One of the 10 most exclusive golf courses in the Bronx

great shirt
Says it all. I love their merry expressions.

vocabulary word of the week (4)
Invidious.
In law school we read certain kinds of cases where the plaintiff needed to prove invidious discrimination. Apparently, in such cases, regular discrimination was not enough to get you relief from a court under artfully drafted nondiscrimination laws. After all, de minimis non curat lex (the law does not concern itself with trifles).
Here’s what invidious means, in general usage:


Here’s a reminder not to rely on the number one google hit for solid information. Opening that page informs us that in the law invidious has many synonyms:
- abominable
- calculated to provoke resentment
- disagreeable
- disliked
- disobliging
- harmful
- hateful
- hurtful
- injurious
- invidiosus
- irksome
- likely to excite ill will
- loathsome
- malicious
- objectionable
- obnoxious
- odious
- offensive
- plaguesome
- rancorous
- spiteful
- troublesome
- unacceptable
- unaccommodating
- ungracious
- unkind
- unpleasant
- unwelcome
- vexatious Associated Concepts: invidious discrimination
Not very useful, not to mention that no actual definition is attempted. Invidiosus [1],Your Honor?
Here is a more useful entry, two or three tics down the screen:
Invidious Discrimination is treating a class of persons unequally in a manner that is malicious, hostile, or damaging. If there is rational justification for the different treatment, then the discrimination is not invidious.
The criteria delineating the groups, such as gender, race, or class, determine the kind of discrimination.
Invidious discrimination generally refers to treating one group of people less well than another on such grounds as their race (racism), gender (sexism), religion (religious discrimination), caste, ethnic background, nationality, disability, sexual orientation, sexual preference or behavior, results of IQ testing, age (ageism) or political views. Discrimination on the basis of such grounds as subcultural preference (Punks, Hippies, Mods, vs. Rockers) is also common.
The effects of invidious discrimination span the spectrum from mild, such as slow or unhelpful retail service, through racial and ethnic slurs, denial of employment or housing, to hate crimes and genocide.
https://definitions.uslegal.com/i/invidious-discrimination/
[1] Country of origin: United States Location: Saint Paul, Minnesota Status: Active Formed in: 2006 Genre: Death Metal Lyrical themes: Depression, Anxiety, Dystopia …
no struggle, no progress

Incumbent congressman gave tour of Capitol complex tunnels and staircases on January 5th
The representative’s name is Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.). Mr. Loudermilk denies the J6 Select Committee ever asked him to talk about the January 5, 2021 tour he conducted of the tunnels, hallways, security checkpoints and staircases under the Capitol complex. He said he’d have gladly answered their questions about the tour he already denied giving, before remembering he did show a Georgia family with kids and red hats around the underbelly of the Capitol the day before the riot, plus a guy he didn’t know.
And they took pictures, of course, as tourists do. On a day that the Capitol was locked down to the public, due to Covid and heightened security for the joint session of Congress the next day, the last formality before the peaceful transfer of power, hallmark of American democracy, contested by Trump.
Sadly, the guy Congressman Loudermilk didn’t know was enthusiastic about the prospect for violence at the Capitol on J6 and a buddy immortalized him for Facebook on J6, in a bouyant mood, carrying a spear-tipped flag pole, on his way to Pelosi’s office, happily talking about the asses he was soon going to be kicking.
Jared, another very stable genius
You know Jared Kushner is a genius, because he’s a billionaire. He was born very rich, that’s true and he had every advantage, but why wouldn’t he? Still, the fact that he’s so rich means that he’s a genius. Here’s further proof:
“My interest at that time was on trying to get as many pardons done,” Mr. Kushner said. “And I know that, you know, he was always, him and the team were always saying, ‘Oh we’re going to resign, we’re not going to be here if this happens, if that happens.’ So I kind of took it up to just be whining, to be honest with you.”

An honest genius. What could be better?
Bill Barr, who told Trump claims of massive election fraud were bullshit
This is why Bill Barr is one of the most despicable and rightfully hated of Trump’s bullying enablers. To save his skin, the most corrupt AG in American history quit right before the armed attack on the Capitol. Then stayed silent about what he knew to be a supremely destructive Big Lie (that he was instrumental in spreading). Now he poses as a voice of reason, an honest arbiter of who is detatched from reality. Here he was, authoritatively spreading disinformation for the entire year before the 2020 election, soundbite courtesy of Fox News.
Check out the mendacious partisan’s short, pure bullshit resignation letter, shortly before the planned Hail Mary violence to overturn the nonfraudulent election :
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/20424018-attorney-general-william-barr-resignation-letter
Fuck him and the whores he rode in on.
The Big Lie
Advice from “an apparently inebriated Rudy Giuliani”
Liz Cheney with another great line today, about Trump’s willful ignorance about losing the election and rejecting advice from his more clear-eyed advisors, instead following “the course recommended by an apparently inebriated Rudy Giuliani” to just claim victory. If I was Rudy, I’d be drunk too.
The pundits all seem to agree that these hearings will change no minds among the 25% to 30% who believe the imperfect vessel of Trump as leader was sent by Jesus Christ Himself, to restore moral clarity to a fallen nation. It certainly won’t change minds among the 3% of Americans who own 40% of the guns, nor the 0.5% who own everything else. Those groups are not the target of these hearings.
The 110,000,000 eligible voters who sat out the 2020 election (that number still blows my mind) which saw record levels of voting, in the teeth of a pandemic, are one target. Most of these apathetic couch potatoes won’t pay much attention, but some will, if the hearings are done right, which, so far, so good.
Another audience is the prudent, apolitical Merrick Garland, who, it must be pointed out, has already indicted several domestic terrorists for seditious conspiracy, a seven tentacled conspiracy the Committee is laying out evidence of. It is inconceivable that a DOJ already investigating seditious conspiracy on behalf of a president who lost and falsely sworn electors for that same person, will not reach the obvious conclusion about who the raging, scheming octopus at the center of these flailing tentacles is.
The pundits remind us not to get our hopes up, and FOX crows that no minds will be changed by the hearings, no matter how clearly and powerfully the January 6 Committee presents their findings. But, you know what, fuck the pundits. They appear to us on mass media controlled by the advertisers, our most powerful corporations.
The real problem for Democrats in the midterms, we are told by most pundits (or “pundents” as Sarah Palin says), is Biden inflation, which afflicts only Biden’s America, and the exploding price of gasoline, which the oil giants are powerless to control (even while making record profits) and which no American law can regulate or offset. Taxing windfall profits is functionally illegal in the USA, unlike in Great Britain where a Conservative government recently imposed a windfall profits tax, payable to consumers, to offset the spike in gas prices.
If you are a wealthy corporation intent on maintaining a wonderful, often tax-free status quo for the wealthiest, the more you raise prices, the higher inflation gets, the better your chances of getting rid of so-called do-gooders like well-meaning, weak Joe Biden and his party of flawed idealists and social justice warriors. Better to have their own in charge of government regulation and taxation. Trump 2024.
I’m watching these hearings with great appetite. A coherent picture is emerging and the only conclusion that makes sense is that criminals of this scale must be, and will be, brought to justice. Like many, I’ve been frustrated at Merrick Garland’s seeming hesitancy, questioning his ability to act as the wartime consigliere we need at this perilous moment in human history. I have to believe he is pursuing a smart strategy, building a complex racketeering case that cannot be overturned on appeal.
Glenn Kirschner points out that by giving the J6 Committee the first crack at a thousand witnesses (something the DOJ always likes to get) Garland allowed all of their testimony to become public, and increase the pressure among the public to bring these criminals to justice. If DOJ had heard them first, in the Grand Jury, everything they said would have been kept strictly secret until indictments, in 2023 or later. We’d learn only “Ivanka spoke to a grand jury under oath for five hours.” How much would that suck?
Be of good cheer. Hope and hopeful action are indispensable.