Positions for the mediator

Party one:

I got my back up after he was very threatening and aggressive to me. He claimed that I hurt him very badly, traumatized him, in fact, the way his father used to, so we were suddenly talking about his traumatic childhood, and not anything that actually happened but after I got my back up, I apologized to him. I told him I was sorry that he made me feel threatened, and that I had acted incorrectly by getting my back up when his defiance reminded me of terrible battles with my daughter, which was very upsetting to me. 

Even after I apologized, and months later, even a year later, he couldn’t let it go, he kept obsessively insisting on talking about what he claimed I did to him.He wouldn’t let it go.He kept trying to make it my problem that he had a bad childhood and he tortured my husband for supporting me.He wouldn’t forgive us, no matter how many times we apologized, even though he kept saying he did forgive us, that he would “always” forgive me.He can’t forgive anybody.

Party Two:

After she flew into a rage during a minor disagreement, she glared at me steadily and did not respond to anything that I said. She literally just stared at me, tight-lipped and beaming hostility, as if I was a defiant child and she was my overwhelmed mother, trying her best to hold it together in the face of such disobedience.  I later accepted her apology, pathetic and blame shifting as it was.  I told her I had more to say about this but that I didn’t want to speak while I was still upset (after having not slept a minute the previous night) because I didn’t want to say anything that might damage our long friendship. 

Although she told me she’d be happy to hear what I had to say, she never let me say what I needed to say, the two times I tried she had temper tantrums.  My calls, texts and letters were ignored.   They began accusing me of being mean to them. Her silence, and her husband’s, went on for weeks and months at a time, complete with angry threats and false accusations against me, libels they’d later spread to our mutual friends and their children, their indignant claim that I was an enraged child irrationally trying to blame them for my obvious problems.

Mediation was the only possibility for fixing things, they finally said, after refusing to talk to me without a mediator present, but would not agree about anything — the conflict that sparked the end of our 50 year friendship, the tensions that mounted during that troubling holiday, the extreme coldness by the end, the angry fallout afterwards — claiming that the mediator would know what to do, without any input from the parties.  When they insisted that no agreement was needed, or possible, I understood that mediation was a ruse, a facially generous offer I would have to turn down, once they heaped impossible conditions on it.The beauty was that I could then be plausibly blamed for blowing up their desperate, endearing peace talks.  The one thing my friends can never forgive is someone who can never forgive.

A very, very stable genius of geniuses

“They’ve taken a President who’s very popular, I got 75 million votes, much more than that I believe.  No president’s ever got that many votes, and they’ve taken that number of people, and I think you can double it or almost you can triple it in terms of the real, the feeling.”

The same instinctual bravuraas a mathematician goes into calculating his ever-multiplying net worth, the value of his properties (when using them as collateral for low cost loans) or, inversely, for valuing his properties (for purposes of avoiding taxes), for the calculation of his incalculable IQ, which is over 180, probably ten or five thousand times that, if you think about it, really, the feeling.

Semi-comical

But also serious as yer proverbial heart attack

DOJ has defendant Trump’s personal phone from January 6, 2021, after its disappearance and years of concealment (can you say obstruction, boys and girls?) along with all relevant Secret Service and White House, Homeland Security and Department of Defense phone calls and text messages from before, during and after the permitless parade to, and deadly riot at, the Capitol.

And here’s the big guy himself, calm and credible as can be, in his most reasonable and persuasive tones, from a month ago. He was asked about the propriety of weaponizing the government against his enemies.

They’ve taken a President who’s very popular, I got 75 million votes, much more than that I believe.  No president’s ever got that many votes, and they’ve taken that number of people, and I think you can double it or almost you can triple it in terms of the real, the feeling.

But we’ve watched it for a long time and it’s not unique, but it’s unique for the United States.  Yeah  If they do this, they’ve already done it, but if they want to follow through on this, yeah, it could certainly happen in reverse. It could certainly happen in reverse.

What they’ve done is they’ve released the genie out of the box, you understand that. They’ve done something that nobody thought would happen. They’ve taken a President who’s very popular, I got 75 million votes, much more than that I believe.  No president’s ever got that many votes, and they’ve taken that number of people, and I think you can double it or almost you can triple it in terms of the real, the feeling. You can’t do that, you can’t go after people.

You know when you’re President, and you’ve done a good job and you’re popular, you don’t go after them, so you can win an election. They’ve done indictments in order to win an election. They call it weaponization and the people aren’t going to stand for it. But yeah, they have done something that allows the next party, I mean if somebody, if I happen to be President and I see somebody who’s doing well and beating me very badly I say “go down and indite them”. 

Why people hate lawyers

After 95 pages documenting the mountain of compelling evidence that then president Trump, loser of the “most secure election in US history” (Trump appointed maker of that statement immediately fired), intended to incite, and did incite, an insurrection [1], the violent riot at the Capitol on January 6, 2021 that disrupted the certification of Biden’s electoral college victory, the new judge, (appointed on January 10, 2023}, made her ruling about this particular insurrectionist’s right to be on the Colorado Republican presidential primary ballot.

She concluded that the oath mentioned in the Fourteenth Amendment, to “support” the Constitution, is very different from the president’s oath to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution and that, therefore, along with the President not being an enumerated officer of the United States listed in that clause, there was no problem with this particular insurrectionist being on the primary ballot in her state. All he is seeking is the highest office in the land, an “office” which was not mentioned specifically as an office in that clause in the Fourteenth Amendment. Here she goes, with the money shot:

313. Here, after considering the arguments on both sides, the Court is persuaded that “officers of the United States” did not include the President of the United States. While the Court agrees that there are persuasive arguments on both sides, the Court holds that the absence of the President from the list of positions to which the Amendment applies combined with the fact that Section Three specifies that the disqualifying oath is one to “support” the Constitution whereas the Presidential oath is
to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution, it appears to the Court that for whatever reason the drafters of Section Three did not intend to include a person who had only taken the Presidential Oath.


Which, of course, makes perfect sense…

[1] “Trump acted with the specific intent to incite political violence and direct it at the Capitol with the purpose of disrupting the electoral certification,” she wrote. “Trump cultivated a culture that embraced political violence through his consistent endorsement of the same.”

Habba, Habba, Habba

From Alina’s website:

Alina Habba’s journey toward becoming the lawyer of her dreams began with her pursuit of education. Her academic journey commenced with her enrollment at Lehigh University, where she obtained her Bachelor of Arts in Political Science. A couple of years later, she pursued higher education again and attended Widener University Commonwealth Law School, where she successfully earned her J.D. (Juris Doctor). Despite acquiring her degrees, Alina Habba did not stop seeking opportunities for further learning. She recognized the significance of continuing education and completed Leading Professional Service Firms courses at the Harvard Business School of Executive Education. This added knowledge, and experience helped her advance her career significantly.

Currently she stands on the steps in front of 60 Centre Street making angry statements about an enraged judge with a red face who is gagging her and her totally innocent client so unfairly as she continues her journey toward her dreams!

Excellent piece on Trump’s perfect day on the witness stand

Trumpie testified yesterday in the civil fraud case against him, summoned by the prosecution. He had no legal choice but to sit in the witness box. He acted the way he always acts, the outraged victim of unfairness, defiant, angry, entitled. The judge told him to stop making political speeches and answer the questions. His lawyer, Alina Habba, stood in front of the courthouse during the lunch break claiming the judge wouldn’t let him speak, echoing her boss’s talking points about unfairness, partisan prosecution, the racism of the Black attorney general, witch hunts etc. As the battle for America’s soul plays out, inside the courtroom and in the ignorant court of public opinion, Lawrence O’Donnell had a very good take on the Orange Polyp’s perfect day on the witness stand.

Devon Nunes!!!

Do you remember that spineless Congress weasel Devon Nunes? He was one of Chrumpie‘s most debased lackeys. He stepped down from Congress to take a highly paid position as CEO of the boss’s imagined media empire. The other day, in the wake of a finding of fraudulent accounting in Trump Inc.’s fraud trial, Digital World Acquisition Corp., the “person” wishing to merge with Trump media/Truth Social amended its filings to say that it’s statement of financial condition “should not be relied on.” One billion dollars of investments evaporated. They are also paying an $18,000,000 fine and are currently under multiple investigations. Here’s the great Allison Gill, with a summary of how well Devon is doing as the steward of the Orange Polyp’s glorious media empire.