
graffiti



It can be right or wrong, but that discomfort in your body is an invitation to stop, and think about what the discomfort is trying to tell you and whether it’s right or wrong.
A pause will prevent you from lashing out, in obedience to the upset feeling in your insides. It may also give you time to understand that your body is telling you something directly that your mind can’t see yet.
I had two telephone chats with a therapist I found on the internet. I’d contacted him telling him I’d undergone narcissistic abuse recently, that an entire group of old friends was buying into harmful lies told to isolate me, and that I need a professional to exchange insights with as I continue to understand and heal, rather than bouncing things off poor Sekhnet, who has trouble hearing any more about this long-running painful situation.
I don’t need someone to cry to, or hold my hand, or tell me I’m absolutely right. I need someone to bounce insights off and talk with. I need an objective sounding board, the thing I described in my initial request for help.
After session one the therapist announced his clinical findings, presumably speaking out loud as he made his notes. “Beset by negative emotions,” and “with a history of ostracism”. I corrected him on the second point, at 66 I experienced ostracism for the first time in my life.
Toward the end of the second session, when I revealed a particularly poignant detail of a talk the last night of my father’s life, he asked me if I ever cried about that. I did not. He had come to the conclusion (coincidentally shared by the group that cast me out) that my primary way of reacting is as a hurt child, rather than an integrated adult. Suddenly he got excited and gave me homework.
Clinical finding number two: You are still reacting as a hurt child and you need to conduct an imaginary conversation with your abusive father, confront him with the pain he’d caused and vent anger at him, anger so red hot, white hot, so unbearably powerful, that you’d be exhausted by the end of venting. So, based on two hours of talk, he had pinpointed my immediate problem as being locked in unresolved childhood pain and unable to express anger at someone who had abused me when I was growing up.
I began the writing assignment, which is easy enough for me, I do this every single day. After a few pages I realized it was worth considering what my gut was trying to tell me. This motherfucker is not listening very well, in his rush to come to a therapeutic diagnosis I did not ask him for. I could tell him this gently, I could tell it to him in a way that demonstrates I have no hesitation to express anger when it is warranted. For example, by gratuitously sprinkling “fuck” into my fucking comments. At the same time, I’d point out, in fairness to him, that what I’d asked him for was difficult and would require great insight and high emotional intelligence. Is it really fair to be angry at someone who thought he was doing the right thing, the helfpful thing, who didn’t know any better? You’re doing the best you can, man, it’s just not what I asked for or what I need. You know what I’m sayin’?
When you pay someone to listen and react intelligently, and they insist on quickly diagnosing and problem solving, your gut might not be wrong to tell you “fuck this guy, old friend. He’s not able to do what you need him to do for you.”


The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals found that Judge for life Aileen Cannon had no jurisdiction to interfere on behalf of Donald Trump in Trump v. United States. Trump v. USA was the legally incoherent lawsuit Trump brought to stop the Department of Justice from conducting their criminal investigation of his illegal retention of presidential records and his obstruction of the investigation. Trump has since been indicted for those crimes. Cannon is the judge assigned to make all rulings in the case the United States v. Donald Trump, in which her benefactor stands accused of unlawful retention of government documents and obstruction of justice..
The unanimous Eleventh Circuit panel ruling overturned all of Cannon’s baseless partisan decisions in Trump v. U.S. They reprimanded her for abusing her discretion, first in not dismissing the case, and then by making findings with no basis in law (and with no jurisdiction to rule on any of it in the first place) and ordered her to dismiss the case she should never have stuck her loyal partisan nose into.
If that does not amount to reasonable questions about her ability to judge the case impartially, the case she already made rulings to delay and suppress evidence in, nothing does.

As to her legal credentials for serving as judge in this historic case, well… Being nominated for that lifetime appointment used to include relevant experience and a proven track record, outside of fidelity to Federalist Society doctrine. Aileen Cannon has had virtually no relevant legal experience and no track record to speak of. The perfect candidate for Trumpie!








Trumpie is extremely childish most of the time, but like a broken clock that’s right twice a day, sometimes he comes up with a perfect disparaging nickname for one of his piece of shit associates. “Lyin’ Ted” for example. Here’s a very recent case in point:


As much as we need connection to others, attachment, to live full, healthy lives, we also need to be authentic — to act in accordance with our deepest needs and beliefs. If you can’t be honest with people you are attached to, you are in a vise that, eventually, will squeeze the life out of you.
So if you need to express something that may affect your attachment to people close to you, and you’re aware that the expression will place pressure on the relationship, you might as well just express the full thing as clearly as you can. If you try to hedge, be polite, respect the feelings of people who can’t accept you as you actually are, well, you’re probably already being sucked toward that treacherous waterfall anyway.
If you say gently that you’re having a hard time living with certain untruths that have been told, you are already gently assenting to your own punishment which is as sure to follow as night follows day. If someone is lying to you and expecting you to silently agree that the lie is necessary and proper, there’s not much point being attached to someone like that.
So whether you gently object, or make your objection as plainly and unmistakably as you can, the effect will be the same. Someone who knowingly lies will not tolerate a word like “untruth”. Anodyne expressions like “debatable”, “questionable” or “not necessarily true” will strike them as forcefully as the proper word, adorned or unadorned, a fucking lie.
In the end, no matter what you do, you cannot convince someone who has already decided that you are dead that there is really no reason to kill your memory too. There is every reason to! You are coming in after the conversation is finished, as you yourself are also finished. Nothing infuriates righteous killers more than when the accursèd dead insist on fucking speaking.