to come to power, before they started committing the serious crimes and wholesale murder they are now known for. 

A guy like Alito is a Nazi because he openly demonstrates his partisan willingness to further the merciless party line, whatever it might be, and enhance the power of his sponsors and fellow extremists, no matter what.  He does this over and over again, in his judicial opinions and angry public statements, as when brazenly lying on FOX about why his Stop the Steal flags were flying outside two of his homes. Some commie called his wife the c word!   She had every right to fly the flag of insurrection over their house!

Check him out in the absurd presidential absolute blanket immunity from criminal prosecution hearing (that, but for several appointees by a criminal defendant, should have been held, and decided, if the ridiculous claim needed to be heard at all, in December 2023, as DOJ requested).

Why I hate irrationality

When someone asserts their will without any reason other than “I am asserting my will no matter what, and you may not fucking question or defy me” understand that you cannot reason with this kind of person. No appeal to fairness, decency, reasonableness, empathy, friendship, kinship, mutuality, morality or anything else will make any difference. There is no negotiation with people who are irrational, particularly when these fuckers are in a rage. Their “arguments” are incoherent, there is no conflict that can be discussed, no possible compromise, no possibility of future understanding. Still, it can take decades to understand what you are up against when you suddenly face this implacable truculence in someone you care about, are connected to, have a long, fond history with.

I recently sent several chapters from the second draft of my manuscript to an old friend who asked to read them. I sent them after explaining that I needed her comments, no matter how brief, to let me know she’d read the pages. I told her how hard it is to get feedback from readers, and how necessary such feedback is to understand how certain writings land with a reader, what needs to be fixed or otherwise clarified. Hearing nothing in a week, I sent a follow up note. After another follow up several days later, with no response, I started to get pissed off. It was tempting to write something angry and dismissive. I note that all of this happened during a few weeks of escalating medical troubles and nights of poor sleep.

In the end, I was glad I’d held my disappointment and temper in check. I wrote this to her, after a phone conversation that helped me greatly from a medical perspective (she’s a retired doctor who did research as we spoke and came to a logical conclusion as to the source and cure of my present autoimmune situation), to help her understand why silence by way of response is so intolerable to me.

As you described, when you were upset as a kid you closed yourself in your room and did math.  You were good at it and immersing yourself in it took you away from your hurt feelings and helped you regain a sense of order and control, a very important thing for us puny earthlings, particularly when we feel under attack.   My escape was always writing, drawing and playing guitar in my room.  All of these were things I controlled, and got better and better at, all things that took me away from my unfairly battered feelings.  Writing has been so important since my banishment from the group of rabid lemmings who expressed great love for me over the last fifty years.

My father’s most effective weapon of abuse was silence.  I’d talk to him about something that bothered me, worried me, tormented me, and he’d reframe it, bat it away, blame me, etc.  When I wouldn’t let him hijack the conversation, he’d go silent.  No response at all.  It was, and still is, kryptonite to me.  

Gina, after assuring me she was “happy” to hear my concerns, gave me complete, total, unbroken silence for four months (followed by an enraged teenaged/two year-old’s temper tantrum when I forced a meeting by insulting Flack’s fragile manhood).   Her hapless puppet, the “homo”, made excuses, blamed me, got offended, had hissy fits, defended his wife’s right to be an enraged, abusive bitch, got mad, calmed down, insisted over and over on irrational points, made incoherent comebacks, etc. but his periods of silence would only last a few weeks at a time.   Letters, texts, WhatsApps, phone calls from me were all ignored by the two queens, the homophobe and her pathologically obliging mate, during this ugly transition from friendship to eternal hatred, hatred spread generously throughout a large group that comprised most of my close friends and their now adult children — all revealed to be as emotionally/morally malleable as any lynch mob anywhere.

That is why after I told you I need acknowledgement before I’d send you my chapters it was so hurtful not to hear back day after day, even after I sent a few follow-ups.   Every day when I checked my email it would be like another little silent kick in the nuts, so familiar from anyone in my life who had malice or passive aggressive anger to let me know about. The intent isn’t relevant really, the effect is the same, particularly with my stress level turned up due to ongoing and new health threats, 80% disability, medical negligence, etc..

Anyway, fucking read that short bit I sent you again today.  It will take you about 6 minutes.  Then write “nice”, or “oh”, or “I think this will interest a literary agent” or “I’d suggest changing this, adding this” or “well-done” or “you really have an inflated sense of your literary abilities, pal, dontcha?” or “Bitter much?” or “I think you could lose part 3” or “I think this is so-so, even though the writing itself is OK” or “I know nothing about these things, but good luck” or … you get the point.  Anything but nothing.  Without reader feedback I’m working in the dark much of the time in how this material might land and getting this feedback is generally about as easy as pulling out my own wisdom teeth.

And so, we were able to come to a better understanding of each other and preserve a relationship that could have easily been severed forever. She emailed that she found my chapter about the unreliable narrator, the one a perverse but perceptive friend urged me to write, portraying myself as a despicable villain well-deserving of my punishment, very funny. Several people have found this chapter about my unpardonable faults funny. There’s no accounting for taste, I suppose. But I take this all as progress, boys and girls, and another living example of living and learning to do better, and using Reason and an appeal to empathy to work through tangled, inflamed emotions with someone capable of responding in kind.

Stating the obvious about unrepentant Nazi Supreme Court justices

Icon of the far right Justice Antonin Scalia, started this “fuck you, ethics” trend when he refused to recuse himself from a case involving his friend and hunting companion, the aptly named Dick Cheney. When asked about the appearance of impropriety in traveling with Vice President Cheney on Air Force Two for some kind of holiday playtime while he sat on a pending case involving Cheney’s secret Energy Task Force meeting with Enron execs and others to deregulate energy on the West Coast, he told the reporter “I think it’s a sad day in America when people question the integrity of Supreme Court justices.”

The reporter was young, and flustered, and worked for a large corporation, an inherently conservative artificial person. She was apparently unable to follow with “I agree with you that it is a sad day when Americans don’t trust the integrity of a Supreme Court justice. However, that was not responsive to my question. So again, how does this clear appearance of impropriety not require you to recuse yourself from a case involving a powerful friend you vacation with?” If it had been me, I like to think I’d have added “bitch” at the end of that rephrasing of my clear question.

However, the point was made by the arrogant Scalia. A justice can simply say “fuck you for fucking questioning my integrity you fucking commie fuck” and that is the end of any discussion of the appearance of impropriety. Enraged extremist Sam Alito can wear a swastika under his robes, next to his Appeal to Heaven t-shirt, while fingering his authoritative compendium of witch burning anti-abortion jurists, compromised Clarence “Black Klansman” Thomas can seethe publicly about how viciously unfair it is that he’s questioned about undisclosed generous gifts from close billionaire friends who sidled up to him once he was on the Supreme Court, not to mention his rabid, powerful activist wife’s full-throated support of the Stolen Election lie. John Roberts’s wife can make millions referring rightwing lawyers to organizations who bring cases before her husband. Kavanuagh’s huge credit card debt can magically disappear overnight, Gorsuch can suddenly easily sell a property he’d had on the market for years, etc.

These clearly partisan, ideologically pure, anti-democratic, fanatical products of a doctrinaire rightwing legal fraternity are completely out of control, and John Roberts is respectfully silent as he and his five activist colleagues brazen out this crisis of public confidence, using the Scalia method, as he votes with them to rule that partisan gerrymandering is completely legal, unless those drawing the maps are wearing Ku Klux Klan hoods and publicly calling for the mass lynching of Blacks as they remove Black voters from a partisan district to protect the election prospects of one of their own.

This, of course, is 11 years after these anti-democratic creeps neutered the unanimously reauthorized (98-0 in the Senate) Voting Rights Act and later ruled that partisan gerrymandering is a political question that the court can’t comment on, unless, of course, as they clarified recently, it’s a bunch of n-words trying to bring a case previously covered by the Voting Rights Act that henceforth will be impossible to win, under new Supreme Court precedent that shifts the burden to them to prove the merely partisan map was also drawn with unmistakable racist intent.

In overturning two federal courts in South Carolina, Alito, writing for the six, created a new presumption of legislative non-racism that must be overcome by Black plaintiffs, no matter what the lower courts’ fact finding showed, no matter that 62% of Blacks were moved out of Nancy Mace’s district and into Representative Jim Clyburn’s (D-SC) district. Alito needs at least a one vote MAGA majority in the House to avoid a bill of impeachment against him getting to the floor, obviously. Every partisan drawn gerrymandered district counts! Fuck these fucking Nazi putos.

Biden in term two must have Congress expand the court and add four or five moderate, non-Federalist Society “ideological” diehards, to the Supreme Court which must also adopt a binding code of ethics. I think Merrick Garland should be one of the added justices, he will make an excellent, highly principled justice, even if he has not been bold in fighting fascism as our nation’s top law enforcement official. Hopefully it’s not too late for democracy in our country teetering on the brink of Klan/Nazi/White Christian Nationalist rule as a powerful minority uses despair, hatred and fear to permanently cement its hold on absolute power.

In the meantime, no more strongly worded letters to bland, smug corporatist John Roberts, Senator Durbin. Subpoena a few of these openly contemptuous fascists, starting with Samuel “My wife doesn’t like being called a cunt” Alito. Do it Tuesday.

scumbag lawyer’s argument, MAGA-style

From the Colorado appeals court’s decision removing Trump from the Colorado primary ballot after finding him an officer who, at minimum, gave aid and comfort to insurrectionists (“hostages”) violating his oath to protect the country from insurrections against the Constitution. Recall how expeditiously this legally sound ruling was taken up and overturned by the Federalist Society Six, all but one appointed by a Republican president who’d lost the popular vote.

This same immovable block, including two billionaire befriended extremists whose wives have expressed undying love for Trump and what he stands for, is slowly delaying Trump’s criminal trial in D.C. (since DOJ’s December request for a ruling on Trump’s absurd, fascistic claim of absolute, blanket presidential immunity) for his central role in planning and carrying out the Hail Mary January 6 riot to obstruct an official proceeding and prevent certification of victory of the man who beat him by 7,000,000 votes.   MAGA Justice Samuel “burn witches”;Alito was fixing to stay the official proceeding, while Trump’s allies in Congress took other measures to get him extra-legally inserted as the president.  This plan was  described  years later by insane Kraken lawyer Sidney Powell [1] (who amazingly, still has a law license), if the vote to certify Biden’s victory hadn’t happened late that night. 

[1]. After Giuliani’s segment ended, Powell took the lectern and alleged, without evidence, that an international communist plot to rig the 2020 election had been engineered by Cuba, China, Venezuela, Hugo Chávez (who died in 2013), George Soros, the Clinton Foundation and antifa.[14][66][67][68] She also alleged that Dominion Voting Systems “can set and run an algorithm that probably ran all over the country to take a certain percentage of votes from President Trump and flip them to President Biden”.[69] The source for many of these claims appeared to be far right news organization One America News Network (OANN).[14] She also repeated a conspiracy theory[70]—spread by Congressman Louie Gohmert, OANN and others[71]—that election results showing a landslide victory for Trump had been transmitted to the German office of the Spanish electronic voting firm Scytl, after which a company server was supposedly seized in a raid by the United States Army.[14] The US Army and Scytl refuted these claims;[72] Scytl has not had any offices in Germany since September 2019 and does not tabulate US votes.[73][74