Truth and Reconciliation

Reconciliation is a beautiful thing. After a bitter struggle, if the two sides can regain trust in each other, reconcile and live in peace, it is the greatest example of redemption imaginable.

What makes reconciliation so difficult is the necessity for truth, the requirement that what causes the pain between the parties is addressed, so that there can be real resolution of the bitter conflict.  Without truth, reconciliation is one side agreeing that anything bad that caused the strife is better forgotten than actually addressed and rectified.

Certain things can’t be rectified without tremendous willingness to forgive on the side of the person wronged. No matter how great the willingness, truth is always an essential ingredient of real reconciliation.  Without an honest back and forth there can be no real meeting of the minds, no chance for true redemption.

If I lynched your brother, no matter how badly I felt about it afterwards, I still lynched your brother.   If we want to have reconciliation and I insist that at the time I lynched your brother I was completely right to do it, that story will never be reconciled with what you need after I lynch your brother.  

If I tell you to get over that unfortunate thing that happened to your brother, (distancing myself from my actions with the passive voice, as first year law students are taught to do when they have to admit an inconvenient fact), we have nothing: no truth, no reconciliation.

We can’t heal from an injury inflicted by someone else unless that injury is addressed, unless we have some assurance going forward that the same actions that caused the injury won’t be repeated. Humans usually get very defensive after they lose control and do something atrocious, they would rather not look squarely at something terrible they may have done when they lost control. 

Much easier to forget, justify, split hairs about it, tell you to get over it, blame you for being unforgiving if you don’t get over their little mistake or their long pattern of consistently similar little mistakes.

When the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa worked, former apartheid torturers cried in guilt for what they publicly acknowledged they’d done to their victims. Sometimes the victims would be so moved by the showing of remorse that there would be tears all around and actual reconciliation in the face of deep, deep regret, after honesty that had to be painful as hell, but no real peace comes without truth. 

The harder that truth is to admit, the more essential it is that it be sincerely acknowledged aloud for peace to follow.  Without truth, reconciliation is as empty as any political slogan you can think of.

Criminal co-conspirator Speaker of the House tries again for the boss

[Yesterday], Johnson supported Trump’s message about January 6 when he said that he was making sure the faces of rioters are blurred in the surveillance footage. “We have to blur some of the faces of persons who participated in the events of that day because we don’t want them to be retaliated against and to be charged by the DOJ [Department of Justice] and to have other, you know, concerns and problems,”  he said. Johnson’s spokesperson quickly walked back the comment, saying Johnson meant to say that faces were blurred to prevent “all forms of retaliation against private citizens from any non-governmental actors.” 

(Heather Cox Richardson)

This cherub-faced little extremist asshole was running around the Capitol days before the January 6th riot/insurrection, urging his colleagues to sign on to an amicus brief to support corrupt Texas tough guy AG Ken Paxton’s grotesquely unconstitutional ploy to the Supreme Court to deny the right of several states Biden won to send their legally certified electors to Congress on January 6th.

Here’s just a reminder, from the evidencebased world, of what the insane former president is charged with in relation to disrupting Congress on January sixth.

It’s no wonder incendiary lies, threats of violence and retribution and cheap theatrics are the staple of Chrump’s 2024 campaign. It’s all he’s got, it’s all he’s ever had, and along with daddy’s fortune, it’s all he’s ever needed.

Judge Chutkan’s denial of absolute criminal immunity for Trump sings

So says Glenn Kirschner. Glenn’s not wrong, here’s a nice bit, with a link to the rest:

Perhaps no one understood the compelling public interest in the rule of law better than our first former President, George Washington. His decision to voluntarily leave office after two terms marked an extraordinary divergence from nearly every world leader who had preceded him, ushering in the sacred American tradition of peacefully transitioning Presidential power— a tradition that stood unbroken until January 6, 2021. In announcing that decision, however,Washington counseled that the newfound American independence carried with it a responsibility. “The very idea of the power and the right of the people to establish government presupposes the duty of every individual to obey the established government.” Washington’s Farewell Address,S. Doc. No. 106-21, at 13 (2d Sess. 2000), available at https://perma.cc/E5CZ-7NNP. He issued a sober warning: “All obstructions to the execution of the laws,” including group arrangements to “counteract” the “regular deliberation and action of the constituted authorities, are destructive of this fundamental principle.” Id. at 14. In Washington’s view, such obstructions would prove “fatal” to the Republic, as “cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.”

In Washington’s view, such obstructions would prove “fatal” to the Republic, as “cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.”

The entire ruling is here

First Amendment right to lie

Right wing billionaire Elon Musk, enemy of unions and any kind of regulation on wealthy businessmen, piously styles himself a First Amendment absolutist any time the increasing hate speech on his social media site is reported on. Musk and his determined ilk peddle the myth that white men are viciously singled out as the most oppressed victims in society. If hate-filled lies that tend to stoke violence are limited by the government, say by requiring warnings to be posted on inflammatory conspiracy posts with no basis in fact (as finally happened on Twitter just before the January 6 riot), Musk and his persecuted minority are placed at a great disadvantage in the war for everything.

The freedom to lie, and enrage alienated masses with a long list of grievances real and imagined, is crucial to the right wing’s cherished dream, so close they can taste it, of a tiny minority of our greatest and most deserving citizens controlling everybody else now and forever. Hammer on woke elites, majoritarian tyranny, blood drinking pedophiles, eternally scheming Jews, murderous Muslim fanatics, homosexual groomers, raping, infectious disease-carrying, blood poisoning, illegal immigrants and so on and you have a chance of keeping the lynch mob whipped up enough to do your bidding. Truth and accurate reporting are these guy’s worst nightmare.

If your chance of winning an argument depends on lying, as is the case almost any time you have a conflict with someone who can never be wrong, and your ability to lie is being limited, in the name of some squishy abstract principle like “fairness,” you will fight like hell or you won’t have a grandiose dream of perfection and enraged superiority anymore.

Death during life, a grim tragedy

When people you love, who you’ve long celebrated with and comforted in their time of sorrow, who have supported you when you most needed them, all turn their faces away, stop listening to you, tell you to shut up if you need to make an uncomfortable point, insist the problem is you needing to talk about something painful and dark, it is a little foretaste of your own death.

When we are in pain the first thing we need from those closest to us is for them to listen, to hear, to understand why we are suffering. If you are forcibly silenced, on the threat of expulsion from the community, you either meekly accept your muzzling, and live a bullied, depressed, greatly diminished life, or continue trying to make yourself heard. If you persist, with a righteously angry crew that can never be wrong, you will get to experience that special foretaste of death while you and your loved ones are, for the moment, all very much alive.

Chapter 60 Be the change you want to see

If you find yourself in a fight with someone close to you, feel threatened and believe there is no way out, you will fight to the death, or flee forever. If you are in conflict with a loved one, and knowthat experience and adult insight offer you more tools to resolve conflict than you had as a child, there is hope of healing.

In the first instance, the fatalistic belief that nothing ever changes for the better will keep you at war. In the second, there is a real chance for peace, if the other side also believes in learning from past mistakes, accepting human foibles, acknowledging the importance of reciprocity, mutuality, adjusting better to the other person’s actual needs.

My father, for whom the pain involved in trying to make his life less painful, a life rooted in hellish abuse and deprivation, was unimaginably intense, always argued that people cannot change themselves in any fundamental way. Those who “work” in therapy, he said, are merely deluding themselves, real change on a deep level is not possible. You cannot change your inborn nature, he always insisted.

I argued against this hopeless proposition, pointing to the improvements people I’ve known have managed in their reactions to frustration, sorrow, guilt, bitterness, the need to blame others. I offered my own changes for the better, my improved control of my temper, for example. He always dismissed the so-called change as self-delusion, which he could always prove, for many years at least, by goading me until I finally lost my temper. That was his triumphant proof that nobody can really change for the better. See, you claimed you can control your temper, but I can make you lose it, you haven’t learned to control shit! Even when I eventually learned not to lose my temper, it was only an act I was performing, one he could easily demean as superficial, self-deluded performance art.

Relentless in his unshakable opinion, as anyone arguing for fatalism must be, my father always argued that people might succeed in changing some superficial aspect of their behavior, but their fundamental nature was as innate and unalterable as mortality itself. His position, I have to say now, is a supremely depressing, deterministic one.

It is also characteristic of someone who cannot be wrong, no matter what. My father was right for himself, as I realized recently. He could not change, the first step involved was crippling to him. The same goes for anyone stuck in the narcissistic person’s tragic trap – either seeing themselves as perfect and never wrong or abjectly, humiliatingly unworthy of love and self-respect.

For someone who lashes out in pain and believes experience plus insight can lead the way to changes that will result in less pain, change is a tangible goal. You can learn to control your angry reactions, for example, and with practice you can become better at it. This step forward can lead to another, and so on. We are all works in progress, if we’re willing to work with our limitations, talk things out and learn new things. Except for those who truly cannot change because acknowledging the need for change involves looking at things that are terrifying to them.

Someone who lashes out in pain and cannot be wrong must believe themself perfectly in the right whenever they are in pain. They are in pain simply because they are the victims of some fucking devil. That devil must be killed. There is nothing that can be done except to identify, isolate and kill the source of pain.

If your emotions are inflamed, in a conflict with the wounds of a traumatic past reopened, and you can change, you have a chance to learn to redeem a ruptured relationship. If your emotions are on fire, in a painful conflict, and you are certain that change is impossible, you are simply fucked up and beyond the reach of redemption. All that is left is retribution against the devil who has wounded you.

If you also cannot be wrong, you must convince everyone else in your life that the person you are in a conflict with is 100% in the wrong and irredeemable. If a person is a piece of shit, has done horrible things to hurt you, and people can’t change, as you know deep in your heart, that’s all she wrote, set and match!

From time to time I try to imagine the accusations against me that caused a group of friends of fifty years to unanimously agree that I was beyond redemption. How atrocious my crimes must have been! The anger could not have been more unyielding if I’d molested all their children, repeatedly, while brutally blackmailing them all into eternal, shameful silence, while I’d been poisoning everyone’s food and drink for decades while lying with every fetid breath I exhaled as I pretended to be funny and angrily denied I was the living incarnation of Adolf Hitler, with a field of corpses to prove it and very proud of myself for what a sly pretender I am.

For someone as evil as this, unless they apologize to everyone they’ve been raping, assaulting and trying to kill for years, admit their heinous crimes and despicable nature and beg for the mercy of the jury, there is not even the remotest possibility of forgiveness. Welcome behind the scenes of the greatest, deadliest shit show it has ever been my horror to participate in!

I also note how painful it must be to live in a world that is as hopelessly, painfully rotten at death as it was during the earliest painful memory. The belief that people cannot change is truly undefeatable in people unalterably deformed by crippling past pain.

When my father insisted that people can’t change, he was speaking with 100% conviction. He knew, as well as he knew anything, that someone like him, someone so deeply damaged that he could not be wrong, on pain of feeling utterly, contemptibly, self-loathingly humiliated and undeserving of love or respect, could not change. Being certain you cannot change will effectively prevent any effort to do so and keep you convinced, since if you can’t do something nobody else can, that people, all people, are incapable of making meaningful changes in their lives to have more peace and less war to the death.

As for somebody who makes a little positive progress toward a less painful life? KILL THEM!

The firehose of toxic, flammable diarrhea never rests

Steve Bannon, unkempt global fascist, is an enthusiastic advocate of an old propaganda technique espoused, if memory serves, by Vladimir Lenin, leader of the Bolshevik revolution in Russia. The theory goes that if you flood the news with infuriating lies, one after another, at a dizzying pace, you will so confuse and enrage the populace that you can do whatever you like with them. The technique was refined by the Hitler team, led by cunning, supremely able Minister of Public Enlightenment Josef Goebbels. Chrump is the perfect avatar of this firehose of mendacity, lying as naturally as most people breathe, flooding the zone with shit and gleefully setting that shit on fire. You can’t keep your eye on the previous lies, or fix institutional problems, because the newest one is so incendiary and burning so hot.

The NY Times recently broke the story of a commutation Chrumpie signed hours before leaving office, one of hundreds of last minute pardons and commutations he likely sold (he is nothing if not transactional). This guy, Jon Braun, is a predatory lender and violence threatening thug who was finally beginning to serve a ten year sentence that had been delayed by ten years as he grudgingly began to cooperate with the DOJ against his predatory lending colleagues. Braun had a connection to convicted felon, and fellow recipient of Trumpie’s mercy for hire, Charles Kushner, father of grossly unqualified entitled idiot Jared, Chrumpie’s right hand boy (back when it was worthwhile to Jared to serve in that role). Alan Dershowitz, Braun’s attorney, made a call and Jared took care of their friend’s prison sentence. It was nullified by a stroke of the big guy’s pen. Braun went back to his old job and told DOJ to go fuck itself and its fucking investigation into predatory lenders. Here is Team Chrump’s perfect response to the NY Times revelation (actually this is in response to the Koch Network throwing its support behind Nikki Haley — the responses are pretty much interchangeable):

Kushner had testified to the J6 Committee that he didn’t know anything about the many tentacled plan to stop the certification of Biden’s victory on January 6. 2021 because he was busily working on pardons around the clock in that final month. Giuliani, or his assistant, described a profit sharing scheme for pardons that didn’t go through the office of the pardon attorney, as is traditionally done before a president issues a pardon. These pardons went for $2,000,000 each, according to this source, and if everyone was to pocket their share of this tidy sum it was important that the office of the pardon attorney not be in the loop. We’ve heard nothing more about this, or about the NY State case against Steve Bannon for bilking MAGA loyalists out of millions in his Build the Wall scam (Trump pardon erased identical federal charges against Sloppy Steve).

Every American convicted as a result of the Mueller investigation (witch hunt!) got a pardon from the Big Guy, in exchange for dummying up when it counted most. Nothing to see here, the president has 100% unappealable discretion to pardon anyone he wants, Joe Arpaio (contempt of court for telling judge to fuck off after she ruled his broiling, outdoor prison camps were illegal), Rod Blagojevich, Michael Milken, a bipartisan rogue’s gallery of infamous scumbags. As is the president’s absolute right, apparently, unless the DOJ were to challenge any as corrupt, for example as a quid pro quo for not cooperating with federal investigators (see for example, Roger Stone, his former partner Paul Manafort, Mike Flynn, et al). Nothing has been done to prevent misuse of the judicial system by wealthy weasels like Don (Gorsuch, Kavanaugh) McGahn, John Bolton, Trump and others to weaponize the delays appeals cause, allowing them to routinely moot legitimate, legal claims against them.

This abuse of the pardon power, aggravating, unjust and sickening as it is, is one among a hundred, two hundred piles of toxic poop Chrumpie left burning in his wake. There’s a new one every news cycle.

Trump channeling Hitler, raising the question among MAGA nation — why this sudden irrational hatred of the Führer? Trump’s plan to build concentration camps for immigrants, even the children of immigrants born here, to deport millions, the Fourteenth Amendment be damned. Trump’s plan to fire thousands of civil servants and replace them with servants who believe the 2020 election was rigged and who’ve taken a personal oath of loyalty to Trump (German: Führereid or Führer Oath). His repeated vows to get revenge on everyone from Rosie O’Donnell and Crooked Hillary to “the Biden Crime Family” and to weaponize the DOJ, as Biden, he insists, has weaponized it against him.

His grotesque, deadly mishandling, and continuing lies about, the COVID pandemic that resulted in further polarizing Americans and causing this great nation to have the highest COVID death toll in the world. The massive corruption involved in the pandemic relief money he handed out to wealthy people he liked. His open interference in the 2020 election by launching hundreds of pre-election lawsuits trying to stop mail-in voting during a spike in the plague and having his mega-donor postmaster general remove mailboxes and dismantle high speed mail sorting machines in areas where Blacks and other “undesirable” voters live.

The riot of January 6 itself, directly incited by his hourlong speech which included the immortal “when you catch somebody in a fraud you’re allowed to go by very different rules” (actual fraud, no, different rules and lynch mob, yes) and years of subsequent lies about the innocence of the rioters, valorizing those who attacked the police as true patriots he will pardon as soon as he gets back into office. The list is literally fucking endless, before we get to the Orange Polyps financial fraud (and already shuttered Trump University and Chrump Charitable Chrust), sexual abuse, hush money payments, illegal non-disclosure agreements and his limitless frivolous lawsuits, groundless motions and futile appeals designed only to delay adjudication.

In this environment, with the firehouse of shit blasting full bore all the time, amplified by right wing media and echoed in the corporate “liberal” media, it’s impossible to remember things like the reasonable plan to get rid of that Republican-minority benefiting vestige of slavery The Electoral College by having states pledge to award electors to the winner of the nationwide popular vote [1]. Or to restore something like the Fairness Doctrine for mass media, making it harder for partisan news outlets to pump out a stream of inflammatory lies, “opinions” presented as fact, 24/7. Or the group Biden set up to monitor online threats that was quickly shut down amid a flood of violent online threats.

Or to regulate hate speech and violence-producing lies on social media, because, to do so, according to the beneficiaries of hate speech and related lies, is to unfairly hobble one side of the political debate. A rightwing racist billionaire will bring lawsuits to carefully selected extremist judges to prove that Communists, Marxists, Jews and Fascist Thugs are illegally interfering with his right to run his own private social media company as he sees fit. The Senate is unable to abolish the filibuster or make sure that one potato-headed imbecile can’t block the presidential appointment of military leaders year after year. The list is almost endless, and this is by design.

You take a firehouse, connect it to the crusty asses of everyone you can find with projectile diarrhea, and blind ambition, you turn it on full and when the high power spray comes out, set it on fire. In a landscape of constantly replenished plumes and sloppy mounds of burning shit, nobody can focus on what needs to be done to hold the shit sprayers responsible and turn off the pressurized firehoses of mendacity. You have to admit, the plan works beautifully, if you can get over the stench.

[1]

However, a constitutional amendment is not the only means by which an alternative to the current Electoral College can be implemented. The most popular alternative is the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC). Started in the mid-2000s, the NPVIC is a fairly straightforward system that capitalizes on the constitutional guarantee that states are free to determine the manner in which they award their electoral votes. The compact requires states to pass laws that would award their electoral votes to the candidate who wins the popular vote nationally. Under the current plan, states that join will not activate the compact until enough states have joined to total 270 electoral votes. That is, the compact does not go into effect until there is a critical mass of states for it to be effective.

source

First Amendment 101

No court, judge or prosecutor has suggested that the world’s greatest winner doesn’t have the right to say everything he said above, channeling one of his historical heroes. There is no gag order relating to any of his angry, paranoid rantings and projections that does not involve threats and intimidation of witnesses or public officials involved in his prosecutions.

He is free to do his dead-on imitation of the Führer, or to state that Hitler was a great person, and so unfairly misunderstood. He may describe in detail how he’d like to bring back an American version of Herr Hitler’s Thousand Year Reich, or even declare that he loves Hitler, as it was Kanye West’s every right to say, whether he meant it or not.

The First Amendment covers a lot of fucked up and despicable things a person could say or write. You have the ACLU defending fucking Nazis’ right to spread Nazi propaganda as a First amendment issue, which it is.

A category of speech not protected by the First Amendment is fighting words, words which are intended as nothing more than a pugnacious “invitation to exchange fisticuffs”. Words whose only intent is to create ill will, stir rage and cause a lingering threat of imminent violence are not protected speech. If violence happens once as a direct result of your speech, and violence happens again after a similar speech and violence continues to happen as a result of your speech, then your speech has been shown to incite violence and is no longer protected by the First Amendment.

The scope of First Amendment protections for your violence-producing speech will be argued about by well-paid First Amendment experts for hire until the next riot your identical lies produces, then it will be argued about again, because the precise scope of fighting words has been narrowed by the Supreme Court over the years [1]. Like the high bar the ethics-free nine built for finding corruption of public officials, which now requires an explicit, provable agreement that both parties knew the deal was corrupt before corruption may be found. USA! USA!!!

[1] results of a quick search for an update on the 80 year old Fighting Words Doctrine:

Fighting words are words meant to incite violence such that they may not be protected free speech under the First Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court first defined them in Chaplinsky v New Hampshire (1942) as words which “by their very utterance, inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace. It has been well observed that such utterances are no essential part of any exposition of ideas, and are of such slight social value as a step to truth that any benefit that may be derived from them is clearly outweighed by the social interest in order and morality.”

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fighting_words

The desire to heal vs. the need to win

If you want to heal a conflict with a loved one, you need to listen to everything they need to say and consider it carefully, without getting defensive or angry. This tricky process requires talking about harmful patterns in the past, behaviors on both sides that led to the conflict. No one (even fucking historical revisionists) can change the past, of course, but with the desire to heal a valued relationship we can safeguard each other’s feelings going forward — once we know best what the other person needs. We can only do this if we honestly hear what has caused the other person pain, learned our role in causing the other discomfort and anger, and both parties make merciful adjustments in the days ahead.

The need to win is much easier. All you have to do is assign blame. One side is right, the other side is 100% wrong. One side is moral, human, good, and perfectly justified in their anger, the other is wicked, inhuman, willfully hurtful and eternally, unforgivably unforgiving. Life, to a winner, is about convincing allies to support you in a war to the death. Do this repeatedly and you win. If you live in a culture of Narcissism, such as hyper-competitive America 2023, you are seen as a winner every time you righteously smite a hated enemy, no matter how many lies you must tell in order to “win”.

The reservoir of pain each of us carries inside ranges from a gigantic sea in a traumatized person to a fairly small pond in someone who was supported and treated lovingly in their formative years. We each maintain a wall that protects us from this pain in a variety of ways, some healthy, some harmful. Take a wrecking ball to someone’s wall and repeatedly smash that dam and you create a flood of pain that will sometimes drown a hated enemy. If there is something praiseworthy in doing this, I can’t think of it. Outside of being an undefeated winner in the psycho sweepstakes.