Corporate Social Safety Net — Medicare edition

Medicare, the health care partnership between private insurance companies, pharmaceutical manufacturers and the government to protect the health of people over 65 (or with certain disabilities) is promoted as the solution to health care coverage for Americans of all ages. At 69, and dealing with Medicare now for a few years, I find this idea appalling, especially since the only solution to protecting the health of the old and the sick is a single payer system that cuts out all the parasitic middle men who profit off disease and our legitimate fear of death.

Citizens of a democracy deserve decent health care as a right of citizenship, like in every other wealthy economy (and formerly Iraq, Libya and other third world “shitholes”). But, lest I forget, America is exceptional.

Every year, between October 15 and December 7 (a day that always lives in infamy now, thanks to Medicare) purchasers of Medicare insurance are urged to shop on the marketplace and find the best suited plans for themselves. You can compare prices and, in some cases, actual coverage. It is no fun navigating the website, shopping for the best “deal” that should be provided to you automatically as a lifelong tax payer. Each of us should get the best deal available from our government, the one we fund, the one that is supposed to watch out for our best interests.

The economic reality is that, in a consumer society, if you need a few pills, you will pay 50 cents each. If you buy a billion pills, the price is 3 cents each. This is simple capitalism, economy of scale. The more you buy, the less each one will cost you [1]. Medicare buys a trillion pills a year, but is prevented, by a right wing/corporate law signed by Dubya, from negotiating prices with pharmaceutical companies based on that economy of scale leverage.

And so old people are forced to enter this kind of virtual mall, after October 15th of each year, where you can search for the best deals before the annual December 7th final deadline comes crashing down and you can choose nothing until the following October 15th rolls around because, fair is fair and rules are rules.

Part D of the alphabet soup that is Medicare is the prescription drug plan and every Medicare recipient must choose a Part D plan (or get it included in the problematic, loophole-ridden, insurance company sponsored Medicare plans known as Medicare Advantage). Prices for Part D vary wildly. In 2024 I chose the cheapest drug plan available, Aetna Silverscript, for $31 a month. Then:

You see profit margins here that would make Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk insanely jealous. Over 100% price increase in 2025 and then, a tic below another 100% price increase the following year. All perfectly legal here in the land of the free and the home of the brave, as long as you get a letter from that corporation informing you that your premiums will double and you will get only slightly less coverage.

A billionaire named Mark Cuban set up a company called CostPlus that will mail you prescription drugs, at 15% above cost plus handling and mailing. You can calculate the approximate cost on their website. The four generic prescription drugs I take will cost under $100 every three months, less than $400 for the year. No deductible, no insurance, just the prescriptions. I signed up online. There is a form for my doctor to submit to them, and the drugs will be shipped to me every ninety days.

I called Aetna to cancel my Part D with them, after visiting the marketplace and seeing annual prices, under our American “freedom of choice”, from $1,000 to $3,000 for the identical drugs (cost of drug copays plus premiums). My once modest $31/month plan was now up there with some of the most expensive. The woman I spoke to at Aetna was lovely, but she was not a trained disenrollment specialist, she explained, and so couldn’t take my cancellation order. She gave me another number to call to speak to a “Medicare disenrollment specialist”, and after checking, at my request, confirmed it is a 24/7 number.

In the wee hours of the morning I decided to make the last aggravating December 7th related call of the year and get that particular pile of steaming scats off my plate. When I called the 800 number it came up like so:

Who the fuck is Valley Organized Physicians? Fuck if I know, but they answer the phone “Medicare”. The person I spoke to patched me through to a disenrollment specialist named Kevin. Kevin and I wound up talking for almost an hour. He somehow had instant access to every prescription drug I’d bought in the last three years. His job, apparently, was to sell me a Part D plan, as I learned when he read me the complete list, suggesting that some, if not many, would be hard to get without insurance.

Kevin warned me that unless I enrolled in a Part D program with creditable coverage that met the minimum standards of Medicare, I’d be subject to a potentially large lifetime monthly fine that would add several dollars, or even a hundred or more, to my monthly premium in perpetuity should I need Part D coverage in the future.

I told Kevin I had no idea what “creditable” meant in that context and he explained. If the prescription drug program you enroll in is not recognized by Medicare, it’s not creditable and you will pay a monthly fine for the rest of your life if you cancel a creditable plan at any time during your years on Medicare. Way to watch out for the old and vulnerable, you fucking corporate psychopaths, I thought. But since Kevin was being so nice, we continued to amiably bat the ball back and forth.

Kevin laid out the worst case scenario to make me understand the risk I was taking by going with a non-creditable plan. Say in five years you decide you need Part D, for some expensive medication, let’s say (which, admittedly, Part D might not cover, but exceptions can sometimes be made for medical necessity). Well, currently the penalty is 39 cents a month times twelve (since you can only fix this once a year). That penalty number keeps going up. So in five years time, Kevin told me, I could be looking at a penalty of maybe $50 a month, maybe $100.

I pointed out that if I realized it was a mistake to opt for CostPlus and bought a Part D plan at the next available date (October 15, 2026) I’d pay $4 a month penalty for the rest of my life. Meantime, Aetna had increased their premium price for their basic plan 100% one year and 100% the following year. I asked him how it was possible that an insurance company can double its rate year after year with no regulation by Medicare.

Kevin had an answer worthy of a Republican congressman speaking to a FOX audience, there are many factors, market forces, which are impossible to regulate, or predict, or even consider, he told me. In other words it’s hard to say and above our pay grades to understand or do anything about. I told him it was not hard to say that costs for Aetna had not increased 200% in two years.

I expressed dismay that Medicare imposed no regulations on what private insurance companies could charge. He agreed that it was not unreasonable for me to be dismayed, but that there was a reason, somehow, beyond our feeble human understanding, apparently, that corporations can’t be regulated but consumers must be charged lifetime penalties for not buying creditable plans from approved insurance companies providing benefits consistent with the minimum standards of Medicare Part D.

Kevin told me to look for a zero cost Part D plan, then checked and said there were none available in my area. He tried to sell me a $35 a month plan, from Healthspring Assurance, which, with the drugs, would cost me only about $720 a year. He agreed there was no guarantee that Healthspring wouldn’t double its premium next year, but that’s why there is a period to compare prices once a year and the requirement of a letter informing the customer that the price was about to double.

He was trying to help me out, he said, after explaining he could have disenrolled me as soon as I called, but he was warning me of the potentially dire consequences of uncreditable disenrollment. I said that in dollars and cents, the difference between $300-400 a year for generic prescriptions, and even the bargain price of $720, would seem to more than offset the penalty for a year or two.

Eventually, after a long chat, he told me he would disenroll me. There was no confirmation number, no proof we’d ever had a conversation of almost an hour (except on my phone, but again, who the hell is Valley Organized Physicians?), I’d get a letter from Aetna confirming I’d been disenrolled, he told me. We bid each other a polite goodnight.

We got off the phone, it was now 4 a.m., and my head immediately fucking exploded. Every narcissist I’ve ever known has told me I’m too sensitive. Maybe the despicable freaks are right about that. I was unable to tune down my outrage enough to get to sleep, the pill I took at 5:00 allowed me to finally drift off around 6:30 a.m. for a few hours of sleep. I’m too sensitive, goddamn it, and it’s messing with my health.

[1]

Quickly forgotten atrocity by the deadly dotard in chief

Trump rage posted this in response to a viral short video in which elected veterans of the armed forces and intelligence services reminded serving members of their oath not to follow illegal orders.

The video was difficult to find on the YouTube search engine or any other search engine I tried.  Fortunately I had it in my history from viewing it the other day:

In fairness to the NY Times, a paper that regularly publishes important investigative pieces and blurs crucial lines with equal frequency, it ran this article yesterday.

Here are a few recent favorites of mine from the front page of the journal of record for the United States of America, but first:

You go, girl.

Trauma as a competitive sport

Narcissists are infuriated by other people talking about their own trauma.   Trauma, like everything else, is a competitive sport for those grandiose souls whose suffering is always greater than anyone else’s.   I recall Gina’s rage, Flack’s rage, when I tried to describe how Gina’s anger had reawakened a trauma in me I thought I’d healed from.  In hindsight, if we take their insane behavior into consideration, they were both much more seriously traumatized in their early lives than I was.   They win, I give up.    This is a game for mad people.

I often think of this competition for greatest victim when I encounter comparisons of historical, and present day, atrocities.  Who had it worse, the millions packed into cargo holds for the deadly trip to slavery in the New World, the Armenians whipped and herded into the desert to die, or into raging rivers to drown, the Jews lined up at the side of a ravine and shot in the back of the head, the two year-old orphan in any bombed out, war-ravaged region of the world?   What a sick question to even pose.  Every one of them is the worst thing a human can experience, where does the need to compare and contrast them come from?

Being a victim justifies an aggressive counter-attack.  I killed thousands because they killed thousands!   I’m not evil, you are!

Bully for you, responding to mass murder with mass murder.   Way to make a more ethical world, Nazi.

Cooperation with Nazi types never goes well for anybody

third in a series of consecutive daily texts to Chuck Chuck BoBuck

Senator Schumer:

Some still find it hyperbolic to compare MAGA to the Nazi party.  This critique is made by people unfamiliar with the Nazi seizure of power, the cast of characters involved and Germany’s lawless, violent lurch to Nazism.  A longtime student of the history of the Nazi rise to power (Mr. Hitler and company killed almost my entire family back in Europe) I can point to a number of reasons the comparison of the Trump administration to Hitler’s is directly on point.  

Understanding what we are facing in “MAGA” (aka GOP, John Birch Society, Kochtopus, Project 2025) demonstrates the abject futility of trying to negotiate with this type.  Only organized, unified resistance, without fractures, or compromises by ‘moderates’, the ruptures that made Weimar liberal opposition fail, can overcome the plans these hyper-motivated American fascists have been carrying out for decades.

“The Leader’s word has the force of law” (Fuhrerworte haben Gesetzenkraft) — Trump claims Article II as the complete justification for virtually all of his unlawful actions including his usurpation of Congressional powers delegated by Article I.   He has a doctrinaire 6-3 “Unitary Executive” Supreme Court that agrees with him, on an emergency basis, almost every time one of his unconstitutional, abusive assertions of power is challenged.

Trump has purged the government and civil service, replacing qualified long serving officials and experts with those who publicly profess complete loyalty to his every lie.  The Nazis made membership in the party, and proof of “Aryan blood”, requirements for practicing all professions in Germany.   A personal oath of loyalty to Hitler replaced the standard military oath.

Trump had a volume of Hitler’s collected speeches at his bedside when he was married to Ivana.  He refers to enemies as illegals, vermin, dangerously sick people, blood poisoners.   He is a racist demagogue with a thirst for killing.   Recall the lame duck rash of executions of federal death row inmates he ordered before he was dragged out of the White House kicking, screaming and stealing classified documents, after fomenting a violent attack on the Capitol to overturn the certification of an election he lost.  Consider his ongoing war crimes in the Caribbean and Pacific, extrajudicially executing “drug dealers” to provoke a war with Venezuela, his bombing of Iran, his willingness to starve millions of Americans to advance his “agenda”.  

There is also Trump’s Sprachregelung (“rules for how to properly refer to unpopular things”).   Hitler’s government prescribed what words could be used, always anodyne terms for things like “killing” “liquidation” and so on.  Here we have “efficiency”, “anti-corruption”,  “patriotism,” “drain the swamp.” “transparency,” “Democrat traitors” and so on.  These framings cover the deliberate destruction of careers, further immiserating the already challenged, increasing homelessness, desperation, violence, allowing starvation and increasing preventable medical deaths.  All desirable and useful outcomes for President Project 2025 and his dream of a rebellion by poor people and the imposition of a police state.

Project 2025 has unleashed a massive force of heavily armed ICE agents, masked, out of uniform, executing SA (Brown Shirt) street tactics against non-violent civilians.  He is spoiling for forceful reactions from protesters of these abuses, and the general precarity he has raised to almost unbearable levels, to justify a police state he controls completely.  Your vote, and a few other Democratic votes, allowed him the obscenely massive budget for this unaccountable paramilitary arm of MAGA, in the name of keeping the government open.

He is building an immense bunker under the Epstein/Marie Antoinette Ballroom after illegally demolishing the East Wing.  It’s hard not to imagine what will take place down there if democracy, we all hope, prevails over American fascism — a remake of the final scenes of that great German movie Downfall.   Hopefully he won’t set off a nuclear holocaust before he exits the scene, an option Hitler didn’t have but surely would have taken.

Joseph Goebbels (1943):   “We will go down in history as the greatest statesmen of all times or as their greatest criminals”    (Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem, p. 22)

You seem to believe that Democrats can find common ground, and bipartisanship, with American Nazis, their Congressional allies, and a dictatorial president who will not condemn praise of Hitler and “jokes” about gassing those who need killing.   As the kids used to say: WTF?

You’re in a supremely difficult no-win situation.   It is time for you to step aside as Senate minority leader and let new, bold, leadership take the reins to give us the best shot at defeating this “movement” before you and I meet in a cattle car, newly stateless and off for “resettlement” somewhere, treated with the most solicitous of sonderbehandlung in our final days.

Your constituent,

Eliot Widaen

Yesterday’s news roundup

Turd swears in Representative Adelita Grijalva after 50 days of public lying and stinking by the “performatively pious pipsqueaker of the House”. She immediately signed the discharge petition (step one of 3 or 4) to force the DOJ to release the rest of the Epstein files in which a certain unnamed current president figures prominently. Recall that here in America (unless you’re a critic of Mr. Trump), there is a presumption of innocence until proven guilty. Just because the Orange Menace was found guilty of sexually assaulting and defaming an adult woman doesn’t mean he’d do the same to a sixteen year-old high school girl groomed by his best friend. Even if the girl looked just like his favorite daughter. That former friend is dead anyway, found dead in his cell under shady circumstances during the first Trump administration. Clearly, nothing to see here!!!

Here’s a few seconds of the obsequious Trump lawyer/Attorney General:

The Attorney General of the United States, recent lobbyist for Qatar, mega-MAGA loyalist and supporter of vindictive prosecution of those publicly accused of “weaponizing” the law by applying it to Republicans, has joined California Republicans’ case against the temporary California redistricting plan. Bondi declared this plan, voted on overwhelmingly by California voters, “a brazen power grab.” Clearly, the DOJ’s position is that you don’t debate an issue and ask citizens to vote on it — you call a sycophant governor, like that bitter little man in Texas, from the Oval Office and order him to redistrict. That’s leadership!

In other news, President Trump is still insane, vindictive, cruel, incoherent and desperate to evade justice in every form. There is increasing evidence, daily, that he is likely also battling dementia. MAGA is starting to sweat over his accelerating shakiness. As Heather Cox Richardson reported last night:

MAGA has been at least partly demoralized by the information coming out of the Epstein documents, with right-wing influencer Dinesh D’Souza, for example, defending Trump by saying: “Right now, we don’t have anyone else.” Trump media ally Stephen Bannon told supporters: “Trump’s…an imperfect instrument, but one infused by divine providence. Without him, we’d have nothing.” source

In the likely event that MAGA’s 6-3 Supreme Court is forced to rule that their leader violated the Constitution by unilaterally imposing wildly fluctuating tariffs, which are taxes, a power reserved to Congress, Trump claims that it will cost $2,000,000,000,000 to repay the money raised from other countries he claims paid these tariffs. The next time he mentioned it he claimed it will cost three trillion. I don’t know how anyone, unless super rich, a member of a hate group, and/or simply a terrified, enraged person of limited intelligence, can look the other way while this madman disgraces our nation and makes the world a much more hostile and unsafe place for everybody but criminally minded billionaires.

Oh, yeah, there was also the release of a bunch of emails like this one:

What is your vision for the future of democracy, Chuck?

Senator Schumer:

The immutable vision of the far right goes back to the “Planters” and their genteel slave society, but its current enactment has more recent roots.  Seventy years ago the far-right was outraged by “judicial activists” on the Supreme Court who threatened to overturn centuries of social tradition when they found, 9-0, that “separate but equal” was unconstitutional.  Several wealthy reactionaries soon founded a political movement that eventually morphed into MAGA, funded by “Libertarian” billionaire money, today as it was then.  

These reactionaries have the same vision and aim today as when the then-fringe John Birch Society was launched by Charles Koch’s father and a few wealthy comrades in 1958 —  a return to a mythical golden age of society-wide freedom, unregulated oligarchy with a robust police state to deal with malcontents. 

They have always had the same set of self-serving, destructive policies they’re intent on enacting no matter what the vast majority of Americans need or want.   After polling 1% in the 1980 presidential election, they’ve doggedly connived through nonelectoral means to get their grimly unpopular vision for America enacted as law.  They’ve done this by any means necessary.   They created countless influential “think tanks” (like the prestigious Heritage Foundation, creator of Project 2025), networks of nefarious nonprofits, a vast public influence operation (aided by fellow travelers like Rupert Murdoch), as well as the doctrinaire far-right judicial fraternity and career ladder that trained and promoted most of their 6-3 Supreme Court majority.  

The law and Constitution have been swallowed time and again by 6-3 rulings, increasingly on the fast-tracked (for POTUS) shadow docket — no record, no debate, no signatures, no reasoning or explanation, except Article II and “The Unitary Executive”.   Issues the majority doesn’t want to touch are deemed “political questions” and the Supreme Court may not hear arguments about those.   We know very clearly what the values and vision of this group of six people is.  It perfectly reflects the values of their political party and its wealthiest donors.

The right has never made their vision for America clearer than under the current president, a vile man who brings out the worst in everyone and licenses his allies’ and followers’ lowest impulses.  As much as he might personally disgust many of our over 800 billionaires, nobody has been more useful to them than this crass, greedy, corrupt, criminal, violence loving, easily manipulable fellow billionaire.

What is your vision of America’s future, Charles Schumer?   

What is the democratic vision of the eight who fell on their swords for that bipartisan vision of what democracy requires?   Is there any common vision of our democratic future among corporate Democrats, outside of somehow retaining power?  

You don’t win elections by pointing to a party acting like actual Nazis — deliberately and defiantly starving your own citizens, children and other poor people, and rushing to the nation’s highest court to enforce the leader’s right to starve children —  and saying “we’re the good guys”.   You especially don’t cooperate with the party acting like actual Nazis.  Bipartisanship is a relic of a bygone age, by design of the party acting like actual Nazis.  There is no such thing as cooperation with Nazis, it never ends well for anybody involved.   In this regard I’ll mention only two names:  Jeff Sessions and Mike Pence. 

What is your vision for the future of our democracy?  I ask this seriously.

Should you and I find ourselves in the same cattle car, I’ll make sure to introduce myself to you.

Meantime, my question remains:  what is your “moderate” vision for American democracy going forward, and how do you square it with this recent Democratic betrayal of tens of millions of our fellow citizens, all of the most vulnerable among us?    I ask this sincerely and hope one of your staffers will write me a thoughtful answer.

Your constituent,

Eliot Widaen

Leadership requires courage and vision

And Chuck Schumer doesn’t have much of either

Dear Senator Schumer:

As the leader of the party in opposition to a lawless regime energetically inflicting authoritarianism on a democratic population, you’re responsible for the way your people vote before binding the rest of our democracy with their decision.   The eight “moderates” could not have reached a final vote this way, locked away in a closed session on a Sunday evening, without your approval.   That you allowed this betrayal of democracy to happen, or were helpless to prevent it, demonstrates your unfitness for leadership as most of us resist hard-charging American fascism.

You could have insisted on more debate before the final vote, and got more weigh in from citizens affected by the shutdown (many of whom were determined to fight Trump’s terror tactics).  These eight electorally invulnerable “defectors” were clearly part of a larger group, they voted “yes” so others could take the principled stand you took in voting “no.”   This is politics at its worst and a betrayal of democratic ideals.   As opposition leader you should have put the urgent political context of this moment starkly before your party and postponed a vote until you had unity in line with the vast majority of Americans.  Instead, you participated in an organized betrayal.   

You could have stopped the Sunday night session before eight members of your caucus had the last word, defied the will of the electorate and the national majority on the existential matter of cutting essential services for tens of millions to enable a tax break for billionaires and funding a vast unaccountable armed force to enable a police state.  As party leader in the Senate, you had a duty to prevent this destructive, demoralizing vote.  Instead, you expressed moral outrage after the dirty deal was done and told America you’d voted no.

When Cheney, Bush, McConnell and company passed that December 2006 law revamping the Postal Service, on a voice vote and by unanimous consent, crippling the US Postal Service in perpetuity, they voted in the dead of a Sunday night the week before Christmas.  The lame duck Bush signed it into law the following Wednesday.  The law, with one unconscionable provision, the requirement that USPS pre-fund employee benefits for USPS employees not yet born, succeeded in hobbling the USPS well into the future. ​[1]

Recall that the GOP insistence on ​imposing this unheard of pre​-funding ​of retiree benefits 75 years into the future​ on our Post Office was the whole reason the lame duck Republicans forced this law through.​   The success of this slick, secretive maneuver with its highly unpopular, hugely lucrative outcome (to USPS’s private sector competitors) is what right-wing think tanks, PR firms and judicial fraternities and American fascists dream of, plan, and inflict on all of us, completely circumventing  the consent of the governed.   Call it what you like, it’s the opposite of democracy.

You allowed eight selected “moderates” (coincidentally none in immediate electoral jeopardy), to vote to capitulate to Project 2025 without getting a single concession, unannounced, and apparently not postponable because of some unnamed pressure, and the “pain” of millions, in the wake of a hope restoring Blue tsunami, an election victory you could not even wholeheartedly embrace. 

You allowed this vote on a Sunday night, when switchboards were closed, when the voice of the people was reduced to an impotent series of passionate phone messages.  You betrayed democracy as well as every Democratic voter and every American who gets health insurance on the ACA marketplace.

Your floor speech after this feckless surrender, following the principled Bernie Sanders, repeating that you voted “no” and condemning the administration’s cruel and punitive policies around health care and nutrition, was a nice performance.  Hollow, but nicely done.   Farce, performed as serious drama.    Bravo, your performance even took me in for a minute.

But don’t piss on my leg and tell me it’s raining, Chuck.   You know you were responsible for this treacherous vote taking place on a Sunday evening, and for the way it turned out.  That you voted “no” and gave that fiery speech afterwards?   Bravo, again, well done, old boy.   

Leadership calls for resoluteness in the face of adversity, and standing up to bullies.  These are two qualities you lack, at a time when actual Nazis are prominent members of the Trump/Heritage Foundation Administration.   

Your recent timid offer to reopen Russel Vought’s government — just one year of funding the ACA subsidies (not even a peep about the 42,000,000 facing sudden food insecurity, Medicaid cuts closing rural hospitals or Trump’s unlimited, incontestable right to recission and impoundment, to use the public fisc as his whim dictates) was craven enough to offer to a president and Congress who had already told you they wouldn’t negotiate with you.  Thune immediately told you to bugger off when you made this pusillanimous offer.   This was all days after Democrats won a blue tidal wave election coast to coast, even in places like Mississippi.  Momentum was finally on our side, after the largest political protest in US history.   The bullies were on the ropes, and rightfully so.

Then you acquiesced to this sickening kowtow.  Way to undermine faith in the re-energized Democratic party!  That vote makes the party you lead no better than the party that brought us the secretive, midnight, “bipartisan” atrocity of the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act in 2006.   I’m sure airline lobbyists and other philanthropic donors made sure all the proper senators got paid in full for their votes.   The consent of the governed is an externality to the billionaire CEOs who buy our elected, corporately owned representatives, people like you.

You are not equipped to fight the desperate real-life peril your constituents face, the concerted, well-funded threat our democracy faces every day.  You negotiate against yourself before falling into a supine surrender pose, then strike a falsely defiant tone after making sure your shameful work is done by surrogates.  

You don’t know from history that it is futile to try to placate actual Nazis?  Why not try to keep the peace by simply giving them Czechoslovakia?  Why would Trump, Johnson, Thune or any of the other MAGA leaders lie or renege on their pinky swear to hold a later Senate vote on ACA subsidies that Democrats don’t have the votes to win?  After all, the second Trump administration calls itself the most transparent and truthful administration in history (comparable only to the German version 1933-45). Who could doubt them?

It’s time for you to step down and let somebody with courage and integrity take your place as leader, if this long, noble experiment in democracy you care so deeply about is to endure.   

Eliot Widaen

[1]  You will recall:   

The Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act​ was approved during the lame duck session of the 109th Congress, and approved via voice vote in the House and by unanimous consent in the Senate.  Republicans insisted on a provision that the USPS pre-fund its retirement benefits to cover USPS workers not yet born, a legal requirement designed to disable the postal service.   Wikipedia:

Impact on the Service

Between 2007 and 2016, the USPS lost $62.4 billion; the inspector general of the USPS estimated that $54.8 billion of that (87%) was due to pre​-funding retiree benefits.[13] By the end of 2019, the USPS had $160.9 billion in debt, due to growth of the Internet, the Great Recession, and prepaying for employee benefits as stipulated in PAEA.[14] Mail volume decreased from 97 billion to 68 billion items from 2006 to 2012. The employee benefits cost the USPS about $5.5 billion per year;[15] USPS began defaulting on this payment in 2012.[13]

Only took them six years to financially hamstring USPS, the length of a senator’s term…