Interview with an artist

Artist:  I was born with special sensitivities that made me passionate about pursuing my talents.  I was born an artist; special, sensitive, talented and passionate.

Me: Guess what– everyone is special, sensitive, talented and passionate about some things.

Artist:  Yes, but an artist makes it his life’s work to express it in a way that makes people feel– and see and hear– differently.  

Me:  Makes them feel what makes you special, sensitive, talented and passionate?  

Artist:  No, wise-ass.  I speak for the universe, show people its magic. 

Me:  The universe speaks for itself.  

Artist:  Yes, but not in a universally understood language like art  

Me: In a universal language like life, it’s the universe, after all.  

Artist: But life does not take on the aspect of art until an artist filters it through their personality and makes it beautiful

Me: Life doesn’t need art to make it beautiful.  Beauty is taken in all the time by people who never gave a fiddler’s fart about art or artists  

Artist: I disagree, people crave art, vision, creative organization of the noisy chaos to let them step back and contemplate the miraculous  

Me:  Some do, sure.  What people really crave is life, and being heard and appreciated.  Art is something sold to them in place of their own innate creative genius, it’s vicariously gratifying even as it removes people further from their own creative abilities.   Art is for the professionals, you dig, that’s what’s sold to us.

Artist:  so why do you draw?  

Me:  Because I love it, because I can’t go for long without drawing, because I have graphomania

Artist:  Don’t you want appreciation?  

Me: Sure, it’s great to be appreciated.  Everyone wants to be appreciated for what they do.

Artist:  So why are you so down on art?  

Me: Because so much of it is bad and artist/non-artist divides the world along arbitrary and destructive lines as creators and consumers of creativity.  It is, in most cases, a lie, and a lie sold at an expensive and damaging price.   Being a professional artist is largely about packaging and selling your idiosyncratic view as a unique and valuable commodity worthy of a high price.  “Art” is politics and marketing as much as anything else.  

Artist:  but my music is about that vision you were referring to, that everyone is an artist. Some people’s art is appreciation of artists.  

Me:  or we can give the glory to the creator of the universe, whether she actually exists or not

Artist:  I dedicate my art to my own sense of God  

Me: I’m sure your sense of God loves you for it  

Artist:  why must you always be so ironic?  

Me:  I’m not always ironic, irony is but one shade on my many-hued palette    

Artist:  Why do you play music?  

Me:  I love music, I love playing, I love hearing the sounds the instruments make, I love being in the middle of music, splashing in its wonderful possibilities  

Artist: so you are a musician  

Me:  Yes, sure.  But there are many musical people out there who don’t play, believe they don’t have the right to make music because they’re not trained, those who measure themselves against, again, professional recording artists like the brilliant Brittney Spears.  I consider all these non-playing musical types musicians too.  

Artist:  OK, I can see we are going to have to agree to disagree about art  

Me:  No argument here.

Blues for Sammy Worst

two and a half years of mostly iPad images presented in a semi-snappy 3:49

Blues for Sammy 2

sorry, boys and girls, I had to take the link to the movie down.  Too much personal content up there for any unscrupulous content collector to collect and pass off as original.   I will put the soundtrack up for  music collectors to enjoy and for the more unscrupulous to claim as their own odd composition.

Embedded?

Need to trim this down and send it to a friend I’ve been out of touch with.  Following up on yesterday’s energizing meeting, the guy turned out to be engaged and engaging and had a lot of helpful information, I need to continue the networking.    This cat knows two well-known animators he’s offered to introduce me to.   Let’s see if this embed works.

State of Perpetual Decrepitude

In October, 1781, American and French forces routed the British and their mercenaries at Yorktown, a decisive turning point of the Revolutionary War.  Joyous Americans gathered to celebrate amid bonfires, speeches, and general revelry amounting to the ceremonial sticking of a fork into King George the Third.   Thomas Jefferson wrote to the Father of Our Country, George Washington, to congratulate him and to beg off on attending the festivities.  His reason survives:  he would have come, he wrote, except for “the state of perpetual decrepitude to which I am unfortunately reduced.”  The Author of Liberty at that point was 38 years old and temporarily retired from politics.*

In a state of perpetual decrepitude myself, the line spoke to me.  Looking for a thread to unite the hundreds of pages I have posted here, it may be that state of perpetual decrepitude.  The phrase has some poetry in it, I think, and the urge to type “perpetual decrepitude” is hard to resist.  Resist I must, though.  Onward!

what that decrepitude sounds like today

de·crep·i·tude

(dĭ-krĕp′ĭ-to͞od′, -tyo͞od′)

n.

The quality or condition of being weakened, worn out, impaired, or broken down by oldage, illness, or hard use.  
Noun 1. decrepitude – a state of deterioration due to old age or long use

deterioration, impairment – a symptom of reduced quality or strength
noun
1. decay, deterioration, degeneration, dilapidation The buildings had been allowed to fall into decrepitude.
2. weakness, old age, incapacity, wasting, invalidity, senility, infirmity, dotage,debility, feebleness, eld (archaic) the boundary between healthy middle age and total decrepitude

decrepitude

noun

* Fawn M. Brodie, Thomas Jefferson, An Intimate Biography,  Norton paperback p. 149

Why persist in writing?

“In today’s world of micromessages and fleeting attention spans, connecting with your audience is more important than ever.”   Denise Morrison, President and CEO, Campbell Soup.

 

We’ll leave that important question — how to connect with your desired audience so your brand can flourish — aside for the moment as I address today’s question from the steadiest of perhaps 3 or 4 regular readers of this blahg.  He writes:

what’s really hard to fathom is how you keep on producing this stuff despite the general lack of interest and encouragement

There is little mystery on my end.  I write as clearly and engagingly as I can, for the reader’s sake.  I practice the craft of writing every day, and feel better for putting my thoughts in order.   I enjoy combing through my words again and again until I am satisfied that what I’m saying could not be more clear.  The key is that I write for myself and my own feeling of clarity and accomplishment.  I am addicted to the satisfaction of those things.  

Writing is one of the few things I do all the time that I need little feedback or encouragement to continue doing.  It’s like playing the guitar for me, I require nobody to hear it or tell me I do it well; I play because I love to play.  I love the sounds of the playing and the time spent making and improving those sounds.  

A compliment is always lovely, and appreciation is like water to a flower, but we do the things we truly love because we love to spend time doing them.   We take pleasure in our mastery of things that were once hard to do.  In this ease we experience the lyrical grace that is otherwise so hard to come by in our high-stakes world.

Years ago I saved successive drafts of virtually everything I wrote.  I don’t save drafts any more because I’m sure now that every change I make is a change for the better.  The writing in each pass is clearer, more concentrated, less cluttered with distracting personal tics.  I set out each day to put at least one thought into focus.  My goal is to untangle sometimes vexing things in a coherent way that is easy to read.  Setting these things clearly into words engages my mind completely, reminds me of my best qualities and leaves me feeling better.

Every year or so I’ll get a note or call from someone telling me how moved they were by some particular thing I’ve written, or provoked, or struck by the collective weight of the many pages I’ve written.   Often this praise will transition into agonizing about not knowing anyone who can help me get my writing published, sympathizing with how frustrating it must be to write in today’s world of noise and “content” where thoughtful writing is often thought little of.   I find myself in the odd position, after I thank them for their compliments about the writing, of consoling them.

After my mother died a grief counselor recommended a helpful book called Death Benefits, my annotated copy of which seems to have been lost by the woman I loaned it to many months ago.  This is a shame, not only because she never read it but because I was planning to loan that personalized copy to a friend who can probably derive comfort from it as she mourns the recent death of her beloved, complicated father.  In that  book there is a reference, barely supported by the flimsiest of footnotes, to babies as young as a few months patting their mothers consolingly when the mother is in distress.   I love this image.

And I love to write.  It would be wonderful to have someone contact me and offer me a monetary advance to collect a hundred of these posts, along with a bunch of illustrations, and put them out in a groovy little tome.   I’d love to be asked to write something for the New Yorker, in much the same way I’d love to find a fat roll of hundred dollar bills abandoned on the sidewalk.  I would be very happy to earn a little money from writing and to have an attentive audience.  Appreciation of this thing I do mainly for myself is a bonus, and a great thing, but not necessary to sustain me in this particular pursuit of excellence.

My energies for struggle, such as they are these days, must remain focused on somehow putting one foot in front of the other and coming up with as yet undiscovered brilliant work-arounds to get my simple idea for changing the world in position to be seen.   That extreme challenge needs the feedback, encouragement, ingenuity and skills of the brightest of those who can see what I see in it.  So far, there is virtually nobody who is able to see what I see in it or offer useful insight for more than a beat or two.   It’s my cross to drag, heavy and sharp splintered, particularly when devil’s advocates are hanging from it in an effort to be helpful.  

That’s the thing that stings me, galls me, makes me want to holler: unless you succeed at making money from a thing you would call a business, unless you manage to sustain unbounded enthusiasm and confidence in the product you would sell, you are a perplexing failure.   It’s hard, to the point of making one doubt one’s basic sanity, to sustain optimism for an idea, regardless of its demonstrated worth, that generates neither money nor enthusiasm in others.  It may be simply a matter of not having connected with the proper audience for it, although using “simply” in that sentence is just whipping myself in the face, but that is a howl for another day.

Writing is in another category, it’s just something I need to do — and the most important conversation I have most days — whether you tell me you like it or not. 

Peace, y’all.

date forgotten

Had we not

bullet in the head  

been forced on top

of our neighbors’ corpses

in that festive

Ukrainian evening  

Had we not  

willing ourselves to forget

plunged

bottle deep

in spirits not our own  

Had rape

not been the law

but mercy instead  

Imagine

the songs we would have sung

the happy noise

scattered over bright chords

ecstatic leaps

and skiing madly

down the perfect slopes

of upturned breasts

under the thinness of silk