Posthumous notes from Aleksei Navalny

All Putin wants is a dictator’s complete immunity to act with total impunity. Who can blame the evil, paranoid, dissenter murdering, invading, war crimes-committing, corrupt, psyops master, multibillionaire motherfucker?

Here are some thoughts from the political opponent he just had murdered, a month before his 99% reelection. Navalny was apparently left outside in -27 degree Siberian weather for a while and finished off with one KGB punch to the heart, in classic style.

“Trump will become president” should President Biden’s health suffer, Mr. Navalny wrote from his high-security prison cell. “Doesn’t this obvious thing concern the Democrats?”

click image above to read entire piece

Putin’s the guy Trump wants to be, the guy Trump’s mob wants Trump to be, the guy they would all like to be in their lives. What could go wrong, America?

Both sides of Putin v Ukraine

Controversy has been manufactured here in the USA in the case of Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. The angry MAGA minority has declared itself firmly on the side of no aid to Ukraine and full support, mainly by silence on the matter, for Putin. The vast majority of Americans favor continued aid to embattled Ukraine, an underdog democracy battling a much larger authoritarian invader. Presenting both sides of this fake controversy gives us an opportunity to see how strong a purely emotional story is, and how resistant to Reason, facts and cause and effect the right emotional appeal is.

The case for Putin’s invasion. He has every right to take back territory that he claims is historically his, because — history! As for the claimed lack of a casus belli, Russia’s indiscriminate killing of civilians, the discovery of mass graves, the mistreatment, torture and murder of prisoners of war — it’s war! War is hell. To pretend otherwise is to be a libtard cuck. From an American point of view, why should we spend money we need here to help one side in a war that has nothing to do with us?

For Ukraine — the country was invaded by a foreign power in a war of aggression. Ukraine committed no act to provoke this foreign power, other than resisting that foreign power’s political efforts to overthrow its government, and make it a satellite of Russia as it had been at times in the past. Ukraine is a democracy defending itself against the aggression of a neighboring dictator, one who routinely kills his political opponents in a political system he controls in the manner of an iron-willed Stalin, Mao or Hitler. Putin is using this war against Ukraine to press his larger territorial ambitions, and assert his right to conquer other countries, as countless megalomaniacal conquerors have done in the course of brutal human history. A Putin victory in Ukraine would be a major blow to the safety of the other surrounding NATO countries. NATO has largely kept the peace in Europe since the end of World War II.

Which side you take will be determined largely by the color of the baseball cap you wear to political rallies. For those in red caps, the fact that no chargeable criminal conspiracy was found between Putin and Trump‘s 2016 presidential campaign, in spite of 140 documented instances of coordination between them, in spite of Trump’s pro bono then-campaign manager’s years working for ousted pro-Russian Ukrainian president Viktor Yanokovitch (who fled Ukraine for refuge in Russia after being overthrown for corruption by pro-democracy, Ukrainians), in spite of proven coordination between Trump’s former campaign manager and Russian agents, and the exchange of sensitive polling data for the states Trump later narrowly won, in spite of Russia’s massive social media interference and successful hacks of voting systems (though no votes were changed this time), in spite of Trump having a Russians only meeting in the Oval Office immediately after his firing of James Comey for publicly speaking of allegations about Trump’s ties to Russia, and Trump destroying all notes of his one on one meeting with Putin in Helsinki, proves that “Russia-gate” was a complete and total hoax, political hit job and classic witch hunt and that there is nothing wrong with Putin or his methods.

For everybody else,  Ukraine was illegally invaded by a relentless force that also meddles in American elections, as set forth in detail in the Republican controlled Senate investigative report on Putin-related irregularities in the 2016 election, written in response to the Mueller Report.  Most Americans, and even a majority of Republicans in Congress, it appears, believe that Ukraine needs and deserves the support of every other democracy in a position to help. The sole argument for denying the support is iron-willed Trump’s unwavering loyalty to Vladimir Putin.

People sometimes give me crap for comparing MAGA to the Nazis. For me, the main point of comparison is that the most illogical argument you could possibly make is good enough for these folks if it rings the bell that stirs their lowest impulses and makes them angry as hell. Once a mass of people is enraged, and that rage can be stoked at will, and they are following an implacable, emotionally infallible leader, they can be convinced to do anything, and they feel right and just and perfect doing whatever is asked of them. Many of them will feel this way even after the wars and mass destruction their leader causes, when history writes the damning verdict on their unfathomable indecency and their willful inability to see what was directly in front of their lying eyes the whole time.

We have faced down American Nazis before

Documentarian Ken Burns interviews Rachel Maddow about the last time millions of Americans were drawn into an angry authoritarian movement by an appeal to their lowest, most violent, Nazi, impulses.  The last time it was actual German Nazis who propagandized to and inspired America’s most right-wing haters. This time it’s something different, but also similar.

This is a great interview, and I’m looking forward to reading her book, Prequel.  Her excellent podcast on these same events is like a great film noir with a strong element of horror and deja vu.  A story so cinematic and consequential that Steven Spielberg immediately purchased the rights to tell the story on the screen. And speaking of stories, here’s a reminder from Ken Burns about the power of an emotionally compelling story.

Maureen Dowd on Trump/Putin myrmidons

The Renfields to Trump’s Dracula are also busy playing sycophants to dictators. At an Axios conference in Miami, Jared Kushner — who was festooned with $2 billion in Saudi investments after he left the White House — called Mohammed bin Salman a “visionary leader.” Asked about the crown prince’s complicity in Jamal Khashoggi’s murder, Kushner replied with exasperation, “Are we really still doing this?”

Before Navalny’s death, Tucker Carlson — who scorned Ukraine’s desperate fight for its independence — cavorted in the Kremlin. His interview with Putin was so indulgent that even Putin complained of a “lack of sharp questions.”

In an interview with an Egyptian journalist, Carlson defended his decision not to ask Putin about freedom of speech or assassinations of his opponents.

“Every leader kills people,” Carlson said blithely, adding, “Leadership requires killing people, sorry.”

Will the craven Republicans ever stand up against autocracy — at home or abroad?

Navalny’s death at the hands of the murderous Putin has given momentum to the push for military assistance for Ukraine.

It’s the American thing to do.

source

Black prosecutors on trial in Georgia

I made the mistake yesterday of watching a bit of the questioning of Fulton county DA Fani Willis by the lawyer for a scumbag co-defendant of Donald Trump‘s, a practitioner of Roger Stone’s rat-fucking dark arts, channeling Roy Cohn by putting his prosecutor on the hot seat, having her sworn to tell the truth under the penalties of perjury and asking her intimate details about her personal life. Fani Willis did fine, but the spectacle turned my stomach. Another sickening glimpse into the narcissistic worldview of MAGA-world.

Fani Willis put me on trial? I put HER on trial, judge! She’s guilty, not me! She’s a corrupt and sex-crazed criminal animal, and a total racist, and I am INNOCENT! That vicious liar needs to be put under oath and forced to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, not that she would know the truth if it bit her in the ass, about this witch hunt!”

If we look back at American history, there’s nothing more common in a place like Georgia than Black people who make legitimate complaints against white people being taken out behind the courthouse to be whipped and worse. In a postbellum courtroom no self-respecting white man with the means to prevent it will allow himself to be put on trial by an accursed Black person under any circumstances. Especially in a case where the defendant has no factual defense to criminal charges backed by overwhelming evidence and the damning sworn testimony of witnesses who are all former members of his inner circle.

This is especially the case when a powerful white man, with unlimited money to spend on his legal defense and a 24/7 public relations offensive, is accused of crimes by a Black woman.

So if a black woman is prosecuting a powerful white man, she must be called a racist, her right to bring the case must be challenged by any means necessary, a whiff of corrupt motive sniffed out, no matter how faint the trail, no matter if there is no trial to sniff. So much the better if this involves making her prove, under oath, that she’s not a sexed-up, thieving, manipulative, lying bitch who can’t control her overpoweringly disqualifying sexual nature. As long as the focus is on her, I get to smirk like a klansman dipping Red Man chaw as the jury fixes to let me off for recent lynchings and delay things until I can get the power back to exact humiliating retribution on Rosie O’Donnell, Taylor Swift, Hillary and their disgusting ilk.

I’m tempted to just say, again, fuck that fucking puto, Donald Trump, and the well-paid fucking whores he rode in on, but WordPress is having some fun with me by inserting random, unwanted highlighting it is not apparent how to defeat and… ah, you know.

But I must add that this conservative Republican judge down there, for holding an evidentiary hearing instead of having dismissed this shameless race baiting, delay tactic stunt for lack of any credible evidence of wrongdoing, or asserting any grounds for disqualifying the DA under Georgia law, is showing his ass more than a bit.

Comer’s star “witness” in Biden impeachment indicted for giving false testimony to FBI

The New York Times continues:

The special counsel investigating Hunter Biden has charged a former F.B.I. informant with fabricating claims that President Biden and his son sought two $5 million bribes from a Ukrainian energy company, according to an indictment in a California federal court.

The former informant, Alexander Smirnov, 43, was accused of falsely telling the F.B.I. that Hunter Biden, then serving as a paid member on the board of Burisma, demanded the money to protect the company from an investigation by the country’s prosecutor general at the time.


The story Mr. Smirnov told investigators was part of a series of explosive and unsubstantiated claims by Republicans that the Bidens engaged in potentially criminal activity — allegations central to the party’s efforts to impeach the president.

The Special Counsel, another traitorous RINO appointed by the radical Merrick Garland to investigate a Biden, is a Donald Trump appointee, (like Robert Hur, who gratuitously, but effectively, slimed Joe Biden just the other day). Proof that even the infallible former/present/future party leader makes mistakes. Who among us has a crystal ball that can always accurately see the future?

One vote GOP majority impeaches Biden cabinet official

Today the House voted 214-213, on party lines, to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, vindicating their humiliating recent failure to impeach him.It is the first time in history that a sitting American cabinet member has been impeached.The tiny GOP House majority was in an admittedly tight spot on the issue of immigration, the party having demanded legislation on border control by tying it to Ukraine, Gaza, Israel and Taiwan aid, getting it from the Senate after months of negotiation, and refusing to bring it to the floor for a vote, on orders of their boss, an impulsive man with a very busy court schedule.

Prior to the vote the NY Times ran a related article, using uncharacteristically direct language to describe the political party that is a big tent for every kind of American hater and bigot (along with the millions of very fine people who are neither haters nor bigots).The very un-Times like headline and lede reads: On Capitol Hill, Republicans Use Bigoted Attacks Against Political Foes; House and Senate Republicans have denigrated fellow lawmakers, Biden administration officials and witnesses in racist ways, both in casual comments and in official settings. The article offered a sampling of bigoted spoutings by the GOP, all in the course of a week.Here’s the bit about Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas:

Around the same time, House Republicans released their report on impeachment charges against Alejandro N. Mayorkas, the Cuban-born homeland security secretary who is the first Latino to lead his department. Using unusually loaded language for a committee report, the panel described its action as “deporting Secretary Mayorkas from his position.”

In private, the language was uglier. During a closed-door meeting of House Republicans, Representative Mark E. Green, Republican of Tennessee and the panel’s chairman, referred to Mr. Mayorkas as a “reptile with no balls” because of his refusal to resign from his post, according to Politico. A White House official condemned the statement, noting that Mr. Mayorkas is Jewish and that the comment echoed an antisemitic trope.

source

A reptile with no balls. What are you going to do with a creature like that?

MAGA 1861-style

Fascinating, disturbing but not surprising bit of American history I’d never heard about, from an op-ed in yesterday’s NY Times by Akhil Reed Amar (link to full piece here)

Mr. Trump’s lawyers legitimately ask what counts as a disqualifying insurrection. Section 3, they note, was clearly aimed at oath-breakers who had backed insurrections akin to the Civil War. In that calamitous insurrection, more than half a million people died. The Jan. 6 Capitol riot, they argue, pales in comparison.

But Section 3’s authors actually had not one but two recent insurrections in mind. Before the bloody insurrection that began when cannons roared at Fort Sumter in April 1861, there was the first insurrection of the 1860s, led by cabinet members of outgoing President James Buchanan, including John B. Floyd, the war secretary, and Philip Francis Thomas, the treasury secretary, among many others. A shadowy network of affiliates and co-conspirators aimed in several and nefarious ways — including mayhem, military subversion and even murder, if need be — to prevent the lawful counting of President-elect Abraham Lincoln’s electoral votes and to thwart his lawful inauguration in early March 1861.

From one angle, the first insurrection was even worse than the giant insurrection that followed. It aimed not merely to shrink the union, but to undo a legitimate presidential election for all Americans.

On Feb. 13, 1861 — the closest equivalent of Jan. 6, 2021 — Congress met to certify Lincoln’s victory. Malicious anti-Lincoln men congregated near the Capitol. But thanks to Gen. Winfield Scott’s steely defense, the Capitol held.

In some ways, the insurrection of 2021 was worse than the first insurrection of 1861. The Capitol did not fall in 1861, but it was breached in 2021.

source

Lincoln won the Electoral College in the election of 1860, although he was not on the ballot in any of the eleven states that seceded and formed the Confederacy (to get on the ballot a certain number of signatures was needed, people collecting signatures for Lincoln were run out of town or lynched).I’d never heard, until today, about the MAGA-like machinations of sitting government officials, their henchmen and a mob to try to keep Lincoln out of office, two months before full scale Civil War broke out.The second time Lincoln won, of course, during the Civil War, he was shot in the head at close range, days after Lee surrendered to Grant, by an enraged Confederate shouting “sic semper tyrannis!” thus may it always be with tyrants.

History comes up with very similar ugly scenarios over and over, like disgusting burps from a meal that was right on the edge of food poisoning.The traitor who led the Confederate army in a war that killed more Americans than any other was honored years later with his likeness on a US postage stamp.The president of the Confederacy was tried criminally, for treason, but the trial was too divisive and political and the new DOJ, I guess, finally just threw up its hands on prosecuting him.Old Jefferson Davis walked away with a wry smile, no harm, no foul.Here’s a piece about that shameful failure of justice, first long delayed, then shadily negotiated, then denied.

During World War II pro-Nazi gangs in America and pro-Nazi members of Congress, literally calling themselves America First, who propagandized for, aided and gave comfort to actual German Nazis who had declared war on the United States, an enemy the US was then fighting… uh, no convictions, because there were passionate, angry people on both sides, particularly the violent, pro-Nazi side.Rachel Maddow did a brilliant audio series on this shit show, called Ultra, highly recommended.Steven Spielberg immediately bought the screen rights for this suspenseful film noir tragedy.

No trial for the antidemocratic masterminds, Bannon, Eastman, Giuliani, Kerik, Flynn and their ilk, who sat in the War Room at the Willard Hotel coordinating the “Green Bay Sweep” the plan by MAGA congressmen and senators to block the certification of Biden’s election and swap in fake electors, including incitement of a violent riot, based on incendiary lies believed by millions, to discard the ballots of millions of Black people and voters in Anarchist Jurisdictions and keep their leader in power? The stink of it all is sickeningly familiar.

Like the ongoing racist, misogynist attacks against the Black, female Fulton County DA who is now under fire, in our craven corporate bottom-line media, for calling the attacks against her racist.Her private life, her sex life, is fair game for these scumbag defendants, and the media takes it seriously, rattles on about some undefined appearance of impropriety and maybe she should walk away.

As I was taught early on in law school, if you have the facts, pound the facts, if you have the law, pound the law, if you have neither the facts nor the law, pound the table.These table-pounding fucks are trying to stir up enough of a foul stench that the court system itself walks away, as has happened before in our storied, often erased history.

This prick is relentless in his greed

Jeff Bezos only makes $131, 666 a minute, this master of the universe (divide by 60 the $7,900,000 an hour he made last year, per Robert Reich, a reliable source). I guess the fucking piece of shit really, really, really wants to be the richest man who ever lived and some other super-competitive piles of dreck are giving him a run for his money.What a shamelessly avaricious little scumbag.I wish him an eternal afterlife in the most lavish, exclusive hell imaginable.Fuck this fucking puto.

And why not try to rake in a few more billion from his millions of addicted customers when he has the power and ability to do so?It’s a lot better making a little extra cash than paying a reasonable amount of tax to a government he can’t completely control… worse, a government who only wants to control him, force him to collectively bargain with his underpaid workers, employ fair business practices, tax him for his massive contribution to global warming and unconscionable shit like that.