The Renfields to Trump’s Dracula are also busy playing sycophants to dictators. At an Axios conference in Miami, Jared Kushner — who was festooned with $2 billion in Saudi investments after he left the White House — called Mohammed bin Salman a “visionary leader.” Asked about the crown prince’s complicity in Jamal Khashoggi’s murder, Kushner replied with exasperation, “Are we really still doing this?”
Before Navalny’s death, Tucker Carlson — who scorned Ukraine’s desperate fight for its independence — cavorted in the Kremlin. His interview with Putin was so indulgent that even Putin complained of a “lack of sharp questions.”
In an interview with an Egyptian journalist, Carlson defended his decision not to ask Putin about freedom of speech or assassinations of his opponents.
“Every leader kills people,” Carlson said blithely, adding, “Leadership requires killing people, sorry.”
Will the craven Republicans ever stand up against autocracy — at home or abroad?
Navalny’s death at the hands of the murderous Putin has given momentum to the push for military assistance for Ukraine.
It’s the American thing to do.
source
Category Archives: Law and Justice
Black prosecutors on trial in Georgia
I made the mistake yesterday of watching a bit of the questioning of Fulton county DA Fani Willis by the lawyer for a scumbag co-defendant of Donald Trump‘s, a practitioner of Roger Stone’s rat-fucking dark arts, channeling Roy Cohn by putting his prosecutor on the hot seat, having her sworn to tell the truth under the penalties of perjury and asking her intimate details about her personal life. Fani Willis did fine, but the spectacle turned my stomach. Another sickening glimpse into the narcissistic worldview of MAGA-world.
“Fani Willis put me on trial? I put HER on trial, judge! She’s guilty, not me! She’s a corrupt and sex-crazed criminal animal, and a total racist, and I am INNOCENT! That vicious liar needs to be put under oath and forced to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, not that she would know the truth if it bit her in the ass, about this witch hunt!”
If we look back at American history, there’s nothing more common in a place like Georgia than Black people who make legitimate complaints against white people being taken out behind the courthouse to be whipped and worse. In a postbellum courtroom no self-respecting white man with the means to prevent it will allow himself to be put on trial by an accursed Black person under any circumstances. Especially in a case where the defendant has no factual defense to criminal charges backed by overwhelming evidence and the damning sworn testimony of witnesses who are all former members of his inner circle.
This is especially the case when a powerful white man, with unlimited money to spend on his legal defense and a 24/7 public relations offensive, is accused of crimes by a Black woman.
So if a black woman is prosecuting a powerful white man, she must be called a racist, her right to bring the case must be challenged by any means necessary, a whiff of corrupt motive sniffed out, no matter how faint the trail, no matter if there is no trial to sniff. So much the better if this involves making her prove, under oath, that she’s not a sexed-up, thieving, manipulative, lying bitch who can’t control her overpoweringly disqualifying sexual nature. As long as the focus is on her, I get to smirk like a klansman dipping Red Man chaw as the jury fixes to let me off for recent lynchings and delay things until I can get the power back to exact humiliating retribution on Rosie O’Donnell, Taylor Swift, Hillary and their disgusting ilk.
I’m tempted to just say, again, fuck that fucking puto, Donald Trump, and the well-paid fucking whores he rode in on, but WordPress is having some fun with me by inserting random, unwanted highlighting it is not apparent how to defeat and… ah, you know.
But I must add that this conservative Republican judge down there, for holding an evidentiary hearing instead of having dismissed this shameless race baiting, delay tactic stunt for lack of any credible evidence of wrongdoing, or asserting any grounds for disqualifying the DA under Georgia law, is showing his ass more than a bit.
Comer’s star “witness” in Biden impeachment indicted for giving false testimony to FBI

The New York Times continues:
The special counsel investigating Hunter Biden has charged a former F.B.I. informant with fabricating claims that President Biden and his son sought two $5 million bribes from a Ukrainian energy company, according to an indictment in a California federal court.
The former informant, Alexander Smirnov, 43, was accused of falsely telling the F.B.I. that Hunter Biden, then serving as a paid member on the board of Burisma, demanded the money to protect the company from an investigation by the country’s prosecutor general at the time.
The story Mr. Smirnov told investigators was part of a series of explosive and unsubstantiated claims by Republicans that the Bidens engaged in potentially criminal activity — allegations central to the party’s efforts to impeach the president.
The Special Counsel, another traitorous RINO appointed by the radical Merrick Garland to investigate a Biden, is a Donald Trump appointee, (like Robert Hur, who gratuitously, but effectively, slimed Joe Biden just the other day). Proof that even the infallible former/present/future party leader makes mistakes. Who among us has a crystal ball that can always accurately see the future?
One vote GOP majority impeaches Biden cabinet official
Today the House voted 214-213, on party lines, to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, vindicating their humiliating recent failure to impeach him. It is the first time in history that a sitting American cabinet member has been impeached. The tiny GOP House majority was in an admittedly tight spot on the issue of immigration, the party having demanded legislation on border control by tying it to Ukraine, Gaza, Israel and Taiwan aid, getting it from the Senate after months of negotiation, and refusing to bring it to the floor for a vote, on orders of their boss, an impulsive man with a very busy court schedule.
Prior to the vote the NY Times ran a related article, using uncharacteristically direct language to describe the political party that is a big tent for every kind of American hater and bigot (along with the millions of very fine people who are neither haters nor bigots). The very un-Times like headline and lede reads: On Capitol Hill, Republicans Use Bigoted Attacks Against Political Foes; House and Senate Republicans have denigrated fellow lawmakers, Biden administration officials and witnesses in racist ways, both in casual comments and in official settings. The article offered a sampling of bigoted spoutings by the GOP, all in the course of a week. Here’s the bit about Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas:
Around the same time, House Republicans released their report on impeachment charges against Alejandro N. Mayorkas, the Cuban-born homeland security secretary who is the first Latino to lead his department. Using unusually loaded language for a committee report, the panel described its action as “deporting Secretary Mayorkas from his position.”
In private, the language was uglier. During a closed-door meeting of House Republicans, Representative Mark E. Green, Republican of Tennessee and the panel’s chairman, referred to Mr. Mayorkas as a “reptile with no balls” because of his refusal to resign from his post, according to Politico. A White House official condemned the statement, noting that Mr. Mayorkas is Jewish and that the comment echoed an antisemitic trope.
source
A reptile with no balls. What are you going to do with a creature like that?
One of the great comedians working today
He works dark, but nobody mines his own personal experience better than this gifted orange comic icon
Two points of view on “existential migrant crisis”
Like the initial charge by then candidate Trump that Mexican rapists are flooding the southern border, the terrifying caravan of migrants before the 2020 election (a hoard that never arrived, or were ever in transit, or spoken of again after the election), and the migrant terror whipped up by the GOP that demanded no aid to Ukraine, Gaza, Israel or Taiwan unless strict border measures were signed into law (bipartisan measures hammered out over months and torpedoed by Trump and his cherub-faced lapdog Speaker at the last minute) the migrant threat is overblown, if not fabricated. Here are two short opposing points of view on the problem.
Commies, at the Department of Homeland Security, who answer only to Mayorkas, no less. Actual commies.
Goddamn it, Grey Lady!
Can you spot the New York Timesisms here?

The New York Times continues:
“The Biden campaign has built its strategy around telling voters that the November election is a choice between the president, whatever doubts the public has about his age, and an opponent in Mr. Trump, 77, whom they paint as a threat to democracy and personal freedoms.“
Fair is fair, it is the centerpiece of Biden campaign strategy to paint Trump as a threat to democracy and personal freedoms. It is a two billion dollar campaign strategy to portray Trump, an ordinary political candidate for president with an unremarkable history, mounting a typical reelection campaign, as some kind of existential threat. Calling him a threat as part of an attack ad campaign, like they all do.
Fair is fair, the Trump appointee who Merrick Garland appointed special counsel to investigate Joe Biden’s handling of classified documents, made comments well beyond the scope of his brief — which was to determine if Biden had or had not committed a crime related to taking government documents. Hur (no relation to Ben) determined that Biden could not be prosecuted and then opined, gratuitously as this blahg you are reading now, that Biden is perhaps in too feeble a mental state to have even been able to form any kind of plan to commit the crimes. No jury would convict such a feeble, doddering, sad, amiable but pitiable old man who barely knew what was going on, added Hur in his final report. You know how the DOJ always like to include a little gossipy stuff in their official reports, spill a little tea, like cattily opining about people’s fitness for their elected position and the political reasons to doubt their abilities.
NY Times, taking the ball and running with it, along with the rest of corporate media.
Or as Biden ad libbed the other day at that news conference where he was angry at special counsel Trump appointee Hur being out of line and working in the interests of a political opponent:
FOX reporter: Are you having problems with your memory?
Biden: I must be, I’m taking a question from you.
Isn’t that right, Grey Lady?
A method to their psychopathy
Heather Cox Richardson describes some of the more insane things Trump has demanded his party do in recent months and then cuts to the chase, in her inimitable way, with this summary:
“Trump is reinforcing a narrative where the only acceptable outcome is his victory, thus preemptively delegitimizing any electoral defeat,” Evansville attorney and former Indiana Republican delegate Joshua Claybourn told Wren. “It sets the stage for yet another crisis of legitimacy in the November general election.”
Mike Murphy, a former Republican member of the Indiana House of Representatives, offered Wren a different theory about Trump’s actions: “The bottom line is he’s completely unhinged. He is literally off his rocker.”
But there is a method behind the madness. Trump’s actions are not those designed to win an election by getting a majority of the votes. They are the tools someone who cannot win a majority uses to seize power.
read the rest
MAGA 1861-style
Fascinating, disturbing but not surprising bit of American history I’d never heard about, from an op-ed in yesterday’s NY Times by Akhil Reed Amar (link to full piece here)
Mr. Trump’s lawyers legitimately ask what counts as a disqualifying insurrection. Section 3, they note, was clearly aimed at oath-breakers who had backed insurrections akin to the Civil War. In that calamitous insurrection, more than half a million people died. The Jan. 6 Capitol riot, they argue, pales in comparison.
But Section 3’s authors actually had not one but two recent insurrections in mind. Before the bloody insurrection that began when cannons roared at Fort Sumter in April 1861, there was the first insurrection of the 1860s, led by cabinet members of outgoing President James Buchanan, including John B. Floyd, the war secretary, and Philip Francis Thomas, the treasury secretary, among many others. A shadowy network of affiliates and co-conspirators aimed in several and nefarious ways — including mayhem, military subversion and even murder, if need be — to prevent the lawful counting of President-elect Abraham Lincoln’s electoral votes and to thwart his lawful inauguration in early March 1861.
From one angle, the first insurrection was even worse than the giant insurrection that followed. It aimed not merely to shrink the union, but to undo a legitimate presidential election for all Americans.
On Feb. 13, 1861 — the closest equivalent of Jan. 6, 2021 — Congress met to certify Lincoln’s victory. Malicious anti-Lincoln men congregated near the Capitol. But thanks to Gen. Winfield Scott’s steely defense, the Capitol held.
In some ways, the insurrection of 2021 was worse than the first insurrection of 1861. The Capitol did not fall in 1861, but it was breached in 2021.
source
Lincoln won the Electoral College in the election of 1860, although he was not on the ballot in any of the eleven states that seceded and formed the Confederacy (to get on the ballot a certain number of signatures was needed, people collecting signatures for Lincoln were run out of town or lynched). I’d never heard, until today, about the MAGA-like machinations of sitting government officials, their henchmen and a mob to try to keep Lincoln out of office, two months before full scale Civil War broke out. The second time Lincoln won, of course, during the Civil War, he was shot in the head at close range, days after Lee surrendered to Grant, by an enraged Confederate shouting “sic semper tyrannis!” thus may it always be with tyrants.
History comes up with very similar ugly scenarios over and over, like disgusting burps from a meal that was right on the edge of food poisoning. The traitor who led the Confederate army in a war that killed more Americans than any other was honored years later with his likeness on a US postage stamp. The president of the Confederacy was tried criminally, for treason, but the trial was too divisive and political and the new DOJ, I guess, finally just threw up its hands on prosecuting him. Old Jefferson Davis walked away with a wry smile, no harm, no foul. Here’s a piece about that shameful failure of justice, first long delayed, then shadily negotiated, then denied.
During World War II pro-Nazi gangs in America and pro-Nazi members of Congress, literally calling themselves America First, who propagandized for, aided and gave comfort to actual German Nazis who had declared war on the United States, an enemy the US was then fighting… uh, no convictions, because there were passionate, angry people on both sides, particularly the violent, pro-Nazi side. Rachel Maddow did a brilliant audio series on this shit show, called Ultra, highly recommended. Steven Spielberg immediately bought the screen rights for this suspenseful film noir tragedy.
No trial for the antidemocratic masterminds, Bannon, Eastman, Giuliani, Kerik, Flynn and their ilk, who sat in the War Room at the Willard Hotel coordinating the “Green Bay Sweep” the plan by MAGA congressmen and senators to block the certification of Biden’s election and swap in fake electors, including incitement of a violent riot, based on incendiary lies believed by millions, to discard the ballots of millions of Black people and voters in Anarchist Jurisdictions and keep their leader in power? The stink of it all is sickeningly familiar.
Like the ongoing racist, misogynist attacks against the Black, female Fulton County DA who is now under fire, in our craven corporate bottom-line media, for calling the attacks against her racist. Her private life, her sex life, is fair game for these scumbag defendants, and the media takes it seriously, rattles on about some undefined appearance of impropriety and maybe she should walk away.
As I was taught early on in law school, if you have the facts, pound the facts, if you have the law, pound the law, if you have neither the facts nor the law, pound the table. These table-pounding fucks are trying to stir up enough of a foul stench that the court system itself walks away, as has happened before in our storied, often erased history.
Trump’s team “respectfully disagrees”
The three (female) judge panel from the DC circuit court of appeals ruled unanimously that an ex-president does not have blanket immunity against criminal prosecution for crimes committed while in office. Not a big surprise. The president’s spokesman, guy named Cheung, said Trump “respectfully disagrees” with the unanimous ruling.
“If immunity is not granted to a president, every future president who leaves office will be immediately indicted by the opposing party,” Mr. Cheung said. “Without complete immunity, a president of the United States would not be able to properly function.”
If he’s a fucking criminal.
Trump’s logic is kind of self-evident, if you love him. Trump was the forty-fifth president. All forty-four presidents before him, on leaving office, immediately pleaded the absolute, blanket immunity that Bill Barr told Trump he had on more than one occasion, until Barr realized he too might die in prison if he kept going forward with the Orange Polyp’s determination to carry out multiple criminal plans to remain in power after losing his re-election bid. If these ex-presidents had not all invoked their lifetime immunity from criminal prosecution, all would have been immediately arrested and locked up, without trial, by their ascendant political enemies!!! And, obviously, their successor would have had each of them killed in prison, having absolute, blanket, lifetime immunity from criminal prosecution, for anything, ever. It’s only common sense … to an insane person.
Here’s the outraged King of MAGA himself, as only he can do it:

A President will be afraid to act for fear of the opposite Party’s Vicious Retribution after leaving OFFICE. I am your retribution, I will take the things the sick, dangerous enemy deliberately weaponized and exact my terrible vengeance with them. The earth will Shake, Rattle and Retribute, universal, mandatory death penalty, Cod Bless these SHAYsssh. Biden grime fambily.





